Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:35:18.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Technological Impacts of Space Weather

from Part IV - Space Weather

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2019

Mioara Mandea
Affiliation:
Centre National d'études Spatiales, France
Monika Korte
Affiliation:
GeoforschungsZentrum, Helmholtz-Zentrum, Potsdam
Andrew Yau
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Eduard Petrovsky
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Get access

Summary

Over the past decade, policy-makers around the world have recognised that space weather is a natural hazard that poses a significant risk to modern societies. This chapter outlines how this risk has gradually developed over nearly 200 years through impacts on technological systems, and now affects a diverse set of technologies, including systems vital to provision of power, transport and communications. It illustrates the importance of these impacts through detailed examination of some key impact areas, looking at the physics that creates these impacts as well their societal consequences. The areas examined include (a) the impact of geomagnetically induced currents on electrically-grounded infrastructures such as electric power grids and railway track circuits, (b) the disruption of satellite navigation by space-weather-induced changes in the upper atmosphere, and (c) the impact of space radiation on satellites, on aircraft and on ground systems. A final section reviews our wider knowledge of space weather impacts and discusses how this can be applied, and improved, to meet future challenges. It stresses the need for improved socio-economic assessments of space weather impacts to aid decision-making and, in particular, to assess the value of investment in improved forecasting and other systems for mitigation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Geomagnetism, Aeronomy and Space Weather
A Journey from the Earth's Core to the Sun
, pp. 251 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. N. (1928). Correlation of long wave transatlantic radio transmission with other factors affected by solar activity. Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 16, 297347. doi: 10.1109/JRPROC.1928.221400Google Scholar
ATSB (Australian Transport Safety Bureau) (2011). In-flight upset, 154 km west of Learmonth, Western Australia, 7 October 2008, VH-QPA, Airbus A330-303. Report AO-2008–070.Google Scholar
Baker, D. N., et al. (2013). A major solar eruptive event in July 2012: Defining extreme space weather scenarios. Space Weather 11, 585–91. doi: 10.1002/swe.20097.Google Scholar
Barlow, W. H. (1849). On the spontaneous electrical currents observed in wires of the electric telegraph. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 139, 6172. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1849.0006Google Scholar
BIRA-IASB (2016). The eccentric dipole model. www.spenvis.oma.be/help/background/magfield/cd.html#ED.Google Scholar
Bolduc, L. (2002). GIC observations and studies in the Hydro-Québec power system. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 64, 17931802. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00128-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, R. J., et al. (2015). Online NARMAX model for electron fluxes at GEO. Ann. Geophys. 33, 405–11. doi: 10.5194/angeo-33-405-2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, P., et al. (2013). Extreme Space Weather: Impacts on Engineered Systems and Infrastructure. UK Royal Academy of Engineering, London.Google Scholar
Carrington, R. C. (1859). Description of a singular appearance seen in the Sun on September 1. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 20, 1315. doi: 10.1093/mnras/20.1.13Google Scholar
Carter, B. A., et al. (2015). Interplanetary shocks and the resulting geomagnetically induced currents at the equator. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6554–9. doi: 10.1002/2015GL065060.Google Scholar
Clauer, C. R. and Siscoe, G.. (2006). The great historical geomagnetic storm of 1859: A modern look. Adv. Space Res. 38, 115388.Google Scholar
Davis, T. N. and Sugiura, M. (1966). Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations. J. Geophys. Res. 71(3), 785801, doi: 10.1029/JZ071i003p00785.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. S., et al. (2007). Solar particle events in the QinetiQ atmospheric radiation model. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54, 1071–5. doi: 10/1109/TNS.2007.893537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, C., et al. (2018). Extreme atmospheric radiation environments & single event effects. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2017.2761258.Google Scholar
Eastwood, J. P., et al. (2018). Quantifying the economic value of space weather forecasting for power grids: An exploratory study. Space Weather 16, 2052–67. doi: 10.1029/2018SW002003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erinmez, I. A., et al. (2002). Management of the geomagnetically induced current risks on the national grid company’s electric power transmission system. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 64, 743–56. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00036-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eroshenko, E. A., et al. (2010). Effects of strong geomagnetic storms on Northern railways in Russia. Adv. Space Res. 46, 1102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.05.017.Google Scholar
