Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:07:29.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2017

Troels Engberg-Pedersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
From Stoicism to Platonism
The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE
, pp. 348 - 372
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accattino, P. (2005) Alessandro di Afrodisia. De anima II (Mantissa). Alessandria.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. (1963) Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with notes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesse, F. (ed.) (2008) Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. (1990) ‘Chrysippus on virtuous abstention from ugly old women (Plutarch, SR 1038E-1039A)’, Classical Quarterly 84: 450–8.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2003) ‘Epictetus and Stoic theology’, in Inwood, (2003): 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. (1994) Sage, Saint and Sophist. Holy Men and Their Associates in the Early Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1990) ‘The Hellenistic version of Aristotle’s Ethics’, Monist 73: 8096.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness. Oxford.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1999) Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2007) ‘Carneades’ classification of ethical theories’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC, ed. Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N.. Naples: 187223.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2013) ‘Plato’s Laws and Cicero’s de Legibus’, in Schofield, (2013): 206–24.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Skepticism. Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.) (2015) Cicero’s De Finibus. A New Appraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. M. (2004) ‘After the ascent: Plato on becoming like God’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 171–83.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. (1903–24) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Arnold, E. V. (1911) Roman Stoicism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attridge, H. W. (2002) ‘Genre bending in the Fourth Gospel’, Journal of Biblical Literature 127: 127.Google Scholar
Attridge, H. W. (2006) ‘The cubist principle in Johannine imagery. John and the reading of images in contemporary Platonism’, in Imagery in the Gospel of John. Terms, Forms, Themes and Theology of Figurative Language, ed. Frey, J., van der Watt, J. G. and Zimmermann, R. with the collaboration of Kern, G.. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 200. Tübingen: 4760; repr. in Attridge, (2010a): 7992.Google Scholar
Attridge, H. W. (2010a) Essays on John and Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 264. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Attridge, H. W. (2010b) ‘An emotional Jesus and Stoic traditions’, in Rasimus, et al. (2010): 7792; repr. in Attridge, (2010a): 122–36.Google Scholar
Attridge, H. W. (2013) ‘How priestly is the “high priestly” prayer of John 17?’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 75: 114.Google Scholar
Attridge, H. W. (2014) ‘La christologie kénotique et l’Épître aux Hébreux’, Etudes théologiques et religieuses 89: 293308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attridge, H. W. and MacRae, G. W., SJ (1985) ‘NHC I,3: the Gospel of Truth’, in Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex) vol. I Introductions, Texts, Translations, Indices, ed. Attridge, H. W.. Nag Hammadi Studies 22. Leiden: 55122.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Publications de l’Université de Lyon. Paris.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1992) ‘La composition des Dialogues pythiques de Plutarque et le problème de leur unité’, Journal des Savants 20: 187234; repr. in Babut, (1994a): 457504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babut, D. (1993) ‘Stoïciens et Stoïcisme dans les Dialogues pythiques de Plutarque’, Illinois Classical Studies 18: 203–27.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1994a) Parerga. Choix d’articles de Daniel Babut (1974–1994). Lyon.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1994b) ‘Du scepticisme au dépassement de la raison. Philosophie et foi religieuse chez Plutarque’, in Babut, (1994a): 549–81.Google Scholar
Ball, D. M. (1996) ‘“I Am” in John’s Gospel. Literary Function, Background and Theological Implications’, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 124. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D. (2014) ‘Plato’s authority and the formation of textual communities’, Classical Quarterly 64: 793807.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. N. (1995) ‘Commentarium in Platonis Theaetetum’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, parte III: Commentari. Florence: 227562.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (ed.) (2014) A Companion to Plutarch. Chichester.Google Scholar
Bekken, P. J. (2014) The Lawsuit Motif in John’s Gospel from New Perspectives. Jesus Christ, Crucified Criminal and Emperor of the World. Novum Testamentum Supplements 158. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Th. (2007) ‘Le débat entre platonisme et stoïcisme sur la vie scolastique. Chrysippe, la Nouvelle Académie et Antiochus’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 121.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Th. (2009a) ‘ΘΕΩΡΙΑ et vie contemplative du stoïcisme au platonisme. Chrysippe, Panétius, Antiochus et Alcinoos’, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009): 331.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Th. (2009b) ‘How industrious can Zeus be? The extent and objects of divine activity in Stoicism’, in Salles, (2009): 2345.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Th. (unpublished) La science des hommes libres. La digression du Théétète dans ses contextes. HDR thesis Paris, 2012.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Th. (2015) ‘Structure, standards and moral progress in De Finibus, 4’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 198220.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M.. (eds.) (2012) Theoria, Praxis and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bergeron, M. and Dufour, R. (2008) Alexandre D’Aphrodise. De l’âme. Paris.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1978) Vom Kynismus. Leiden.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, E. (1995) ‘What does Philo mean by “seeing God”? Some methodological considerations’. Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 34. Atlanta: 535–52.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, E. (1996) The Place of Judaism in Philo’s Thought. Israel, Jews, and Proselytes. Studia Philonica Monographs 2. Brown Judaic Studies 290. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1972) ‘Plotinus’ psychology. Aristotle in the service of Platonism’, International Philosophical Quarterly 12: 340–64.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2002) ‘Eudoro di Alessandria e il Timeo di Platone (a proposito di Simpl. In Phys. p. 181, 7–30 Diels)’, in Arrhetos Theos. L’Ineffabilità del Primo Principio nel Medio Platonismo, ed. Calabi, F.. Pisa: 1134.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici. Il debattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2007a) ‘Eudorus’ psychology and Stoic ethics’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2007b) ‘Plutarco, l’academia e la politica’, in Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo Fisciano – Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005, ed. Cacciatore, P. Volpe and Ferrari, F.. Naples: 265–80.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2009) ‘Antiochus’ ethics and the subordination of Stoicism’, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009): 3354.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2012a) ‘Theoria and praxis. On Plutarch’s Platonism’, in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, (2012): 139–62.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2012b) ‘Antiochus and Platonism’, in Sedley, (2012): 307–33.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2013a) ‘Le commentateur anonyme du Théétète et l’invention du platonisme’, in La mesure du savoir. Études sur le Théétète de Platon, ed. El Murr, D.. Paris: 309–33.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2013b) ‘Pythagoreanising Aristotle. Eudorus and the systematisation of Platonism’, in Schofield, (2013): 160–86.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2014) ‘Middle Platonists on fate and human autonomy. A confrontation with the Stoics’, in On What Is Up to Us, ed. Destrée, P., Horn, C. and Salles, R.. Sankt Augustin: 283–94.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2015) À la recherche des Idées. Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d’Antiochus à Plotin. Paris.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.) (2005) L’eredità platonica. Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.) (2007a) Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (2007b) ‘Introduction’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): viixv.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C. and Steel, C. (eds.) (2007) A Platonic Pythagoras. Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds.) (2009) The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven.Google Scholar
Bonhöffer, A. (1890) Epiktet und die Stoa. Untersuchungen zur stoischen Philosophie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Boot, P. (1984) Plotinus, Over Voorzienigheid (Enneade III 2–3 [47–48]). Inleiding – Commentaar – Essays. Diss. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Borgen, P. (1965) Bread from Heaven. An Exegetical Study of the Concept of Manna in the Gospel of John and the Writings of Philo. Novum Testamentum Supplements 10. Leiden.Google Scholar
