Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:35:14.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Managing the knowledge transfer process: the case of Sierra and its Indian subsidiary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Sundeep Sahay
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Brian Nicholson
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
S. Krishna
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Get access

Summary

GSW: a knowledge perspective

This chapter introduces the importance of taking a knowledge perspective to understand the process of growth of a GSA. Software development in general is an example of knowledge-intensive work. When taken in the context of global separation, the knowledge intensity is magnified many times over. In addition to domain-specific product knowledge, it requires a deep understanding of the multiple local contexts involved and the ongoing and changing development requirements. Many of these requirements remain undocumented and tacitly held by individuals and groups.

The significance of the knowledge transfer process can be analysed at multiple levels: institutions, project teams and individuals. Institutional reflexivity, which Giddens (1990) has described to be a defining feature of globalization, is particularly emphasized in knowledge-intensive software development work. Continuously and reflexively, firms must monitor new knowledge about technologies, organizations and markets. They must make changes in their own processes as the situation demands. The need for continuous reflexive action is significant because of the speed at which new knowledge about software is being generated and the tremendous interconnectivity between global systems (including electronic) that facilitates the spread of new knowledge from one part of the world to others.

The knowledge perspective is equally significant at the level of project teams and the individuals in the teams. Most software development firms comprise multiple teams working with different clients, engaging in different technologies and serving various markets and products.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global IT Outsourcing
Software Development across Borders
, pp. 132 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, 25, 1, 107–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badke-Schaub, P. and Strohschneider, S. (1998). complex problem solving in the cultural context, Le Travail Humain, 61, 1, 1–28Google Scholar
Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Organizations, London: Corwin Press
Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation, Organization Studies. 16, 6, 1047–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation, Organization Science40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P.(2000). The Social Life of Information, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
Carmel, E. (1999). Global Software Teams, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Ein Dor, P., Segev, E. and Orgad, M. (1993). The effect of national culture on information systems: implications for international information systems, Journal of Global Information Management, 1, 1, 33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press
Giddens, A.(1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press
Heeks, R., Krishna, S., Nicholson, B. and Sahay, S. (2001). ‘Synching’ or ‘sinking’: trajectories and strategies in gobal software outsourcing relationships, Institution of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Software, 18, 2, 54–62Google Scholar
Lam, A. (1997). Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures, Organization Studies 18, 6, 973–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1993). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York: Cambridge University Press
Little, S. (2001). Conclusion: managing knowledge in a global framework, in S. Little, P. Quintas and T. Ray (eds.), Managing Knowledge. An Essential Reader, London: Sage, 368–89
Massey, D. (1995). Space, Place and Gender, Cambridge: Polity Press
Maznevski, M. and Chudoba, K. (2000). Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness, Organization Science, 11, 5, 473–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, B. (1999). The Process of Software Development across Time and Space: The Case of Outsourcing to India, unpublished PhD thesis, Salford University, United Kingdom
Nicholson, B. and Sahay, S. (2001). The political and cultural implications of the globalisation of software development: case experience from United Kingdom and India, Information and Organisation, 11, 1, 25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, J. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: community memory in a service culture, in D. Middleton and D. Edwards (eds.), Collective Remembering, London: Sage, 169–89
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post Critical Philosophy, New York: Harper Torchbooks
Polanyi, M.(1966). The Tacit Dimension, New York: Anchor Day Books
Sinha, D. and Sinha, M. (1990). Dissonance in work culture in India, in A. D. Moddie (ed.), The Concept of Work in Indian Society, New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 206–19
Sinha, J. B. P. (1984). A model of effective leadership styles, India International Studies of Man and Organizations, 14, 86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 3, 339–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telioglu, H. and Wagner, I. (1999). Software cultures, Communications of the Association of Computing Manufacturers, 42, 12, 71–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition, Bristol: Intellect Books
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, New York: Basic Books

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×