Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T02:02:47.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The interaction of international law and municipal law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Campbell McLachlan
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Central to the study of the way in which law constrains the external exercise and effect of the public power of states is an understanding of the relevant aspects of the relationship between public international law and municipal law. After all, it is the very province of public international law to regulate the public power of states as between themselves. The extent and manner in which its rules are given effect within the municipal legal system are therefore vital to the operation of foreign relations law.

Yet the essential starting point is that public international law and municipal law are two separate legal systems. Each has its own internal secondary rules of recognition, which determine, for the purpose of that system, the validity and interpretation of legal norms. Such rules include rules about the extent to which the norms of other systems have currency or application within the system. ‘Each legal system has its own rules of reception: that is what it is to be a legal system.’ International law has such rules to determine its priority over national law in establishing the responsibility of states on the international plane, but also to decide how it must proceed when the issue before the international tribunal is one properly governed by municipal law. Municipal law has a highly developed set of rules that decide when foreign law is to be applied: that is the function of private international law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Serbian Loans (France v Serbia) PCIJ Ser A No 20 (1929), 5 ILR 466
R v Lyons [2002] UKHL 44, [2003] 1 AC 976, 131 ILR 538, [105]
Attorney General for Canada v Attorney General for Ontario [1937] AC 326, 347, (1937) 8 ILR 41 (PC)
R v Keyn (1876) LR 2 Ex D 63, 85 per Sir Robert Phillimore
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Brind [1991] 1 AC 696, (1991) 85 ILR 29
Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37, 219 CLR 562
Thomas v Baptiste [2000] 2 AC 1, (1999) 123 ILR 508 (PC (Trinidad and Tobago) Lords Browne-Wilkinson, Steyn and Millett
Briggs v Baptiste [2000] 2 AC 40, (1999) 123 ILR 536 (PC (Trinidad and Tobago) Lords Millett, Hoffmann, Clyde and Russell; Lord Nicholls dissenting)
Higgs v Minister of National Security [2000] 2 AC 228 (PC (Bahamas) Lords Hoffmann, Hobhouse and Henry
Lewis v Attorney General of Jamaica [2001] 2 AC 50, (2000) 134 ILR 615 (PC (Jamaica) Lords Slynn, Nicholls, Steyn and Hutton; Lord Hoffmann dissenting)
E.g. A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘Belmarsh Prison’) [2004] UKHL 56
R v Hape 2007 SCC 26
Chung Chi Cheung v The King [1939] AC 160, 168, (1938) 9 ILR 264 (PC)
R v Dodd (1874) 2 NZCA 598, 2 NZ Jur 52
Wanganui-Rangitikei Electric Power Board v The Australian Mutual Provident Society (1934) 50 CLR 581, 601 per Dixon J
Ludgater Holdings Ltd v Gerling Australia Insurance Co Pty Ltd [2010] NZSC 49, [2010] 3 NZLR 713 (SC)
Trendtex Trading Corp v Central Bank of Nigeria [1977] 1 QB 529, 553–4, (1977) 64 ILR 111 (CA) per Lord Denning MR.
R v Hape 2007 SCC 26, [2007] 2 SCR 292, 143 ILR 140, [39]
West Rand Central Gold Mining Co Ltd v The King [1905] 2 KB 391, 406–7
Chung Chi Cheung v The King [1939] AC 160, 168–9, (1938) 9 ILR 264 (PC)
Trendtex Trading Ltd v Central Bank of Nigeria [1977] 1 QB 529, 569, (1977) 64 ILR 111 (CA) per Stephenson LJ
Chow Hung Ching v The King (1948) 77 CLR 449, 477, 15 ILR 147
Nulyarimma v Thompson [1999] FCA 1192, 96 FCR 153, 120 ILR 353, [131] per Merkel J
R v Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2007] 1 AC 136, 132 ILR 668, [11]
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia (No 9) [2013] FCA 323, 212 FCR 406
Mokbel v The Queen [2013] VSCA 118, [32]–[33]
R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55, [2005] 2 AC 1, 131 ILR 652
R v Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2007] 1 AC 136, 132 ILR 668, discussed below
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [2000] 1 AC 147, (1999) 119 ILR 135
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry [2012] UKSC 35, [2013] 1 AC 182, below
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16, (1971) 49 ILR 2, below
Habib v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] FCAFC 12, 183 FCR 62, 149 ILR 478, [114], below
Commercial and Estates Co of Egypt v Board of Trade [1925] 1 KB 271
Feather v R (1865) 6 B & S 257, 122 ER 1191
Finnish Ships Arbitration (Finland v Great Britain) (1934) III RIAA 1479, 7 ILR 231, below
R (Al-Jedda) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 58, [2008] 1 AC 332, 137 ILR 202, [5], below
Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2006] UKHL 26, [2007] 1 AC 270, 129 ILR 629
La Générale des Carrières et des Mines (‘Gécamines’) v F G Hemisphere Associates LLC [2012] UKPC 27, [2013] 1 All ER 409, [28]
Certain questions of mutual assistance in criminal matters (Djibouti v France) [2008] ICJ Rep 177, 244, (2008) 148 ILR 1, [196], below,
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) [2012] ICJ Rep 99, [100]
Dicey 2012, [5-013]
Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249, (1975) 72 ILR 446 (HL), below
Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 & 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 AC 883, 125 ILR 602
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) [2012] ICJ Rep 99, [93]
Zaoui v Attorney General (No 2) [2005] NZSC 38, [2006] 1 NZLR 289, 131 ILR 308, [79]
Mack v Canada (Attorney General) (2002) 60 OR (3d) 737
Suresh v Canada 2002 SCC 1, [2002] 1 SCR 3, 124 ILR 343
Ahmed v H M Treasury [2010] UKSC 2, [2010] 2 AC 534, 149 ILR 641
R v Finta [1994] 1 SCR 701, (1994) 104 ILR 284
Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (War Crimes Act Case) (1991) 172 CLR 501
Knuller (Publishing, Printing & Promotions) Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions [1973] AC 435 (HL)
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [2000] 1 AC 147, 273–6, (1999) 119 ILR 135
Hutchinson v Newbury Magistrates Court (2000) 122 ILR 499 (Engl DC)
Lord Advocate’s Reference No 1 of 2000 2001 SLT 507, (2001) 122 ILR 619 (HC Scot)
R v Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2007] 1 AC 136, 132 ILR 668
In re Piracy Jure Gentium [1934] AC 586, (1934) 7 ILR 213 (PC)
In re Sandrock (1945) 13 ILR 297
Jones, [23] citing R v Keyn (1876) LR 2 Ex D 63, 203
Knuller (Publishing, Printing & Promotions) Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions [1973] AC 435 (HL)
Abdelrazik v Canada 2009 FC 580, [2010] 1 FCR 267
Kadi v Council of the European Union C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, [2009] 1 AC 1225 (ECJ GC)
Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2010] EWCA Civ 758, [2011] QB 773
Al-Jedda v United Kingdom (App No 27021/08, 7 July 2011) 147 ILR 107 (ECtHR GC)
Ahmed v H M Treasury [2010] UKSC 2, [2010] 2 AC 534, 149 ILR 641, [75]
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131 (HL)
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [2000] 1 AC 147, (1999) 119 ILR 135

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×