Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:44:45.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The past as key to the future: a new perspective on forest health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

S.A. Teale
Affiliation:
State University of New York
J.D. Castello
Affiliation:
State University of New York
John D. Castello
Affiliation:
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Stephen A. Teale
Affiliation:
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Get access

Summary

Introduction

What exactly is forest health? How does one define it? Can it be defined? Is it something real, or is it just another “fuzzy concept?” (More1996). Would you recognize a healthy forest if you saw one? These are among the questions with which forest ecologists and managers struggle. Many are surprised when they realize that these apparently simple questions do not have simple answers. In spite of the widespread use of the term “forest health,” it means very different things to different people. While the notion of a healthy forest has universal appeal, different people have different reasons for needing to know if a given forest is healthy or not. To some, forest health means sustainable timber harvest; to others it means preserving biodiversity or restoring the forest to its condition prior to human disturbance.

Definitions of forest health

Forest health has been defined from a range of perspectives that can be categorized as either utilitarian or ecological (Kolb et al. 1994). Some of the key features of forest health that have been included by various authors include ecosystem “balance,” “resilience” to change, plant and animal community “function,” and sustainable productivity (Edmonds et al. 2000; Raffa et al. 2009). Given these diverse perspectives, and the disparate definitions arising from them, it is not surprising that many forest protection professionals find the concept confusing at best, and useless at worst.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forest Health
An Integrated Perspective
, pp. 3 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchman, R. G., Pederson, S. P., and Walters, N. R. 1983. A tree survival model with application to species of the Great Lakes region. Canadian Journal Forest Research 13: 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castello, J. D., Leopold, D. J., and Smallidge, P. J. 1995. Pathogens, patterns, and processes in forest ecosystems. BioScience 45: 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, H. 1989. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Dayton, P. K. 1972. Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In: Proceedings of the Colloquium on Conservation Problems in Antarctica. Parker, B. C. (ed.). Allen Press, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Liocourt, F. 1898. De l'amenagement des sapinieres. Bull. Triemestriel Societe Forestiere de Franche-Comte et Belfort, Besancon: 396–409.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. L., Agee, J. K., and Gara, R. I. 2000. The concept of forest health. In: Forest Health and Protection. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, D. 1992. Ecosystem health and ecological theories. In: Ecosystem Health. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell, B. D. (eds.). Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ellison, A. M., Bank, M. S., Clinton, B. D.et al. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcombe, P. A. 1987. Tree life tables: Simple birth, growth and death data encapsulate life histories and ecological roles. BioScience 37: 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, J. A. (ed.). 1998. The Dictionary of Forestry. The Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.
Hughes, T. P. 1984. Population dynamics based on individual size rather than age: a general mode with a coral reef example. American Naturalist 123: 778–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, T. E., Wagner, M. R., and Covington, W. W. 1994. Concepts of forest health. Journal Forestry 92: 10–15.Google Scholar
Kraus, N. E, 2003. Relationships between forest health and plant diversity in westernNew York State forest lands. MS Thesis SUNY-ESF.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population. J. Johnson. London.Google Scholar
Manion, P. D. and Griffin, D. H. 2001. Large landscape scale analysis of tree death in the Adirondack Park, New York. Forest Science 47: 542–549.Google Scholar
Monnig, E. and Byler, J. 1992. Forest health and ecological integrity in the northern Rockies. USDA Forest Service FPM Rep. 92–7.Google Scholar
More, T. A. 1996. Forestry's fuzzy concepts: An examination of ecosystem management. Journal Forestry 94: 19–23.Google Scholar
Raffa, K., Aukema, B., Bentz, B. J.et al. 2009. A literal use of “forest health” safeguards against misuse and misapplication. Journal Forestry 107: 276–277.Google Scholar
Rubin, B. D., Manion, P. D., and Faber-Langendoen, D. 2006. Diameter distributions and structural sustainability in forests. Forest Ecology & Management 222: 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,USDA Forest Service, 1993a. Healthy forests for America's future: A strategic plan. USDA Forest Service MP-1513.Google Scholar
,USDA Forest Service, 1993b. National Center of Forest Health Management strategic plan. USDA Forest Service. Morgantown, WV.Google Scholar
,USDA Forest Service, 2003. Strategic Plan for Forest Health Protection: 2003–2007. USDA Forest Service MP-1590.Google Scholar
Vanbergen, A. J., Watt, A. D., Mitchell, R.et al. 2007. Scale-specific correlations between habitat heterogeneity and soil fauna diversity along a landscape structure gradient. Oecologia 153: 713–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, P. A. 1975. Predictions of fate from rosette size in teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). Oecologia 20: 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×