Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:41:36.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Salman Hussain
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College
Anil Markandya
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Luke Brander
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit
Alistair McVittie
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College
Rudolf de Groot
Affiliation:
Wageningen University
Olivier Vardakoulias
Affiliation:
Development and environmental economics, and nef-consulting
Alfred Wagtendonk
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit
Peter H. Verburg
Affiliation:
VU University
Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Consensus Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we look at the costs and benefits of three possible interventions that would enhance the planet's biodiversity and improve its ecosystems over the next forty years. The results are based on a study carried out across four research institutes and coordinated by the Scottish Agricultural College (Hussain et al., 2011) that combined a global biophysical model (IMAGE-GLOBIO), which analyzed the biophysical impacts of different development scenarios compared to the counterfactual, with a set of valuation studies that placed monetary values on the outcomes resulting from the different policy options in terms of biodiversity and ecosystem services (ESSs).

While reference is frequently made in the popular press to biodiversity losses, in practice it is difficult to quantify and value them. There are several studies that attempt to do this in specific cases but no one has successfully estimated the value of the loss of biodiversity at a global level. This is because the links between biodiversity and biolo-gical systems and the economic and social values that they support are extremely complex. Even the measurement of biodiversity is problematic, with a multi-dimensional metric regarded as appropriate (Purvis and Hector, 2000; Mace et al., 2003), but with further work considered necessary to define the appropriate combination.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Problems, Smart Solutions
Costs and Benefits
, pp. 72 - 136
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkemade, R., van Oorschot, M., Miles, L., Nellemann, C., Bakkenes, M., and B. ten Brink, , 2009: GLOBIO3: a framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss, Ecosystems 12, 374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. and Grigera, S., 2005: Analysis of soil fertility and management effects on yields of wheat and corn in the rolling Pampa of Argentina, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 191, 321–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A., Brown, S., Loisel, C., Peskett, L., Streck, C., and Zarin, D., 2009: Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): an options assessment report, Meridian Institute, Washington, DC
Bai, Z. G., Dent, D. L., Olsson, L., and Schaepman, M. E., 2008: Global Assessment of Land Degradation and Improvement 1: Identification by Remote Sensing, Report 2008/01, FAO/ISRIC, Rome and Wageningen
Bakkes, J. A., Bosch, P. R., Bouwman, A. F. E., den Elzen, M. G. J., Janssen, P. H. M., Isaac, M., Klein Goldewijk, K., Kram, T., de Leeuw, F. A. A. M., Olivier, J. G. J., van Oorschot, M. M. P., Stehfest, E. E., van Vuuren, D. P., Bagnoli, P, Chateau, J., Corfee-Morlot, J., and Kim, Y. G., 2008: Background Report to the OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030: Overviews, Details, and Methodology of Model-based Analysis, PBL Report 500113001/2008, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
Balmford, A., Gaston, K. J., Blyth, S., James, A., and Kapos, V., 2003: Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 1046–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreto, P., Amaral, P., Vidal, E., and Uhl, C., 1998: Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia, Forest Ecology and Management 108, 9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrio, M. and Loureiro, M. L., 2010: A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies, Ecological Economics 69, 1023–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, I. J. and Jones, A. P., 2003: Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values, Land Economics, 79, 235–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, W., 2009: The Food Wars, Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
Blaser, J. and Robledo, C., 2007: Initial Analysis on the Mitigation Potential in the Forestry Sector, Report Prepared for the UNFCCC Secretariat, New York
Boucher, D., 2008: What REDD Can Do: The Economics and Development of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Brander, L. M., Florax, J. G. M., and Vermaat, J. E., 2006: The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and meta-analysis of the literature, Environmental and Resource Economics, 33, 223–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, L. M., Brauer, I., Gerdes, H., Ghermandi, A., Kuik, O., Markandya, A., Navrud, S., Nunes, P. A. L. D., Schaafsma, M., Vos, H., and Wagtendonk, A., 2011: Using meta-analysis and GIS for value transfer and scaling up: valuing climate change induced losses of European wetlands, Environmental and Resource Economics 52, 395–413,
