Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:30:13.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Trade Barriers and Subsidies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Kym Anderson
Affiliation:
Wine Economics Research Centre
Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Consensus Center
Get access

Summary

Opening economies to international trade and investment, and reducing price-distorting subsidies, can generate enormous economic and social benefits relative to the costs of adjustment to such policy reform. Numerous barriers to trade in goods, in some services, and in capital flows have been reduced considerably over the past three decades, but many remain, as do many farm subsidies. Such price-distorting policies harm most the economies imposing them, but the worst of them (in agriculture and textiles) are particularly harmful to the world's poorest people. Addressing this challenge would therefore also reduce poverty and thereby assist in meeting several of the other challenges identified in the Copenhagen Consensus project, including malnutrition, disease, poor education, and air pollution.

This chapter focuses on how costly those anti-poor trade policies are, and examines possible strategies to reduce remaining price-distorting measures. Four opportunities in particular are addressed. The most beneficial involves multilaterally completing the stalled Doha Development Agenda (DDA) of the WTO. If that continues to prove to be too difficult politically to bring to a conclusion in the near future, the other three opportunities considered here involve prospective subglobal regional integration agreements. One involves the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) among a subset of member countries of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) grouping; another involves extending the free-trade area (FTA) among the ten-member Association of South East Asian Nations to include China, Japan, and Korea (ASEAN+3); and the third opportunity is an FTA among all APEC countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Problems, Smart Solutions
Costs and Benefits
, pp. 673 - 698
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, R. C. and Keller, W., 2007: Technology transfers through imports, NBER Working Paper 13086, Cambridge, MA
Ades, A. and di Tella, R., 1999: Rents, competition, and corruption, American Economic Review 89, 982–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Griffith, R., 2005: Competition and Growth: Reconciling Theory and Evidence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P., 2006: Appropriate growth policy: a unified framework, Journal of the European Economic Association 4, 269–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., 1992: Effects on the environment and welfare of liberalising world trade: the cases of coal and food, in Anderson, K. and Blackhurst, R. (eds.), The Greening of World Trade Issues, Harvester-Wheatsheaf and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, LondonGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., 2003: Measuring effects of trade policy distortions: how far have we come?, The World Economy 26, 413–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., 2013: Costing global trade barriers, 1900 to 2050, in Lomborg, B. (ed.), The Way the World Is: Past, Present and Future Challenges, Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and Hayami, Y., 1986: The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection East Asia in International Perspective, Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and Jackson, L. A., 2005: Some implications of GM food technology policies for Sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of African Economies 14, 385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and McKibbin, W., 2000: Reducing coal subsidies and trade barriers: their contribution to greenhouse gas abatement, Environment and Development Economics 5, 457–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and Nelgen, S., 2011: What's the appropriate agricultural protection counterfactual for trade analysis?, in Martin, W. and Mattoo, A. (eds.), Unfinished Business? The WTO's Doha Agenda, Centre for Economic Policy Research and the World Bank, LondonGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and Nelgen, S., 2012: Trade barrier volatility and agricultural price stabilization, World Development 40, 36–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and Winters, L. A., 2009: The challenge of reducing international trade and migration barriers, in Lomborg, B. (ed.), Global Crises, Global Solutions, 2nd edn., Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., Cockburn, J., and Martin, W., 2011: Would freeing up world trade reduce poverty and inequality? The vexed role of agricultural distortions, The World Economy 34, 487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., Cockburn, J., and Martin, W. (eds.), 2010: Agricultural Price Distortions, Inequality and Poverty, World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRef
