Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Prologue
- 1 The Dynamics of Sites of Memory
- 2 The Construction of an In Situ Memorial Site: Framing Painful Heritage
- 3 The Performance of Memory: The Making of a Memorial Museum
- 4 The Fragmented Memorial Museum: Indexicality and Self-Inscription
- 5 The Spatial Proliferation of Memory: Borders, Façades and Dwellings
- Epilogue
- Acknowledgements
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - The Performance of Memory: The Making of a Memorial Museum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Prologue
- 1 The Dynamics of Sites of Memory
- 2 The Construction of an In Situ Memorial Site: Framing Painful Heritage
- 3 The Performance of Memory: The Making of a Memorial Museum
- 4 The Fragmented Memorial Museum: Indexicality and Self-Inscription
- 5 The Spatial Proliferation of Memory: Borders, Façades and Dwellings
- Epilogue
- Acknowledgements
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Where the previous chapter dealt with the institutional development of the memorial complex, this chapter traces performances of memory that both attached meaning to and derived meaning from the Hollandsche Schouwburg, beginning as early as 1948. Sites of memory such as the Schouwburg are never simply there but rather produced over time as they are invested with meaning by performances of memory. Such practices have greater impact if they allow the public to appropriate the site through an affective investment, be it a collective and organized commemoration or a private visit. The relationship between site and performance is always reciprocal. If we take, for example, the early commemorations at the doorsteps of the building, we see how, on the one hand, that the structure provided a unique spatial framework for these ceremonies: people assembled at the very spot from which Jews were deported during the occupation. On the other hand, the Hollandsche Schouwburg became a meaningful site because of these commemorations and other performances that could have been held at other locations. It is impossible to speak of a fixed and spatial memory that is inherent to the material building and that precedes performances of memory. Rather, the Hollandsche Schouwburg is a site where the memory of the persecution of the Jews has been and continues to be actively reproduced through collective, individual, official, informal, traditional and innovative practices. These performances cocreated, defined and altered the Hollandsche Schouwburg as an important site of memory. Some of these practices – such as the early commemorations on the doorsteps in the late 1940s – foreshadowed its future purpose as a site of commemoration. Other practices were made possible by the installation of the memorial, in particular early visiting practices. As such, these performances are both related and run parallel to the institutional development of the building as discussed in the previous chapter, challenging, following and at times expediting this process.
In order to better understand the character of the Hollandsche Schouwburg as both a public and Jewish site of memory which was turned into a memorial museum in the 1990s, four topics are addressed: small-scale commemorations; presenting a public memorial; adopting Yom HaShoah; and visiting practices and the installation of a museum exhibition.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fragments of the HolocaustThe Amsterdam Hollandsche Schouwburg as a Site of Memory, pp. 81 - 132Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2018