Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:02:14.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - An evidence-based approach to counseling for fertility treatment compliance

from Section 6 - Practice issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Sofia Gameiro  and
Jacky Boivin
Edited by
Sharon N. Covington
Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Counseling
Clinical Guide and Case Studies
 , pp. 265 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fauser, BC, Tarlatzis, BC, Rebar, RW, Legro, RS, Balen, AH, Lobo, R, et al. Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(1): 28–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. Adherence to Long-term Therapies: Evidence for Action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar
Stern, JE, Brown, MB, Luke, B, Wantman, E, Lederman, A, Missmer, SA, et al. Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1334–40.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Domar, AD, Shapiro, DB, Wischmann, T, Fauser, BC, Verhaak, CM. Tackling burden in ART: An integrated approach for medical staff. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(4): 941–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gameiro, S, Verhaak, CM, Kremer, JAM, Boivin, J. Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(2): 124–35.Google Scholar
Gameiro, S, Boivin, J, Peronace, LA, Verhaak, CM. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(6): 652–69.Google Scholar
Brandes, M, van der Steen, JOM, Bokdam, SB, Hamilton, CJCM, de Bruin, JP, Nelen, WLDM, et al. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(12):3127–34.Google Scholar
Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS, Kohn, LT, Maguire, SK, Pike, KC. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Press; 2001.Google Scholar
Pedro, J, Canavarro, MC, Boivin, J, Gameiro, S. Postive experiences of patient-centred care are associated with intentions to comply with fertility treatment: Findings from the validation of the Portuguese version of the PCQ-Infertility. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(9):2462–72.Google Scholar
van Empel, IWH, Dancet, EAF, Koolman, XHE, Nelen, WLDM, Stolk, EA, Sermeus, W, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: A discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(3): 584–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peddie, VL, van Teijlingen, E, Bhattacharya, S. A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(7):1944–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauprich, O, Berns, E, Vollmann, J. Information provision and decision-making in assisted reproduction treatment: results from a survey in Germany. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 2382–91.Google Scholar
Boden, J. When IVF treatment fails. Hum Fertil. 2007;10: 93–8.Google Scholar
Peddie, VL, van Teijlingen, E, Bhattacharya, S. Ending in-vitro fertilization: Women's perception's of decision making. Hum Fertil. 2004; 7(1): 31–7.Google Scholar
Boivin, J. Evidence-based approaches to infertility counselling. In: Covington, SN, Hammer, Burns L, editors. Infertility Counselling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
Sackett, D, Strauss, SE, Richardson, WS, Rosenberg, W, Haynes, RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.Google Scholar
The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: a committee option. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(1): e6–e9.Google Scholar
Malcolm, CE, Cumming, DC. Follow-up of infertile couples who dropped out of a specialist fertiliy clinic. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(2): 269–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gameiro, S, Boivin, J, Domar, AD. Optimal IVF for 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 302–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shariff, SZ, Math, B, Bejaimal, SAD, Sontrop, JM, Iansavichus, AV, Haynes, RB, et al. Retrieving clinical evidence: A comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(8): e164.Google Scholar
Bramer, WM, Giustini, D, Kramer, BMR, Anderson, FP. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searchers for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2013; 2: 115.Google Scholar
Barry, JA, Kuckmierczyk, AR, Hardiman, PJ. Anxiety and depression in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 2442–51.Google Scholar
Dokras, A, Clifton, S, Futterweit, W, Wild, RA. Increased prevalence of anxiety symptoms in women with polycystic ovary syndrom: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(1): 225–30.Google Scholar
Dokras, A, Clifton, S, Futterweit, W, Wild, RA. Increased risk for abnormal depression scores in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(1): 145–52.Google Scholar
Veltman-Verhulst, S, Boivin, J, Eikjemans, E, Fauser, BC. Emotional distress in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(6): 638–51.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Griffiths, E, Venetis, CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 2011; 342(d223).Google Scholar
Matthiesen, SM, Frederiksen, Y, Ingerlev, HJ, Zachariae, R. Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 2763–76.Google Scholar
Moran, LJ, Hutchison, SK, Norman, RJ, Teede, HJ. Lifestyle Changes in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. 06 July 2011 edn. Cochrane Library 2011.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Boyce, J, Johns, DJ, Jebb, SA, Aveyard, P, Behavioural Weight Management Review Group. Effect of behavioural techniques and delivery mode on effectiveness of weight management: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Obes Rev. 2014; 15: 598–609.Google Scholar
Phelps, C, Bennett, P, Hood, K, Brain, K, Murray, A. A self-help coping intervention can reduce anxiety and avoidant health behaviours whilst waiting for cancer genetic risk information: results of a phase III randomised trial. Psychooncology. 2012; 22: 836–44.Google Scholar
Bennett, P, Phelps, C, Brain, K, Hood, K, Gray, J. A randomized controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information. J Psychosom Res. 2007; 63(1):59–64.Google Scholar
Lancastle, D, Boivin, J. A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 2299–307.Google Scholar
Ockhuijsen, H, van den Hoogen, A, Eijkemans, M, Macklon, N, Boivin, J. The impact of a self-administered coping intervention on emotional well-being in women awaiting the outcome of IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29:1459–70.Google Scholar
Skiadas, CC, Terry, K, De Pari, M, Geoghegan, A, Lubetsky, L, Levy, S, et al. Does emotional support during the luteal phase decrease the stress of in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 1467–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, J, Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011.Google Scholar
Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.Google Scholar
Lancastle, D. Reasons to be Cheerful: Part I, II, III. Dispositional Optimism, Positive Reappraisal Coping and Positive (Re)appraisals of the Situation: Effects on Emotional Well-being and Physical Outcomes. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing: Cardiff University; 2006.Google Scholar
Pinborg, A, Gaarslev, C, Hougaard, CO, Nyboe Anderson, A, Kragh, Anderson P, Boivin, J, et al. The influence of female body weight on assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures and live birth rates: A longitudinal multi-centre cohort study of 487 infertile couples. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23(4): 490–9.Google Scholar
Rose, SA, Poynter, PS, Anderson, JW, Noar, SM, Conigliaro, J. Physician weight loss advice and patient weight loss behavior change: a literature review and meta-analysis of survey data. Int J Obes. 2013; 37(1):118–28.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Takefman, J, Braverman, A. Giving bad news: It's time to stop. In: Macklon, N, editor. Assisted Reproduction in the Complicated Patients. London: Taylor & Francis; 2005. pp. 233–40.Google Scholar
Aarts, JWM, van den Haak, P, Nelen, WL, Tuil, WS, Faber, MJ, Kremer, JAM. Patient-focused intervent interventions in reproductive medicine: a scoping review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(2): 211–27.Google Scholar
Rimm, AA, Katayama, AC, Diaz, M, Katayama, KP. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2004; 21(12): 437–43.Google Scholar
Wen, J, Jiang, J, Chenyue, D, Juncheng, D, Liu, Y, Xia, Y, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(6): 1331–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwyn, G, Miron-Shatz, T. Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect. 2009; 13:139–47.Google Scholar
Elwyn, G, Stiel, M, Durand, M-A, Boivin, J. The design on patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17:565–74.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J, Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1944.Google Scholar
Durand, M-A, Boivin, J, Elwyn, G. Stakeholder field-testing of amnioDex, a person-centered decision support intervention for amniocentesis. Int J Pers Cent Med. 2012; 2(3): 568–76.Google Scholar
Jones, ML, Cifu, DX, Backus, D, Sisto, SA. Instilling a research culture in an applied clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(1): S49–54.Google Scholar
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Glossary 2014 [April 4th 2014]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/?o=1116.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×