Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:37:20.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Can transgenic fish save fisheries?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Rebecca M. Bratspies
Affiliation:
CUNY School of Law 62-21 Main Street Flushing, NY 11367 USA
William W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Michael G. Schechter
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Lois G. Wolfson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Fisheries are in trouble. For decades, there have been warnings that fish harvests have reached or exceeded sustainable limits and that collapse of capture fisheries might be imminent. Recent evidence has overwhelmingly confirmed these dire predictions (Pauly et al. 1997; Pauly and Maclean 2003). Despite increased fishing effort and more effective equipment, total catch levels have remained stable or decreased every year since the mid 1990s (Vannuccini 2003). Dismal as this total catch statistic might be, it unfortunately paints a deceptively rosy picture. Ever-increasing inputs of money and technology are required to merely tread water – a constant total catch under these circumstances means a diminished return per unit of fishing effort. Moreover, looking only at tonnes of fish caught (the typical representation of total catch) masks the dramatic shifts that have taken place in the species making up that total catch (Garcia and Newton 1997). Increasing catches of low-value species (so-called “trash fish”) obscures the decline in almost every high-value demersal fishery and the profound impact that changing fish populations have had on the aquatic food web.

At the same time that fishers are expending more effort to catch fewer and less valuable fish, demand for fish is increasing at a rapid pace. The human population grows year by year, and food security continues to lag behind.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackefors, H. E. 1999. Environmental impact of different farming technologies. In Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the Future, eds. Svennevig, N., Reinertsen, H., and New, M.. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema, pp. 145–169.Google Scholar
Aitken, M. 2002. Staggering extent of fish farm escapes: over a million salmon lost from cages threaten Scotland's wild stock with extinction. The Mail on Sunday April 14, 2002.
Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 2001. Reported Escapes and Recoveries of Atlantic Salmon in Washington State, British Columbia, and Alaska. Available online at www.adfg.state.ak.us/special/as/docs/esc_rec87-01.pdf
Aleström, P. 1996. Genetically Modified Fish in Future Aquaculture: Technical, Environmental and Management Considerations. Available online at www.agbios.com/docroot/articles/02-254-005.pdf
Aleström, P., Kisen, G., Klungland, H., and Andersen, Ø. 1992. Fish gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene and molecular approaches for control of sexual maturation: development of a transgenic fish model. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 1: 376–379.Google ScholarPubMed
Allsopp, W. H. L. 1997. Aquaculture performance and perspectives. In Global Trends: Fisheries Management, eds. Pikitch, E. L., Huppert, D. D., and Sissenwine, M. P.. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 153–165.Google Scholar
Alsea Valley Alliance. 2001. Alsea Valley Alliance v. Evans, 161 F. Supp. 2d 1154.
Anderson, J. 1997. The growth of salmon aquaculture and the emerging new world order of the salmon industry. In Global Trends: Fisheries Management, eds. Pikitch, E. L., Huppert, D. D., and Sissenwine, M. P.. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar
Association to Protect Hammersly. 2002. Association to Protect Hammersly v. Taylor Resources, 299 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002).
Atlantic Salmon Federation. 2001. Catastrophic salmon escape prompts calls for moratorium on the aquaculture industry: largest documented escape ever in US or Atlantic Canada. Available online at www.asf.ca/Communications/2001/feb/catastrophe.html
Atlantic Salmon Federation. 2002. Atlantic Salmon Aquaculture: A Primer. Available online at www.asf.ca/backgrounder/asfaquacbackgrounder.pdf
BBC. 2003. Farm threat to wild salmon. October 20, 2003.