Borgen, P. (1983) Logos Was the True Light and Other Essays on the Gospel of John. Trondheim.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. (1976) Providentia Divina. Assen.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. C. and Todd, R. B. (eds.) (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1997) ‘Thyrsus–bearer of the Academy or enthusiast for Plato?’, in Plutarch and His Intellectual World. Essays on Plutarch, ed. Mossman, J.. London and Swansea: 4158.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1998) ‘Plutarch on κοινὸς λόγος. Towards an architecture of De Stoicorum repugnantiis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 299329.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2001) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. A study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2005) ‘Alcinoos, Didaskalikos 4. In defence of dogmatism’, in Bonazzi, and Celluprica, (2005): 201–34.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2009) ‘Cornutus und sein philosophisches Umfeld. Der Antiplatonismus der Epidrome’, in A. Cornutus. Die griechischen Götter. Ein Überblick über Namen, Bilder und Deutungen, ed. Nesselrath, H.-G.. Tübingen: 141–61.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2012) ‘Antiochus’ metaphysics’, in Sedley, (2012): 220–36.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2013) ‘Seneca against Plato. Letters 58 and 65’, in Long, A. G. (2013): 128–46.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2014) ‘Unity and the good. Platonists against Oikeiosis’, in Unité et origine des vertus dans la philosophie ancienne, ed. Collette-Dučić, B. and Delcomminette, S.. Brussels: 297320.Google Scholar
Brakke, D. (2010) The Gnostics. Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa. The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2005) ‘Common sense. Concepts, definitions and meaning in and out of the Stoa’, in Language and Learning. Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, ed. Frede, D. and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 164209.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2006) Cicero on Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2012) ‘Antiochus’ epistemology’, in Sedley, (2012a): 104–30.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2015) ‘Cicero’s sceptical methods. The example of the De Finibus’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 1240.Google Scholar
Broek, R. (2013) Gnostic Religion in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (1897) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis. De anima libri cum Mantissa. Supplementum Aristotelicum II, 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge: 114–44.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1995) Etudes sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Epicurisme, stoïcisme, scepticisme. Paris.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2003) ‘Stoic metaphysics’, in Inwood, (2003): 206–32.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1986) ‘Cicero’s officium in the Civil War’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 1232.Google Scholar
Buch-Hansen, G. (2010a) ‘The emotional Jesus. Anti-Stoicism in the Fourth Gospel?’, in Rasimus, et al. (2010): 93114.Google Scholar
Buch-Hansen, G. (2010b) ‘It Is the Spirit That Gives Life.’ A Stoic Understanding of Pneuma in John’s Gospel. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 173. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bückers, H. (1938) Die Unsterblichkeitslehre des Weisheitsbuches. Ihr Ursprung und ihre Bedeutung. Alttestamentliche Abhandlungen 13. Münster.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1985) Greek Religion. Archaic and Classical. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burns, D. M. (2014) Apocalypse of the Alien God. Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Calabi, F. (2008) God’s Acting, Man’s Acting. Tradition and Philosophy in Philo of Alexandria. Studies in Philo of Alexandria 4. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Carmichael, C. M. (1996) The Story of Creation. Its Origin and Interpretation in Philo and the Fourth Gospel. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Casevitz, M. and Babut, D. (eds.) (2002–4) Plutarque. Œuvres Morales, Tome XV, 1re partie, Traité 70, Sur les contradictions stoïciennes. Traité 71, Synopsis du traité ‘Que les Stoïciens tiennent des propos plus paradoxaux que les poètes’. 2e partie, Traité 72, Sur les notions communes, contre les Stoïciens. Texte établi par Casevitz, M., traduit et commenté par Babut, D.. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation. The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Castner, C. J. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. Frankfurt and New York.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (2012) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On the Soul, Part I. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Catana, L. (2013), ‘The origin of the division between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism’, Apeiron 46: 166200.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (ed.) (1976) Plutarch’s Moralia in Seventeen Volumes, XIII, Part II, 1033A-1086B. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2007) ‘Platonismo e teoria della conoscenza stoica tra II e III secolo d.C.’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 209–41.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009a) ‘Plotino su pensiero, estensione e percezione sensibile: un dualismo “cartesiano”?’, in Il Platonismo e le scienze, ed. Chiaradonna, R.. Rome: 8199.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009b) ‘Autour d’Eudore. Les débuts de l’exégèse des Catégories dans le Moyen Platonisme’, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009): 89111.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (ed.) (2012) Filosofia tardoantica. Rome.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2013) ‘Platonist approaches to Aristotle. From Antiochus of Ascalon to Eudorus of Alexandria (and beyond)’, in Schofield, (2013): 2852.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. (1997) Jewish Wisdom in the Hellenistic Age. Old Testament Library. Louisville.Google Scholar
Colpe, C. (1979) ‘Von der Logoslehre des Philo zu der des Clemens von Alexandrien’, in Kerygma und Logos. Beiträge zu den geistesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen Antike und Christentum. FS für Carl Andresen zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Ritter, A. M.. Göttingen: 89107; repr. in Colpe, C., Das Siegel der Propheten. Historische Beziehungen zwischen Judentum, Judenchristentum, Heidentum und frühem Islam. Berlin (1990): 141–64.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1999a) Reason and Emotion. Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1999b) ‘Posidonius on emotions’, in Cooper, (1999a): 449–84.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (2011) ‘Aristotle’s definition of non-rational pleasure and pain and desire’, in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. A Critical Guide, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 117–43.Google Scholar
Cordero, M. García (1993) ‘El “Logos” de Filón y el “Logos” del prólogo al Cuarto Evangelio’, Ciencia Tomista 120: 209–42, 433–61.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1929a) ‘L’origine et l’évolution de l’epochè’, Revue des études grecques 42: 373–97.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1929b) ‘Le stoïcisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d’histoire de la philosophie 3: 241–76.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1941) ‘Les sorites de Carnéade contre le polythéisme’, Revue des études grecques 54: 4357.Google Scholar
Cox, R. (2007) By the Same Word. Creation and Salvation in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 145. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, D. (1992) Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1977, 2nd ed. 1996) The Middle Platonists 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1988) ‘“Orthodoxy” and “eclecticism”. Middle Platonists and Neo-Pythagoreans’, in Dillon, and Long, (1988): 103–25.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (ed.) (1993) Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism, tr. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1998) ‘ASŌMATOS. Nuances of incorporeality in Philo’, in Philon d’Alexandrie et le langage de la philosophie, ed. Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 99110.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2001) ‘The Neoplatonic reception of Plato’s Laws’, in Plato’s Laws and Its Historical Significance, ed. Lisi, F. L.. Sankt Augustin: 243–54.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2003) The Heirs of Plato. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2008) ‘Philo and Hellenistic Platonism’, in Alesse, (2008): 223–32.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2011) ‘The ideas as thoughts of God’, Études platoniciennes 8: 3142.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Long, A. A. (eds.) (1988) The Question of “Eclecticism”. Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar
Dingeldein, L. (2014) ‘Gaining virtue, gaining Christ. Moral development in the letters of Paul’. Diss. Brown University.Google Scholar
Dobbin, R. (1998) Epictetus, Discourses, Book 1. Clarendon Later Ancient Philosophers. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1963) The Elements of Theology. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. L. (2007) Judaism and Gentiles. Jewish Patterns of Universalism. Waco, TX.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1988a) ‘The history of the concept of eclecticism’, in Dillon, and Long, (1988): 1533.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1988b) ‘La connaissance de dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos’, in Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. van den Broek, R., Baarda, T. and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: 118–31.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1994) ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der rӧmischen Welt II.36.7, ed. Haase, W. and Temporini, H.. Berlin and New York: 50275100.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (2002) ‘L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco’, in Ἕνωσις καὶ φιλία: Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano, ed. Barbanti, M., Giardina, G. R., Manganaro, P. et al. Catania: 247–73.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (2012) ‘Una nuova raccolta di studi su Antioco di Ascalona’, Méthexis 25: 151–63.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1944) ‘Der Platoniker Eudoros von Alexandreia’, Hermes 79: 2538.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1987–2008) Der Platonismus in der Antike, 8 vols. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1996) Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Einige grundlegende Axiome / Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) I. Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. 4. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (2002) Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. 6. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2010) ‘“Editori” antichi di Platone’, Antiquorum Philosophia 4: 161–74.Google Scholar
