Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T12:44:04.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Arrigo Opocher  and
Ian Steedman
Arrigo Opocher
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Ian Steedman
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Full Industry Equilibrium
A Theory of the Industrial Long Run
 , pp. 201 - 208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R.G.D. (1938), Mathematical Analysis for Economists, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. and Hurwicz, L. (1958), ‘On the Stability of Competitive Equilibrium’, Econometrica, 24 (4): 522–52.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (2007), ‘The Distribution of Earnings in OECD Countries’, International Labour Review, 146 (1–2): 41–60.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B and Stiglitz, J.E. (1980), Lectures on Public Economics, Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Autor, D.H., Katz, L.F. and Kearney, M.S. (2006), ‘The Polarization of the US Labor Market’, American Economic Review, 96 (2): 189–94.Google Scholar
Bain, J.S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition. Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barone, E. (1992) [1894], ‘On the Analysis of Dynamic Problems’, in Pasinetti, L.L. (ed.), Italian Economic Papers, Vol. I, pp. 17–38. Bologna, Il Mulino/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bassett, L.R. and Borcherding, T.E. (1970a), ‘The Firm, the Industry, and the Long-Run Demand for Factors of Production’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 3 (1): 140–44.Google Scholar
Bassett, L.R. and Borcherding, T.E. (1970b), ‘Industry Factor Demand’, Western Economic Journal, 8 (3): 259–61.Google Scholar
Bassett, L.R. and Borcherding, T.E. (1970c), ‘The Relationship between Firm Size and Factor Price’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3): 518–22.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J. (1982), ‘Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industrial Structure’, American Economic Review, 72 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. and Willig, J.C. (1988)[1982], Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure, second edition. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.Google Scholar
Bear, D.V.T. (1965), ‘Inferior Inputs and the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Political Economy, 73 (3): 287–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (1994), ‘Free Trade: Old and New Challenges’, Economic Journal, 104 (March): 231–46.Google Scholar
Braulke, M. (1984), ‘The Firm in Short-Run Industry Equilibrium: Comment’, American Economic Review, 74 (4): 750–53.Google Scholar
Braulke, M. (1987), ‘On the Comparative Statics of a Competitive Industry’, American Economic Review, 77 (3): 479–85.Google Scholar
Braulke, M. and Endres, A. (1985), ‘On the Economics of Effluent Charges’, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 18 (4): 891–97.Google Scholar
Burmeister, E. and Turnovsky, S.J. (1972), ‘Capital Deepening Response in an Economy with Heterogeneous Capital Goods’, American Economic Review, 62 (5): 842–53.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.G. (1988), Applied Production Analysis. A Dual Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chavas, J-P. and Cox, T.L. (1997), ‘On Market Equilibrium Analysis’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79 (2): 500–13.Google Scholar
Checchi, D. and García-Peñalosa, C. (2008), ‘Labour Market Institutions and Income Inequality’, Economic Policy, 23 (56): 601–49.Google Scholar
Cornes, R. (1992), Duality and Modern Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Meza, D. (1988), ‘The Efficacy of Effluent Charges’, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 21 (1): 182–86.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. (1971), ‘An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: a Generalized Leontief Production Function’, Journal of Political Economy, 79(3): 481–507.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. (1982), ‘Duality Approaches to Microeconomic Theory’, in Arrow, K.J. and Intriligator, M.D. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. II, pp. 535–99. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Domar, E.D. (1961), ‘On the Measurement of Technological Change’, Economic Journal, 71 (December): 709–29.Google Scholar
Dorfman, R., Samuelson, P.A. and Solow, R.M. (1958), Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F.Y. (1913), ‘Contributions to the Theory of Railway Rates – IV’, Economic Journal, 23 (June): 206–26.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.E. (1966), ‘Production, Prices, and the Theory of Jointly-derived Input Demand Functions’, Economica, 33 (November): 454–61.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.E. and Saving, T.R. (1969), ‘Long-run Scale Adjustments of a Perfectly Competitive Firm and Industry’, American Economic Review, 59 (5): 774–83.Google Scholar
