Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:32:41.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - On human development and affective social learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

Daniel Dukes
Affiliation:
Université de Fribourg, Switzerland
Fabrice Clément
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Recent research has shown that children often learn what to believe by attending to the claims of other people. Similarly, they often learn how to act by attending to the actions of other people. Moreover, in each of these two domains, children are selective in their learning – they prefer to endorse and to emulate individuals who, as representatives of the surrounding culture, can serve as good models. I argue that this type of selective social learning also plays a major role in children’s emotional development. Although young children may encounter some situations that have a universal biological significance – for example a steep cliff or a sudden loud noise – the emotional implications of many encounters, especially with artefacts, people and foods, are likely to vary from one culture to another. Children can learn to perceive these encounters through the distinctive emotional lens of their own culture if they attend to and adopt the expressive appraisals of individuals who are representative of their culture. Such appraisals may be conveyed non-verbally, as in the classic social-referencing paradigm, but they can also be conveyed verbally.

Type
Chapter
Information
Foundations of Affective Social Learning
Conceptualizing the Social Transmission of Value
, pp. 67 - 114
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Addessi, E., Galloway, A. T., Visalberghi, E., & Birch, L. L. (2005). Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2–5-year-old children. Appetite, 45(3), 264271. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.07.007Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1992). A consideration of social referencing in the context of attachment theory and research. In Feinman, S. & Feinman, S. (Eds.), Social referencing and the social construction of reality in infancy (pp. 349367). New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2462-9_14Google Scholar
Aldridge, V., Dovey, T. M., & Halford, J. G. (2009). The role of familiarity in dietary development. Developmental Review, 29(1), 3244.Google Scholar
Begus, K., & Southgate, V. (2012). Infant pointing serves an interrogative function. Developmental Science, 15, 611677.Google Scholar
Birch, L. L. (1980). Effects of peer models’ food choices and eating behaviors on pre-schoolers’ food preferences. Child Development, 51, 489496.Google Scholar
Birch, L. L. (1999). Development of food preferences. Annual Review of Nutrition, 19, 4162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiarella, S. S., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2018). ‘Are you really sad?’ infants show selectivity in their behaviors toward an unconventional emoter. Infancy, doi:10.1111/infa.12230Google Scholar
Chow, V., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Lewis, J. (2008). To see or not to see: Infants prefer to follow the gaze of a conventional looker. Developmental Science, 11, 761770.Google Scholar
Clément, F., & Dukes, D. (2017). Social appraisal and social referencing: Two components of affective social learning. Emotion Review, 9, 253261.Google Scholar
DeJesus, J. M., Shutts, K., & Kinzler, K. D. (2017). Mere social knowledge impacts children’s consumption and categorization of foods. Developmental Science, 21(5). doi:10.1111/desc.12627Google Scholar
de Rosnay, M., Cooper, P. J., Tsigaras, N., & Murray, L. (2006). Behaviour, Research and Therapy, 44, 11651175.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1938). Experimental modification of children’s food preferences through social suggestion. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 33, 489507.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expression. In Ekman, P. (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression (pp. 169222). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusaro, M., & Harris, P. L. (2008). Children assess informant reliability using bystanders’ non-verbal cues. Developmental Science, 11, 781787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, L. V., & Sanders, K. M. (1975). The effect of adults’ eating on young children’s acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 206214.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2012a). Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2012b). The child as anthropologist. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 35, 259277.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2017). Emotion, imagination and the world’s furniture. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(6), 672683.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2019). Infants want input. In Grover, V., Uccelli, P., Rowe, M. L., & Lieven, E. (Eds.), Learning through language: Towards an educationally informed theory of language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children’s selective trust in informants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 366, 11791190.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Koenig, M. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505524.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., Koenig, M. A., Corriveau, K. H., & Jaswal, V. K. (2018). Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 251273.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Lane, J. D. (2014). Infants understand how testimony works. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 33, 443458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, P. A., Legare, C. H., Harris, P. L., & Whitehouse, H. (2013). Stick to the script: The effect of witnessing multiple actors on children’s imitation. Cognition, 129, 536543.Google Scholar
Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164181.Google Scholar
Hornik, R., Risenhoover, N., & Gunnar, M. (1987). The effects of maternal positive, neutral, and negative affective communications on infant responses to new toys. Child Development, 58, 937944.Google Scholar
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188205.Google Scholar
Kim, G., & Kwak, K. (2011). Uncertainty matters: Impact of stimulus ambiguity on infant social referencing. Infant and Child Development, 20, 449463.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14, 106111.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. PNAS, 104, 1257712580.Google Scholar
Kovács, A., Tauzin, T., Téglás, E., Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2014). Pointing as epistemic request: 12-month-olds point to receive new information. Infancy, 19, 543557.Google Scholar
