Adler, S. (1964) “Tests of the conserved vector current and partially conserved axial-vector current hypotheses in high energy neutrino reactions”PR, 135: B963–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (1965a) “Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current, I and II”PR, 137: B1022–B1033; PR, 139: B1638–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (1965b) “Calculation of the axial-vector coupling constant renormalization in beta decay”PRL, 14: 1051–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (1965c) “Sum rules for the axial-vector coupling constant renormalization in beta decay”PR, 140: B736–B747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (1966) “Sum rules giving tests of local current commutation relations in high energy neutrino reactions”PR, 143: 1144–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (1967) “Current algebra” in Proceedings of International School of Physics, “Enrico Fermi” Course 41, Selected Topics in Particle Physics (July 17–29, 1967) (ed. Steinberger, J.; Academic Press) 1–54.Google Scholar

Adler, S. (1969) “Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics”PR, 177: 2426–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (1970): “π0 decay” in High-Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure (ed. Devors, S.; Plenum Press) 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. (2006) “Commentaries” in Adventures in Theoretical Physics (World Scientific) 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. and Bardeen, W. A. (1969) “Absence of higher-order corrections in the anomalous axial-vector divergence equation”PR, 182: 1517–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. and Gilman, F. J. (1967) “Neutrino or electron energy needed for testing current commutation relations”PR, 156: 1598–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. and Tung, W. K. (1969) “Breakdown of asymptotic sum rules in perturbation theory”PRL, 22: 978–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, S. and Tung, W. K. (1970) “Bjorken limit in perturbation theory”PR, D1: 2846–2859.Google Scholar

Affleck, I., Dine, M., and Seiberg, S. (1983) “Supersymmetry breaking by instantons”PRL, 51: 1026–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Affleck, I., Dine, M., and Seiberg, S. (1984) “Calculable nonperturbative supersymmetry breaking”PRL, 52: 1677–1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aharonov, Y. and Bohm, D. (1959) “Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory”PR, 115: 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, P. (1963) “Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass”PR, 130: 439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appelquist, T. and Politzer, D. (1975) “Heavy quarks and long-lived hadrons”PR, D12: 1404–1414.Google Scholar

Appelquist, T., Barnett, R., and Lane, K. (1978) “Charm and beyond”Annu. Rev. Nucl. and Particle Sci., 28: 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustin, J.-E.et al. (1974) “Discovery of a narrow resonance in e+e− annihilation”PRL, 33: 1406–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardeen, W., Fritzsch, H., and Gell-Mann, M. (1972) “Light cone current algebra, π0 decay and e+e− annihilation” (first circulated as a CERN Preprint, Ref.TH.1538-CERN; 21 July 1972), in Scale and Conformal Symmetry in Hadron Physics (ed. Gatto, R.; Wiley) 139–153.Google Scholar

Bartoli, B.et al. (1970) “Multiple particle production from e+e− interactions at C.M. energies between 1.6 and 2 Gev”NC, 70A: 615–631.Google Scholar

Belavin, A., Polyakov, A., Schwarz, A., and Tyupkin, Y. (1975) “Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations”PL, 59B: 85–87.Google Scholar

Bell, J. (1967) “Current algebra and gauge invariance”NC, 50A: 129–134.Google Scholar

Bell, J. and Jackiw, R. (1969) “A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the σ-model”NC, 60A: 47–61.Google Scholar

Bethe, H. A. (1947) “The electromagnetic shift of energy levels”PR, 72: 339–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1966a) “Inequality for electron and muon scattering from nucleons”PRL, 16: 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1966b) “Applications of the chiral U(6)⊗U(6) algebra of current densities”PR, 148: 1467–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1967a [2003]) “Inelastic lepton scattering and nucleon structure.”An incomplete unpublished manuscript written in March 1967, later published in In Conclusion (World Scientific), 27–39.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1967b) “Current algebra in small distances” in Proceedings of International School of Physics, “Enrico Fermi” Course 41, “Selected Topics in Particle Physics” (July 17–19, 1967), (ed. Steinberger, J.;Academic Press) 55–81.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1967c) “Theoretical ideas on inelastic electron and muon scattering” in Proceedings of the 1967 International Symposium on Electron and Photon Interactions at High Energies (Stanford, September 5–9, 1967) (International Union of Pure and Applied Physics, US Atomic Energy Commission with a Foreword by Berman, S. M.) 109–127.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1968) “Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum”SLAC preprint: SLAC-PUB-510.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1969) “Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum”PR, 179: 1547–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1973a) “A theorist's view of e+e− annihilation” in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Electron and Photon Interaction at High Energies, 1973, Boun (eds. Rollnik, H. and Pteil, W.; North-Holland), reprinted in Bjorken, 2003, 199–224.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1973b) “High transverse momentum processes”Le Journal de Physique, Colloques, Supplement, 34 (C1): 385–400.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1979) “The new orthodoxy: How can it fail?”A talk presented at Neutrino 79 – International Conference on Neutrinos, Weak Interactions and Cosmology (Bergen, Norway, June 18–22, 1979), printed in Bjorken, 2003, 291–303.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. (1997) “Deep-inelastic scattering: from current algebra to partons” in The Rise of The Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dressden, M.; Cambridge University Press) 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. (2003) In Conclusion (World Scientific).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. and Glashow, S. (1964) “Elementary particles and SU (4)”PL, 11: 255–257.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. and Paschos, E. (1969) “Inelastic electron-proton and γ-proton scattering and the structure of the nucleon”PR, 185: 1975–1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorken, J. and Tuan, S. F. (1972) “Is the Adler sum rule for inelastic lepton-hadron processes correct?”Comm. of Nucl. Part Phys. 5: 71–78.Google Scholar

Bjorken, J. and Walecka, J. (1966) “Electroproduction of nucleon resonances”AP, 38: 35–62.Google Scholar

Blankenbecler, R., Cook, L. F., and Goldberger, M. L. (1962) “Is the photon an elementary particle?”PRL, 8: 463–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, E., and Gilman, F. (1970) “Scaling, duality, and the behavior of resonances in inelastic electron-proton scattering”PRL, 25: 1140–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, E. D. and Taylor, R. E. (1968) “To: Program Coordinator” (May 10, 1968) Supplement No. 1 to SLAC Proposal 4–b.

Bloom, E. D.et al. (1969) “High energy inelastic e-p scattering at 60 and 100”PRL, 23: 930–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, E. D.et al. (1970) MIT-SLAC Report No. SLAC-PUB-796 (unpublished report presented to the 15th International Conference on High Energy Physics, Kiev, USSR, 1970.Google Scholar

Bludman, S. A. (1958) “On the universal Fermi interaction”NC, 9: 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodek, A. (1973) “Comment on the extraction of nucleon cross sections from deuterium data”PR, D8: 2331–2334.Google Scholar

Bogoliubov, N. (1958) “A new method in the theory of superconductivity”JETP, 34 (7): 41–46, 51–55.Google Scholar

Bollini, D.Buhler-Broglin, A., Dalpiaz, P.et al. (1968) “An evidence for a new decay mode of the X°-meson: X°→2γ”NC, 58A: 289–296.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1925) “Atomic theory and mechanics”Nature, 116: 845–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, R. A. (1967) “Derivation of renormalized relativistic perturbation theory from finite local fiend equations”AP, 44: 221–265.Google Scholar