Anderson, K., Jackson, L. A., and Nielsen, C. P., 2005: GM rice adoption: implications for welfare and poverty alleviation, Journal of Economic Integration 20, 771–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., Martin, W., and van der Mensbrugghe, D., 2006: Market and welfare implications of the Doha reform scenarios, in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds.), Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, Palgrave Macmillan, London (co-published with the World Bank)Google Scholar
APEC, 2010: Leaders’ Declaration,
Arnold, J. M., Javorcik, B. S., and Mattoo, A., 2011: Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic, Journal of International Economics 85, 136–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2011: Asian Development Outlook 2011, ADB, ManilaGoogle Scholar
Bacchetta, M. and Jansen, M., 2003: Adjusting to trade liberalization: the role of policy, institutions and WTO disciplines, Special Studies 7, World Trade Organization, Geneva
Baldwin, R. E., 2004: Openness and growth: what's the empirical relationship?, in Baldwin, R. E. and Winters, L. A. (eds.), Challenges to Globalization: Analysing the Economics, University of Chicago Press for NBER and CEPRCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., 2009: Big-think regionalism: a critical survey, in Estevadeordal, A., Suominen, K., and Teh, R. (eds.), Regional Rules in the Global Trading System, Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., 2011: Trade and industrialization after globalization's, 2nd unbundling: how building and joining a supply chain are different and why it matters, NBER Working Paper 17716, Cambridge, MA
Beghin, J., van der Mensbrugghe, D., and Roland-Holst, D., 2002: Trade and the Environment in General Equilibrium: Evidence from Developing Economies, Kluwer AcademicNorwell, MAGoogle Scholar
Bendivogli, C. and Pagano, P., 1999: Trade, job destruction and job creation in european manufacturing, Open Economies Review 10, 156–84Google Scholar
Bermudez, E., 2004: Sustainability Assessments of Trade Policies and Programmes, WWF International, GlandGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., and Schott, P. K., 2007: Firms in international trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, 105–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. N., 1971: The generalized theory of distortions and welfare, in Bhagwati, J. N. et al. (eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Billmeier, A. and Nannicini, T., 2009: Trade openness and growth: pursuing empirical glasnost, IMF Staff Papers 56, 447–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, M. and Rousseau, P., 2012: Historical evidence on the finance–trade–growth nexus, Journal of Banking and Finance 36, 1236–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, H., 2007: The evolution of the trade and environment debate at the WTO, in Najam, A., Halle, M., and Melendez-Ortiz, R. (eds.), Trade and Environment: A Resource Book, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, see Google Scholar
CEPII, 2003: Methodological Tools for SIA: Report of the CEPII Workshop held on 7–8 November 2002 in Brussels, CEPIIo, Paris, Working Paper 2003–19, Google Scholar
Chang, R., Kaltani, L., and Loayza, N., 2005: Openness can be good for growth: the role of policy complementarity, Policy Research Working Paper 3763, World Bank, Washington, DC, and NBER Working Paper 11787, Cambridge, MA
Cline, W. R., 2004: Climate change, in Lomborg, B., (ed.), Global Crises, Global Solutions, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Cline, W. R., Kawanabe, T. O., Kronsjo, M., and Williams, T., 1978: Trade Negotiations in the Tokyo Round: A Quantitative Assessment, Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Coase, R., 1960: The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. A., 2003: Development, trade, and the environment: how robust is the environmental kuznets curve?, Environment and Development Economics 8, 557–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copland, B. and Taylor, M. S., 2003: Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence, Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corden, W. M., 1997: Trade Policy and Economic Welfare, 2nd edn., Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, A. V. and Stern, R. M., 1979: An Economic Analysis of the Effects of the Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations on the United States and Other Major Industrial Countries, MTN Studies 5, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, A. V. and Stern, R. M., 1986: The Michigan Model of World Production and Trade: Theory and Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
de Melo, J. and Mathys, N. A., 2012: Reconciling trade and climate policies, CEPR Discussion Paper 8760, London
de Melo, J. and Tarr, D., 1990: Welfare costs of US quotas on textiles, steel and autos, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 489–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, W., 1952: The End of the ITO, International Finance Section, Essays in International Finance 16, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Dollar, D. and Kraay, A., 2002: Growth is good for the poor, Journal of Economic Growth 7, 195–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W., 2001: The Elusive Quest for Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Faini, R., 2004: Trade liberalization in a globalizing world, CEPR Discussion Paper 4665, London
