Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- 1 Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking
- 2 Object Concepts and Action
- 3 Constraints on Spatial Language Comprehension: Function and Geometry
- 4 Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination
- 5 Passionate Thoughts: The Emotional Embodiment of Moral Concepts
- 6 Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion
- 7 Situating Abstract Concepts
- 8 Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning
- 9 The Emergence of Grammar from Perspective
- 10 Embodied Sentence Comprehension
- 11 On the Perceptual-Motor and Image-Schematic Infrastructure of Language
- 12 Connecting Concepts to Each Other and the World
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
9 - The Emergence of Grammar from Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- 1 Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking
- 2 Object Concepts and Action
- 3 Constraints on Spatial Language Comprehension: Function and Geometry
- 4 Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination
- 5 Passionate Thoughts: The Emotional Embodiment of Moral Concepts
- 6 Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion
- 7 Situating Abstract Concepts
- 8 Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning
- 9 The Emergence of Grammar from Perspective
- 10 Embodied Sentence Comprehension
- 11 On the Perceptual-Motor and Image-Schematic Infrastructure of Language
- 12 Connecting Concepts to Each Other and the World
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Successful communication rests not just on shared knowledge and reference (Clark & Marshall, 1981), but also on a process of mutual perspective taking. By giving clear cues to our listeners about which perspectives they should assume and how they should move from one perspective to the next, we maximize the extent to which they can share our perceptions and ideas. When language is rich in cues for perspective taking and perspective shifting, it awakens the imagination of the listener and leads to successful sharing of ideas, impressions, attitudes, and narratives. When the process of perspective sharing is disrupted by interruptions, monotony, excessive complexity, or lack of shared knowledge, communication can break down.
Although we understand intuitively that perspective taking is central to communication, few psycholinguistic or cognitive models assign it more than a peripheral role. Linguistic theory typically views perspective as a secondary pragmatic filter (Kuno, 1986; O'Grady, in press) that operates only after hard linguistic constraints have been fulfilled. This paper explores the hypothesis that, far from being peripheral or secondary, perspective taking is at the very core of language structure and higher-level cognition. This approach, which I call the Perspective Hypothesis, makes the following basic claims:
Perspective taking operates online using images created in five systems: direct experience, space/time deixis, plans, social roles, and mental acts.
Language uses perspective taking to bind together these five imagery subsystems.
Grammar emerges from conversation as a method for supporting accurate tracking and switching of perspective.
By tracing perspective shifts in language, children are able to learn the cognitive pathways and mental models sanctioned by their culture.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Grounding CognitionThe Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, pp. 198 - 223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. (1995). Children Talk about the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press
, , & (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 74–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimension context space. Language and Cognitive Processes 12, 177–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Clark, H., & Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In B. W. A. Joshi & I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and Language Acquisition (pp. 28–63). New York: Academic Press
, , , , , , et al. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain 119, 89–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E. (1995). Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, & (1996). Knowledge of binding in normal and SLI children. Journal of Child Language 23, 431–464Google ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Givón, T. (1976). Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 149–188). New York: Academic Press
Hausser, R. (1999). Foundations of Computational Linguistics: Man–machine Communication in Natural Language. Berlin: Springer
Haviland, J. (1996). Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistics Relativity (pp. 271–323). New York: Cambridge University Press
(1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75, 244–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (1984). Word grammar. Oxford: Blackwell
Jeannerod, M. (1997). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
, , & (1999). Muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex. Science 285, 2136–2139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalization: The “what's X doing Y?” construction. Language 75, 1–33Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1986). Functional Syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, G. (1974). Syntactic amalgams. In R. F. M. LaGaly & A. Bruck (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Langacker, R. (1995). Viewing in grammar and cognition. In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Models (pp. 153–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
, , & (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1014, 676–703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 397–421). New York: Cambridge University Press
, & (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 543–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language Acquisition: Vol. 1. Syntax and Semantics (pp. 73–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
MacWhinney, B. (1987). Toward a psycholinguistically plausible parser. In S. Thomason (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus: Ohio State University
MacWhinney, B. (1988). Competition and teachability. In R. Schiefelbusch & M. Rice (Eds.), The Teachability of Language (pp. 63–104). New York: Cambridge University Press
MacWhinney, B. (ed.), (1999b). The Emergence of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
MacWhinney, B. (1999a). The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The Emergence of Language (pp. 213–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
MacWhinney, B. (2002). Language emergence. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske & A. Rohde (Eds.), An Integrated View of Language Development – Papers in Honor of Henning Wode (pp. 17–42). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier
MacWhinney, B. (2003). The gradual evolution of language. In B. Malle & T. Givón (Eds.), The Evolution of Language. Philadelphia: Benjamins
, & (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition 29, 95–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8, 1–71Google ScholarPubMed
, , , & (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379, 649–652CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, D. C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
(1997). Talking the talk is like walking the walk. Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society55–59Google Scholar
O' Grady, W. (in press). Syntactic carpentry. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Rinehart and Winston
, , , , , , et al. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375, 54–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Postal, P. (1971). Cross-Over Phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
, , , & (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 3, 131–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacerdoti, E. (1977). A Structure for Plans and Behavior. New York: Elsevier Computer Science Library
(1995). Conceptual perspective-taking and children's interpretation of pronouns in reported speech. Journal of Child Language 22, 171–187Google ScholarPubMed
, & (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science 12, 153–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , & (1997). CaMeRa: A computational model of multiple representations. Cognitive Science 21, 305–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, C., & Speas, P. (2002). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In A. DiSciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
van Hoek, K. (1997). Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
(1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 654, 695–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 22, 1196–1207Google Scholar
- 40
- Cited by