Brown, L. M. (1978) “The idea of the neutrino”Physics Today, 31(9): 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchholz, D. (1994) “On the manifestation of particles” in Mathematical Physics Toward the 21st Century (eds. Sen, R. N and Gersten, A.; Ben Gurion University Press).Google Scholar

Buchholz, D. (1996) “Quarks, gluons, color: facts or fiction?”NP, 469: 333–353.Google Scholar

Cabibbo, N. (1963) “Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays”PRL, 10: 531–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabibbo, N., Parisi, G., and Testa, M. (1970) “Hadron production in e+e− collisions”Lettere NC, 4: 35–39.Google Scholar

Callan, C. (1970) “Bjorken scale invariance in scalar field theory”PR, D2: 1541–1547.Google Scholar

Callan, C. and Gross, D. (1968) “Crucial test of a theory of currents”PRL, 21: 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, C. and Gross, D. (1969) “High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current”PRL, 22: 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, C. and Gross, D. (1973) “Bjorken scaling in quantum field theory”PR, D8: 4383–4394.Google Scholar

Callan, C. and Treiman, S. (1966) “Equal-time commutators and K-meson decays”PRL, 16: 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, C., Coleman, S., and Jackiw, R. (1970) “A new improved energy-momentum tensor”AP, 59: 42–73.Google Scholar

Callan, C., Dashen, R., and Gross, D. (1976) “The structure of the vacuum”PL, 63B: 334–340.Google Scholar

Callan, C., Dashen, R., and Gross, D. (1978) “Toward a theory of the strong interactions”PR, D17: 2717–2763.Google Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (1997) Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (2001) “Prerequisites for a consistent framework of quantum gravity,”Stud. Hist. Philos Mod. Phys., 32(2): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (2003a) “Structural realism and the interpretation of quantum field theory”Synthese, 136(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (2003b) “Can we dissolve physical entities into mathematical structures?”Synthese, 136(1): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (2003c) “What is ontological synthesis? A reply to Simon Saunders”Synthese, 136(1): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (2006) “Structural realism and quantum gravity” in Structural Foundation of Quantum Gravity (eds. Rickles, D., French, S., and Saatsi, J.; Oxford University Press) 42–55.Google Scholar

Cao, T. Y. (forthcoming) The Making of QCD (Cambridge University Press).

Capra, F. (1979) “Quark physics without quarks: a review of recent developments in S-matrix theory,”AJP, 47: 11–23.Google Scholar

Capra, F. (1985) “Bootstrap physics: a conversation with Geoffrey Chew” in A Passion for Physics: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Chew (eds. Tar, C., Finkelstein, J. and Tan, C. I.; Taylor and Francis) 247–286.Google Scholar

Carmeli, M. (1976) “Modified gravitational Lagrangian”PR, D14: 1727.Google Scholar

Carmeli, M. (1977) “SL2c conservation laws of general relativity”NC, 18: 17–20.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1928) Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. (Felix Meiner Verlag; English translation by George, Rolf A., 1967, The Logical Structure of the World. Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. University of California Press).Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1934) Logische Syntax der Sprache. (English translation 1937, The Logical Syntax of Language. Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1950) “Empiricism, semantics and ontology”Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40; also in Carnap (1956), 205–221.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1956) Meaning and Necessity (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Casher, A., Kogut, J., and Susskind, L. (1973) “Vacuum polarization and the quark-parton puzzle”PRL, 31: 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1936) Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics (Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1944) “Group concept and perception theory,”Philos. Phenom. Res., 5: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakravartty, A. (2004) “Structuralism as a form of scientific realism”Int. Stud. Philos. of Sci., 18: 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, C. (1968) “Causality in S-matrix theory”PR, 174: 1749–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, C. and Stapp, H. P. (1969) “Macroscopic causality and properties of scattering amplitudes”JMP, 10: 826–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, C.et al. (1975) “Observed deviations from scale invariance in high-energy muon scattering”PRL, 35: 901–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charap, J. M. and Fubini, S. (1959) “The field theoretic definition of the nuclear potential-I,”NC, 14: 540–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. (1953a) “Pion-nucleon scattering when the coupling is weak and extended”PR, 89: 591–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. (1953b) “A new theoretical approach to the pion-nucleon interaction”PR, 89: 904.Google Scholar

Chew, G. F. (1961) S-Matrix Theory of Strong Interactions (W. A. Benjamin).Google Scholar

Chew, G. F. (1962) “S-matrix theory of strong interactions without elementary particles”RMP, 34: 394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. (1967) “Closure, locality, and the bootstrap”PRL, 19: 1492–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. (1989) “Particles as S-matrix poles: hadron democracy” in Pions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950s (eds. Brown, L. M., Dresden, M. and Hoddeson, L.; Cambridge University Press) 600–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. and Frautschi, S. C. (1960) “Unified approach to high- and low-energy strong interactions on the basis of the Mandelstam representation”PRL, 5: 580–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. and Frautschi, S. C. (1961a) “Potential scattering as opposed to scattering associated with independent particles in the S-matrix theory of strong interactions”PR, 124: 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. and Frautschi, S. C. (1961b) “Principle of equivalence for all strongly interacting particles within the S-matrix framework”PRL, 8: 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. and Frautschi, S. C. (1961c) “Principle of equivalence for all strongly interacting particles within the S-matrix framework”PRL, 7: 394–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. and Low, F. E. (1956) “Effective-range approach to the low-energy p-wave pion-nucleon interaction”PR, 101: 1570–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F. and Mandelstam, S. (1960) “Theory of low energy pion-pion interaction”PR, 119: 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F., Goldberger, M. L., Low, F. E., and Nambu, Y. (1957a) “Application of dispersion relations to low-energy meson-nucleon scattering”PR, 106: 1337–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G. F., Goldberger, M. L., Low, F. E., and Nambu, Y. (1957b) “Relativistic dispersion relation approach to photomeson production”PR, 106: 1345–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, G., Karplus, R., Gasiorowicz, S., and Zachariasen, F. (1958) “Electromagnetic structure of the nucleon in local field theory”PR, 110: 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Y. M. (1975) “Higher-dimensional unifications of gravitation and gauge Theories”JMP, 16: 2029–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Y. M. (1976) “Einstein Lagrangian as the translational Yang-Mills Lagrangian”PR, D14: 2521–2525.Google Scholar

Coleman, S. and Jackiw, R. (1971) “Why dilatation generators do not generate dilatations”AP, 67: 552–598.Google Scholar

Coleman, S. and Gross, D. (1973) “Price of asymptotic freedom”PRL, 31: 851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, S. and Weinberg, E. (1973) “Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking”PR, D7: 1888–1910.Google Scholar

Cornwall, J. M. and Jackiw, R. (1971) “Canonical light-cone commutators”PR, D4: 367–378.Google Scholar

Coster, J. and Stapp, H. P. (1969) “Physical-region discontinuity equations for many-particle scattering amplitudes. I”JMP, 10: 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coster, J. and Stapp, H. P. (1970a) “Physical-region discontinuity equations for many-particle scattering amplitudes. II”JMP, 11: 1441–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coster, J. and Stapp, H. P. (1970b) “Physical-region discontinuity equations”JMP, 11: 2743–2763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creutz, M., Jacobs, L., and Rebbi, C. (1979) “Monte Carlo study of Abelian lattice gauge theories”PR, D20: 1915–1922.Google Scholar