Brock, W. A. and Xepapadeas, A., 2003: Valuing biodiversity from an economic perspective: a unified economic, ecological, and genetic approach, The American Economic Review 93, 1597–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunckhorst, D., 2000: Bioregional Planning: Resource Management Beyond the New Millennium, Harwood Academic, SydneyGoogle Scholar
Bruner, A. and Naidoo, R., 2007: Review on the economics of biodiversity loss: scoping the science: review of the costs of conservation, European Commission, ENV/070307/2007/486089/ETU/B2, Brussels
Bruner, A., Gullison, R., and Balmford, A., 2004: Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries, BioScience 54, 119–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, A., Naidoo, R., and Balmford, A., 2008: Review on the economics of biodiversity loss: scoping the science. Review of the costs of conservation and priorities for action, European Commission, ENV/070307/2007/486089/ETU/B2
Brussaard, L., Caron, P., Campbell, B., Lipper, L., Mainka, S., Rabbinge, R., Babin, D., and Pulleman, M., 2010: Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2 34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carret, J. C. and Loyer, D., 2003: Comment financer durablement les aires protégées à Madagascar?Agence Française de Dévelopement (AFD) Notes et Etudes 3, ParisGoogle Scholar
Chomitz, K., 2006: At Loggerheads?: Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Coad, L., Burgess, N., Fish, L., Ravilious, C., Corrigan, C., Pavese, H., Granziera, A., and Besan&c.¸on, C., 2009a: Progress on the Convention on Biological Diversity Terrestrial 2010 and Marine 2012 Targets for Protected Area Coverage, WWF Reports, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Coad, L., Burgess, N. D., Loucks, C., Fish, L., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Duarte, L. B., and Besançon, C., 2009b: The Ecological Representativeness of the Global Protected Areas Estate in 2009: Progress towards the CBD 2010 Target, UNEP–WCMC, WWFUS and ECI, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
Criqui, P., Mima, S., and Viguier, L., 1999: Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model, Energy Policy 27, 585–601
Dixon, J., Gulliver, A., Gibbon, D., 2001: Farming systems and poverty: improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world, FAO and World Bank, Rome and Washington, DC
Dreyfus, F., Plencovich, C., and Petit, M. (eds.), 2009: Historical analysis of the effectiveness of AKST systems in promoting innovation, in McIntyre, B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., and Watson, R. T. (eds), Agriculture at Crossroads: International Assessment for Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology, Island Press, Washington, DC
Easterly, W., 2001: The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Eliash, J., 2008: Climate Change: Financing Global Forests, UK Treasury, London, Crown Copyright 2008
Evenson, R. E. and Gollin, D., 2003: Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000, Science 300, 758–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faith, D. P. and Walker, P. A., 1996: Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areas, Biodiversity and Conservation 5, 431–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO, 2001: Global forest resources assessment 2000: main report, FAO Forestry Paper 140, FAO, Rome
FAO 2006: Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, FAO, Rome
Ferraro, P. J., 2002: The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar, Ecological Economics 43, 261–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R., Byerlee, D., and Edmeades, G. O., 2009: Can Technology Deliver on the Yield Challenge to 2050?, FAO, Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050, FAO, Rome
Galindo, J. et al., 2005: Análisis de Necesidades de Financiamiento del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (SNAP) del Ecuador, Mentefactura, QuitoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, E., 2008: The Gallagher Review: The Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production, Renewable Fuels Agency, Report to the UK Secretary of State for Transport, London
Goklany, I. M., 1998: Saving habitat and conserving biodiversity on a crowded planet, Bioscience 48, 941–53
Gomez, K., 2009: Co-benefits of Collateral Damage? The Potential Impacts on the Wellbeing of Forest-dependent People under Different Shades of REDD, Center for Environmental, Policy and Development, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Research Reports, SOAS, LondonGoogle Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M., 2006: The Cost of Avoiding Deforestation: Report Prepared for the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change, International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M. 2008: The Cost of Avoiding Deforestation: Update of the Report Prepared for the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change, International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M., 2010: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being, in Raffaelli, D. and Frid, C. (eds.), Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. M., 1996: World agricultural futures: regional sustainability and ecological limits, Ecological Economics 17, 95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, J., 2009: Global Warming, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, S. S., Winrow-Giffin, A., Moran, D., Robinson, L. A., Fofana, A., Paramor, O. A. L., and Frid, C. L. J., 2010: An ex ante ecological economic assessment of the benefits arising from marine protected areas designation in the UK, Ecological Economics 69, 828–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, S. S., McVittie, A., Brander, L., Vardakoulias, O., Wagtendonk, A., Verburg, P., Tinch, R., Fofana, A., Baulcomb, C., and Mathieu, L. 2011: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Quantitative Assessment, Draft Final Report to UNDEP, New York
