Book contents
- Fetal Medicine
- Advanced Skills Series
- Fetal Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Genetics and antenatal screening
- Section 2 Embryology, fetal physiology and fetal anatomy
- Section 3 Fetal anomalies
- Section 4 Fetal disease
- Section 5 Termination of pregnancy
- Section 6 Fetal growth and wellbeing
- Section 7 Multiple pregnancy
- Chapter 23 Multiple pregnancy: pathology and epidemiology
- Chapter 24 Multiple pregnancy: diagnosis and screening
- Chapter 25 Multiple pregnancy: management and outcomes
- Section 8 Placenta, amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid
- Section 9 Diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures
- Index
- References
Chapter 24 - Multiple pregnancy: diagnosis and screening
from Section 7 - Multiple pregnancy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016
Book contents
- Fetal Medicine
- Advanced Skills Series
- Fetal Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Genetics and antenatal screening
- Section 2 Embryology, fetal physiology and fetal anatomy
- Section 3 Fetal anomalies
- Section 4 Fetal disease
- Section 5 Termination of pregnancy
- Section 6 Fetal growth and wellbeing
- Section 7 Multiple pregnancy
- Chapter 23 Multiple pregnancy: pathology and epidemiology
- Chapter 24 Multiple pregnancy: diagnosis and screening
- Chapter 25 Multiple pregnancy: management and outcomes
- Section 8 Placenta, amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid
- Section 9 Diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fetal Medicine , pp. 302 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Whitworth, M, Bricker, L, Neilson, JP, et al. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 4: CD007058.Google Scholar
Dias, T, Mahsud-Dornan, S, Thilaganathan, B, et al. First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable? BJOG 2010; 117(8): 979–84.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Multiple pregnancy: the management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period. London: RCOG Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dias, T, Arcangeli, T, Bhide, A, et al. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38(5): 530–2.Google Scholar
Stagiannis, KD, Sepulveda, W, Southwell, D, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of the dividing membrane in twin pregnancy during the second and third trimesters: a reproducibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1546–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias, T, Ladd, S, Mahsud-Dornan, S, et al. Systematic labeling of twin pregnancies on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 130–3.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. RCOG Green-Top Guideline No. 8. London: RCOG Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Garchet-Beaudron, A, Dreux, S, Leporrier, N, et al; ABA Study Group; Clinical Study Group. Second-trimester Down syndrome maternal serum marker screening: a prospective study of 11 040 twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28(12): 1105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, MS, Ellings, JM, Newman, RB, et al. Predictive value of antepartum ultrasound examination for anomalies in twin gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 43–9.Google Scholar
Schinzel, AA, Smith, DW, Miller, JR. Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. J Pediatr 1979; 95: 921–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperling, L, Kiil, C, Larsen, LU et al. Detection of chromosomal abnormalities, congenital abnormalities and transfusion syndrome in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29(5): 517–26.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, et al. on behalf of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 643–8.Google Scholar
Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2006; 8: 136–44.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 550–5.Google Scholar
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(1): 94–103.Google Scholar
Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27(4): 181–90.Google Scholar
Sueters, M, Oepkes, D. Diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective growth restriction, twin anaemia-polycythaemia sequence, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28(2): 215–26.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 941–4.Google Scholar
Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R, Hassan, SS et al. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203(2): 128.e1–128.e12.Google Scholar
Colton, T, Kayne, HL, Zhang, Y et al. A metaanalysis of home uterine activity monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173(5): 1499–505.Google Scholar