Crewther, R. (1972) “Nonperturbative evaluation of the anomalies in low-energy theorems”PRL, 28: 1421–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushing, J. T. (1990) Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S-Matrix Theory (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutkosky, R. E. (1960) “Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes”JMP, 1: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalitz, (1966) “Quark models for the ‘elementary particles’” in High Energy Physics (eds. DeWitt, C. and Jacob, M.; Gordon and Breach) 251–324.Google Scholar

Dalitz, (1967) “Symmetries and the strong interactions” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on High Energy Physics (University of California Press) 215–234.Google Scholar

Forest, T., and Walecka, J. D. (1966) “Electron scattering and nuclear structure”Adv. Phys., 15: 1–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rujula, A. (1976) “Plenary report on theoretical basis of new particles” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on High Energy Physics (Tbilisi, USSR) II: N111–127.Google Scholar

Rujula, (1979) “Quantum Chromo Dynamite”Proceedings of the International Conference on High Energy Physics (European Physical Society, Geneva, June 27–July 4, 1979), 418–441.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. (1951) “Evidence for the formation of positronium in gases”PR, 82: 455–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeWitt, B. S. (1964) “Theory of radiative corrections for non-Abelian gauge Fields”PRL, 12: 742–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeWitt, B. S. (1967a) “Quantum theory of gravity I. The canonical theory”PR, 160: 1113–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeWitt, B. S. (1967b) “Quantum theory of gravity II. The manifestly covariant theory”PR, 162: 1195–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeWitt, B. S. (1967c) “Quantum theory of gravity III. Applications of the covariant theory”PR, 162: 1239–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolen, R., Horn, O., and Schmid, C. (1967) “Prediction of Regge parameters of ρ poles from low-energy πN data”PRL, 19: 402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolen, R., Horn, O., and Schmid, C. (1968) “Finite-energy sum rules and their applications to πN charge exchange”PR, 166: 1768–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doncel, M. G., Hermann, A., Michel, L, Pais, A. (eds.) (1987) Symmetries in Physics (1600–1980) (Servei de Publicacions, UAB, Barcelona).Google Scholar

Drell, S. and Lee, T. D. (1972) “Scaling properties and the bound-state nature of the physical nucleon”PR, D5: 1738–1763.Google Scholar

Drell, S. and Schwartz, C. L. (1958) “Sum rules for inelastic electron scattering”PR, 112: 568–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drell, S. and Walecka, J. D. (1964) “Electrodynamic processes with nuclear targets”AP, 28: 18–33.Google Scholar

Drell, S., Levy, D., and Yan, T. M. (1969) “Theory of deep-inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering and lepton-pair annihilation processes. I”PR, 187: 2159–2171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, P. (1906) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Trans. Wiener, Philip P.; Princeton University Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Dyson, F. J. (1951) “The renormalization method in quantum electrodynamics”PRS, A207: 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, F. (2004) “A meeting with Enrico Fermi”Nature, 427: 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichten, E., Gottfried, K., Kinoshita, T.et al. (1975): “Spectrum of charmed quark-antiquark bound states”PRL, 34: 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, J. (1974) “Theoretical ideas about e+e− → hadrons at high energies” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on High Energy Physics, London, July 1974 (ed. Smith, J. R.; Rutherford Laboratory, Science Research Council), IV: 20–35.Google Scholar

Ellis, J., Gaillard, M. K., and Ross, G. (1976) “Search for gluons in e+e− annihilation”NP, B111: 253–271.Google Scholar

Faddeev, L. D. and Popov, V. N. (1967) “Feynman diagrams for the Yang-Mills field”PL, 25B: 29–30.Google Scholar

Federbush, P., Goldberger, M. L., and Treiman, S. (1958) “Electromagnetic structure of the nucleon”PR, 112: 642–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feigl, H. (1974) “Empiricism at bay?” in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (eds. Cohen, R. and Wartofsky, D.; Reidel) XIV: 8.Google Scholar

Fermi, E. and Yang, C. N. (1949) “Are mesons elementary particles?”PR, 76: 1739–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feynman, R. P. (1963) “Quantum theory of gravity”Acta Phys. Polonica, 24: 697–722.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. (1969a) “Very high-energy collisions of hadrons”PRL, 23: 1415–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feynman, R. P. (1969b) “The behavior of hadron collisions at extreme energies” in High Energy Collisions (eds. Yang, C. N., Cole, J. A., Good, M., Hwa, R., Lee-Franziui, J.; Gordon and Breach) 237–258.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. and Gell-Mann, M. (1958) “Theory of the Fermi interaction”PR, 109: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feynman, R. P., Gell-Mann, M., and Zweig, G. (1964) “Group U(6) ⊗ U(6) Generated by Current Components”PRL, 13: 678–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Field, R. D. (1979) “Dynamics of high energy reactions” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on High Energy Physics (August 23–30, 1978, Tokyo; eds. Homma, S., Kawaguchi, M., and Miyazawa, H.; Physical Society of Japan) 743–773.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (1998) “The viewpoint of no-one in particular” in Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, 72: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, M. E. (1964) “Correlation functions and the critical region of simple fluids”JMP, 5: 944–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frazer, W. R and Fulco, J. R. (1959) “Effect of a pion-pion scattering resonance on nucleon structure”PRL, 2: 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frazer, W. R and Fulco, J. R. (1960) “Effect of a pion-pion scattering resonance on nucleon structure. II”PR, 117: 1609–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fregeau, R. and Hofstadter, R. (1955) “High-energy electron scattering and nuclear structure determination. III. Carbon-12 nucleus”PR, 99: 1503–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, S. (1998) “On the withering away of physical objects” in Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics (ed. Castellani, E.; Princeton University Press) 93–113.Google Scholar

French, S. and Krause, D. (2006) Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, S. and Ladyman, J. (1999) “Reinflating the semantic approach”Int. Stud. Philos. Sci., 13: 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, S. and Ladyman, J. (2003a) “Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure”Synthese, 136: 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, S. and Ladyman, J. (2003b) “Between platonism and phenomenalism: Reply to Cao”Synthese, 136: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, J. (1968) “Preliminary data from a SLAC–MIT inelastic electron–proton scattering experiment,” presented at the conference, not published, but listed as paper 563 on page 456 in the Proceedings of 14th International Conference on High Energy Physics (Geneva, CERN, 1968), with the truncated title “Inelastic scattering from protons.”Google Scholar

Friedman, J. (1991) “Deep inelastic scattering: Comparison with the quark model”RMP, 63: 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, J. (1997) “Deep inelastic scattering and the discovery of quarks” in The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; CambridgeUniversity Press) 566–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, J. and Kendall, H. (1972) “Deep inelastic electron scattering”Annu. Rev. of Nucl., 22: 203–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M. (1992) Kant and the Exact Sciences (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frishman, Y. (1970) “Scale invariance and current commutators near the light cone”PRL, 25: 966–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritzsch, H. and Gell-Mann, M. (1971a) “Scale invariance and the light cone” in Proceedings of the 1971 Coral Gables Conference on Fundamental Interactions at High Energy (eds. Dal Cin, M., et al.; Gorfon and Breach) 1–53.Google Scholar

Fritzsch, H. and Gell-Mann, M. (1971b) “Light cone current algebra” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Duality and Symmetry in Hadron Physics” (ed. Gotsman, E.; Weizmann Science Press) 317–374.Google Scholar

Fritzsch, H. and Gell-Mann, M. (1972) “Current algebra, quarks and what else?” in Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on High Energy Physics, September 6–13, 1972 (eds. Jackson, J. D. and Roberts, A.; National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia), vol. 2: 135–165.Google Scholar