IAASTD, 2009: Agriculture at a crossroads: global report, McIntyre, B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., and Watson, R. T. (eds.), International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
IPCC, 2007: Mitigation, IPCC, Geneva
van Ittersum, M., Leffelaar, P. A., van Keulen, H., Kropff, M. J., Bastiaans, L., and Goudriaan, J., 2003: On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models, European Journal of Agronomy 18, 201–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A., Gaston, K., and Balmford, A., 1999: Balancing the Earth's accounts, Nature 401, 323–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, A., Gaston, K. J. and Balmford, A. 2001: Can we afford to conserve biodiversity?, BioScienceBioscience, 51, 43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karousakis, K., 2009: Promoting biodiversity co-benefits in REDD, OECD Environment Working Papers 11, OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, B., Carberry, P., Bindraban, P., Asseng, S., Meinke, H., and Dixon, J., 2010: Eco-efficient agriculture: concepts, challenges, and opportunities, Crop Science 50, S-1–S-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindermann, et al., 2008: Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 10302–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitayama, K., 2008: Risks and co-benefits of biodiversity conservation in REDD, Meeting of the ad-hoc technical expert group on biodiversity and climate change, Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), London
Lambin, E., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C, George, P., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E. F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P. S., Richards, J. F., Skanes, H., Steffen, W., Stone, G. D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T. A., Vogel, C., and Xu, J., 2001: The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths, Journal of Global Environmental Change 11, 261–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letourneau, A., 2010: MSc student at Wageningen University, personal communication
Lewandrowski, J., Darwin, R. F., Tsigas, M., and Raneses, A., 1999: Estimating costs of protecting global ecosystem diversity, Ecological Economics 29, 111–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindhjem, H. and Navrud, S., 2008: How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?, Ecological Economics 66, 425–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, G. M., Gittleman, J. L., and Purvis, A., 2003: Preserving the tree of life, Science 300, 1707–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matson, P. A. and Vitousek, P. M., 2006: Agricultural intensification: will land spared from farming be land spared for nature?, Journal of Conservation Biology 20, 709–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., and Swift, M. J., 1997: Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties, Science 277, 504–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, K. S., 2000: The diversity–stability debate, Nature 405, 228–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., and Watson, R. T. (eds.), 2009: Agriculture at a crossroads: International assessment for agricultural knowledge, science and technology, Island Press, Washington, DC
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Island Press, Washington, DC
Morris, M., Kelly, V. A., Kopicki, R. J., and Byerlee, D., 2007: Fertilizer Use in African Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Good Practice Guide, World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, D. C., DeFries, R., and Shimabukuro, Y. E., 2006: Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103, 14637–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naidoo, R. and Iwamura, T., 2007: Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: implications for conservation priorities, Biological Conservation 140, 40–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P.-G., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T., and Rouget, M., 2006: Integrating economic costs into conservation planning, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 681–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R. E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T. R., and Ricketts, T. H., 2008: Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 105, 9495–9500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann, K., Verburg, P. H., Sethfest, H., E. and Muller, C., 2010: The yield gap of global grain production: a spatial analysis, Agricultural Systems 103, 316–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. and Yang, Z., 1996: A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate change strategies, American Economic Review 886, 741–65Google Scholar