Flux, A.W. (1923) [1904], Economic Principles: An Introductory Study, London, Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Fullerton, D. and Metcalf, G.E. (2002), ‘Tax Incidence’, in Auerbach, A.J. and Feldstein, M (eds.) Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 1787–872. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gamberoni, E., Lanz, R. and Piermartini, R. (2010), ‘Timeliness and Contract Enforceability in Intermediate Goods Trade’, WTO, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2010–14.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1970), ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, 37 (3): 407–36.Google Scholar
Gehrke, C. and Kurz, H.D. (2006), ‘Sraffa on von Bortkiewicz: Reconstructing the Classical Theory of Value and Distribution’, History of Political Economy, 38 (1): 91–149.Google Scholar
Gehrke, C. and Lager, C. (1995), ‘Environmental Taxes, Relative Prices and Choice of Technique in a Linear Model of Production’, Metro-economica, 46(2): 127–45.Google Scholar
Giffen, R. (1888), ‘Recent Changes in Prices and Incomes Compared’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 51 (4): 713–815.Google Scholar
Goos, M. and Manning, A. (2007), ‘Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (1): 118–33.Google Scholar
Goos, M., Manning, A. and Salomons, A. (2009), ‘Job Polarization in Europe’, American Economic Review, 99 (2): 58–63.Google Scholar
Haberler, G. (1936), The Theory of International Trade, with its Applications to Commercial Policy, London, William Hodge & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Harberger, A.C. (1962), ‘The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax’, Journal of Political Economy, 70 (3): 215–40.Google Scholar
Harberger, A.C. (1998), ‘A Vision of the Growth Process’, American Economic Review, 88 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Harrod, R.F. (1930), ‘Notes on Supply’, Economic Journal, 40 (June): 232–41.Google Scholar
Heiner, R.A. (1982), ‘The Theory of the Firm in “Short-Run” Industry Equilibrium’, American Economic Review, 72 (3): 555–62.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1932), The Theory of Wages, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1937), Théorie Mathématique de la Valeur en Régime de Libre Concurrence, Paris, Herman & Cie Éditeurs.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1939), Value and Capital, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1953–4), ‘A Note on a Point in Value and Capital: A Reply’, Review of Economic Studies, 21 (3): 218–21.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1932), ‘Edgeworth's Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Demand and Supply Functions’, Journal of Political Economy, 40 (5): 577–616.Google Scholar
Hulten, C.R. (1978), ‘Growth Accounting with Intermediate Inputs’, Review of Economic Studies, 45 (3): 511–18.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. and Stiroh, K.J. (2000), ‘US Economic Growth at the Industry Level’, American Economic Review, 90 (2): 161–67.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., Ho, M.S. and Stiroh, K.J. (2005), Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, L.F. and Autor, D.H. (1999), ‘Changes in the Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality’, in Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics. Volume 3, pp. 1463–555. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L.J. and Summers, L.H. (1987), ‘Tax Incidence’, in Auerbach, A.J. and Feldstein, M. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 1043–92. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N. (1995), Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1919), Industry and Trade, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics, eighth edition, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D. and Green, J.R. (1995), Microeconomic Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. (1978), ‘Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions’, in Fuss, M and McFadden, D. (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Volume I, pp. 3–109. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
McKinnon, R.I. (1966), ‘Intermediate Products and Differential Tariffs: A Generalization of Lerner's Symmetry Theorem’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (4): 584–615.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J.S. and Steedman, I. (1972), ‘Reswitching and Primary Input Use’, Economic Journal, 82 (March): 140–57.Google Scholar
Mieszkowski, P. (1969), ‘Tax Incidence Theory: The Effects of Taxes on the Distribution of Income’, Journal of Economic Literature, 7 (4): 1103–24.Google Scholar
Montet, C. (1979), ‘Reswitching and Primary Input Use: A Comment’, Economic Journal, 89 (Sept.): 642–47.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. (1953–4a), ‘A Note on a Point in Value and Capital’, Review of Economic Studies, 21 (3): 214–17.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. (1953–4b), ‘A Note on a Point in Value and Capital: A Rejoinder’, Review of Economic Studies, 21 (3): 222.Google Scholar