Fritzsch, H., Gell-Mann, M., and Leutwyler, H. (1973) “Advantages of the color octet gluon picture”PL, 47B: 267–271.Google Scholar

Fubini, S. and Furlan, G. (1965) “Renormalization effects for partially conserved currents”Physics, 1: 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaillard, M. (1979) “QCD phenomenology” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on High Energy Physics (23–30 August, 1978, Tokyo; eds. Homma, S., Kawaguchi, M., and Miyazawa, H.; Physical Society of Japan) 390–417.Google Scholar

Gaillard, M., Lee, B. and Rosner, J. (1975) “Search for charm”RMP, 47: 277–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galison, P. (1987) How Experiments End (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Garwin, R. L., Lederman, L. M., and Weinrich, M. (1957) “Observations of the failure of conservation of parity and charge conjugation in meson decays: the magnetic moment of the free muon”PR, 105: 1415–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1953) “Isotopic spin and new unstable particles”PR, 92: 833–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1956a) “The interpretation of the new particles as displaced charged multiplets,”NC Suppl., 4: 848–866.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1956b) “Dispersion relations in pion-pion and photon-nucleon scattering” in High Energy Nuclear Physics, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Rochester Conference (Interscience), sec. III: 30–36.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1957) “Model of the strong couplings”PR, 106: 1296–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1958) “Test of the nature of the vector interaction in b-decay”PR, 111: 362–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1961) “The eightfold way: a theory of strong interaction symmetry”California Institute of Technology Synchrotron Laboratory Report No. CTSL-20; reprinted in Gell-Mann and Ne'eman (1964), 11–57.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1962) “Symmetries of baryons and mesons”PR, 125: 1067–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1964a) “A schematic model of baryons and mesons”PL, 8: 214–215.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1964b) “The symmetry group of vector and axial vector currents”Physics, 1: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1969) “Symmetry violation in hadron physics”University of Hawaii Summer School lectures, later published in Hawaii Topical Conference in Particle Physics, 1: 168–188.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1972) “Quarks: developments in the quark theory of hadrons”Acta Phys. Austriaca, 9: 733–761.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1987) “Particle theory from S-matrix to quarks” in Symmetries in Physics (1600–1980), Proceedings of the First International Meeting on the History of Scientific Ideas (Catalonia, Spain, 1983; eds. Doncel, M. G., Hermann, A., Michel, L. and Pais, A.; Bella Terra) 474–497.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1997) “Quarks, color, and QCD”The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; Cambridge University Press) 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Goldberger, M. L. (1954) “The scattering of low energy photons by particles of spin ½”PR, 96: 1433–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Levy, M. (1960) “The axial vector current in beta decay”NC, 16: 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Low, F. E. (1954) “Quantum electrodynamics at small distances”PR, 95: 1300–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Ne'eman, Y. (eds.) (1964) The Eightfold Way (W. Benjamin).Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Pais, A. (1954) “Theoretical views on the new particles” in Proceedings of the Glasgow International Conference on Nuclear Physics (eds. Bellamy, E. H. and Moorhouse, R. G.; Pergamon) 342–350.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M., Goldberger, M. L., and Thirring, W. (1954) “Use of causality conditions in quantum theory”PR, 95: 1612–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gershstein, S. and Zeldovich, J. (1955) “On corrections from mesons to the theory of β-decay”, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 29: 698–699. (English trans. JETP, 2: 576).Google Scholar

Glashow, S. L. (1959) “The renormalizability of vector meson interactions”NP, 10: 107–117.Google Scholar

Glashow, S. L. (1961) “Partial symmetries of weak interactions”NP, 22: 579–588.Google Scholar

Glashow, S. L., Iliopoulos, J., and Maiani, L. (1970) “Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry”PR, D2: 1285–1292.Google Scholar

Goldberger, M. L. (1955a) “Use of causality conditions in quantum theory”PR, 97: 508–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberger, M. L. (1955b) “Causality conditions and dispersion relations I. Boson fields,”PR, 99: 979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberger, M. L. and Treiman, S. B. (1958) “Decay of the pi meson”PR, 110: 1178–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldhaber, M. (1956) “Compound hypothesis for the heavy unstable particles. II”PR, 101: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldhaber, G.et al. (1976): “Observation in e+e− annihilation of a narrow state at 1865 Mev/c2 decaying to Kπ and Kπππ”PRL, 37: 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstone, J. (1961) “Field theories with ‘superconductor’ solutions”NC, 19: 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goto, T. and Imamura, T. (1955) “Note on the non-perturbation-approach to quantum field theory”PTP, 14: 396–397.Google Scholar

Goto, T (1971): “Relativistic quantum mechanics of one-dimensional mechanical continuum and subsidiary condition of dual resonance model”PTP, 46: 1560–1569.Google Scholar

Greenberg, O. (1964) “Spin and unitary-spin independence in a paraquark model of baryons and mesons”PRL, 13: 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, O. and Zwanziger, D. (1966) “Saturation in triplet models of hadrons”PR, 150: 1177–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, D. (1997) “Asymptotic freedom and the emergence of QCD” in The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; CambridgeUniversity Press) 199–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, D. and Treiman, S. (1971) “Light cone structure of current commutators in the gluon-quark model”PR, D4: 1059–1072.Google Scholar

Gross, D. and Wilczek, F. (1973a) Ultraviolet behavior of non-abelian gauge theories”PRL, 30: 1343–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, D. and Wilczek, F. (1973b) “Asymptotic free gauge theories: I”PR, D8: 3633–3652.Google Scholar

Gross, D. and Wilczek, F. (1973c) “Asymptotic free gauge theories: II”PR, D9: 980–983.Google Scholar

Gulmanelli, P. (1954) Su una Teoria dello Spin Isotropico (Pubblicazioni della Sezione di Milano dell'istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Casa Editrice Pleion, Milano).Google Scholar

Gürsey, F. and Radicati, L. A. (1964) “Spin and unitary spin independence”PRL, 13: 173–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haag, R. (1958) “Quantum field theories with composite particles and asymptotic conditions”PR, 112: 669–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haag, R. (1992) Local Quantum Physics (Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, M. Y. and Nambu, Y. (1965) “Three-triplet model with double SU(3) symmetry”PR, 139B: 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hand, L. (1963) “Experimental investigation of pion electroproduction”PR, 129: 1834–1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hara, Y. (1964) “Unitary triplets and the eightfold way”PR, B134: 701–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, B. J., Park, S. Y., and Yildiz, A. (1975) “Scalar-meson dominance model in the decay ψ′→J+2π”PR, D12: 2765–2767.Google Scholar

Hehl, F. W.et al. (1976) “General relativity with spin and torsion: foundations and prospects”RMP, 48: 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1925) “Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehung”ZP, 33: 879–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1943a) “Die ‘beobachtbaren Grössen’ in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen”ZP, 120: 513–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1943b) “Die ‘beobachtbaren Grössen’ in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen. II”ZP, 120: 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1944) “Die ‘beobachtbaren Grössen’ in der Theorie der Elementarteilchen. III”ZP, 123: 93–112.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1958) “Research on the non-linear spinor theory with indefinite metric in Hilbert Space” in 1958 Annual International Conference on High Energy Physics at CERN (CERN, Geneva), 119–126.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1960) “Recent research on the nonlinear spinor theory of elementary particles”Proceedings of the 1960 Annual International Conference on High Energy Physics at Rochester (Interscience), 851–857.Google Scholar

Hesse, M. B. (1980) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science (Harvester).Google Scholar

Higgs, P. W. (1964a) “Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields”PL, 12: 132–133.Google Scholar

Higgs, P. W. (1964b) “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons”PRL, 13: 508–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, C. (2005) “Conjecture on the physical implications of the scale anomaly” Fermilab-Conf-05/482-T.