Feenstra, R. C., 2003: Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, R. and Rodrik, D., 1991: Resistance to reform: status quo bias and the presence of individual specific uncertainty, American Economic Review 81, 1146–55Google Scholar
Fouré, J., Bénassy-Quéré, A., and Fontagné, L., 2010: The world economy in 2050: a tentative picture, CEPII Working Paper 2010–27, CEPII, Paris
Francois, J. F., 2003: Assessing the impact of trade policy on labour markets and production, in Methodological Tools for SIA, CEPII Working Paper 2003–19, CEPII, Paris, 61–88Google Scholar
Francois, J. F. and Hoekman, B., 2010: Services trade and policy, Journal of Economic Literature 48, 642–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, J. F. and Martin, W., 2004: Commercial policy, bindings and market access, European Economic Review 48, 665–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, J. F. and Martin, W., 2010: Ex ante assessments of the welfare impacts of trade reforms with numerical models, in Beladi, H. and Choi, E. K. (eds.), New Developments in Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for Trade Policy, Emerald Group Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
Francois, J. F. and Reinert, K. A. (eds.), 1997: Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef
Frankel, J. A. and Cavallo, E. A., 2008: Does openness to trade make countries more vulnerable to sudden stops, or less? Using gravity to establish causality, Journal of International Money and Finance 27, 1430–52Google Scholar
Frankel, J. A. and Romer, D., 1999: Does trade cause growth?, American Economic Review 89, 379–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. B., 2004: Trade wars: the exaggerated impact of trade in economic debate, The World Economy 27, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, T. L., 2007: The World is Flat: The Globalized World in the Twenty-First Century, Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
Furusawa, T. and Lai, E. L. C., 1999: Adjustment costs and gradual trade liberalization, Journal of International Economics 49, 333–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenday, G., 2002: Trade liberalization and customs revenue: does trade liberalization lead to lower customs revenue? The Case of Kenya, Journal of African Finance and Economic Development 5, 89–125Google Scholar
Greenaway, D., 1993: Liberalizing foreign trade through rose-tinted glasses, Economic Journal 103, 208–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, D. and Milner, C., 1993: The fiscal implication of trade policy reform: theory and evidence, UNDP/World Bank Trade Expansion Program Occasional Paper 9, World Bank, Washington, DC
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E., 1991: Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Rossi-Hansberg, E., 2012: Task trade between similar countries, Econometrica 80, 593–629Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), 1995: Handbook of International Economics, Vol. III, North-Holland, Amsterdam
Hanson, G. H., Mataloni, R. J., and Slaughter, M. J., 2005: Vertical production networks in multinational firms, Review of Economics and Statistics 87, 664–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Levinson, A., and Wilson, D. M., 2002: Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve, Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 541–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrigan, J. and Choi, E. K. (eds.), 2003: Handbook of International Trade, Blackwell, Oxford
Helpman, E. and Itskhoki, O., 2010: Labor market rigidities, trade and unemployment, Review of Economic Studies 77, 1100–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E., Marin, D., and Verdier, T. (eds.), 2008: The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hertel, T. W., Verma, M., Ivanic, M., and Rios, A. R., 2011: GTAP–POV: a framework for assessing the national poverty impacts of global economic and environmental policies, GTAP Technical Paper 31, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Hollander, J., 2003: The Real Environmental Crisis: Why Poverty, Not Affluence, is the Environment's Number One Enemy, University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Hoxha, I., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., and Vollrath, D., 2011: How big are the gains from international financial integration?, CEPR Discussion Paper 8647, London
Irwin, D. A., 2002: Free Trade Under Fire, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, L. S., LaLonde, R. J., and Sullivan, D. G., 1993: Earnings losses of displaced workers, American Economic Review 83, 685–709Google Scholar