Mosak, J.L. (1938), ‘Interrelations of Production, Price, and Derived Demand’, Journal of Political Economy, 46 (6): 761–87.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R.A. (1953), ‘On Incidence’, Journal of Political Economy, 61 (4): 306–23.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R.A. (1985), ‘A Brief History of Fiscal Doctrine’, in Auerbach, A.J. and Feldstein, M. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, Vol 1, pp. 1–59. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. von (1945–6), ‘A Model of General Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, 13 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Nuti, D.M. (1970), ‘Capitalism, Socialism and Steady Growth’, Economic Journal, 80 (March): 32–57.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. (2002), ‘Taking Marshallian Long-Period Equilibrium Seriously’, Journal of Economics, 75 (1): 63–93.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. (2010), ‘Measuring Productivity Increase by Long-Run Prices: The Early Analyses of G.R. Porter and R. Giffen’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17 (5): 1271–91.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. and Steedman, I., (2008a), ‘Long-Run Rising Supply Price and the Numéraire’, Metroeconomica, 59 (1): 74–84.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. and Steedman, I. (2008b), ‘The Industry Supply Curve: Two Different Traditions’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15 (2): 247–74.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. and Steedman, I. (2009), ‘Input Price–Input Quantity Relations and the Numéraire’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33 (5): 937–48.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. and Steedman, I. (2011), ‘On/off Inputs and their Rentals’, in Salvadori, N. and Gehrke, C. (eds.), Keynes, Sraffa and the Criticism of Neoclassical Theory. Essays in Honour of Heinz Kurz, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Opocher, A. and Steedman, I. (2013), ‘Unconventional Results with Surrogate Production Functions’, Metroeconomica, 64 (3): 539–46.Google Scholar
Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1978), ‘On the Comparative Statics of a Competitive Industry with Inframarginal Firms’, American Economic Review, 68 (3): 474–78.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L.L. (1977)[1975], Lectures on the Theory of Production, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A.C. (1927), ‘The Laws of Diminishing and Increasing Cost’, Economic Journal, 37 (June): 199–97.Google Scholar
Pigou, A.C. (1928), ‘An Analysis of Supply’, Economic Journal, 38 (June): 238–57.Google Scholar
Porter, G.R. (1851)[1836], The Progress of the Nation, second edition, London, J. Murray.Google Scholar
Portes, R.D. (1971), ‘Long-Run Scale Adjustments of a Perfectly Competitive Firm and Industry: An Alternative Approach’, American Economic Review, 61 (3): 430–34.Google Scholar
Poterba, J.M. (1996), ‘Retail Price Reactions to Changes in State and Local Sales Taxes’, National Tax Journal, 49 (2): 165–76.Google Scholar
Rader, T. (1968), ‘Factor Inputs are Never Gross Substitutes’, Journal of Political Economy, 76 (1): 38–43.Google Scholar
Reed, A.J., Levedahl, J.W. and Hallahan, C. (2005), ‘The Generalized Composite Commodity Theorem and Food Demand Estimation’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87 (1): 28–37.Google Scholar
Ricci, U. (1906), ‘Curve Piane di Offerta dei Prodotti’, Giornale degli Economisti, 17 (September): 223–40.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1934), ‘Remarks Upon Certain Aspects of the Theory of Costs’, Economic Journal, 44 (March): 1–18.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.V. (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.V. (1941), ‘Rising Supply Price’, Economica, 8 (February): 1–8.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.V. (1953), ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital’, Review of Economic Studies, 21 (2): 81–106.Google Scholar
Russell, R.R. (1964), ‘A Graphical Proof of the Impossibility of a Positively Inclined Demand Curve for a Factor of Production’, American Economic Review, 54 (5): 726–32.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1947), Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1962), ‘Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function’, Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3): 193–206.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1966), ‘A Summing Up’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (4): 568–83.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1971), ‘An Exact Hume–Ricardo–Marshall Model of International Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 1 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1972), ‘Maximum Principles of Analytical Economics’, American Economic Review, 62 (3): 249–62.Google Scholar