Hofstadter, R. (1956) “Electron scattering and nuclear structure”RMP, 28: 214–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstadter, R. and McAllister, R. W. (1955) “Electron scattering from the proton”PR, 98: 217–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstadter, R., Fechter, H. R., and McIntyre, J. A. (1953) “Scattering of high-energy electrons and the method of nuclear recoil”PR, a2: 978–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houard, J. C. and Jouvet, B. (1960) “Etude d'un modèle de champ à constante de renormalisation nulle”NC, 18: 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iagolnitzer, D. and Starpp, H. P. (1969) “Macroscopic causality and physical region analyticity in the S-matrix theory”CMP, 14: 15–55.Google Scholar

Ikeda, M., Ogawa, S. and Ohnuki, Y. (1959) “A possible symmetry in Sakata's model for bosons-baryons system. II”PTP, 22: 715–724.Google Scholar

Jackiw, R. and Preparata, G. (1969) “Probe for the constituents of the electromagnetic current and anomalous commutators”PRL, 22: 975–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackiw, R. and Rebbi, C. (1976) “Vacuum periodicity in a Yang-Mills quantum theory”PRL, 37: 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackiw, R., Royen, R. V., and West, G. B (1970) “Measuring light-cone singularities”PR, D12: 2765–2767.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (1961) “Solution of the equations for the Green's functions of a two dimensional relativistic field theory”NC, 20: 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, K. and Low, F. (1966) “Current algebra in a simple model”PTP, 37–38: 74–93.Google Scholar

Jost, R. (1947) “Über die falschen Nullstellen der Eigenwerte der S-matrix”Helv. Phys. Acta., 20: 256–266.Google Scholar

Kadanoff, L. P. (1966) “Scaling laws for Ising models near Tc”Physics, 2: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamefuchi, S. (1960) “On Salam's equivalence theorem in vector meson theory”NC, 18: 691–696.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1783). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können (Hartknoch, J. F., Riga, ; English translation: Hackett, 1977).Google Scholar

Kendall, H. (1991) “Deep inelastic scattering: experiment on the proton and the observation of scaling”RMP, 63: 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kibble, T. W. B. (1961) “Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field”JMP, 2: 212–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, O. (1959) “On the systematics of elementary particles”Ark. Fys. Swedish Academy of Sciences, 16: 191–196.Google Scholar

Kogut, J. and Susskind, L. (1974) “Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks in four dimensions”PR, D9: 3501–3512.Google Scholar

Kogut, J. and Susskind, L. (1975) “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson's lattice gauge theories”PR, D11: 395–408.Google Scholar

Komar, A. and Salam, A. (1960) “Renormalization problem for vector meson theories”NP, 21: 624–630.Google Scholar

Kramers, H. A. (1944) “Fundamental difficulties of a theory of particles”Ned. Tijdschrift Voor Natuurkunde, 11: 134–147.Google Scholar

Kronig, R. (1946) “A supplementary condition in Heisenberg's theory of elementary particles”Physica, 12: 543–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second enlarged edition, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (2000) The Road Since Structure (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Ladyman, J. (1998) What is structural realism?Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 29: 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1970) “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (eds. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A.; Cambridge University Press) 91–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1971) “History of science and its rational reconstructions” in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (eds. Cohen, R. and Wartofsky, D.; Reidel) VIII: 91–136.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D. (1955) “On the quantum theory of fields” in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics (ed. Pauli, W.; Pergamon) 52–69.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D. (1959) “On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum fined theory”NP, 13: 181–192.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D. and Pomeranchuck, I. (1955) “On point interactions in quantum electrodynamics”DAN, 102: 489–491.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., Abrikosov, A. A., and Khalatnikov, I. M. (1954a) “The removal of infinities in quantum electrodynamics”DAN, 95: 497–499.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., Abrikosov, A. A., and Khalatnikov, I. M. (1954b) “An asymptotic expression for the electron Green function in quantum electrodynamics”DAN, 95: 773–776.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., Abrikosov, A. A. and Khalatnikov, I. M. (1954c) “An asymptotic expression for the photon Green function in quantum electrodynamics”DAN, 95: 1117–1120.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., Abrikosov, A. A., and Khalatnikov, I. M. (1954d) “The electron mass in quantum electrodynamics”DAN, 96: 261–263.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., Abrikosov, A. A., and Kalatnikov, I. M. (1956) “On the quantum theory of fields”NC (Suppl.), 3: 80–104.Google Scholar

Lattes, C. M. G., Muirhead, H., Occhialini, G. P. S., and Powell, C. F. (1947) “Processes involving charged mesons”Nature, 159: 694–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lattes, C. M. G., Occhialini, G. P. S., and Powell, C. F. (1947) “Observations on the tracks of slow Mesons in photographic emulsions, part I, II,”Nature, 160: 453–456; 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, B. W. (1972) “Perspectives on theory of weak interactions” in Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on High Energy Physics, September 6–13, 1972 (eds. Jackson, J. D. and Roberts, A.; National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia) vol. 4: 249–305.Google Scholar

Lee, T. D. (1954) “Some special examples in renormalizable field theory”PR, 95: 1329–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, T. D. and Yang, C. N. (1956) “Question of parity conservation in weak interactions”PR, 104: 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, T. D. and Yang, C. N. (1962) “Theory of charge vector mesons interacting with the electromagnetic field”PR, 128: 885–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, T. D., Weinberg, S., and Zumino, B. (1967) “Algebra of fields”PRL, 18: 1029–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Y. K., Mo, L. W., and Wu, C. S. (1963) “Experimental test of the conserved vector current theory on the beta spectra of B12 and N12”PRL, 10: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann, H., Symanzik, K., and Zimmerman, W. (1955) “Zur Formalierung quantisierter Feldtheorie,”NC, 10(1): 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leutwyler, H. (1968) “Is the group SU(3)l an exact symmetry of one-particle-states?” Preprint (University of Bern).Google Scholar

Leutwyler, H. and Stern, J. (1970) “Singularities of current commutators on the light cone”NP, B20: 77–101.Google Scholar

Levin, E. M. and Frankfurt, L. L. (1965) “The quark hypothesis and relations between cross sections at high energies”JETP Letters, 2(3): 65–67.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. (1998) An exchange on higher superstition with Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt, New York Review of Books, 45(19): 59–60.Google Scholar

Lipkin, H. (1997) “Quark models and quark phenomenology” in The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; Cambridge University Press) 542–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Llewellyn-Smith, C. H. (1971) “Inelastic lepton scattering in gluon models”PR, D4: 2392–2397.Google Scholar

Low, F. E. (1954) “Scattering of light of very low frequency by system of spin ½”PR, 96: 1428–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Low, F. E. (1962) “Bound states and elementary particles”NC, 25: 678–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mack, G. (1968) “Partially conserved dilatation current”NP, B5: 499–507.Google Scholar

Maglic, B. C., Alvarez, L. W., Rosenfeld, A. H., and Stevenson, M. L. (1961) “Evidence for a T=0 three-pion resonance”PRL, 7(1): 78–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maki, Z., Ohnuki, Y., and Sakata, S. (1965) “Remarks on a new concept of elementary particles and the method of the composite model” PTP (Supplement: A Commemoration Issue for the 30th Anniversary of the Meson Theory by Dr. H. Yukawa) 406–415.