Lane, J. D., Conder, E. B., & Rottman, J. (2017). Effects of testimony on children’s evaluation of novel social groups. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Legare, C. H., & Harris, P. L. (2016). The ontogeny of cultural learning. Child Development, 87, 633642.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. E., Damrosch, D. H., Lin, J. K., Macris, D. M., & Keil, F. C. (2011). The scope and limits of overimitation in the transmission of artifact culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 11581167.Google Scholar
Moses, L. J., Baldwin, D. A., Rosicky, J. G., & Tidball, G. (2001). Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. Child Development, 72, 718735.Google Scholar
Poulin-Dubois, D., Brooker, I., & Polonia, A. (2011). Infants prefer to imitate a conventional person. Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 303309.Google Scholar
Shutts, K., Kinzler, K. D., & DeJesus, J. M. (2013). Understanding infants’ and children’s social learning about foods: Previous research and new prospects. Developmental Psychology, 40, 419425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutts, K., Kinzler, K. D., McKee, C. B., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Social information guides infants’ selection of foods. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10, 117.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Olson, K. R. (2017). ‘Catching’ social bias: Exposure to biased nonverbal signals creates social biases in preschool children. Psychological Science, 28, 216224.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. L., Olson, K. R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2018). Roots of prejudice: Observing other people’s nonverbal bias can create prejudice in preschool children. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J. J., & Klinnert, M. D. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behaviour of 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 21, 195200.Google Scholar
Stenberg, G. (2009). Selectivity in infant social referencing. Infancy, 14, 457473.Google Scholar
Stenberg, G. (2012). Why do infants look at and use positive information from some informants rather than others in ambiguous situations? Infancy, 17, 642671,Google Scholar
Stenberg, G. (2013). Do 12-month-olds infants trust a competent adult? Infancy, 18, 873904.Google Scholar
Stenberg, G., & Hagekull, B. (2007). Infant looking behaviour in ambiguous situations: Social referencing or attachment behaviour? Infancy, 11, 111129.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Adolph, K. E., Lobo, S. A., Karasik, L. B., Ishak, S., & Dimitropoulou, K. A. (2008). When infants take mothers’ advice: 18-month-olds integrate perceptual and social information to guide motor action. Developmental Psychology, 44, 734746.Google Scholar

References

Armstrong, D. M. (1968). A materialist theory of mind. New York, NY: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Emotions as natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 1, 2858.Google Scholar
Begus, K., & Southgate, V. (2012). Infant pointing serves an interrogative function. Developmental Science, 15(5), 611617.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. (2003). Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358, 561572.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 387392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Altachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. London, UK: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In Sperber, D., Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary debate (pp. 263291). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1980). Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 28, 362367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2002) Breeding together: Kin selection, reciprocity and mutualism in cooperative animal societies, Science, 296, 6972.Google Scholar
Crivelli, C., & Fridlund, A. J. (2018). Facial displays are tools for social influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 388399.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. (2010). Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language, 25, 141168.Google Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2006). Social learning and social cognition: The case of pedagogy. In Johnson, M. H. & Munakata, Y. M. (Eds.), Processes change in brain and cognitive development: Attention and performance XXI (pp. 249274). Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G., (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148153.Google Scholar
Csibra, G., (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 366, 11491157.Google Scholar
Demos, V. (1986). Crying in early infancy: An illustration of the motivational function of affect. In Brazelton, T. B. & Yogman, M. W. (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 3973). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Dennett, D., & Haugeland, J. C. (1987). Intentionality. In Gregory, R. L. (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 383386). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dicara, L. V. (1970). Learning in the autonomic nervous system. Scientific American, 222, 3039.Google Scholar
Egyed, K., Király, I., & Gergely, G. (2013). Communicating shared knowledge in infancy. Psychological Science, 24, 13481353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1992). Facial expressions of emotion: New findings, new questions. Psychological Science, 3(1), 3438.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288298.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972). Emotion in the human face. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 221, 12081210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, T. (1994). The effects of mother’s physical and emotional unavailability on emotion regulation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 208227.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect-regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Target, M. (2007). The parent–infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3–4), 288328.Google Scholar
Futó, J., Téglás, E., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2010). Communicative function demonstration induces kind-based artifact representation in preverbal infants. Cognition, 117, 18.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gergely, G. (2007a). Learning ‘about’ versus learning ‘from’ other minds: Human pedagogy and its implications. In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., & Stich, S., (Eds.). The innate mind: Foundations and the future (pp. 170198). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gergely, G. (2007b). The social construction of the subjective self: The role of affect-mirroring, markedness, and ostensive communication in self-development. In Mayes, L., Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (Eds.), Developmental science and psychoanalysis (pp. 4588). London, UK: Karnac.Google Scholar