Downing, F. G. (1990) ‘Ontological asymmetry in Philo and Christological realism in Paul, Hebrews and John’, Journal of Theological Studies 41: 423–40.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. (1975–6) ‘The problem of evil in Philo of Alexandria, with special reference to the De providentia [in Greek]’, Philosophia (Athens) 5–6: 306–52.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. (1976) The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and Providence of the Gods. Athens.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2008) ‘Transformed “from glory to glory”. Paul’s appeal to the experience of his readers in 2 Cor 3:18’, Journal of Biblical Literature 127: 762–80.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2013) ‘Cicero’s rhetorical theory’, in The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Steel, C.. Cambridge: 2540.Google Scholar
Dunderberg, I. (2008) Beyond Gnosticism. Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. D. G. (1996) Christology in the Making. A New Testament Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2004) A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dyson, H. (2009) Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa, Berlin.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. (eds.) (1988–99) Posidonius, 3 vols. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 13, 14, 36. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. and De Lacy, Ph. (eds.) (1967) Plutarch’s Moralia in Fifteen Volumes, XIV, 1086C–1147A. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990) The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Moral Development and Social Interaction in Early Stoic Philosophy. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2000) Paul and the Stoics. Edinburgh and Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.) (2001) Paul Beyond the Judaism/Hellenism Divide. Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2010a) Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul. The Material Spirit. Oxford.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2010b) ‘Setting the scene. Stoicism and Platonism in the transitional period in ancient philosophy’, in Rasimus, et al. (2010): 114.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2012) ‘Logos and pneuma in the Fourth Gospel’, in Greco-Roman Culture and the New Testament. Studies Commemorating the Centennial of the Pontifical Biblical Institute, ed. Aune, D. E. and Brenk, F. E.. Novum Testamentum Supplements 143. Leiden and Boston: 2748.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (2012) Aristotelianism in the First Century BCE. Xenarchus of Seleucia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (1996) ‘Dio: padre e artefice. La teologia di Plutarco in Plat. Quaest. 2’, in Plutarco e la religione. Atti del VI Convegno plutarcheo (Ravello, 29–31 maggio 1995), ed. Gallo, I.. Naples: 395409.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2000) ‘Plutarch. Platonismus und Tradition’, in Philosophen des Altertums, ed. Erler, M. and Graeser, A.. Darmstadt: 109–27.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2005) ‘Plutarco e lo scetticismo ellenistico’, in Plutarco e l’età ellenistica. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Firenze, 23–24 Settembre 2004, ed. Casanova, A.. Florence: 369–84.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2008) ‘I fondamenti metafisici dell’etica di Plutarco’, Ploutarchos, n.s. 5, 2007–8: 1932.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1995) ‘The statesman and the law in the political philosophy of Cicero’, in Justice and Generosity, ed. Laks, A. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 4873.Google Scholar
Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le De Ira de Sénèque et la philosophie Stoïcienne des passions. Paris.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.) (1983) On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities vol. 1. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.) (with Gutas, D.) (2011) Theophrastus of Eresus, Commentary Volume 6.1. Leiden.Google Scholar
Fraade, S. (2008) ‘Hearing and seeing at Sinai. Interpretive trajectories’, in The Significance of Sinai. Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity, ed. Brooke, G. J., Najman, H. and Stuckenbruck, L. T.. Leiden: 247–68.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1986) ‘The Stoic doctrine of the affections of the soul’, in The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (1986). Cambridge: 93110.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987) ‘On Galen’s epistemology’, in his Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: 279–98.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1989) ‘Chaeremon von Alexandreia’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.3, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 20672103.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1990) ‘La teoría de las ideas en Longino’, Méthexis 3: 8598.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994) ‘The Stoic conception of reason’, in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Boudouris, K.. Athens: 5063.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999a) ‘Stoic epistemology’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 295322.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999b) ‘Epilogue’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 771–97.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, P. (1991) ‘Judaism, the circumcision of Gentiles, and apocalyptic hope’, Journal of Theological Studies 42: 532–64.Google Scholar
Frick, P. (1999) Divine Providence in Philo of Alexandria. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 77. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Früchtel, L. (1964) ‘Über die Vorsehung’, in Philo von Alexandria. Die Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, ed. Cohn, L, Heinemann, I., Adler, M. and Theiler, W., 7 vols. Breslau and Berlin: 7.267–382.Google Scholar
Fuglseth, K. S. (2005) Johannine Sectarianism in Perspective. A Sociological, Historical and Comparative Analysis of Temple and Social Relationships in the Gospel of John, Philo, and Qumran. Novum Testamentum Supplements 119. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gercke, A. (1885) ‘Chrysippea’, Jahrbücher für klassische Philologie (Leipzig): 689781.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2005) Aristotle and other Platonists, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2009) Ancient Epistemology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2013) From Plato to Platonism, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Geytenbeek, A. C. (1963) Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe. Assen.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013) ‘Of Cicero’s Plato. Fictions, Forms, foundations‘, in Schofield, (2013): 225–75.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1998) ‘Did Galen understand Platonic and Stoic thinking on emotions?’, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T.. Dordrecht: 113–48.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2003) ‘The School in the Roman imperial period’, in Inwood, (2003): 3358.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2004) ‘The Stoic theory of ethical development. In what sense is nature a norm?’, in Was ist das für den Menschen Gute? Menschliche Natur und Güterlehre / What is Good for a Human Being? Human Nature and Values, ed. Szaif, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M.. Berlin: 101–25.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2007) ‘Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations. How Stoic and how Platonic?’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 189207.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2010) Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2012) ‘The transformation of Aristotle’s Ethics in Roman philosophy’, in The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. (2015) ‘Antiochus’ theory of oikeiōsis’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 221–47.Google Scholar
Gioè, A. (2002) Filosofi Medioplatonici del II Secolo D.C. Testimonianze e frammenti. Gaio, Albino, Lucio, Nicostrato, Tauro, Severo, Arpocrazione. Elenchos. Collana de testi e studi sul pensiero antico 36. Naples.Google Scholar
Giusta, M. (1964) I dossografi di etica. Vol. 1. Turin.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Göransson, T. (1995) Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (1983) ‘Oikeiōsis in Arius Didymus’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 165–89.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the troublemaker. De Legibus 1.39’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 85113.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1987) ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world from the time of Cicero to the end of the second century AD’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.36.2, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 10791174.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1989–2012) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. Vol. 1–5 and Supplément. Paris.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (2013) ‘Ancient philosophers. A first statistical survey’, in Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns. Essays in Honor of Pierre Hadot, ed. Chase, M., Clark, S. R. L. and McGhee, M.. Chichester: 1039.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (2005) ‘Musonius Rufus’, in Goulet, (1989–2012): 4.555–72.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2008) ‘Le Platon de Panétius. À propos d’un témoignage inédit de Galien’, Philosophie antique 8: 139–51.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2009) ‘The Stoics on matter and prime matter. Corporealism and the imprint of Plato’s Timaeus’, in Salles, (2009): 4670.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2012) ‘Seneca and the Contemplatio veri’, in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, (2012): 7398.Google Scholar