Mandelstam, S. (1958) “Determination of the pion-nucleon scattering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity. General theory”PR, 112: 1344–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelstam, S. (1968a) “Feynman rules for electromagnetic and Yang-Mills fields from the gauge-independent field-theoretic formalism”PR, 175: 1580–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelstam, S. (1968b) “Feynman rules for the gravitational field from the coordinate-independent field-theoretic formalism”PR, 175: 1604–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxwell, G. (1970a) “Structural realism and the meaning of theoretical terms” in Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, IV (eds. Winokur, S. and Radner, M.; University of Minnesota Press) 181–192.Google Scholar

Maxwell, G. (1970b) “Theories, perception and structural realism” in Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, IV (ed. Colodny, R., University of Pittsburgh Press) 3–34.Google Scholar

Muta, T. (1979a) “Deep inelastic scattering beyond the leading order in asymptotically free gauge theories” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on High Energy Physics (August 23–30, 1978, Tokyo; eds. Homma, S., Kawaguchi, M., and Miyazawa, H.; Physical Society of Japan) 234–236.Google Scholar

Muta, T. (1979b) “Note on the renormalization-prescription dependence of the quantum-chromodynamic calculation of structure-function moments”PR, D20: 1232–1234.Google Scholar

Nakano, T. and Nishijima, K. (1953) “Charge independence for V-particles”PTP, 10: 581–582.Google Scholar

Nambu, Y. (1956) “Structure of Green's functions in quantum field theory. II”PR, 101: 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nambu, Y. (1957) “Possible existence of a heavy neutral meson”PR, 106: 1366–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nambu, Y. (1965a) “Dynamical symmetries and fundamental fields” in Symmetry Principles at High Energies (eds. Kursunoglu, B., Perlmutter, A. and Sakmar, A.; Freeman) 274–285.Google Scholar

Nambu, Y. (1965b) “A systematics of hadrons in subnuclear physics” in Preludes in Theoretical Physicse (eds. Shalit, A., Feshbach, H., and Hove, L.; North-Holland) 133–142.Google Scholar

Nambu, Y. (1969) “Quark model and the factorization of the Veneziano amplitude” in Proceedings of International Conference on Symmetries and Quark Models, Wayne State University June 1969 (ed. Chaud, R.; Gordon and Breach) 269–278.Google Scholar

Nambu, Y. (1970) “Duality and hadrodynamics” (notes prepared for the Copenhagen high energy symposium, August 1970, unpublished. Texts now available from Broken Symmetry, eds. Eguchi, T. and Nishijima, K.; World Scientific, 1995) 280–301.Google Scholar

Nambu, Y. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1961a) “A dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. I”PR, 122: 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nambu, Y. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1961b) “A dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. II”PR, 124: 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ne'eman, Y. (1961) “Derivation of strong interactions from a gauge invariance”NP, 26: 222–229.Google Scholar

Newman, M. H. A. (1928) “Mr Russell's causal theory of perception”Mind, 37: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, H. and Olesen, P. (1973) “Vortex-line models for dual strings”NP, B61: 45–61.Google Scholar

Nielsen, H. and Susskind, L. (1970) TH 1230-CERN (Preprint, September 1970).

Nielsen, H. (1971) “Connection between the Regge trajectory universal slope α′ and the transverse momentum distribution of partons in planar Feynman diagram model”PL, 35B: 515–518.Google Scholar

Nishijima, K. (1955) “Charge independence theory of V particles”PTP, 13: 285–304.Google Scholar

Nishijima, K. (1957) “On the asymptotic conditions in quantum field theory”PTP, 17: 765–802.Google Scholar

Nishijima, K. (1958) “Formulation of field theories of composite particles”PR, 111: 995–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissani, N. (1984) “SL (2, C) gauge theory of gravitation: conservation laws”PR, 109: 95–130.Google Scholar

Ogawa, S. (1959) “A possible symmetry in Sakata's composite model”PTP, 21: 209–211.Google Scholar

Ohnuki, Y. (1960) “Composite model of elementary particles” in Proceedings of the 1960 Annual International Conference on High Energy Physics at Rochester (eds. Sudarshan, E. C. G., Tinlot, J. H., and Melissinos, A. C.; University of Rochester) 843–850.Google Scholar

Olive, D. I. (1964) “Exploration of S-matrix theory,”PR, 135B: 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pais, A. (1953) “Isotopic spin and mass quantization”Physica, 19: 869–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pais, A. (1962) “Theorem on local action on lepton currents”PRL, 9: 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pais, A. (1964) “Implications of spin-unitary spin independence”PRL, 13: 175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pais, A. (1965) “Comments” in Recent Developments in Particle Symmetries (ed. Zichichi, A.; Academic Press) 406.Google Scholar

Pais, A. (1986) Inward Bound (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Panofsky, W. (1968) “Low electrodynamics, elastic and inelastic electron (and muon) scattering” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on High Energy Physics, Vienna, August 28–September 5, 1968 (eds. Prentki, J. and Steinberger, J.; Geneva, CERN) 23–39.Google Scholar

Panofsky, W. and Allton, E. A. (1968) “Form factor of the photopion matrix element at resonance”PR, 110: 1155–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parisi, G. (1973) “Deep inelastic scattering in a field theory with computable large-momenta behavior”NC, 7: 84–87.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1953) Two letters to Abraham Pais, see Pauli (1999); two seminar lectures, reported in Paolo Gulmanelli (1954).

Pauli, W. (1999) Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Vol. IV, Part II (Springer-Verlag, edited by Meyenn, K. V.). Letter [1614]: to A. Pais (July 25, 1953); letter [1682]: to A. Pais (December 6, 1953); letter [1727]: to C. N. Yang (February 1954).Google Scholar

Pecceei, R. D. and Quinn, H. R. (1977) “CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles”PRL, 38: 1440–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, D. H. (1972) “Neutrino interactions” in Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on High Energy Physics, September 6–13, 1972 (eds. Jackson, J. D. and Roberts, A.; National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia), vol. 4: 189–247.Google Scholar

Peruzzi, I.et al. (1976) “Observation of a narrow charged state at 1876 MeV/c2 decaying to an exotic combination of Kππ”PRL, 37: 569–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterman, A. and Stueckelberg, E. C. G. (1951) “Restriction of possible interactions in quantum electrodynamics”PR, 82: 548–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pevsner, A.et al. (1961) “Evidence for a three-pion resonance near 550 Mev,”PRL, 7: 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickering, A. (1984) Constructing Quarks (Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1902) La science et l'hypothese (Flammarion).Google Scholar

Politzer, H. D. (1973) “Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?”PRL, 30: 1346–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politzer, H. D. (1974) “Asymptotic freedom: An approach to strong interactions”Phys. Rept., 14: 129–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politzer, D. (2004) “The dilemma of attribution” Nobel lecture delivered in December 2004; for the text, see RMP, 77(3): 851–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polyakov, A. M. (1974) “Particle spectrum in quantum field theory”JETPL, 20: 194–195.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1978) Meaning and the Moral Sciences (Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Quigg, , and Rosner, J. (1979) “Quantum mechanics with applications to quarkonium”PR, 56: 167–235.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1951) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”Philoso. Rev., 60: 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redhead, M. (2001) “The intelligibility of the universe” in Philosophy at the New Millennium (ed. O'Hear, A.; Cambridge University Press) 73–90.Google Scholar

