Prof. Alexander'sMoral Order and Progress is a very full, interesting, and original discussion. Its character, as the sub-title indicates, is “an analysis of Ethical Conceptions.” The general position of the author is that of one struck with the convergence of idealistic and naturalistic ethics in the light of evolutionism; but, while coming himself from the camp of the idealists, Mr. Alexander is strongly inclined to seek a place in the left wing of the partially amalgamated forces. All that is true or solid in idealist ethics is provided for, he thinks, in the biological scheme. As for intuitionalism, it may go packing; there is no portion for it in the promised land of truth ; it is mere mischievous illusion. We have been told by some of Lord Beaconsfield's admirers that there was a great unity throughout his career, in spite of all apparent change—he always disliked the middle classes. Against them he appealed variously to the nobles and the poor, to Tory and Radical instincts. So it is to be with the typical bourgeois philosophy of intuitionalism. Idealists and empiricists are to agree sweetly in destroying it. Its excellent intentions shall not excuse it one cruel blow, in view of its hopeless and irritating limitations.

Having affirmed so strongly the competency of naturalism, Mr. Alexander has to face a question which, in our judgment, presses hard upon all naturalistic ethics.