Graver, M. and Long, A. A. (2015) Seneca. Letters on Ethics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Gray, B. (in press) ‘A later Hellenistic debate about the value of Classical Athenian civic ideals? The evidence of epigraphy, historiography and philosophy’, in The Hellenistic Reception of Classical Athenian Democracy and Political Thought, ed. Canevaro, M. and Gray, B.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2015) Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gritti, E. (2011) ‘Dossografia sulla percezione nell’Anthologium di Giovanni Stobeo’, in Thinking Through Excerpts. Studies on Stobaeus, ed. Reydams-Schils, G.. Turnhout: 203–42.Google Scholar
Guyau, A. (1946) Epictète et Platon. Paris.Google Scholar
Haas, F. (2014) ‘Presuppositions of moral action in Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias’, in Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought. Studies in Honour of Carlos Steel, ed. d’Hoine, P. and Van Riel, G.. Leuven: 103–16.Google Scholar
Hadas-Lebel, M. (1973) De providentia I et II. Les Œuvres de Philon d’Alexandrie 35. Paris.Google Scholar
Hadas-Lebel, M. (2012) Philo of Alexandria. A Thinker in the Jewish Diaspora. Translated by Frechet, R.. Leiden and Boston. Originally published (2003) as Philon d’Alexandrie. Un penseur en diaspora. Paris.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1992) Introduction aux ‘Pensées’ de Marc Aurèle. La citadelle intérieure. Paris.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1998) Études de philosophie ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Hagner, D. (1971) ‘The vision of God in Philo and John. A comparative study’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 14: 8193.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1977) The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Ohio.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1983) ‘The diaeretic method and the purpose of Arius’ doxography’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 1537.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1985) ‘The Stoic theory of change’, in Spindel Conference 1984. Recovering the Stoics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 Supplement, ed. Epp, R.. Memphis: 3956.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1990) ‘The ethical doxography of Arius Didymus’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der rӧmischen Welt II.36.6, ed. Haase, W. and Temporini, H.. Berlin and New York: 29353055.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (1992) Der Aufstieg zum Einen. Untersuchungen zu Platon und Plotinus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds.) (1961) The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Bollingen Series 71. New York.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1997) ‘Natural criteria and the transparency of judgement. Antiochus, Philo and Galen on epistemological justification’, in Assent and Argument, ed. Inwood, B. and Frede, D.. Leiden: 161216.Google Scholar
Harl, M. (ed.) (1966) Philon Quis rerum divinarum heres sit. Paris.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2014) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics on pleasure’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Polansky, R.. Cambridge: 288318.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2011) Potamo of Alexandria and the Emergence of Eclecticism in Late Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Helmig, C. (2012) Forms and Concepts. Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hengel, M. (1969) Judentum und Hellenismus. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 10. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Hense, O. (ed.) (1905) C. Musonii Rufi Reliquiae. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. (1992a) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 3353–83.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. (1992b) ‘Plutarch and Stoicism’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 3336–52.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2010) Seneca. Natural Questions. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2005) ‘Der eine Gott bei Philon von Alexandrien und Plutarch’, in Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder, Gottesbilder, Weltbilder, ed. Hirsch-Luipold, R.. Berlin: 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R., Görgemanns, H. and von Albrecht, M. (eds.) (2009) Religiöse Philosophie und philosophische Religion der frühen Kaiserzeit. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 51. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Hodge, C. J. (2007) If Sons, Then Heirs. A Study of Kinship and Ethnicity in the Letters of Paul. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoek, A. (2000) ‘Philo and Origen. A descriptive catalogue of their relationship’, Studia Philonica Annual 12: 44121.Google Scholar
Horst, P. W. (1998) ‘“The elements will be dissolved with fire.” The idea of cosmic conflagration in Hellenism, ancient Judaism, and early Christianity’, in van der Horst, P. W., Hellenism–Judaism–Christianity. Essays on Their Interaction. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 8. Leuven: 271–92.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (2008) ‘Cicero’s Plato’, Wiener Studien 121: 145–70.Google Scholar
Hoven, R. (1971) Stoïcisme et stoïciens face au problème de l’au-delà. Paris.Google Scholar
Hübner, H. (1993a) ‘Die Sapientia Salomonis und die antike Philosophie’, in Die Weisheit Salomos im Horizont Biblischer Theologie, ed. Hübner, H.. Biblisch-Theologische Studien 22. Neukirchen-Vluyn: 5581.Google Scholar
Hübner, H. (1993b) ‘La Sapienza di Salomone e la filosofia antica’, in La Sapienza di Salomone, ed. Hübner, H.. Brescia: 7097.Google Scholar
Hübner, H. (ed.) (1999) Die Weisheit Salomons. Das Alte Testament Deutsch/Apokryphen 4. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1983) ‘Comments on Professor Görgemanns’ paper: “The two forms of oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa”’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 190201.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1984) ‘Hierocles. Theory and argument in the second century AD’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 151–83.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1999) ‘Stoic ethics (I–VII)’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 675705.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2005a) Reading Seneca. Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2005b) ‘Getting to goodness’, in Inwood, (2005a): 271301.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007a) Seneca. Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007b) ‘Seneca, Plato, and Platonism. The case of Letter 65’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 149–67.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2012) ‘Antiochus on physics’, in Sedley, (2012): 188219.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014a) Ethics After Aristotle. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014b) ‘Ancient goods. The tria genera bonorum in ethical theory’, in Strategies of Argument. Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology and Logic, ed. Lee, M.-K.. Oxford: 255–80.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2015) ‘The voice of nature’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 147–66.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2016) ‘A later (and non-standard) Aristotelian account of moral motivation’, in Moral Motivation. A History, ed. Vasiliou, I.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1986) Opinione e scienza. Naples.Google Scholar
Jagu, A. (1946) Epictète et Platon. Essai sur les relations du Stoïcisme et du Platonisme à propos de la morale des Entretiens. Paris.Google Scholar
Ju, A. E. (2013) ‘Posidonius as historian of philosophy. An interpretation of Plutarch, de Animae Procreatione in Timaeo 22, 1023b–c’, in Schofield, (2013): 95117.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1983) ‘Arius as a doxographer’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 313.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (1998) ‘Aidōs in Epictetus’, Classical Philology 93: 136–60.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (unpublished) ‘Naturalism, ancient and modern. AMC of Brad Inwood, Ethics After Aristotle’, A paper given at the APA Pacific Division, April 2015.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Oxford.Google Scholar
Kechagia-Ovseiko, E. (2014) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in Beck, (2014): 104–20.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1972) ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 55: 177–96.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (1971) ‘Posidonius on emotions’, in Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: 200–15.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (1988) ‘Posidonius as philosopher-historian’, in Philosophia Togata, ed. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 3850.Google Scholar
King, K. L. (2003) What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
King, K. L. (2006) The Secret Revelation of John. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Knust, J. (2006) ‘Early Christian re-writing and the history of the pericope adulterae’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 14: 485536.Google Scholar
Köckert, C. (2009) Christliche Kosmologie und kaiserzeitliche Philosophie. Die Auslegung des Schöpfungsberichtes bei Origines, Basilius und Gregor von Nyssa vor dem Hintergrund kaiserzeitlicher Timaeus-Interpretationen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Koester, C. R. (1989) ‘Hearing, seeing and believing in the Gospel of John’, Biblica 70: 327–48.Google Scholar
Kooten, G. (2008) Paul’s Anthropology in Context. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 232. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. (1964) Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lacy, Ph. (1943) ‘The logical structure of the ethics of Epictetus’, Classical Philology 38.2: 112–15.Google Scholar
Lacy, Ph. (ed.) (1978–84) Galen. De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, with tr. and comm., 3 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Larcher, C. (1969) Études sur le Livre de la Sagesse. Études bibliques. Paris.Google Scholar
Larcher, C. (1983–5) Le Livre de la Sagesse ou La Sagesse de Salomon, 3 vols. Études bibliques 1, 3, 5. Paris.Google Scholar