Gaunt, C. T. (2014). Reducing uncertainty – responses for electricity utilities to severe solar storms. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 4, A01. doi: 10.1051/swsc/2013058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, C. T. and Coetzee, G. (2007). Transformer failures in regions incorrectly considered to have low GIC-risk, presented at the IEEE Powertech Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, July. doi: 10.1109/PCT.2007.4538419.Google Scholar
Gauthier, L., et al. (2001). EGNOS: The first step in Europe’s contribution to the global navigation satellite system. ESA Bull. 105, 3542. http://esamultimedia.esa.int/multimedia/publications/ESA-Bulletin-105/.Google Scholar
Gold, T. and Palmer, D. R. (1956). The solar outburst, 23 February 1956 – Observations by the Royal Greenwich Observatory. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 8, 287–90.Google Scholar
Guillon, S., Toner, P., Gibson, L. and Boteler, D. (2016). A colorful blackout: The havoc caused by auroral electrojet generated magnetic field variations in 1989. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 14(6), 5971. doi: 10.1109/MPE.2016.259176.Google Scholar
Hambling, D. (2014). Burnout. New Scientist 223, 42–5. doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(14)61863-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapgood, M. (2017a). Space Weather. IOP Publishing, Bristol. doi: 10.1088/978-0-7503-1372-8.Google Scholar
Hapgood, M. (2017b). Satellite navigation – Amazing technology but insidious risk: Why everyone needs to understand space weather. Space Weather 15, 545–8. doi: 10.1002/2017SW001638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapgood, M. (2019). The Great Storm of May 1921: an Exemplar of a Dangerous Space Weather Event. Space Weather 17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapgood, M., et al. (2016). Summary of space weather worst-case environments. Revised edition. RAL Technical Report RAL-TR-2016-06. http://purl.org/net/epubs/work/25015281.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. (1859). On a curious appearance seen in the Sun. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 20, 1516. doi: 10.1093/mnras/20.1.15.Google Scholar
Horne, R. B., et al. (2013). Space weather impacts on satellites and forecasting the Earth’s electron radiation belts with SPACECAST. Space Weather 11, 169–86. doi: 10.1002/swe.20023.Google Scholar
HSE (Health and Safety Executive) (1992). The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. www.onr.org.uk/documents/tolerability.pdf.Google Scholar
Jakowski, N., et al. (2008). Large-scale ionospheric gradients over Europe observed in October 2003, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 70, 18941903. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.03.020.Google Scholar
Karsberg, A., et al. (1959). The Influences of Earth Magnetic Currents on Telecommunication Lines. English edn. Televerket, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kintner, P. M., Ledvina, B. M. and de Paula, E. R. (2007). GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather 5, S09003. doi: 10.1029/2006SW000260.Google Scholar
Klobuchar, J. A. (1987). Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency GPS users. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-23, 325–31. doi: 10.1109/TAES.1987.310829Google Scholar
Knipp, D. J., et al. (2016). The May 1967 great storm and radio disruption event: Extreme space weather and extraordinary responses. Space Weather 14, 614–33. doi: 10.1002/2016SW001423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosik, J. C. (1994). Maglib User’s Guide. Version 2. CNES, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Krausmann, E., et al. (2015). Space weather and rail: Findings and outlook. EU Joint Research Centre report 98155. doi: 10.2788/211456Google Scholar
Liu, L., et al. (2016). Analysis of the monitoring data of geomagnetic storm interference in the electrification system of a high-speed railway. Space Weather 14, 754–63. doi: 10.1002/2016SW001411.Google Scholar
Loh, R., et al. (1995). The U.S. Wide-Area Augmentation System (WAAS). Navigation 42, 435–65. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.1995.tb01900.xGoogle Scholar
Luntama, J., et al. 2017. Report on the ESA Space-Weather Socio-Economic Study. www.ukssdc.ac.uk/meetings/L5InTandemWithL1/talks/session01/04_SSA%20SWE%20CBA%20Study.pptx.Google Scholar
Marsden, P.L., et al. (1956). Variation of cosmic-ray nucleon intensity during the disturbance of 23 February 1956. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 8, 278–81.Google Scholar
Maunder, E. W. (1900). The Royal Observatory Greenwich: A Glance at Its History and Work. Reprinted by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. E. (1961). Coordinates for mapping the distribution of magnetically trapped particles. J. Geophys. Res. 66, 3681–91. doi: 10.1029/JZ066i011p03681.Google Scholar
McNish, A. G. (1940). The magnetic storm of March 24, 1940. Terr. Magn. Atmos. Electr. 45, 359–64. doi: 10.1029/TE045i003p00359.Google Scholar
Meredith, N. P., Horne, R. B., Isles, J. D. and Rodriguez, J. V. (2015), Extreme relativistic electron fluxes at geosynchronous orbit: Analysis of GOES E >2 MeV electrons. Space Weather 13. doi: 10.1002/2014SW001143.Google Scholar