Reeh, H. and Schlieder, S. (1961) “Bemerkungen zur unitaraquivalenz von Lorentzinvaranten Feldern”NC, 22: 1051–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regge, T. (1958a) “Analytic properties of the scattering matrix”NC, 8: 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regge, T. (1958b) “On the analytic behavior of the eigenvalue of the S-matrix in the complex plane of the energy”NC, 9: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regge, T. (1959) “Introduction to complex orbital momenta”NC, 14: 951–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regge, T. (1960) “Bound states, shadow states and Mandelstam representation,”NC, 18: 947–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1951) The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (University of California Press).Google Scholar

Rosenbluth, M. (1950) “High energy elastic scattering of electrons on protons”PR, 79: 615–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosner, J. (1969) “Graphical Form of duality”PRL, 22: 689–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, B. (1927) The Analysis of Matter (Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Sakata, S. (1956) “On the composite model for the new particles”PTP, 16: 686–688.Google Scholar

Sakata, S. (1963) “Concluding remarks at the meeting on Models and Structures of Elementary Particles, Hiroshima University, March 1963” Soryushiron Kenkyu (mimeographed circular in Japanese), 28, 110; English translation, PTP(Supplement) 50 (1971): 208–209.Google Scholar

Sakita, B. (1964) “Supermultiplets of elementary particles”PR, B136: 1756–1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sakurai, J. J. (1960) “Theory of strong interactions”AP, 11: 1–48.Google Scholar

Sakurai, J. (1969) “Vector-meson dominance and high-energy electron-proton inelastic scattering”PRL, 22: 981–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salam, A. (1960) “An equivalence theorem for partially gauge-invariant vector meson interactions,”NP, 18: 681–690.Google Scholar

Salam, A. (1962) “Lagrangian theory of composite particles”NC, 25: 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salam, A. (1968) “Weak and electromagnetic interactions”in Elementary Particle Theory: Relativistic Group and Analyticity, Proceedings of Nobel Conference 8 (ed. Svartholm, N.; Almqvist & Wiksell) 367–377.Google Scholar

Salam, A. and Ward, J. C. (1959) “Weak and electromagnetic interactions”NC, 11: 568–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiff, L. I. (1949) “Microwave Laboratory technical report no. 102”Stanford University, November 1949.Google Scholar

Schlick, M. (1918) General Theory of Knowledge (trans. by Blumberg, A. E. and Feigl, H.; Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar

Schroer, B (1997) “Motivations and physical aims of algebraic QFT”www.esi.ac.at/preprints/esi371.pdf

Schweber, S. (1997) “A historical perspective on the rise of the standard model” in The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; Cambridge University Press) 645–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwinger, J. (1957) “A theory of the fundamental interactions”AP, 2: 407–434.Google Scholar

Schwinger, J. (1959) “Field theory commutators”PRL, 3: 296–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwinger, J. (1962a) “Gauge invariance and mass”PR, 125: 397–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwinger, J. (1962b) “Gauge invariance and mass. II”PR, 128: 2425–2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwinger, J. (1965) “The future of fundamental physics” in Nature of Matter: Purposes of High Energy Physics (ed. Yuan, L. C. L.; Brookhaven National Laboratory) 23.Google Scholar

Silvestrini, V. (1972) “Electron-positron interactions” in Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on High Energy Physics, September 6–13, 1972 (eds. Jackson, J. D. and Roberts, A.; National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia), vol. 4: 1–40.Google Scholar

Simons, P. (1994) “Particulars in particular clothing: three trope theories of substance”Philos. Phenom. Res., 54: 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slavnov, A. (1972) “Ward identities in gauge theories”Theor. Math. Phys., 19: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P. (1962a) “Derivation of the CPT theorem and the connection between spin and statistics from postulates of the S-matrix theory,”PR, 125: 2139–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P. (1962b) “Axiomatic S-matrix theory,”RMP, 34: 390–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P. (1965) “Space and time in S-matrix theory,”PR, B139: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P. (1968) “Crossing, hermitian analyticity, and the connection between spin and statistics,”JMP, 9: 1548–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, H. (1989) “Yes, but some skeptical remarks on realism and anti-realism”Dialectica, 43: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Straumann, N. (2000) “On Pauli's invention of non-abelian Kaluza-Klein theory in 1953” in The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting. Proceedings of the MGIXMM Meeting held at The University of Rome “La Sapienza”, July 2–8 2000 (eds.: Gurzadyan, V. G., Jantzen, R. T. and Remo Ruffini, R.; World Scientific) Part B: 1063–1066.Google Scholar

Strawson, (1959) Individuals (Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stueckelberg, E. C. G. and Peterman, A. (1953) “La normalisation des constances dans la théorie des quanta”Helv. Phys. Acta., 26: 499–520.Google Scholar

Sudarshan, E. C. G. and Marshak, R. E. (1958) “Chirality invariance and the universal Fermi interaction”PR, 109: 1860–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susskind, L. (1968) “Models of self-induced strong interactions”PR, 165: 1535–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susskind, L. (1969) “Harmonic-oscillator analogy for the Veneziano model”PRL, 23: 545–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susskind, L. (1970) “Structure of hadrons implied by duality”PR, D1: 1182–1186.Google Scholar

Susskind, L. (1997) “Quark confinement” in The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; Cambridge University Press) 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutherland, D. G. (1967) “Current algebra and some non-strong mesonic decays”NP, B2: 433–440.Google Scholar

Symanzik, K. (1970) “Small distance behavior in field theory and power counting”CMP, 18: 227–246.Google Scholar

Symanzik, K. (1971) “Small-distance behavior analysis and Wilson Expansions”CMP, 23: 49–86.Google Scholar

Symanzik, K. (1972) “On theories with massless particles” in Renormalization of Yang-Mills Fields and Applications to Particle Physics, Proceedings of Marseille Conference (June 19–23 1972, ed. Korthals-Altes, C. P.; Centre de Physique Theorique).Google Scholar

Symanzik, K. (1973) “Infrared singularities and small-distance-behavior analysis”CMP, 34: 7–36.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. C. (1958) “Beta decay of the pion”PR, 110: 1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, J. C. (1971) “Ward identities and the Yang-Mills field”NP, B33: 436–444.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. E (1967) “Nucleon form factors above 6 GeV” in Proceedings of the 1967 International Symposium on Electron and Photon Interactions at High Energies (Stanford, September 5–9, 1967) (Printed by International Union of Pure and Applied Physics, US Atomic Energy Commission with a Foreword by Berman, S. M.) 78–101.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. E. (1968) “To: Program Coordinator” (July 26, 1968) Supplement No. 2 to SLAC Proposal 4-b.