Laurand, V. (2014) Stoïcisme et lien social. Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus. Paris.Google Scholar
Layton, B. (1987) Gnostic Scriptures. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
Leonhardt-Balzer, J. (2004) ‘Der Logos und die Schöpfung. Streiflichter bei Philo (Op 20–25) und im Johannesprolog (Joh 1,1–18)’, in Kontexte des Johannesevangeliums. Das vierte Evangelium in religions- und traditionsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, ed. Frey, J. and Schnelle, U.. Tübingen: 295319.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1984) ‘La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres II et IV du De finibus’, Revue des études latines 62: 111–27.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus. Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1999) ‘Permanence et mutations d’un projet aristotélicien. La doxographie morale d’Aristote à Varron’, Méthexis 12: 3551.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2008) ‘La conversion du scepticisme chez Philon d’Alexandrie’, in Alesse, (2008): 103–20.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2010) ‘Breaking the Stoic language. Philo’s attitude towards assent (sunkatathesis) and comprehension (katalepsis)’, Henoch 32: 3344.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2011) ‘L’aristotélisme parent pauvre de la pensée philonienne?’, in Plato, Aristotle or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity, ed. Benatouïl, T., Maffi, E. and Trabattoni, F.. Hildesheim: 1733.Google Scholar
Lilla, S. R. C. (1997) ‘Neoplatonic hypostases and the Christian Trinity’, in Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition, ed. Joyal, M. A.. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT: 127–89.Google Scholar
Litwa, M. D. (2012) We Are Being Transformed. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 187. Berlin.Google Scholar
Löhr, W. (2010), ‘Christianity as philosophy. Problems and perspectives of an ancient intellectual project’, Vigiliae Christianae 64: 160–88.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1982) ‘Ptolemy On the Criterion. An epistemology for the practising scientist’, in Dillon, and Long, (1982): 176207.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1983) ‘Arius Didymus and the exposition of Stoic ethics’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 4165.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988) ‘Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy’, Classical Quarterly 38: 150–71.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995) ‘Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 3762. (Also in Long, A. A. [2006a]: 285306.)Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996a) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996b) ‘Soul and body in Stoicism’, in Long, A. A. (1996a): 224–49.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1999) ‘Stoic psychology’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 560–84.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2002) Epictetus. A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2003) ‘Roman philosophy’, in Sedley, (2003c): 184210.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006a) From Epicurus to Epictetus. Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006b) ‘Scepticism about gods’, in Long, A. A. (2006a): 114–27.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2008) ‘Philo on Stoic physics’, in Alesse, (2008): 121–41.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2010) ‘Cosmic craftsmanship in Plato and Stoicism’, in One Book, The Whole Universe. Plato’s Timaeus Today, ed. Mohr, R. and Sattler, B.. Las Vegas: 3753.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (ed.) (2013a) Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (ed.) (2013b) ‘Subtexts, connections and open opposition’, in Long, A. G. (2013a): 106–27.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. (1975) ‘Elementary physics in the Lyceum and Stoa’, Isis 66: 211–29.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. (2006) The Brute Within. Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. (2011) ‘Posidonius on the nature and treatment of the emotions’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 189211.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, S. (2008) Das paulinische Eikon-Konzept. Semantische Analysen zur Sapientia Salomonis, zu Philo und den Paulusbriefen. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.250. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Luck, G. (1953) Der Akademiker Antiochos. Berne.Google Scholar
Luttikhuizen, G. P. (2006) ‘The revelation of the unknowable God in Coptic gnostic texts’, in The Revelation of the Name YHWH to Moses. Perspectives from Judaism, the Pagan Graeco-Roman World, and Early Christianity, ed. van Kooten, G. H.. Themes in Biblical Narrative 9. Leiden and Boston: 237–46.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (1947) ‘Musonius “The Roman Socrates”’, Yale Classical Studies 10: 3147.Google Scholar
Macdonald, P. (2003) History of the Concept of Mind. Speculations about the Soul, Mind and Spirit from Homer to Hume. Burlington.Google Scholar
Mack, B. L. (1984) ‘Philo and exegetical tradition in Alexandria’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.21.1, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 227–71.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G. (1991) L’oikeiōsis peripatetica in Ario Didimo e nel ‘De Finibus’ di Cicerone. Turin.Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J. (1989) Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J. (1992) ‘Hellenistic moralists and the New Testament’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.26.1, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 267333. (Also in Malherbe, [2014]: 674747.)Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J. (2010) ‘Godliness, self-sufficiency, greed and the enjoyment of wealth. 1 Timothy 6:3-19’, Novum Testamentum 52: 376405.Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J. (2014) Light from the Gentiles. Hellenistic Philosophy and Early Christianity. Collected Essays, 1959–2012, ed. Holladay, C. R., Fitzgerald, J. T., Sterling, G. E. and Thompson, J. W., 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘Providence and the destruction of the universe in early Stoic thought’, in Studies in Hellenistic religions, ed. Vermaseren, M. J.. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain 78. Leiden: 129–88; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983) ‘Resurrection added. The interpretatio christiana of a Stoic doctrine’, Vigiliae Christianae 37: 218–33.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1989) Studies in Later Greek Philosophy and Gnosticism. London.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2001) ‘Plato, Pythagoras, Aristotle, the Peripatetics, the Stoics and Thales and his followers “On Causes” (Ps-Plutarchus Placita I 11 and Stobaeus Anthologium I 13)’, in Antichi e Moderni nella Filosofia di Età Imperiale, ed. Brancacci, A.. Naples: 1768.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Vol. 1. Philosophia Antiqua 73. Leiden.Google Scholar
Marcus, R. (ed. and tr.) (1953) Philo. Questions and Answers on Genesis. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Markschies, C. (1992) Valentinus Gnosticus? Untersuchungen zur valentinianischen Gnosis mit einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten Valentins. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 65. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 77: 197209, 535–55.Google Scholar
Mazzinghi, L. (2010) ‘Law of nature and light of the law in the Book of Wisdom (Wis 18:4c)’, in Studies in the Book of Wisdom, ed. Xeravits, G. G. and Zsengellér, J.. Journal of the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period Supplements 142. Leiden and Boston: 3759.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Meeks, W. A. (1976) ‘The divine agent and its counterfeit in Philo and the Fourth Gospel’, in Aspects of Religious Propaganda in Judaism and Early Christianity, ed. Fiorenza, E. Schüssler. Notre Dame, IN: 4367.Google Scholar
Merlan, P. (1967) ‘The later Academy and Platonism’, in The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, ed. Armstrong, A. H.. Cambridge: 5383.Google Scholar
Miller, P. (2006) ‘“They saw his glory and spoke of him.” The Gospel of John and the Old Testament’, in Hearing the Old Testament in the New Testament, ed. Porter, S. E.. Grand Rapids, MI: 127–51.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1973–2001) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, 3 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Vol. 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n. Chr. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Morford, M. (2002) The Roman Philosophers. London.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2010) ‘Aristotle’s non-trivial, non-insane view that everyone always desires things under the guise of the good’, in Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Tenenbaum, S.. Oxford: 6581.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (2009) Cornutus, Die Griechischen Götter. Ein Überblick über Namen, Bilder und Deutungen. SAPERE 14. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Newman, C. (1992) Paul’s Glory Christology. Traditions and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. (2011a) Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. (2011b) ‘Philo’s exposition in a Roman context’, Studia Philonica Annual 23: 121.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. (2012) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics in Hellenistic philosophy. A hidden treasure’, in The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 530.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (2010) Ancient Models of Mind. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nikiprowetzky, V. (1977) Le commentaire de l’Écriture chez Philon d’Alexandrie. Son caractère et sa portée; observations philologiques. Arbeiten zur Literatur und Geschichte des hellenistischen Judentums 11. Leiden.Google Scholar
Olivieri, M. (2000) Il secondo libro del De Providentia di Filone di Alessandria. I frammenti greci e la tradizione armena. Diss. Bologna.Google Scholar
