Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T01:41:16.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Casemix development and implementation in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2010

John Kimberly
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Gerard de Pouvourville
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Thomas d'Aunno
Affiliation:
INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Australia, with a population of around 20 million, is a federation consisting of six states (the largest, New South Wales, accounting for about 33 per cent of the population, the second largest, Victoria, accounting for a further 25 per cent of the population) and two territories. Casemix development in Australia has been shaped by the design of the Australian health care system, Australia's federal constitution, and the division of responsibilities between the Commonwealth government and the states. Australia has a universal health insurance system providing for public funding for access to hospital and medical care, complemented by private health insurance which provides insurance against the costs of access to private hospital care and ancillary services (such as physiotherapy, dental). About 40 per cent of hospital admissions occur in private hospitals.

Funding of public hospital care is shared between the Commonwealth and state governments, but states have operational responsibility for public hospitals. This mix of Commonwealth and state shared responsibility and public and private sectors means that the organisational arrangements of health care in Australia are quite complex.

Private health insurance organisations negotiate contracts with private hospitals to minimise out-of-pocket costs for their contributors. In some circumstances these contractual arrangements involve casemix-based payments to private hospitals (see Willcox 2005 for a discussion of these payments).

The relationship between the Commonwealth and the states is governed by the Australian Health Care Agreements, which are negotiated every five years (see Duckett 2004 for an outline of negotiation issues surrounding the 2003–2008 Australian Healthcare Agreements).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, J. and O'Neill, D. (eds) (1994) The Contract State: Public Management and the Kennett Government. Deakin University Press: Melbourne.Google Scholar
,Auditor-General of Victoria (1998) Acute Health Services under Casemix: A Case of Mixed Priorities. Special Report No. 56. Victorian Government Printer: Melbourne (also www.audit.vic.gov.au/old/sr56/ags56cv.htm).
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller: New York.Google Scholar
Costar, B. and Economou, N. (1999) The Kennett Revolution: Victorian Politics in the 1990s. UNSW Press: Sydney.Google Scholar
Duckett, S. J. (1985) ‘If DRGs Are the Solution, What Is the Problem?Australian Health Review, 8(1): 25–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Duckett, S.J. (1986) ‘Diagnosis Related Groups: Towards a Constructive Application for Victoria’, Australian Health Review, 9(2): 107–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Duckett, S.J. (1995) ‘Hospital Payment Arrangements to Encourage Efficiency: The Case of Victoria, Australia’, Health Policy, 34: 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckett, S. J. (1998) ‘Casemix Funding for Acute Hospital Inpatient Services in Australia’, Medical Journal of Australia, 169(Supplement, 19 October): S17–S21.Google ScholarPubMed
Duckett, S.J (2004) ‘The Australian Health Care Agreements 2003–2008’, Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 1(5).Google ScholarPubMed
Edelman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. P. and McGuire, T. G. (1986) ‘Provider Behavior under Prospective Reimbursement’, Journal of Health Economics, 5: 129–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadorn, D. and ,Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project (2003) ‘Setting Priorities on Waiting Lists: Point-count Systems as Linear Models’, J Health Serv Res Policy, 8(1): 48–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, T. (2001) ‘Using Computerised Patient-level Costing Data for Setting DRG Weights: The Victorian (Australia) Cost Weight Studies’, Health Policy, 56: 149–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, T., Sevil, P., Tate, R. and Collard, K. (1995) The Development of Relative Resource Weights for Non-admitted Patients. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University: Fairfield.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Lin, V. and Duckett, S. J. (1997) ‘Structural Interests and Organisational Dimensions of Health System Reform’. In Health Policy in Australia, Gardner, H. (ed.) Oxford University Press: Melbourne, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
Marmor, T. (2004) Fads in Medical Care Management and Policy. The Nuffield Trust: London.Google Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley: Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
Parkinson, C. N. (1965) Parkinson's Law or The Pursuit of Progress. Penguin Books: Harmondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Rix, M., Owen, A., et al. (2005) ‘(Re)form with Substance? Restructuring and Governance in the Australian Health System 2004–2005’, Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2(19).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, L. B. (1989) Medicare's New Hospital Payment System: Is it Working?The Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Street, A. and Duckett, S. (1996) ‘Are Waiting Lists Inevitable?Health Policy, 36: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuohy, C. H. (1999) Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Turner, L. and Short, S. D. (1999) ‘George Rupert Palmer – DRG Carrier and Champion’, Australian Health Review, 22(2) 86–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Victorian Dept of Human Services (2000) Ministerial Review of Health Care Networks – Final Report.
Willcox, S. (2005) ‘Buying Best Value Health Care: Evolution of Purchasing among Australian Private Health Insurers’, Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2(1): 6. Available at: www.anzhealthpolicy.com/content/2/1/6.
Wilson, R. M., Runciman, W. B., Gibberd, R. W., Harrison, B. T., Newby, L. and Hamilton, J. D. (1995) ‘The Quality in Australian Health Care Study’, MJA, 163 (6 November): 458–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, D. W. and Saltman, R. B. (1985) The Hospital Power Equilibrium: Physician Behaviour and Cost Control. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×