Taylor, R. E (1975) “Inelastic electron-nucleon scattering” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies, Stanford, 21–27 August 1975 (ed. Kirk, W. T.; SLAC) 679–708.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. (1991) “Deep inelastic scattering: the early years”RMP, 63: 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1971a) “Renormalization of massless Yang-Mills fields”NP, B33: 173–199.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1971b) “Renormalizable Lagrangians for massive Yang-Mills fields”NP, B35: 167–188.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, M. (1972) “Remarks after Symansik's presentation” in Renormalization of Yang-Mills Fields and Applications to Particle Physics, Proceedings of Marseille Conference (19–23 June 1972, ed. Korthals-Altes, C. P.; Marseille, Centre de Physique Theorique), CERN preprint Th. 1666, May, 1973.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1974) “Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories”NP, B79: 276–284.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1975) “Gauge theories with unified weak electromagnetic and strong interactions” in E. P. S. International Conference on High Energy Physics, Palermo, 23–28 June, 1975 (ed. Zichichi, A.; Editrice Compositori).Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1976a) “Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies”PRL, 37: 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1976b) “Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle”PR, D14: 3432–3450.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. (1998) “The creation of quantum chromodynamics” in The Creation of Quantum Chromodynamics and the Effective Energy (ed. Lipatov, L. N.; World Scientific) 11–50.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, and Veltman, M. (1972a) “Renormalization and regularization of gauge fields”NP, B44: 189–213.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, and Veltman, M. (1972b) “Combinatorics of gauge fields”NP, B50: 318–353.Google Scholar

Toll, J. (1952) The dispersion relation for light and its application to problem involving electron pairs. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Toll, J. (1956) “Causality and the dispersion relation: logical foundations,”PR, 104: 1760–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomozawa, Y. (1966) “Axial-vector coupling constant renormalization and the meson-baryon scattering lengths”NC, A46: 707–717.Google Scholar

Tryon, E. P. (1972) “Dynamical parton model for hadrons”PRL, 28: 1605–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umezawa, H. and Kamefuchi, S. (1961) “Equivalence theorems and renormalization problem in vector field theory (the Yang-Mills field with non-vanishing masses)”NP, 23: 399–429.Google Scholar

Utiyama, R. (1956) “Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction”PR, 101: 1597–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vainshtein, A. I. and Ioffe, B. L. (1967) “Test of Bjorken's asymptotic formula in perturbation theory”JETP Letter, 6: 341–343.Google Scholar

Valatin, J. G. (1954a) “Singularities of electron kernel functions in an external electromagnetic field”PRS, A222: 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valatin, J. G. (1954b) “On the Dirac-Heisenberg theory of vacuum polarization”PRS, A222: 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valatin, J. G. (1954c) “On the propagation functions of quantum electrodynamics”PRS, A225: 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valatin, J. G. (1954d) “On the definition of finite operator quantities in quantum electrodynamics”PRS, A226: 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. (1997) “Structure and perspective: philosophical perplexity and paradox” in Logic and Scientific Methods (eds. Dalla Chiara, M. L.et al.; Kluwer) 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaughn, M. T., Aaron, R., and Amado, R. D. (1961) “Elementary and composite particles,”PR, 124: 1258–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veltman, M. (1966) “Divergence conditions and sum rules”PRL, 17: 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veltman, M. (1967) “Theoretical aspects of high energy neutrino interactions”PRS, A301: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veltman, M. (1968) “Perturbation theory of massive Yang-Mills fields”NP, B7: 637–650.Google Scholar

Veltman, M. (1970) “Generalized Ward identities and Yang-Mills fields”NP, B21: 288–302.Google Scholar

Veneziano, G. (1968) “Construction of a crossing-symmetric, Regge-behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories”NC, 57A: 190–197.Google Scholar

Veneziano, G. (1979) “U(1) without instantons”NP, B159: 213–224.Google Scholar

Veneziano, G. and Yankielowicz, S. (1982) “An effective Lagrangian for the pure N = 1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory”PL, 113B: 231.Google Scholar

Watkins, J. (1958) “Confirmable and influential metaphysics”Mind, 67: 345–365.Google Scholar

Watkins, J. (1975) “Metaphysics and the advancement of science”Brit. J. Philos. of Sci., 26: 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1966a) “Current commutator theory of multiple pion production”PRL, 16: 879–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1966b) “Current commutator calculation of the Kl4 form factors”PRL, 17: 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1966c) “Pion scattering lengths”PRL, 17: 616–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1967) “A model of leptons”PRL, 19: 1264–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1978) “A new light boson?”PRL, 40: 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberger, W. (1965) “Renormalization of the weak axial-vector coupling Constant”PRL, 14: 1047–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wess, J. (1960) “The conformal invariance in quantum field theory”NC, 13: 1086–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Widom, B. (1965a) “Surface tension and molecular correlations near the critical point”, J. Chem. Phys., 43: 3892–3897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Widom, B. (1965b) “Equation of state in the neighborhood of the critical point”J. Chem. Phys., 43: 3898–3905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiik, B. (1976) “Plenary report on new particle production in e+e− colliding beams” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on High Energy Physics, Tbilisi, USSR, July 1976 (eds. Bogoliubov, et al. USSR) II: N75–86.Google Scholar

Wiik, B. (1979) “First results from PETRA” in Proceedings of Neutrino 79 (Bergen, June 18–22, 1979; eds. Haatuft, A. and Jarlskog, C.) I: 113–154.Google Scholar

Wilczek, F. (1978) “Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons”PRL, 40: 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1969) “Non-Lagrangian models of current algebra”PR, 179: 1499–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1970a) “Model of coupling-constant renormalization”PR, D2: 1438–1472.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1970b) “Operator-product expansions and anomalous dimensions in the Thirring model”PR, D2: 1473–1477.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1970c) “Anomalous dimensions and the breakdown of scale invariance in perturbation theory”PR, D2: 1478–1493.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1971a) “The renormalization group and strong interactions”PR, D3: 1818–1846.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1971b) “Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I. Renormalization group and the Kadanof scaling picture”PR, B4: 3174–3183.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1971c) “Renormalization group and critical phenomena. II. Phase-space cell analysis of critical behavior”PR, B4: 3184–3205.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1972) “Renormalization of a scalar field in strong coupling”PR, D6: 419–426.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. G. (1974) “Confinement of quarks”PR, D10: 2445–2459.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. (2004) “The origins of lattice gauge theory”arXiv:hep-lat/0412043v2 NP, Proceedings Supplements B140: 3–19.Google Scholar

Witten, E (1979a) “Theta vacua in two-dimensional quantum chromodynamics”NC, A51: 325.Google Scholar

Witten, E (1979b) “Current algebra theorems for the U(1) ‘Goldstone boson’”NP, B156: 269.Google Scholar

Witten, E (1979c) “Dyons of charge e theta/2 pi”PL, B86: 283–287.Google Scholar

Worrall, J. (1989) “Structural realism: the best of both worlds?”Dialectica, 43: 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worral, J. (2007) Reason in Revolution: a Study of Theory-Change in Science (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., and Hudson, R. P. (1957) “Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay”PR, 105: 1413–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, S. L. (1997) “Hadron jets and the discovery of the gluon” in The Rise of the Standard Model (eds. Hoddeson, L., Brown, L., Riordan, M., and Dresden, M.; Cambridge University Press) 600–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, S. L. and Zobernig, G. (1979) “A three-jet candidate (run 447, event 13177)”TASSO Note No. 84 (June 26, 1979).Google Scholar

Yang, C. N. (1983) Selected Papers, 1945–1980, with Commentary (Freeman).Google Scholar

Yang, C. N. and Mills, R. L. (1954a) “Isotopic spin conservation and a generalized gauge invariance”PR, 95: 631.Google Scholar

Yang, C. N. and Mills, R. L. (1954b) “Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance”PR, 96: 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yoh, J. (1997) “The discovery of the b quark at Fermilab in 1977: The experiment Coordinator's story” Fermilab preprint: Fermilab-Conf. 97/432-E (E288).

Yukawa, H. (1935) “On the interaction of elementary particles, I.”Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. (Japan), 17: 48–57.Google Scholar