OECD, 2009: OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030, OECD, Paris
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D’Amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R., 2001: Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth, Bioscience 51, 933–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagiola, S. and Bosquet, B., 2009: Estimating the costs of REDD at the country level, World Bank, Working PapersGoogle Scholar
Pardey, G., Alston, J. M., and Pigott, R. (eds.), 2006: Agricultural R&D in the Developing World: Too Little, too Late?, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., and Verma, M., 2010: The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity, in The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations (Chapter 5, TEEB Ecological and Economic Foundations Report), FSD and Wageningen University
PBL, 2010: Rethinking Global Biodiversity Strategies: Exploring Structural Changes in Production and Consumption to Reduce Biodiversity Loss, Netherlands Environmental ASSESSMENT Agency,
Pearce, D., 2007: Do we really care about biodiversity?, Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1), 313–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Ploeg, S., Wang, Y., and de Groot, D., 2010: The TEEB Valuation Database: An Introduction and Overview of Data and Results, Final Report for TEEB D0 Report, FSD and Wageningen University
Purvis, A. and Hector, A., 2000: Getting the measure of biodiversity, Nature 405, 212–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rist, G., 2001: The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith, Zed Books London, 1st English edn., 1997
Rosegrant, M. W., Fernandez, M., and Sinha, A., 2009: Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST, in McIntyre, B., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., and Watson, R. T. (eds.), Agriculture at a Crossroads: International Assessment for Agricultural Knowledge, Science and TechnologyIsland Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, J. V., 2005: Análisis de las Necesidades de Financiamiento del SINANPE 2005–2014, PROFONANPE, LimaGoogle Scholar
sCBD, PBL, 2007: Cross-roads of Life on Earth: Exploring Means to Meet the 2010 Biodiversity Target. Solution-oriented Scenarios for Global Biodiversity Outlook 2, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (sCBD), Montreal and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Bilthoven
Schmidhuber, J., Bruinsma, J., and Boedeker, G., 2009: Capital Requirements for Agriculture in Developing Countries to 2050, FAO, Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A., Friedl, M., and Potere, D., 2009: A new map of global urban extent from MODIS data, Environmental Research Letters 4, article 044003
Schneider, A., Friedl, M., and Potere, D., 2010: Monitoring urban areas globally using MODIS 500m data: new methods and datasets based on “urban ecoregions,” Remote Sensing of Environment 114, 1733–46
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., and Haan, C., 2006: Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
Stern, N., 2007: The Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strassburg, B., Turner, K., Fisher, B., Schaeffer, R., and Lovett, A., 2008: An empirically-derived mechanism of combined incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation, CSERGE Working Paper, ECM 08–01, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
TEEB, 2008: An Interim Report, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
TEEB, 2010: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, Kumar, P. (ed.), Earthscan, London and Washington, DC
Ten Brink, P. (ed.), 2011: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making, Earthscan, London and Washington, DC
Tilman, D. and Downing, J. A., 1994: Biodiversity and stability in grasslands, Nature 367, 363–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNEP, 2009: The Environmental Food Crisis: The Environment's Role in Averting Future Food Crises, UNEP, GRID-Arendal
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., and Melillo, J. M., 1997: Human domination of earth's ecosystems, Science 277, 494–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Ploeg, S., Wang, Y., and de Groot, D., 2010: The TEEB Valuation Database: An Introduction and Overview of Data and Results, TEEB Ecological and Economic Foundations Report, FSD and Wageningen University, Wageningen
van Vuuren, D. P. and Faber, A., 2009: Growing within Limits. A Report to the Global Assembly 2009 of the Club of Rome, Netherlands Environmental Agency, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
World Bank, 2002: Costing the 7th Millennium Development Goal: ensure environmental sustainability, Environment Department and Development Economics Research Group. World Bank, Washington, DC (restricted)
World Bank 2010: World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC, , accessed August 27, 2010

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×