Javorcik, B., Keller, W., and Tybout, J., 2008: Openness and industrial responses in a Walmart world: a case study of Mexican soaps, detergents and surfactant producers, The World Economy 31, 1558–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, P. and Kristrom, B., 2007: On a clear day you might see an environmental Kuznets curve, Environmental and Resource Economics 37, 77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L., and Schmitz, A., 2004: The Welfare Economics of Public Policy, Edward Elgar, LondonGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P., 1989: Commercial policy between the wars, in Mathias, Peter and Pollard, Sidney (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. 8, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
King, D. K., 2003: GM Science Review: First Report, Prepared by the GM Science Review Panel under the chairmanship of Sir David King for the UK Government, July
Kose, M. A., Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., and Wei, S., 2009: Financial globalization: a reappaisal, IMF Staff Papers 56, 8–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. O., 1983: Trade and Employment in Developing Countries, Volume, 3 Synthesis and Conclusions, University of Chicago Press for NBERGoogle Scholar
Laborde, D., Martin, W., and van der Mensbrugghe, D., 2011: Potential real income effects of Doha reforms, in Martin, W. and Mattoo, A. (eds.), Unfinished Business? The WTO's Doha Agenda, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London and World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Laborde, D., Martin, W., and van der Mensbrugghe, D., 2012: Implications of the Doha market access proposals for developing countries, World Trade Review 11. 1–25
Lee, J.-W., 1995: Capital goods imports and long-run growth, Journal of Development Economics 48, 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lileeva, A. and Trefler, D., 2010: Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity…for some plants, Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, 1051–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, P., 1991: Historical patterns of agricultural protection, in Timmer, P. (ed.), Agriculture and the State, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NYGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P. J., 1974: A more general theory of price distortions in an open economy, Journal of International Economics 4, 365–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, B., 2001: The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, B. (ed.), 2004: Global Crises, Global Solutions, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumenga-Neso, O., Olarreaga, M., and Schiff, M., 2005: On “Indirect” Trade-Related R&D Spillovers, European Economic Review 49, 1785–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matusz, S. and Tarr, D., 2000: Adjusting to trade policy reform, in Krueger, A. O. (ed.), Economic Policy Reform: The Second Stage, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Mazumdar, J., 2001: Imported machinery and growth in LDCs, Journal of Development Economics 65, 209–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, M. J., 2003: The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica 71, 1692–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, M. J. and Ottaviano, G. I. P., 2008: Market size, trade and productivity, Review of Economic Studies 75, 295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaely, M., Papageorgiou, D., and Choksi, A. (eds.), 1991: Liberalizing Foreign Trade, 7: Lessons of Experience in the Developing World, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA and Oxford
Nash, J. and Takacs, W., 1998: Lessons from the trade expansion program, in Nash, J. and Takacs, W., (eds.), Trade Policy Reform: Lessons and Implications, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
OECD, 1996: Subsidies and the Environment: Exploring the Linkages, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
OECD, 1997: Reforming Energy and Transport Subsidies: Environmental and Economic Implications, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
OECD, 1998: Improving the Environment Through Reducing Subsidies, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
OECD, 2003a: Agricultural Trade and Poverty: Making Policy Analysis Count, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
OECD, 2003b: Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Policy Issues and Challenges, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
Olsen, M., 1965: The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Oneal, J. and Russett, B., 2000: Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence and International Organizations, W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Petri, P. A., Plummer, M. G., and Zhai, F., 2011: The Trans-Pacific partnership and Asia-Pacific integration: a quantitative assessment, East–West Center Economics Working Paper 119, Honolulu
Porto, G. and Hoekman, B. (eds.), 2010: Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: Impacts, Determinants and Policy Responses, CEPR, London and World Bank, Washington, DC