Gergely, G. (2013). Ostensive communication and cultural learning: The natural pedagogy hypothesis. In Terrace, H. S. & Metcalfe, J., (Eds.), Joint attention and agency (pp. 139151). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2005). The social construction of the cultural mind: Imitative learning as a mechanism of human pedagogy. Interaction Studies, 6(3), 463481.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., (2006). Sylvia’s recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In Levenson, S. & Enfield, N. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and human interaction (pp. 229255). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., (2013). Natural pedagogy. In Banaj, M. R. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 127132). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., Egyed, K., & Király, I. (2007). On pedagogy. Developmental Science, 10(1), 139146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G., & Jacob, P. (2012). Reasoning about instrumental and communicative agency in human infancy. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 43, 5994.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., & Unoka, Z. (2007). The development of the unreflective self. In Bush, F. N. (Ed.), Mentalization: Theoretical considerations, research findings, and clinical implications (pp. 57102). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., (2008). Attachment, affect-regulation and mentalization: The developmental origins of the representational affective self. In Sharpe, C., Fonagy, P., & Goodyer, I. (Eds.), SociaI cognition and developmental psychology (pp. 305342). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1996). The social bio-feedback theory of parental affect mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 731.Google Scholar
Gergely, G., (1999). Early social-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social bio-feedback model. In Rochat, P. (Ed.), Early social cognition (pp. 101I37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Nazzi, T. (2003). Words, kinds and causal powers: A theory theory perspective on early naming and categorization. In Rakison, D. H. & Oakes, L. M. (Eds.), Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 303329). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1993). Autism and the development of mind. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
James, W. [1890] (1950). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Jurist, E. (2018). Minding emotions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, D., & Carey, S. (2007). The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance. In Margolis, E. & Lawrence, S. (Eds.), Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation (pp. 212230). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Király, I., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2013). Beyond rational imitation: Learning arbitrary means actions from communicative demonstrations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116(2), 471486.Google Scholar
Kovács, Á. M., Tauzin, T., Téglás, E., Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2014). Pointing as epistemic request: 12-month-olds point to receive new information. Infancy, 19(6), 543557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kripke, S. (1972/1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Malatesta, C. Z., Culver, C., Tesman, R. J., & Shepard, B. (1989). The development of emotion expression during the first two years of life. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54, Serial No. 219.Google Scholar
Malatesta, C. Z., & Izard, C. E. (1984). The ontogenesis of human social signals: From biological imperative to symbol utilization. In Fox, N. A. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The psychobiology of affective development (pp. 161206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57111.Google Scholar
Mercier, H., (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1969). Learning visceral and glandular responses. Science, 163. 434445.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1978). Bio-feedback and visceral learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 373404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mineka, S., & Cook, M. (1993). Mechanisms involved in the observational conditioning of fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 2338.Google Scholar
Neander, K. (1995). Misrepresenting and malfunctioning. Philosophical Studies, 79, 109141.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. L., & Russell, J. A. (2013) Universality revisited. Emotion Review, 5, 815.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. (2004). Embodied emotions. In Solomon, R. C. & Harlan, L. C. (Eds.), Thinking about feeling: Contemporary philosophers on emotion, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of meaning. In Gunderson, K. (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Russell, C. L., Bard, K. A., & Adamson, L. B. (1997). Social referencing by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 185193.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2013). Agency: Its role in mental development. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Snowden, C., & Boe, C. (2003). Social communication about unpalatable foods in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 142148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, V., van Maanen, C., & Csibra, G. (2007). Infant pointing: Communication to cooperate or communication to learn? Child Development, 78, 735740.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language, 17, 323.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tauzin, T., & Gergely, G. (2018). Communicative mind-reading in preverbal infants. Scientific Reports, 8(9534).Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001) Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 348.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44, 112119.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z., & Cohn, J. F. (1989). Infant–mother face-to-face interaction: Age and gender differences in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Development, 60, 8592.Google Scholar
Vouloumanos, A., & Waxman, S. R. (2014). Listen up! Speech is for thinking during infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 642646.Google Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1985). Contingency perception in early social development. In Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A. (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 157176). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1994). Detection of self: The perfect algorithm. In Parker, S. T., Mitchell, R. W., & Boccia, M. L. (Eds.), Self-awareness in animals and humans: Developmental perspectives (pp. 131148). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1995). Mother–infant interaction: Dispositional properties and mutual designs. In Thompson, N. S. (Ed.), Perspectives in ethology. Vol. 11. Behavioral design (pp. 189210). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×