Miyake, F., et al. (2012). A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774–775 from tree rings in Japan. Nature 486, 240–42. doi: 10.1038/nature11123.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38, 114–17.Google Scholar
Nava, B., Coisson, P. and Radicella, S. M. (2008). A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 70(15), 1856–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015.Google Scholar
NERC (North American Electrical Reliability Corporation) (2012). GMD Task Force Report: Effects of GMD on the bulk power system. www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Geomagnetic%20Disturbance%20Resources%20DL/2012_GMD_Report_112012.pdf.Google Scholar
New York Times (1921a). Sunspot credited with rail tie-up, 16 May, p. 2. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9E05E7D61E3FEE3ABC4E52DFB366838A639EDE.Google Scholar
Ngwira, C. M., et al. (2015). Characteristics of extreme geoelectric fields and their possible causes: Localized peak enhancements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6916–21. doi: 10.1002/2015GL065061.Google Scholar
Normand, E. (1997). Neutron-induced single event burnout in high voltage electronics. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 44, 2358–66. doi: 10.1109/23.659062.Google Scholar
Ott, E. (1978). Theory of Rayleigh–Taylor bubbles in the equatorial ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 2066–70. doi: 10.1029/JA083iA05p02066.Google Scholar
Oughton, E., et al. (2018). A risk assessment framework for the socio-economic impacts of electricity transmission infrastructure failure due to space weather: An application to the UK. Risk Analy.. doi: 10.1111/risa.13229.Google Scholar
Pisacane, V. L. (2016). The Space Environment and Its Effects on Space Systems. 2nd edn. AIAA, Reston, VA. doi: 10.2514/4.103537.Google Scholar
PourEVA (2003). Le Ministre DEWAEL reconnait la faillibilité du vote électronique grâce à un rayon cosmique complice! www.poureva.be/article.php3?id_article=36.Google Scholar
Preece, W. H. (1894). Earth currents. Nature 49, 554. doi: 10.1038/049554b0.Google Scholar
Pulkkinen, A., et al. (2015). Regional-scale high-latitude extreme geoelectric fields pertaining to geomagnetically induced currents. Earth Planets Space 67, 93. doi: 10.1186/s40623-015-0255-6.Google Scholar
Rao, K. N. (2007). GAGAN – The Indian satellite based augmentation system. Ind. J. Radio Space Phys. 36, 293302. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/4707.Google Scholar
Russell, C. T., et al. (2013). The very unusual interplanetary coronal mass ejection of 2012 July 23: A blast wave mediated by solar energetic particles. Astrophys. J. 770, 38. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/38.Google Scholar
Smith, P. M. (1990). Effects of geomagnetic disturbances on the national grid system. Presented at the Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).Google Scholar
Space Studies Board and National Research Council (2009). Severe Space Weather Events – Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts: A Workshop Report. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
STFC (2017). ChipIR: Instrument for rapid testing of effects of high energy neutrons. www.isis.stfc.ac.uk/instruments/chipir/chipir8471.html.Google Scholar
Stilgoe, J. (2017). Tesla crash report blames human error – this is a missed opportunity. The Guardian, 21 January. www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2017/jan/21/tesla-crash-report-blames-human-error-this-is-a-missed-opportunity.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. and Wild, J. (2010). When the lights go out … Astron. Geophys. 51, 5.23–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4004.2010.51523.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinity House (2016). Satellite navigation ground based augmentations. www.trinityhouse.co.uk/dgps.Google Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., et al. (2013). The AD775 cosmic event revisited: The Sun is to blame. Astronomy and Astrophysics 552, L3.Google Scholar
van den IJssel, J., Forte, B. & Montenbruck, O. (2016). Impact of Swarm GPS receiver updates on POD performance. Earth Planet and Space 68, 85. doi: 10.1186/s40623-016-0459-4.Google Scholar
Viljanen, A., et al. (2006a). Recordings of geomagnetically induced currents and a nowcasting service of the Finnish natural gas pipeline system. Space Weather 4, S10004. doi: 10.1029/2006SW000234.Google Scholar
Viljanen, A., et al. (2006b). Relation between substorm characteristics and rapid temporal variations of the ground magnetic field. Ann Geophys 24, 725–33. doi: 10.5194/angeo-24-725-2006.Google Scholar
Wik, M., et al. (2009). Space weather events in July 1982 and October 2003 and the effects of geomagnetically induced currents on Swedish technical systems. Ann. Geophys. 27, 1775–87. doi: 10.5194/angeo-27-1775-2009.Google Scholar
Wood, J. and Caustin, E. (2006). Timely testing avoids cosmic ray damage to critical auto electronics. www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1272752.Google Scholar
Wrubel, J. N. (1992). Monitoring program protects transformers from geomagnetic effects. IEEE Comput. Appl. Power 5, 1014. doi: 10.1109/67.111465.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. J., et al. (2015). GIC due to storm sudden commencement in low-latitude high-voltage power network in China: Observation and simulation. Space Weather 13, 643–55. doi: 10.1002/2015SW001263.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×