Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T05:37:19.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Factors Motivating Students to Become Secondary School Teachers

Evidence from Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

Helen M. G. Watt
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Paul W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Kari Smith
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Like many countries, Norway has a shortage of qualified teachers. While national authorities have taken action to increase enrolment–for instance, recruitment campaigns–many colleges and universities struggle to attract qualified candidates to their teacher education programs. Therefore, there is a need for research that examines students’ motivation to become teachers and how different motivational factors interact with and influence one another. In this chapter, we present selected results from a survey based on a sample of student teachers studying to teach secondary school in Norway. Factors that were highest rated are emphasised and discussed in relation to theory and findings from other countries. In general, results indicate that motivations to teach among Norwegian student teachers do not differ substantially from those of future teachers in other countries. Second, we accompany the aforementioned discussion with additional data that extend the current understanding of how students think about their careers and study choices during the process of applying for teacher education programs. The results suggest that many student teachers are very conscious of their career choice; further, subject interest may be a main motivator for student teachers approaching secondary education. Third, we investigate how various concepts may be interconnected; more specifically, we examine the relations between gender, intrinsic value, competence perception, and altruism. Results indicate that there are gender differences in altruistic motivation and that individuals who enjoy teaching often want to work with children. Moreover, teaching ability motivation is a stronger predictor of altruistic values than intrinsic value for teaching. Finally, altruistic values are related to their parents’ occupations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergem, T., Björkqvist, O., Hansén, S. E., Carlgren, I. & Hauge, T. E. (1997). Research on teachers and teacher education in Scandinavia: a retrospective review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41(3–4), 433–58. doi:10.1080/0031383970410316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. -L. & D’Ascoli, Y. (2012). Becoming a vet teacher as a second career: investigating the determinants of career choice and their relation to perceptions about prior occupation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 317–41. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspersen, J., Aamodt, P. O., Vibe, N. & Carlsten, T. C. (2014). Kompetanse og praksis blant norske lærere: Resultater fra talis-undersøkelsen i 2013 [Competence and practice among Norwegian teachers: Results from TALIS 2013]. Oslo: NIFU.Google Scholar
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In Csíkszentmihályi, M. & Csíkszentmihályi, I. S. (eds.), Optimal Experience (pp. 1535). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11(4), 227–68. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104-01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 105–21). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 7889. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E. & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183201. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.1990.tb01929.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–32. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N. & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100–31. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.94.1.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. & Canrinus, E. T. (2012). The factors influencing teaching (FIT)-Choice scale in a Dutch teacher education program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 249–69. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønmo, L. S., Bergem, O. K., Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S. & Turmo, A. (2004). TIMSS 2003, hva i all verden har skjedd i realfagene?[TIMSS 2003, What has happen with the subjects of science and matematics]. Universitetet i Oslo Press.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300–12. doi:10.1037/0012–1649.17.3.300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, M. E. & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 431–41. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.90.3.431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A. & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition: Integrative Perpectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development (pp. 89115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jugović, I., Marušić, I., Pavin Ivanec, T. & Vizek Vidović, V. (2012). Motivation and personality of preservice teachers in Croatia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 271–87. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kılınç, A., Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2012). Factors influencing teaching choice in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 199226. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J. & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289301. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001Google Scholar
Kyriacou, C. & Coulthard, M. (2000). Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career choice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(2), 117–26. doi:10.1080/02607470050127036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. & Rothland, M. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: effects on general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 289315. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, S., Kjærnsli, M., Roe, A. & Turmo, A. (2001). Godt rustet for framtida? Norske 15-åringers kompetanse i lesing og realfag i et internasjonalt perspektiv (pisa 2000). Universitetet i Oslo Press.Google Scholar
Lin, E., Shi, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, S. & Hui, L. (2012). Initial motivations for teaching: comparison between preservice teachers in the United States and China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 227–48. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education (1996). Lærerutdannning, mellom krav og ideal [Teacher education, between requirements and ideals]. Green paper no. 22, Ministry of Education, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2006). Og ingen sto igjen: Tidlig innsats for livslang læring [And nobody left behind: early effort toward lifelong learning]. White paper no. 16, Ministry of Education, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2012). På rett vei: Kvalitet og mangfold i fellesskolen [On the right track: quality and diversity in a school for all]. White paper no. 20, Ministry of Education, Oslo.Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzales, E. J. & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
Müller, K., Alliata, R. & Benninghoff, F. (2009). Attracting and retaining teachers: a question of motivation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 574–99. doi:10.1177/1741143209339651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møen, J., Salvanes, K. G. & Thorsen, H. S. (2012). Har kvaliteten på lærere falt over tid? [Has the teacher quality declined over time?]. Magma, 2012(6), 6271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesje, K. (2014). Teach First Norway: new models in teacher education. In Elstad, E. & Helstad, K. (eds.), Profesjonsutvikling i skolen [Professional development in school] (pp. 97113). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Nesje, K., Brandmo, C. & Berger, J.-L. (in press). Motivation to become a teacher: a Norwegian validation of the factors influencing teaching choice scale. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1080/00313831.2017.1306804Google Scholar
OECD. (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Overview. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results, Vol. II: Overcoming Social Background: Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
OECD/UNESCO (2003). Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow: Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–84. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 2756. doi:10.1080/13598660500480290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roksvaag, K. & Texmon, I. (2012). Arbeidsmarkedet for lærere og førskolelærere fram mot år 2035 [The labour market of teachers and pre-school teachers towards 2035]. Report no. 18, Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar
Roness, D. (2011). Still motivated? The motivation for teaching during the second year in the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 628–38. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.016Google Scholar
Roness, D. & Smith, K. (2009). Postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) and student motivation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 111–34. doi:10.1080/02619760902778982Google Scholar
Roness, D. & Smith, K. (2010). Stability in motivation during teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 169–85. doi:10.1080/02607471003651706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 5467. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020Google Scholar
Salvanes, K. G., Møen, J., Hægeland, T., Raaum, O. & Bjorvatn, K. (2008). Veien mot kunnskapslandet: utfordringer for det norske utdanningssystemet [The way to knowledge society: challenges of the Norwegian educational system]. Bergen: Samfunns og nærlingslivsforskning as.Google Scholar
Schwarzweller, H. K. & Lyson, T. A. (1978). Some plan to become teachers: determinants of career specification among rural youth in Norway, Germany, and the United States. Sociology of Education, 51(1), 2943. doi:10.2307/2112280Google Scholar
Statistics Norway (2013). Utdanning 2013 – fra barnehage til doktorgrad [Education 2013 – from kindergarden to PhD] (ed. Holmseth, ). Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Tiplic, D., Brandmo, C. & Elstad, E. (2015). Antecedents of Norwegian beginning teachers’ turnover intentions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(2), 451–74. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.987642Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167202. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 408–28. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.002Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U. & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: an international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 791805. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.003Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–73. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: a history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 2836. doi:10.1080/00461520903433596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265310. doi:10.1016/0273–2297(92)90011-PGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 6881. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×