Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:55:30.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Landslide hazards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Irasema Alcántara-Ayala
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City
Andrew S. Goudie
Affiliation:
St Cross College, Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Landslides are naturally occurring phenomena in every environment on Earth, including the tropics, the temperate regions and the high latitudes, and in the oceans. Unfortunately, this ubiquitous natural process represents a substantial hazard to humans because people and structures have a surprisingly low capacity to withstand the forces generated by mobile soil and/or rock. In consequence, there is a long recorded history of landslide disasters – for example, Nihon Shoki (the ancient chronicle of Japan), which was completed in the year AD 720, describes numerous landslides and failures associated with the Hakuho earthquake on 29 November AD 684, whilst the city of Helike in Greece is believed to have been submerged and destroyed as a result of a submarine landslide in 373 BC. Today, landslides continue to inflict a substantial economic and social toll, especially in mountainous, less developed countries, and there is a widely held but admittedly poorly quantified expert perception that the impacts associated with mass movements are increasing rapidly with time.

The term landslide is unfortunately something of a misnomer as many landslides do not in reality involve sliding. The word landslide is used to describe a range of processes that result in downward and outward movement of slope-forming material composed of rock, soil and artificial materials. In this context the term ‘mass movement’ might be preferable, but here the term landslide will be retained as it is in such common use in this context.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardet, J.-P., Synolakis, C. E., Davies, H. L., Imamura, F. and Okal, E. A. (2003). Landslide tsunamis: recent findings and research directions. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, 1793–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, L. and Soldati, M. (2002). The influence of Holocene climatic changes on landslide occurrence in Europe. In Rybar, J., Stemberk, J. and Wagner, P. (eds.), Landslides. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
Brooks, S. M., Crozier, M. J., Glade, T. W. and Anderson, M. G. (2004). Towards establishing climatic thresholds for slope instability: use of a physically-based combined soil hydrology-slope stability model. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 161, 881–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsden, D. (2002). Geomorphological roulette for engineers and planners: some insights into an old game. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 101–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsden, D., Doornkamp, J. C., Fookes, P. G., Jones, D. K. C. and Kelly, J. M. H. (1975). Large scale geomorphological mapping and highway engineering design. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 8, 227–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. M., Moore, R., Petley, D. N. and Siddle, H. J. (2007). Pre-failure behaviour of slope materials and their significance in the progressive failure of landslides. In McInnes, R., Jakeways, J., Fairbank, H. and Mathie, E. (eds.), Landslides and Climate Change: Challenges and Solutions. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 207–215.Google Scholar
Catani, F., Farina, P., Moretti, S., Nico, G. and Strozzi, T. (2005). On the application of SAR interferometry to geomorphological studies: estimation of landform attributes and mass movements. Geomorphology, 66, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, K. T., Chiang, S. H. and Hsu, M. L. (2007). Modeling typhoon- and earthquake-induced landslides in a mountainous watershed using logistic regression. Geomorphology, 89, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadson, S., Hovius, N., Chen, H., et al. (2003). Links between erosion, runoff variability and seismicity in the Taiwan orogen. Nature, 426, 648–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fookes, P. G. and Dale, S. G. (1992). Comparison of interpretations of a major landslide at an earthfill dam site in Papua New Guinea. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 25, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fookes, P. G., Dale, S. G and Land, J. M. (1991). Some observations on a comparative aerial-photography interpretation of a landslipped area. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 24, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. S., Hutchinson, J. N., Brunsden, D., Petley, D. J. and Fookes, P. G. (2004). The reactivation of a landslide during the construction of the Ok Ma tailings dam, Papua New Guinea. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 37, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, G. J. (2002). Engineering geomorphology for road design in unstable mountainous areas: lessons learnt after 25 years in Nepal. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibsen, M-L. and Brunsden, D. (1996). The nature, use and problems of historical archives for the temporal occurrence of landslides, with specific reference to the south coast of Britain, Ventnor, Isle of Wight. Geomorphology, 15, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, D. K. (1994). The importance of earthquake-induced landslides to long-term slope erosion and slope-failure hazards in seismically active regions. Geomorphology, 10, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korup, O., McSaveney, M. J. and Davies, T. R. H. (2004). Sediment generation and delivery from large historic landslides in the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 61, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. (1999). Classic and new dating methods for assessing the temporal occurrence of mass movements. Geomorphology, 30, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J-C, Petley, D. N., Jen, C-H. and Hsu, M-L. (2006). Slope movements in a dynamic environment: A case study of Tachia river, Central Taiwan. Quaternary International, 147, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynett, P. J., Borrero, J. C., Liu, P. L.-F. and Synolakis, C. E. (2003). Field survey and numerical simulations: a review of the 1998 Papua New Guinea earthquake and tsunami. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, 2119–2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F. and Reichenbach, P. (2004). Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 29, 687–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. A., McSaveney, M., Zondervan, A.et al. (2007). The Keylong Serai rock avalanche, NW Indian Himalaya: geomorphology and palaeoseismic implications. Landslides, 4, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petley, D. N., Dunning, S. A. and Rosser, N. J. (2005a). The analysis of global landslide risk through the creation of a database of worldwide landslide fatalities. In Hungr, O., Fell, R., Couture, R. and Eberhardt, E., (eds.), Landslide Risk Management, Amsterdam: A. T. Balkema, pp. 367–374.Google Scholar
Petley, D. N., Mantovani, F., Bulmer, M. H. K. and Zannoni, F. (2005b). The interpretation of landslide monitoring data for movement forecasting. Geomorphology, 66, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petley, D. N., Hearn, G. J., Hart, A.et al. (2007). Trends in landslide occurrence in Nepal. Natural Hazards, 43, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliavini, F., Mantovani, M., Marcato, G., Pasuto, A. and Silvano, S. (2007). Validation of landslide hazard assessment by means of GPS monitoring technique: a case study in the Dolomites (Eastern Alps, Italy). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 7, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varnes, D. J. (1978). Slope movement types and processes. In Schuster, R. L. and Krizek, R. J. (eds.), Landslides, Analysis and Control. Transportation Research Board Sp. Rep. No. 176, National Academy of Sciences, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×