Olivieri, M. (2011) ‘Philo’s De Providentia. A work between two traditions’, in Studies on the Ancient Armenian Version of Philo’s Works, ed. Lombardi, S. M. and Pontani, P.. Leiden: 87124.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. (1999) ‘Epicurus Neoplatonicus’, in Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, ed. Fuhrer, Th. and Erler, M.. Stuttgart: 8391.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. (2000) ‘Scepticism and ineffability in Plotinus’, Phronesis 45: 240–51.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1997) ‘Favorinus versus Epictetus on the philosophical heritage of Plutarch. A debate on epistemology’, in Plutarch and His Intellectual World. Essays on Plutarch, ed. Mossman, J.. London and Swansea: 1739.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of The Truth. Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2005) ‘Plutarch’s Platonism revisited’, in Bonazzi, and Celluprica, (2005): 161200.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2007) ‘The place of Plutarch in the history of Platonism’, in Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo Fisciano – Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005 ed. Cacciatore, P. Volpe and Ferrari, F.. Naples: 281309.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2012) ‘Plutarch on the division of the soul’, in Plato and the divided self, ed. Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C.. Cambridge: 311–30.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2014) ‘Plutarch and the Stoics’, in Beck, (2014): 88103.Google Scholar
Owen, G. (1971) ‘Aristotelian pleasures’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1971–2): 135–52.Google Scholar
Passaro, A. (2010) ‘Cosmology and music. Wis 19:18 and the concept of creation in the Book of Wisdom’, in Studies in the Book of Wisdom, ed. Xeravits, G. G. and Zsengellér, J.. Journal of the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period Supplements 142. Leiden and Boston: 101–23.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. (2007) Ancient Gnosticism. Traditions and Literature. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Pembroke, S. G. (1971) ‘oikeiōsis’, in Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: 114–49.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. (1987) ‘Stoic “common notions” in Plotinus’, Dionysius 11: 3352.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1942) ‘Philon von Alexandreia’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 5: 409–87; repr. in Kleine Schriften, ed. Dörrie, H.. Hildesheim (1965): 1.305–83.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1948) Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Porter, S. E. (2015) John, His Gospel, and Jesus. In Pursuit of the Johannine Voice. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2001) ‘Were Cicero’s Laws the laws of Cicero’s Republic?’, in Cicero’s Republic, ed. Powell, J. G. F. and North, J.. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 76. London: 739.Google Scholar
Powers, N. (2013) ‘Plato’s demiurge as the precursor to the Stoic providential god’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 63: 713–22.Google Scholar
Puech, B. (1994) ‘Diadouménos’, in Goulet, (1989–2012): 2.750.Google Scholar
Rabens, V. (2012) ‘Johannine perspectives on ethical enabling in the context of Stoic and Philonic Ethics’, in Rethinking the Ethics of John. ‘Implicit Ethics’ in the Johannine Writings. Kontexte und Normen neutestamentlicher Ethik, ed. van der Watt, J. G. and Zimmermann, R.. Contexts and Norms of New Testament Ethics 3. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 291. Tübingen: 114–39.Google Scholar
Radice, R. (2000) ‘Oikeiosis’. Ricerche sul fondamento del pensiero Stoico e sulla sua genesi. Milan.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2003) Anneo Cornuto, Compendio di teologia greca. Testo Greco a fronte. Milan.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (ed.) (2008) Stoici Romani Minori. Milan.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2013) ‘Boethus’ Aristotelian Ontology’, in Schofield, (2013): 5377.Google Scholar
Rasimus, T. (2009) Paradise Reconsidered in Gnostic Mythmaking. Rethinking Sethianism in the Light of the Ophite Evidence. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 68. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rasimus, T., Engberg-Pedersen, T. and Dunderberg, I. (eds.) (2010) Stoicism in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Ready, J. (2012) ‘Zeus, ancient Near Eastern notions of divine incomparability, and similes in the Homeric Epics’, Classical Antiquity 31: 5691.Google Scholar
Reale, G. (1989) Storia della filosofia antica. Vol. iv. 6th ed. Milan.Google Scholar
Reese, J. M. (1970) Hellenistic Influence on the Book of Wisdom and Its Consequences. Rome.Google Scholar
Reid, J. S. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica, the Text revised and Explained by J. S. R. London.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2007) ‘Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 2.513–29.Google Scholar
Reis, B. (1999) Der Platoniker Albinos und sein sogenannter ‘Prologos’. Prolegomena, Überlieferungsgeschichte, kritische Edition und Übersetzung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1995) ‘Stoicized readings of Plato’s Timaeus in Philo of Alexandria’, Studia Philonica Annual 7: 85102.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1997) ‘Posidonius and the Timaeus. Off to Rhodes and back to Plato?’, Classical Quarterly 47: 455–76.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1999) Demiurge and Providence. Monothéismes et Philosophie. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics. Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2010) ‘Seneca’s Platonism. The soul and its divine origin’, in Nightingale, and Sedley, (2010), 196215.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2013) ‘The Old Academy, the Stoics, Antiochus of Ascalon, and Cicero on Plato’s Timaeus’, in Long, A. G. (2013): 2958.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. M. (2014) The Nag Hammadi Story, 2 vols. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2002) ‘A παιδεία for the ruler. Plutarch’s dream of collaboration between philosopher and ruler’, in Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 A.D.), ed. Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L.. Leuven: 175–89.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2005) On the Path to Virtue. The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roukema, R. (2009) ‘Jesus and the divine name in the Gospel of John’, in The Revelation of the Name YHWH to Moses. Perspectives from Judaism, the Pagan Graeco-Roman World, and Early Christianity, ed. van Kooten, G. H.. Themes in Biblical Narrative 9. Leiden and Boston: 207–23.Google Scholar
Royse, J. R. (2009) ‘The works of Philo’, in The Cambridge Companion to Philo, ed. Kamesar, A.. Cambridge: 3264.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1981) ‘Philo’s De aeternitate mundi. The problem of its interpretation’, Vigiliae Christianae 35: 105–51; repr. in Runia (1990).Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1986) Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of Plato. 2nd ed. Philosophia Antiqua 44. Leiden.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1988) ‘Naming and knowing. Themes in Philonic theology with special reference to the De mutatione nominum’, in Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. van den Broek, R., Baarda, T. and Mansfeld, J.. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain 112. Leiden and New York: 6991.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1990) Exegesis and Philosophy. Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Variorum Collected Studies Series. London.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1993a) Philo in Early Christian Literature. A Survey. Compendia rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum 3. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1993b) ‘Was Philo a Middle Platonist? A difficult question revisited’, Studia Philonica Annual 5: 112–40.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1996) ‘Additional fragments of Arius Didymus on physics’, in Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld, ed. Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D.. Leiden: 363–83.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1999) ‘Philo of Alexandria and the Greek Hairesis-model’, Vigiliae Christianae 53, 2: 117–47.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (2001) Philo of Alexandria. On the Creation of the Cosmos According to Moses. Leiden.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (2003) ‘Plato’s Timaeus, first principle(s) and creation in Philo and Early Christian thought’, in Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon, ed. Reydams-Schils, G.. Notre Dame: 133–51.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (2008) ‘Philo and Hellenistic doxography’, in Alesse, (2008): 1352.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (2011) ‘Ancient philosophy and the New Testament. “Exemplar” as example’, in Method and Meaning. Essays on New Testament Interpretation in Honor of Harold W. Attridge, ed. McGowan, A. B. and Richards, K. H.. Atlanta: 347–61.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (2010) ‘Virtue and happiness in the Lyceum and beyond’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 143–85.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (ed.) (2005) Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (ed.) (2009a) God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (2009b) ‘Chrysippus on conflagration and the indestructibility of the cosmos’, in Salles, (2009a): 118–34.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1930) ‘Ennoia and Prolepsis in the Stoic theory of knowledge’, Classical Quarterly 24: 4451.Google Scholar
Schenke, G. (2008) ‘The relationship of the Gospel of Judas to the New Testament and to Sethianism. Appended by a new English translation of the Gospel of Judas’, Journal of Coptic Studies 10: 6398.Google Scholar
