Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Cited by 11
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - Facing the future: emotion communication and the presence of others in the age of video-mediated communication

Summary

Overview:Video-mediated communication is about to become a ubiquitous feature of everyday life. This chapter considers the differences between face-to-face and video-mediated communication in terms of co-presence and considers the implications for the communication of emotion, self-disclosure, and relationship rapport. Following initial consideration of the concepts of physical presence and social presence, we describe recent studies of the effect of presence on the facial communication of emotion. We then delve further into the different social psychological aspects of presence, and present a study that investigated how these various aspects independently impact upon self-disclosure and rapport. We conclude by considering how the absence of co-presence in video-mediated interaction can liberate the communicators from some of the social constraints normally associated with face-to-face interaction, while maintaining others and introducing new constraints specific to the medium.

Video-mediated interpersonal interactions are set to become a ubiquitous feature of everyday life. Recent advances in communication technologies, such as affordable broadband access to the internet and the appearance of third-generation mobile phones, mean that the much-heralded advent of the videophone is about to become reality. As video becomes ubiquitous, it places the face center-stage for the communication of emotion on the internet, much as it is in our normal “face-to-face” interactions. Of course the big difference between the face-to-face interactions that we take for granted today and the face-to-face interaction of the future is the absence of physical co-presence. In this new form of visual interaction, actors are separated by distance, communicating via webcams and computers or mobile phones.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Adams, C. H. (2001). Prosocial bias in theories of interpersonal communication competence: must good communication be nice? In Shepherd, G. J. and Rothenbuhler, E. W. (Eds.), Communication and Community (pp. 37–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Altman, I. and Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ando, K. (1978). Self-disclosure in the acquaintance process: effects of affiliative tendency and sensitivity to rejection. Japanese Psychological Research, 20(4), 194–199.
Argyle, M. and Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
Argyle, M. and Kendon, A. (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. III, pp. 55–98). New York: Academic Press.
Argyle, M. and Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and Mutual Gaze. London: Cambridge University Press.
Beattie, G. W. (1978). Floor apportionment and gaze in conversational dyads. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 7–15.
Beattie, G. W. (1979). Contextual constraints on the floor-apportionment function of speaker-gaze in dyadic conversations. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 391–392.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., and Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Towards a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence, 12, 456–480.
Biocca, F., Kim, J., and Choi, Y. (2001). Visual touch in virtual environments: an exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence, 10, 247–265.
Buck, R. (1994). Social and emotional functions in facial expression and communication: the readout hypothesis. Biological Psychology, 38, 95–115.
Bull, P. and Brown, R. (1977). The role of postural change in dyadic conversations. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 29–33.
Burgoon, J. K. and Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 19–41.
Carnevale, P. J., Pruitt, D. G., and Seilheimer, S. D. (1981). Looking and competing: accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111–120.
Crown, C. L. (1991). Coordinated interpersonal timing of vision and voice as a function of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 29–46.
Deutsch, R. D. (1976). An empirical investigation into the grammar of visual interaction: looks and stares. Man–Environment Systems, 6, 163–173.
Duggan, A. P. and Parrott, R. L. (2001). Research note: physicians' nonverbal rapport building and patients' talk about the subjective component of illness. Human Communication Research, 27, 299–311.
Edelmann, R. J. and Hampson, S. E. (1981). Embarrassment in dyadic interaction. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 171–177.
Edinger, J. A. and Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal involvement and social control. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 30–56.
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In Cole, J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1971 (pp. 207–283). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior – categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124–129.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., and Ancoli, S. (1980). Facial signs of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1125–1134.
Ellsworth, P. C. and Ross, L. D. (1975). Intimacy in response to direct gaze. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 592–613.
Fernández-Dols, J. M. and Ruiz-Belda, M. A. (1995). Are smiles a sign of happiness? Gold medal winners at the Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1113–1119.
Fernández-Dols, J. M., Sánchez, F., Carrera, P., and Ruiz-Belda, M. A. (1997). Are spontaneous expressions and emotions linked? An experimental test of coherence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 163–177.
Finn, J. and Lavitt, M. (1994). Computer-based self-help groups for sexual abuse survivors. Social Work with Groups, 17, 21–46.
Flack, W. F., Laird, J. D., and Cavallaro, L. A. (1999). Separate and combined effects of facial expressions and bodily postures on emotional feelings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 203–217.
Frick, F. C. (1959). Information theory. In Koch, S. (ed.), Psychology: A Study of Science (pp. 611–636). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Sociality of solitary smiling: potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229–240.
Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. New York: Academic Press.
Funder, D. C. and Colvin, C. (1988). Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158.
Gackenbach, J. (1998). Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. New York: Academic Press.
Goh, J. (2004). Self-Disclosure and Computer-Mediated Communication: Implications for Crisis Support on the Internet. M.Phil. dissertation, University of Manchester.
