Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:36:59.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The USPTO and JPO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Peter Drahos
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

The USPTO

The USPTO is the oldest examining office in the world. As we saw in Chapter 3 the US committed itself to substantive examination in 1790 and has stayed with it, aside from its experiment with a registration-only system from 1793 to 1836. It has, therefore, the longest experience of the problems of an examination system. An examiner travelling in time from the nineteenth century to the USPTO building in twenty-first century Alexandria, Virginia would see, once he had gotten over the marvel of computers and automatically flushing toilets, the same basic problems that confronted the office in the nineteenth century. These problems include finding and classifying prior art, retaining a sufficient number of trained examiners, dealing with a backlog of applications and coping with the gaming behaviour of the users of the system. These problems have proved to be remarkably persistent.

The US patent system in the blink of an eye

The US patent system has deeper constitutional roots than other patent systems. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution states: ‘To promote the Progress of Science and Useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.’ As one US Supreme Court decision has put it, by ‘constitutional command’ the patent system must serve the progress of useful arts. The clause is also consistent with the social value conception of the patent contract that was argued for in Chapter 1.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Global Governance of Knowledge
Patent Offices and their Clients
, pp. 144 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Merrill, Stephen A., Levin, Richard C. and Myers, Mark B. (eds.), A Patent System for the 21st Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004
Lemley, Mark A. and Moore, Kimberly A., ‘Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations’, 82 (2004) B.U. L. Rev., 63Google Scholar
Fenning, Karl, ‘Growth of American Patents’, 52 (1925–26) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 52, 54Google Scholar
Keel, Chas H., ‘Patent Office Backlog’, 30 (1948) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 73–5Google Scholar
Rosa, Manuel C., ‘Patent Office Organization, Viewpoint and Classification31 (1949) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 414Google Scholar
Owen, Richard B., Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Departmental Practice, Washington, New York, 1925
Lanham, B.E., ‘Chemical Patent Searches,’ 34 (1952) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 315, 315–16Google Scholar
Thurber, W. L. (Examiner), ‘A Suggestion for Improving Patent Office Searches’, 1 (1918–19) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 167–8Google Scholar
Wyman, Wm. I., ‘Examiners’ Salaries', 1 (1918–19) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 392–5Google Scholar
Sweet, Donald H., ‘On Delay in the Issuance of Patents’, 7 (1924–5) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 535Google Scholar
Ballard, William R., ‘Money for the Patent Office’, 37 (1955) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 435Google Scholar
Giunta, Peter L., ‘Quid Pro Whoa!: An Exponential Fee Structure for Patent Applications’, 25 (2004) Cardozo L. Rev., 2317, 2337–8Google Scholar
Brenner, Edward J., ‘Patent Office Activities during Fiscal year 1966 – Outlook for Fiscal Year 1967’, 48 (1966) Journal of the Patent Office Society, 475Google Scholar
Ordover, Janusz A., ‘A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion’, 5 (1991) Journal of Economic Perspectives, 43Google Scholar
Arai, Hisamitsu, ‘Intellectual Property Policies for the Twenty-First Century: The Japanese Experience in Wealth Creation’, 3 (2000) Journal of World Intellectual Property, 423Google Scholar
Wantanabe, M. and ,IP Study Group of Tsukuni & Associates, How to Read and Write Japanese Patent Specifications in Chemistry and Biotechnology, Maruzen Planet Co. Ltd, Tokyo, 2007
Heath, Christopher, ‘Industrial Policy and Intellectual Property in Japan and Beyond’ in Antons, Christoph (ed.), Law and Development in East and Southeast Asia, Routledge Curzon, London and New York, 2003
Granstrand, Ove, The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, UK, 1999
Branstetter, Lee G., ‘Do Stronger Patents Induce More Local Innovation?’ in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome H. (eds.), International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005
Ritchie, Frederick M., ‘So, You Want A Commercially Important Patent in Japan!’, 74 (1992) Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 186Google Scholar
Helfand, Michael Todd, ‘How Valid Are U.S. Criticisms of the Japanese Patent System?’, 15 (1992) Hastings Communications and Environmental Law Journal, 123, 150Google Scholar
Dore, Jean-Christophe, Dutheuil, Christian, Miquel, Jean-Francois, ‘Multidimensional analysis of trends in patent activity’, 47 (2000) Scientometrics, 475, 486Google Scholar
Kitamura, Hiroki and Shimizu, Yuki, ‘Outline of the Proposed New Route for Patent Applications Abroad’, 31 (2006) AIPPI Journal, 55Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The USPTO and JPO
  • Peter Drahos, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: The Global Governance of Knowledge
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676581.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The USPTO and JPO
  • Peter Drahos, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: The Global Governance of Knowledge
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676581.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The USPTO and JPO
  • Peter Drahos, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: The Global Governance of Knowledge
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676581.006
Available formats
×