Beardmore, J. A. and Porte, J. S. 2003. Genetically Modified Organisms and Aquaculture, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 989. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at http://200. 198.202.145/seap/pesquisa/pdf/Aquicultura/Tecnologia/2.pdfGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belton, B., Brown, J., Hunter, L., Letterman, T, Mosness, A., and Skledany, M. 2004. Open Ocean Aquaculture. Available online at www.mindfully.org/Water/2004/Aquaculture-Open-Ocean-IATP10Feb04.htm
Benbrook, C. 2002. Antibiotic Drug Use in U.S. Aquaculture. Available online at www.iatp.org/fish/library/antibiotics
California Fish and Game Commission. 2003. December Meeting Summary. Available online at www.dfg.ca.gov/fg_comm/2003/12-03-03summary.html
Cartagena Protocol. 2000. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Available online at www.biodiv.org/biosafety/protocol.asp
CDC (Center for Disease Control). 1999. Center for Disease Control Memo to Record, Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Aquaculture: Potential for Public Health Impact. Available online at www.nationalaquaculture.org/pdf/CDC%20Memo%20to%20the%20Record.pdf
Central Statistics Office. 2003. Fisheries Statistics 2002. Available online at www.cso.ie/publications/agriculture/fishery.pdf
CEQ/OSTP. 2001. Assessment: Case Studies of Environment Regulation for Biotechnology, Case Study No. 1, Growth Enhanced Salmon. Available online at www.ostp.gov/html/ceq_ostp_study2.pdf
Clifford, S. L., McGinnity, P., and Ferguson, A. 1998. Genetic changes in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations of northwest Irish rivers resulting from escapes of adult farm salmon, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuente, J., Guillen, I., Martinez, R., and Estrada, M. P. 1999. Growth regulation and enhancement in tilapia: basic research findings and their applications. Genetic Analysis 15: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Silva, S. S. 1999. Feed resources, usage and sustainability. In Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the Future, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Aquaculture, Oslo, eds. Svennevig, N., Reinertsen, H., and New, M.. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema, pp. 221–244.Google Scholar
Devlin, R. H. and E. M. Donaldson. 1992. Containment of genetically altered fish. In Transgenic Fish, eds. Hew, C. L. and Fletcher, G. L.. Singapore: World Scientific Press, pp. 229–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, R. H., Yesaki, T. Y., Biagi, C. A., et al. 1994. Brief communication: Extraordinary salmon growth. Nature 371: 209–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, R. H., Yesaki, T. Y., Donaldson, E. M., Du, S.-J., and Hew, C. L. 1995a. Production of germline transgenic Pacific salmonids with dramatically increased growth performance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1376–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, R. H., Yesaki, T. Y., Donaldson, E. M., and Hew, C. L. 1995b. Transmission and phenotypic effects of an antifreeze/GH gene construct in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 137: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, R. H., Johnsson, J. I., Smailus, D. E., et al. 1999. Increased ability to compete for food by growth hormone transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch Walbaum). Aquaculture Research 30: 479–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, R. H., Biagi, C. A., Yesaki, T. Y., Smailus, D. E., and Bryatt, J. C. 2001. Brief communication: Growth of domesticated transgenic fish. Nature 409: 781–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOC (Department of Commerce). 1999. U.S. Department of Commerce Aquaculture Policy. Available online at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/trade/newgrant.htm#Top.
Donaldson, E. M., Devlin, R. H., Soler, I. I., and Piferrer, F. 1993. The reproductive containment of genetically altered salmonids. In Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes, eds. Cloud, J. G. and Torgaard, G. H.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, S. J., Gong, Z., Fletcher, G. L., et al. 1992. Growth enhancement in transgenic Atlantic salmon by the use of an “all fish” chimeric growth hormone gene construct. Bio/Technology 10: 176–181.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunham, R. A. 2003. Status of Genetically Modified (Transgenic) Fish: Research and Application, FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Genetically Modified Animals including Fish. Available online at www.fao.org/biotech/index.asp?lang'en
Environmental Law Center. 2002. Judge approves landmark settlement of clean water act lawsuit against Heritage Salmon, Inc. Press release, July 29, 2002.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category, Proposed Rule. 67 Fed. Reg. 57871-57928 (September 12, 2002).
Ernst, W., Jackman, P., Doe, K., et al. 2001. Dispersion and toxicity to non-target aquatic organisms of pesticides used to treat sea lice on salmon in net pen enclosures. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42: 433–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Commission 2002. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition on the Use of Canthaxanthin in Feedingstuffs for Salmon and Trout, Laying Hens, and Other Poultry. Available online at http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scan/out81_en.pdf.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1995. FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible FisheriesRome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO. 2002a. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at www.fao.org/docrep/005/y7300e/y7300e00.htm
FAO. 2002b. Aquaculture Development and Management: Status, Issues and Prospects. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/004/y3277E.htm
Farrell, A. P., Bennett, W., and Devlin, R. H. 1997. Growth enhanced transgenic salmon can be inferior swimmers. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 2003. FDA Statement regarding GloFish, December 9. Available online at www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00994.html
FDCA. 2005. Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(v).