Schneider, J.-P. (1994) ‘Boéthus de Sidon RE 9’, in Goulet, (1989–2012): 2.126–30.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1980) ‘Preconception, argument, and God’, in Doubt and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, ed. Barnes, J. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 283308.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28: 3158.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) The Stoic Idea of the City, expanded edition. Chicago.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) ‘Ciceronian dialogue’, in The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, ed. Goldhill, S.. Cambridge: 6384.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012a) ‘Antiochus on social virtue’, in Sedley, (2012): 173–87.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012b) ‘The neutralizing argument. Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero’, in Sedley, (2012): 237–49.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (ed.) (2013) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. New Directions for Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schrenk, L. P. (1991a) ‘A Middle Platonic reading of Plato’s theory of recollection’, Ancient Philosophy 11: 103–10.Google Scholar
Schrenk, L. P. (1991b) ‘Faculties of judgment in the Didaskalikos’, Mnemosyne 44: 347–63.Google Scholar
Schrenk, L. P. (1993) ‘The Middle Platonist reception of Aristotelian science’, Rheinisches Museum 136: 342–59.Google Scholar
Scott, J. M. (1995) Paul and the Nations. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1982) ‘On signs’, in Science and Speculation, ed. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge-Paris: 239–72.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1996) ‘Alcinous’ epistemology’, in Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday, ed. Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D.. Leiden: 300–12.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1997a) ‘Plato’s auctoritas and the rebirth of the commentary tradition’, in Philosophia Togata II. Plato and Aristotle at Rome, ed. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Oxford: 110–29.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1997b) ‘“Becoming like god” in the Timaeus and Aristotle’, in Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias, ed. Calvo, T. and Brisson, L.. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1999) ‘The ideal of godlikeness’, in Plato 2 – Ethics, Politics, Religion and the Soul, ed. Fine, G.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2002a), ‘Aristotelian relativities’, in Le style de la pensée, ed. Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P.. Paris: 324–52.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2002b) ‘The origins of Stoic god’, in Traditions of Theology, ed. Frede, D. and Laks, A.. Leiden: 4183.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2003a) ‘The school from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in Inwood, (2003): 732.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2003b) ‘Philodemus and the decentralisation of philosophy’, Cronache ercolanesi 33: 3141.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (ed.) (2003c) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2005) ‘Stoic metaphysics at Rome’, in Salles, (2005): 117–42.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (ed.) (2012a) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2012b) ‘Introduction’, in Sedley, (2012a): 18.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2012c) ‘Antiochus as historian of philosophy’, in Sedley, (2012a): 80103.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2012d) ‘The theoretikos bios in Alcinous’, in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, (2012): 163–81.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2013) ‘Cicero and the Timaeus’, in Schofield, (2013): 187205.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1983) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Fate. London.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1989) ‘The criterion of truth in Philo Judaeus, Alcinous, and Alexander of Aphrodisias’, in The Criterion of Truth. Essays Written in Honour of George Kerferd, ed. Huby, P. and Seal, G.. Liverpool: 231–56.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1990) Alexander of Aphrodisias. Ethical Problems. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1995) ‘Counting Plato’s principles’, in The Passionate Intellect, ed. Ayres, L.. New Brunswick: 6782.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias. Supplement to On the Soul. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2007) ‘Peripatetics on happiness’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 2.627–37.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2008a) Alexander of Aphrodisias, De anima libri mantissa. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2008b) ‘Habent sua fata libelli. Aristotle’s Categories in the first century BC’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 48: 273–87.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2010a) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to 200 AD. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2010b) ‘Peripatetics’, in The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Later Antiquity, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Vol. I. Cambridge: 140–60.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2011) ‘Perfecting pleasures. The metaphysics of pleasure in Nicomachean Ethics X’, in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. A Critical Guide, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 191220.Google Scholar
Siegert, F. (1988) Philon von Alexandrien: Über die Gottesbezeichnung ‘wohltätig verzehrendes Feuer’ (De Deo). Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 46. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Siegert, F. (1998) ‘The Philonian fragment De Deo. First English translation’, Studia Philonica Annual 10: 133.Google Scholar
Siegert, F. (2004) ‘Der Logos, “älterer Sohn” des Schöpfers und “zweiter Gott”. Philons Logos und der Johannesprolog’, in Kontexte des Johannesevangeliums. Das vierte Evangelium in religions- und traditionsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, ed. Frey, J. and Schnelle, U.. Tübingen: 277–93.Google Scholar
Siegert, F. and Bergler, S. (2010) Synopse der vorkanonischen Jesusüberlieferungen. Zeichenquelle und Passionsbericht, die Logienquelle und der Grundbestand des Markusevangeliums in deutscher Übersetzung gegenübergestellt von Folker Siegert. Rekonstruktion der Zeichenquelle von Siegfried Bergler. Schriften des Institutum Judaicum Delitzschianum 8/1. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Z. (1990) Drudgery Divine. On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (2001) The Origins of Biblical Monotheism. Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (2008) God in Translation. Deities in Cross-Cultural Discourse in the Biblical World. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sommer, B. (2009) The Bodies of God and the World of Ancient Israel. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2000) Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2005) The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 AD. Vol. 1: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2007a) ‘Introduction’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 132.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2007b) ‘What is new on emotion in Stoicism after 100 BC?’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 163–74.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.) (2007) Greek & Roman Philosophy 100 BC – 200 AD, 2 vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 94. London.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. (1992) ‘Creatio temporalis, aeterna, vel continua? An analysis of the thought of Philo of Alexandria’, Studia Philonica Annual 4: 1541.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. (1993) ‘Platonizing Moses. Philo and Middle Platonism’, Studia Philonica Annual 5: 96111.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. (1995) ‘Wisdom among the perfect. Creation traditions in Alexandrian Judaism and Corinthian Christianity’, Novum Testamentum 37: 355–84.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. (2012) ‘“The Image of God”. Becoming like God in Philo, Paul, and Early Christianity’, in Portraits of Jesus. Studies in Christology, ed. Myers, S. E.. Tübingen: 157–73.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (1994) A Rereading of Romans. Justice, Jews and Gentiles. New Haven.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2003) ‘Paul and self-mastery’, in Paul in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Sampley, J. P.. Harrisburg: 524–50.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2008a) ‘What is Pauline participation in Christ’, in New Views of Jewish and Christian Self-Definition. Essays in Honor of E. P. Sanders, ed. Chancey, M., Heschel, S. and Udoh, F.. Notre Dame: 352–71.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2008b) ‘Two kinds of self. A response to Ekkehard W. Stegemann’, in Reformation Readings of Romans, ed. Ehrensperger, K. and Holder, R. W.. London: 50–6.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2009) ‘The Apostle Paul’, in The History of the Western Philosophy of Religion (vol. 1), ed. Oppy, G. and Trakakis, N.. Oxford: 145–57.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2011a) ‘The religion of plant and animal offerings versus the religion of meanings, essences and textual mysteries’, in Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice, ed. Knust, J. W. and Varhelyi, Z.. Oxford: 3556.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2011b) ‘Paul’s four discourses about sin’, in Celebrating Paul. Festschrift in Honor of Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, O.P., and Joseph A. Fitzmyer, S. J., ed. Spitaler, P.. Washington, DC: 100–27.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2012) ‘Gods, monotheism and ancient Mediterranean religion’, A paper presented at the Brown Seminar for Culture and Religion of the Ancient Mediterranean and the Columbia University New Testament Seminar.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2013) ‘Paul as hero of subjectivity’, in Paul and the Philosophers, ed. Blanton, W. and de Vries, H.. New York: 159–74.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. (2015) ‘Paul and the terrain of philosophy’, Early Christianity 6: 141–56.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996a) Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996b) ‘Kriterion tes aletheias’, in Striker, (1996a): 2276.Google Scholar