Saving, T.R. (1963), ‘Note on Factor Demand Elasticity: The Competitive Case’, Econometrica, 31 (3): 555–7.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1954), History of Economic Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shephard, R.W. (1970), Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silberberg, E. (1974), ‘The Theory of the Firm in Long-Run Equilibrium’, American Economic Review, 64 (4): 734–41.Google Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1957), ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3): 312–20.Google Scholar
Spence, M. (1983), ‘Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure: A Review Article’, Journal of Economic Literature, 21 (3): 981–90.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1925), ‘Sulla Relazione tra Costo e Quantità Prodotta’, Annali di Economia, Vol. II: 277–328. English edition: Pasinetti, L.L. (ed.) (1998) Italian Economic Papers, III, pp. 323–63. Bologna, Il Mulino/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1926), ‘The Laws of Returns Under Competitive Conditions’, Economic Journal, 36 (December): 535–50.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960), Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (1983), ‘On the Measurement and Aggregation of Productivity Increase’, Metroeconomica, 35 (3): 223–33.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (1985), ‘On Input “Demand Curves”’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9 (1): 165–72.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (1986), ‘Produced Inputs and Tax Incidence Theory’, Public Finance/Finances Publique, 41 (3): 331–49.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (1988), ‘Sraffian Interdependence and Partial Equilibrium Analysis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 12 (1): 85–95.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (1998), ‘Produced Input Use per Unit of Output’, Economics Letters, 59 (2): 195–99.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (2005), ‘Comparative Statics of Industry-Level Produced Input Use in HOS Trade Theory’, Review of Political Economy, 17 (3): 465–70.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (2006), ‘Long Run Demand for Labour in the Consumer Good Industry’, Metroeconomica, 57 (2): 158–64.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (2009), ‘Many Capital–Output Ratios Increasing with the Rate of Interest: An Industry-Level Analysis’, Metroeconomica, 60 (1): 150–61.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (2013), ‘Sraffian Thoughts in Full Marginalist Dress’, Metroeconomica, 64 (4): 598–606.Google Scholar
Stolper, W.F. and Samuelson, P.A. (1941), ‘Protection and Real Wages’, Review of Economic Studies, 9 (1): 58–73.Google Scholar
Thurman, W.N. (1991), ‘Applied General Equilibrium Welfare Analysis’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73 (5): 1508–16.Google Scholar
Thurman, W.N. and Wohlgenant, M.K. (1989), ‘Consistent Estimation of General Equilibrium Welfare Effects’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71 (4): 1041–45.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA and London, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. (1963), ‘Variable Factor Proportions and Inter-Industry Flows in the Theory of International Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77 (1): 129–42.Google Scholar
Viner, J. (1953)[1931], ‘Cost Curves and Supply Curves’, in Stigler, G.J. and Boulding, K.E. (eds.), Readings in Price Theory, pp. 198–232. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E.R. (1991), Stabilizing Dynamics. Constructing Economic Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1934)[1901], Lectures on Political Economy, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Winch, D.M. (1965), ‘The Demand Curve for a Factor of Production: Comment’, American Economic Review, 55 (4): 856–61.Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K. (2001), ‘Marketing Margins: Empirical Analysis’, in Gardner, B. and Rausser, G. (eds.) Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 934–70. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
World Bank (2006), ‘Equity and Development’, World Development Report 2006.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Arrigo Opocher, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy, Ian Steedman, Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Book: Full Industry Equilibrium
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316160893.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Arrigo Opocher, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy, Ian Steedman, Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Book: Full Industry Equilibrium
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316160893.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Arrigo Opocher, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy, Ian Steedman, Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Book: Full Industry Equilibrium
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316160893.013
Available formats
×