Ravallion, M., 2006: Looking beyond averages in the trade and policy debate, World Development 34, 1374–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, L. and Romer, P., 1991: International integration and endogenous growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigeuz, F. and Rodrik, D., 2001: Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic's guide to cross-national evidence, in Bernanke, B. S. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D., 2007: One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Romalis, J., 2007: Market access, openness and growth, NBER Working Paper 13048, Cambridge, MA
Romer, P., 1994: New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions, Journal of Development Economics 43, 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, T. F. and Tarr, D. G., 2002: Trade liberalization, product variety and growth in a small open economy: a quantitative assessment, Journal of International Economics 56, 247–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D. and Warner, A., 1995: Economic reform and the process of global integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, X., 2006: The world distribution of income: falling poverty and…convergence, period, Quarterly Journal of Economics 121, 351–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schularick, M. and Steger, T. M., 2010: Financial integration, investment, and economic growth: evidence from two eras of financial globalization, Review of Economics and Statistics 92, 756–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., 1999: Development as Freedom, Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. S., 1999: Trade and trade policy in endogenous growth models, in Piggott, J. and Woodland, A. (eds.), International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim, Macmillan for the IAE, LondonGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R. M. and Ueda, K., 2010: Welfare gains from financial globalization, International Economic Review 51, 553–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyers, R. and Anderson, K., 1992: Disarray in World Food Markets: A Quantitative Assessment, Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
USITC, 1997: The Dynamic Effects of Trade Liberalization: An Empirical Analysis, Publication 3069, US International Trade Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, E., van der Mensbrugghe, D., and Anderson, K., 2009: General equilibrium effects of price distortions on global markets, farm incomes and welfare, in Anderson, K. (ed.), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective, 1955–2007, Palgrave Macmillan, London and World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
van Beers, C. and de Moor, A., 2001: Public Subsidies and Policy Failures: How Subsidies Distort the Natural Environment, Equity and Trade and How to Reform Them, Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
van der Mensbrugghe, D., 2011: Linkage Technical Reference Document: Version 7.1, World Bank, Washington, DC, March, mimeo, or Google Scholar
Vollebergh, H., Melenberg, B., and Dijkgraaf, E., 2009: Identifying reduced-form relations with panel data: the case of pollution and income, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58, 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Moltke, A., McKee, C., and Morgan, T., 2004: Energy Subsidies: Lessons Learned in Assessing Their Impact and Designing Policy Reforms, Greenleaf Books for UNEP, LondonGoogle Scholar
Wacziarg, R., 2001: Measuring the dynamic gains from trade, World Bank Economic Review 15, 393–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacziarg, R. and Welch, K. H., 2008: Trade liberalization and growth: new evidence, World Bank Economic Review 15, 393–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalley, J., 1985: Trade Liberalization Among Major World Trading Areas, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Whalley, J., 2010: China's FDI and non-FDI economies and the sustainability of future high chinese growth, China Economic Review 21, 123–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. A., 2002: Trade liberalisation and poverty: what are the links?, The World Economy 25, 1339–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. A., 2004: Trade liberalization and economic performance: an overview, Economic Journal 114, F4–F21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. A., McCulloch, N., and McKay, A., 2004: Trade liberalization and poverty: the empirical evidence, Journal of Economic Literature 62, 72–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. A. and Takacs, W. E., 1991: Labour adjustment costs and British footwear protection, Oxford Economic Papers 43, 479–501Google Scholar
World Bank, 2006: Global Economic Prospects 2006: Economic Implications of Remittances and Migration, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Yohe, G. W., Tol, R. S. J., Richels, R. G., and Blanford, G. J., 2009: Climate change, in Lomborg, B. (ed.), Global Crises, Global Solutions, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Zhai, F., 2008: Armington meets melitz: introducing firm heterogeneity in a global CGE model of trade, Journal of Economic Integration 23, 575–604

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×