Struck, P. (2004) The Birth of the Symbol. Ancient Readers and the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Szaif, J. (2012) Gut des Menschen. Untersuchungen zur Problematik und Entwicklung der Glücksethik bei Aristoteles und in der Tradition des Peripatos. Berlin.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. (2010) review of Dörrie, H. et al., Der Platonismus in der Antike, Gnomon 82: 389404.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1993) Thrasyllian Platonism. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2005) Recollecting Plato’s Meno, London.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2007) ‘Moral goal and moral virtues in Middle Platonism’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 419–29.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2008) ‘Eudorus and the early Platonist interpretation of the Categories’, Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64: 583–95.Google Scholar
Terian, A. (1984) ‘A critical introduction to Philo’s dialogues’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II.21.1, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 272–94.Google Scholar
Terian, A. (1991) ‘Strange interpolations in the text of Philo. The case of Quaestiones in Exodum’, in Heirs of the Septuagint. Philo, Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity. Festschrift for Earle Hilgert, ed. Runia, D. T., Hay, D. M. and Winston, D.. Brown Judaic Studies 230 [= Studia Philonica Annual 3]. Atlanta: 320–7.Google Scholar
Terian, A. (unpublished), ‘From onologue to trialogue. De Providentia I–III and the culmination of Philo’s apology for the law’, A paper presented to the Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting, San Francisco 2011.Google Scholar
Theiler, W. (1965) ‘Philo von Alexandria und der Beginn des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus’, in Parusia. Studien zur Philosophie Platons und zur Problemgeschichte des Platonismus, ed. Flasch, K.. Frankfurt: 199218.Google Scholar
Thiel, D. (2006) Die Philosophie des Xenokrates im Kontext der Alten Akademie. Munich.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. (ed.) (2005) Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus, text, tr., and comm. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 33. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. (2012) ‘Popular philosophy in the Hellenistic-Roman world’, Early Christianity 3: 279–95.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. (2015) ‘Paul and popular philosophy’, in Paul’s Graeco-Roman Context, ed. Breytenbach, C., Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 277. Leuven, Paris and Bristol, CT: 4774.Google Scholar
Thomassen, E. (2006) The Spiritual Seed. The Church of the ‘Valentinians’. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 60. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections. Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tobin, T. H. (1983) The Creation of Man. Philo and the History of Interpretation. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 14. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tobin, T. H. (1990) ‘The prologue of John and Hellenistic Jewish speculation’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 52: 252–69.Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1976) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Stoic Physics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1977) ‘The author of the De Qualitatibus Incorporeis. If not Albinus, who?’, L’Antiquité Classique 46: 198204.Google Scholar
Torri, P. ‘Quale dio per quale vita? Una interpretazione del τέλος platonico dell’ assimilazione a dio nel Didaskalikos di Alcinoo’, in press in Philologus.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire. Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Trizio, M. (2008) ‘Neoplatonic source-material in Eustratios of Nicaea’s Commentary on Book VI of the Nicomachean Ethics’, in Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Barber, C. and Jenkins, D.. Leiden: 71110.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2010) ‘Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics’. Diss. Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2012) ‘Antiochus on contemplation and the happy life’, in Sedley, (2012): 131–50.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. (2001) Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi, Études 6. Quebec.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. (2007) ‘Sethian Gnosticism. A revised literary history’, in Actes du huitième congrès international d’études coptes. Paris, 28 juin-3 juillet 2004, ed. Bousson, N. and Goud’hors, A.. 2 vols. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 163. Louvain: II, 899908.Google Scholar
Urban, L. and Henry, P. (1979–80) ‘“Before Abraham was I am”. Does Philo explain John 8:56–58?Studia Philonica 6: 157–95.Google Scholar
Van Ackeren, M. (2011) Die Philosophie Marc Aurels, 2 vols. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Van der Stockt, L. (2011) ‘Semper duo, numquam tres? Plutarch’s Popularphilosophie in On Having Many Friends’, in Virtues for the People. Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, ed. Roskam, G. and Van der Stockt, L.. Plutarchea Hypomnemata 4. Leuven: 1939.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. (2011) ‘Philo of Alexandria. Challenging Graeco-Roman culture’, in Van Nuffelen, P., Rethinking the Gods. Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period. Cambridge: 200–16.Google Scholar
Vegge, I. (2008) 2 Corinthians – a Letter about Reconciliation. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.239. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1991) Mortals and Immortals. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (eds.) (1884–1912, repr. 1958) Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium, 5 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wahlde, U. C. (2010) The Gospel and Letters of John, 3 vols. Eerdmans Critical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Waldstein, M. and Wisse, F. (1995) The Apocryphon of John. Synopsis of Nag Hammadi Codices II,1; III,1; and IV,1 with BG 8502,2. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 33. Leiden.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2015) ‘The bloom of youth’, Apeiron 48: 327–45.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. J. (2008) The Death of the Soul in Romans 7. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.256. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. J. (2012) ‘Paul beyond the Judaism/Hellenism divide? The case of Pauline anthropology in Romans 7 and 2 Cor 4–5’, in Christian Origins and Hellenistic Judaism. Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, ed. Porter, S. and Pitts, A.. Leiden: 259–79.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. J. (2013) ‘Beyond apocalyptic dualism. Ranks of divinities in 1 Enoch and Daniel’, in ‘The One Who Sows Bountifully’. Essays in Honor of Stanley K. Stowers, ed. Hodge, C. Johnson, Olyan, S. M., Ullucci, D. and Wasserman, E. J.. Providence: 189–99.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. J. (in press) Apocalypse as Holy War. Religious Polemic and Violence in the World of Paul. New Haven.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1967) Die Schule des Aristoteles. Texte und Kommentar. 2nd ed. Basel.Google Scholar
Wendland, P. (1892) Die philosophischen Quellen des Philo von Alexandria in seiner Schrift über die Vorsehung. Berlin.Google Scholar
White, M. J. (2003) ‘Stoic natural philosophy (physics and cosmology)’, in Inwood, (2003): 124–52.Google Scholar
White, S. (2002) ‘Happiness in the Hellenistic Lyceum’, in Eudaimonia and Well-Being. Ancient and Modern Conceptions, ed. Jost, L. J. and Shiner, R. A. = Apeiron 35: 6993.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (2006) ‘The Nicomachean account of philia’, in The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Kraut, R.. Oxford: 276304.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (ed.) (1990) Alcinoos. Enseignement des doctrines de Platon. Paris.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. (2012) The Cosmic Viewpoint. A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, J. A. (1988) Biblical Interpretation in the Gnostic Gospel of Truth from Nag Hammadi. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 79. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Williams, M. A. (1996) Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’. An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Winston, D. (1971) ‘The Book of Wisdom’s theory of cosmogony’, History of Religions 11: 185202; repr. in Winston, (2001): 5982.Google Scholar
Winston, D. (1979) The Wisdom of Solomon. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 43. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
Winston, D. (ed.) (1981) Philo of Alexandria. The Contemplative Life, The Giants and Selections. The Classics of Western Spirituality. New York.Google Scholar
Winston, D. (1985) Logos and Mystical Theology in Philo of Alexandria. Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Winston, D. (2001) The Ancestral Philosophy. Hellenistic Philosophy in Second Temple Judaism, ed. Sterling, G. E.. Studia Philonica Monographs 4. Brown Judaic Studies 331. Providence, RI.Google Scholar
Winston, D. (2004) ‘Un secolo di ricerca sul libro della Sapienza’, in Il Libro della Sapienza. Tradizione, redazione, teologia, ed. Bellia, G. and Passaro, A.. Studia Biblica 1. Rome: 1331.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1909) Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer historischen Entwicklung III.1. 4th ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zetterholm, M. (2009) Approaches to Paul. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (trans.) (1999) Cicero. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2016) ‘Philosophy is in the streets’, in Roman Reflections. Studies in Latin Philosophy, ed. Williams, G. D. and Volk, K.. Oxford: 5062.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Troels Engberg-Pedersen, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: From Stoicism to Platonism
  • Online publication: 24 March 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316694459.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Troels Engberg-Pedersen, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: From Stoicism to Platonism
  • Online publication: 24 March 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316694459.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Troels Engberg-Pedersen, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: From Stoicism to Platonism
  • Online publication: 24 March 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316694459.018
Available formats
×