Federal Register. 1990. Research proposal on transgenic fish: publication of environmental assessment. 55 Fed. Reg. 5752-5757
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. 2004. The Seed Industry in U.S. Agriculture: An Exploration of Data and Information on Crop Seed Markets, Regulation, Industry Structure, and Research and Development, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. AIB786. Available online at www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib786/
Fleming, I. A., Jonsson, B., Gross, M. R., and Lamberg, A. 1996. An experimental study of the reproductive behavior and success of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, I. A., Hindar, K., Mjølnerød, I. B., et al. 2000. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 1517–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. L., Goddard, S. V., and Hew, C. L. 2000. Current status of transgenic Atlantic salmon for aquaculture. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, eds. Fairbairn, C., Scoles, G., and McHughen, A., July 2000, Saskatoon, pp. 179–189.Google Scholar
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2004. Mangroves: “Walking Trees.” Available online at http://wwdep.state.fl.us/coastal/habitats/mangroves.htm
FWS. 2000. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Endangered Status for a Distinct Population Segment of Anadromous Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) in the Gulf of Maine. 65 Fed. Reg. 69459-01, November 17, 2000.
Garcia, S. and Newton, C. 1997. Current situation, trends and prospects in world capture fisheries. In Global Trends: Fisheries Management, eds. Pikitch, E. L., Huppert, D. D., and Sissenwine, M. P.. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 2–27.Google Scholar
Gardar, J. 2002. 600 000 Faroese salmon on the run after storms. Intrafish February 28, 2002.
Hansen, P., Jacobsen, J. A., and Lund, R. A. 1993. High numbers of farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, observed in oceanic waters north of the Faroe Islands. Aquaculture Fisheries Management 24: 777–781.Google Scholar
Harden, B. 2004. Hatchery salmon to count as wildlife. Washington Post April 29, 2004.
Hedrick, P. W. 2001. Invasion of transgenes from salmon or other genetically modified organisms into natural populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hites, R. A., Foran, J. A., Carpenter, D. O., et al. 2004. Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science 303: 226–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, R. D., Martens, R. S., Innes, S. A., Drnevitch, J. M., and Hale, J. 1998. Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka. Animal Behavior 55: 1151–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Center for Technology Assessment. 2004. International Center for Technology Assessment. v. Thompson, Docket No. 1:04-CV-00062-RMU, Complaint filed January 14, 2004.
Issues in Ecology. 2001. No. 8: Effects of Aquaculture on World Fish Supplies. Available online at www.esa.org/sbi/sbi_issues/issues_pdfs/issue8.pdf
Jönsson, E., Johnsson, J. I., and Björnsson, B. T. 1996. Growth hormone increases predation exposure of rainbow trout. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 647–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, M. J. 2001. Ecological effects of shellfish cultivation. In Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture, ed. Black, K. D.. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, pp. 51–75.Google Scholar
Kapuscinski, A. R. and Brister, D. J. 2001. Genetic impacts of aquaculture. In Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture, ed. Black, K. D.. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, pp. 128–153.Google Scholar
Kapuscinski, A. R. and Hallerman, E. M. 1991. Implications of introduction of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerry, J., Hiney, M., Coyne, R., et al. 1994. Frequency and distribution of resistance to oxytetracycline in microorganisms isolated from marine fish farm sediments following therapeutic use of oxytetracycline. Aquaculture 123: 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, N. and Laight, R. J. 2000. Transgenic fish: an evaluation of benefits and risks. Fish and Fisheries 1: 146–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, N. and Talmar, S. 1984. Injection of cloned genes with rainbow trout eggs. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 82: 187.Google Scholar
MacMillan, J. R. 2001. Aquaculture and antibiotic resistance: a negligible public health risk? World Aquaculture 32(2): 49–51, 68.Google Scholar
McDowell, N. 2002. Stream of escaped farm fish raises fears for wild salmon. Nature 416: 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnity, P., Stone, C., Taggart, J. B., et al. 1997. Genetic impact of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) on native populations: use of DNA profiling to assess freshwater performance of wild, farmed and hybrid progeny in a natural river environment, ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 998–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnity, P., Prodöhl, P., Ferguson, A., et al. 2003. Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 2443–2450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinnell, S. and Thompson, A. J. 1997. Recent events concerning Atlantic salmon escapees in the Pacific. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 1221–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, P., Gong, Z., Fletcher, G., and Hew, C. L. 2002. The potential impact of modern biotechnology on fish aquaculture. Aquaculture 204: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellon, M., Benbrook, C., and Benbrook, K. 2001. Hogging It: Estimates of Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
Monsanto. 2002. Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, September 4, 2002, Canada Federal Court of Appeals, 2. F.C. 165.
Morton, A. and Volpe, J. 2002. A description of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar captures and their characteristics in one Pacific salmon fishery area in British Columbia, Canada in 2000. Alaska Fisheries Research Bulletin 9: 102–110.Google Scholar
Muir, W. M. and Howard, R. D. 1999. Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 13853–13856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muir, W. M. and Howard, R. D. 2001. Fitness components and ecological risk of transgenic release: a model using Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). American Naturalist 158: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R. A., Levin, S. A., Lande, R., et al. 2004. Policy forum: hatcheries and endangered salmon. Science 303: 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nambiar, K. P. 1999. Global market for fish and fishery products. In Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the Future, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Aquaculture, Oslo, eds. Svennevig, N., Reinertsen, H., and New, M.. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema, pp. 246–262.Google Scholar
NASCO (North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization). 2000. Guidelines on Containment of Farm Salmon. Available online at www.nasco.int/pdf/nasco_res_slgguidecontain.pdf
National Aquaculture Association. 2004. Drugs Used in U.S. Aquaculture Industry. Available online at www.natlaquaculture.org/pdf/Drugs%20and%20Chemicals%20in%20US%20Aquaculture%2011.10.pdf
Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J. H., et al. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naylor, R. L., Eagle, J., and Smith, W. L. 2003. Salmon aquaculture in the Pacific Northwest: a global industry. Environment 45: 18–39.Google Scholar
NMFS. (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2004. Enumeration of Threatened Marine and Anadromous Species. 50 C.F.R. 223.102, Code of Federal Regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1996. Endangered and Threatened Species: Threatened Status for Central California Coast Coho Salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU). 61 Fed. Reg. 56,138-56,149, October 31, 1996.
NOAA. 1997. Endangered and Threatened Species: Threatened Status for Southern Oregon/Northern California Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of Coho Salmon. 62 Fed. Reg. 24588, May 6, 1997.
NOAA. 1998. Endangered and Threatened Species: Threatened Status for the Oregon Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit of Coho Salmon. 63 Fed. Reg. 42587, August 10, 1998.
NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available online at www.mindfully.org/GE/GE4/Animal-Biotechnology-Concerns-NRC-Aug02.htm
NRC. 2004. Biological Containment of Genetically Modified Organisms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ocean Studies Board. 2004. Atlantic Salmon in Maine, Committee on Atlantic Salmon in Maine, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pauly, D. and Maclean, J. 2003. In a Perfect Ocean. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., and Torres, F. 1997. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D., Bennett, E., Christensen, V., Tyedmers, P., and Watson, R. 2003. The future for fisheries. Science 302: 1359–1361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, T. H. and Black, K. D. 2001. The environmental impacts of marine fish cage culture. In Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture, ed. Black, K. D.. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. 2003. Safety of Transgenic Animals Raises Questions. Available online at http://pewagbiotech.org/newsroom/summaries/
Price Waterhouse Coopers. 2001. Northern Aquaculture Buyers Guide.
Rahman, M. A. and Maclean, N. 1999. Growth performance of transgenic tilapia containing an exogenous piscine growth hormone gene. Aquaculture 173: 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, M. A., Mak, R., Ayad, H., Smith, A., and Maclean, N. 1998. Expression of a novel piscine growth hormone gene results in growth enhancement in transgenic tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Transgenic Research 7: 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, M. A., Ronyai, A., Engidaw, B. Z., et al. 2001. Growth performance of transgenic tilapia containing an exogenous piscine growth hormone gene. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters. 2002. Caged Scottish salmon escape, threaten wild cousin. April 3, 2002.
Sandnes, K. and Ervick A. 1999. Industrial marine fish farming. In Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the Future, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Aquaculture, Oslo, eds. Svennevig, N., Reinertsen, H., and New, M.. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema, pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Saegrov, H., Hindar, K., Kalus, S. and Lura, H. 1997. Escaped farm salmon replace the original salmon stocks in the River Vosso, Western Norway, ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 1166–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, R. 1991. Potential interaction between cultured and wild Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seattle Times 1997. Farm salmon escape pens. News Service, July 21, 1997.
Seattle Times 2004. Study finds higher level of toxins in farmed salmon. News Service, January 9, 2004.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: First Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Senate Bill. 2005. National Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2005, Senate Bill 1195. Available online at http://thomas.loc.gov
Stokstad, Eric. 2002. News focus: Engineered fish–friend or foe of the environment? Science 297: 1797–1798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Economist. 2003. The promise of a blue revolution. August 9, 2003.
Todd, C. D., Walker, A. M, Wolff, L., et al. 1997. Genetic differentiation of populations of the copepod sea louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer) ectoparasite on wild and farmed salmonids around the coast of Scotland: evidence from RAPD markers, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 210: 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traxter, G. S., Anderson, E., et al. 1999. Naked DNA vaccination of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar against IHNV. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 38: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, O., Gargan, P., Poole, W. R., and Whelan, K. F. 1999. Spatial and temporal variations in the infestation of sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) by caliged copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer) in relation to sources of infection in Ireland. Parasitology 119: 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2001. Got Fish? Already tired of that holiday gift aquarium? Think before you dump and create an even bigger problem. Available online at www.msgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=517
USGS. n.d. Problems with the Release of Exotic Fish. Available online at http://nas.er.usgs.gov/fishes/dont_rel.html
USPIRG (U.S. Public Interest Research Group). 2002. United States Public Interest Research Group v. Heritage Salmon, Inc., (2002) D. C. Maine CIV-00-150-B-C. Available online at www.med.uscourts.gov/opinions/kravchuk/2002/MJK_02192002_1-00cv150_USPISG_v_Heritage.pdf
USPIRG. 2003. United States Public Interest Research Group v. Atlantic Salmon of Maine, (2003) D. C. Maine CIV. 00-151-B-C, CIV-00-149-B-C. Available online at www.med.uscourts.gov/opinions/carter/2003/GC_05282003_1-00cv151_USPIRG_v_AtlanticSal.pdf
Vannuccini, S. 2003. Overview of Fish Production, Utilization, Consumption and Trade. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at ftp://ftp.fao.org/fi/document/trends/overview/2001/commodit/2001fishery-overview.pdf
Volpe, J. P., Taylor, E. G., Rimmer, D. W., and Glickman, B. G. 2000. Evidence of natural reproduction of aquaculture escaped Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in a coastal British Columbia river. Conservation Biology 14: 899–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpe, J. P., Anholt, B. R., and Glickman, B. G. 2001. Competition among juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss): relevance to the invasion potential in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watershed Watch. 2001. Salmon Farms, Sea Lice and Wild Salmon. Conquitlam, British Columbia: Wateshed Watch Salmon Society.
Weber, M. L. 2003. What price farmed fish. In Title of Book. Silver Spring, MD: SeaWeb Aquaculture Cleaninghouse, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
Western Australia Department of Fisheries. 2006. Invasive Aquarium Species. Available online at www.fish.wa.gov.au/hab/broc/invasivespecies/aquarium/index.html
Wilkie, M. L. and Fortuna, S. 2003. Status and Trends in Mangrove Area Extent Worldwide, FAO Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper No. 63, Appendix I. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/DOCREP/007/J1533E/J1533E00.htm.
Zhu, Z. Y., Li, G., He, L., and Chen, S. 1985. Novel gene transfer into the fertilized eggs of the goldfish Carassius acuratus L. 1758. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 1: 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuikov, M. 2004. Dumping of aquarium fish causing trouble in Duluth or something's fishy in Rock Pond. Available online at www.greatlakesdirectory.org/mn/051204_great_lakes.htm

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×