Grayson, D. M. and Monk, A. F. (2003). Are you looking at me? Eye contact and desktop video conferencing. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 10, 221–243.
Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., and VanCura, L. J. (1973). A computer interview by psychiatric patient target symptoms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 247–253.
Gurtman, M. B. (1987). Depressive affect and disclosures as factors in interpersonal rejection. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11(1), 87–99.
Hess, U., Banse, R., and Kappas, A. (1995). The intensity of facial expression is determined by underlying affective state and social situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 280–288.
Horley, K., Williams, L. M., Gonsalvez, C., and Gordon, E. (2003). Social phobics do not see eye to eye: a visual scanpath study of emotional expression processing. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17(1), 33–44.
Ijsselstein, W. A., Ridder, H., Freeman, J., and Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: concept, determinants and measurement. Proceedings of the SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, 3959–3976.
Jakobs, E., Manstead, A. S. R., and Fischer, A. H. (1999). Social motives and subjective feelings as determinants of facial displays: the case of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 424–435.
Jakobs, E., Manstead, A. S. R., and Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social context effects on facial activity in a negative emotional setting. Emotion, 1, 51–69.
Jourard, S. M. and Jaffe, P. E. (1970). Influence of an interviewer's disclosure on the self-disclosing behaviour of interviewee. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 17, 252–257.
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.
Kraut, R. E. and Johnston, R. E. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling: an ethological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1539–1553.
Ksionzky, S. and Mehrabian, A. (1980). Personality correlates of self-disclosure. Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 145–152.
Lea, M. (1991). Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer-mediated communication. Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, 153–172.
Lea, M. and Duck, S. (1982). A model for the role of similarity of values in friendship development. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 301–310.
Lea, M. and Giordano, R. (1997). Representations of the group and group processes in CSCW research: a case of premature closure? In Bowker, G. C., Star, S. L., Turner, W., and Gasser, L. (Eds.), Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide (pp. 5–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lea, M. and Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In Wood, J. T. and Duck, S.. (eds), Understudied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track (pp. 197–233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lea, M., Spears, R., and Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: effects of visual anonymity on self-categorization, stereotyping and attraction in computer-mediated groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526–537.
Lea, M., Spears, R., and Watt, S. E. (2007). Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 761–773.
Marvin, C. (1988). When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. Oxford University Press.
McKenna, K. Y. A. and Bargh, J. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57–75.
Mehrabian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from neutral verbal communications. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 414–417.
Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 203–207.
Merten, J. (1997). Facial-affective behavior, mutual gaze and emotional experience in dyadic interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21(3), 179–201.
Monk, A. F. and Gale, C. (2002). A look is worth a thousand words: full gaze awareness in video-mediated conversation. Discourse Processes, 33, 257–278.
Newton, D. A. and Burgoon, J. K. (1990). Nonverbal conflict behaviors: functions, strategies, and tactics. In Cahn, D. D. (ed.), Intimates in Conflict: A Communication Perspective (pp. 77–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O'Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., and Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: a language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 464–490.
Parks, M. R. (1982). Ideology in interpersonal communication: off the couch and into the world. In Burgoon, M. (ed.), Communication Yearbook 5 (pp. 79–107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Patterson, M. L. (1973). Compensation in nonverbal immediacy behaviors: a review. Sociometry, 36, 237–252.
Raskar, R., Welch, G., Cutts, M., Lake, A., Stesin, L., and Fuchs, H. (1998). The office of the future: a unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. InProceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, (pp. 179–188). New York: ACM.
Reis, H. T. and Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. (ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions (pp. 367–389). New York: Wiley.
Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451–484.
Rogers, P. and Lea, M. (2005). Social presence in distributed group environments: the role of social identity. Behaviour and Information Technology, 24, 151–158.
Rosenberg, E. L. and Ekman, P. (1994). Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 201–229.
Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.
Rutter, D. R. (1984). Looking and Seeing: The Role of Visual Communication in Social Interaction. Chichester: Wiley.
Rutter, D. R. (1987). Communicating by Telephone. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Rutter, D. R., Stephenson, G. M., Ayling, K., and White, P. A. (1978). The timing of looks in dyadic conversation. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 17–21.
Salem, D. A., Bogat, A., and Reid, C. (1997). Mutual help goes on-line. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 189–207.
Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Chichester: Wiley.
Spears, R. and Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427–459.
Stritzke, W. G. K., Nguyen, A., and Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: a self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6, 1–22.
Trommsdorff, G. and John, H. (1992). Decoding affective communication in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 41–54.
Wallbott, H. G. (1991). The robustness of communication of emotion via facial expression: emotion recognition from photographs with deteriorated pictorial quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 89–98.
Wells, J. W. and Kline, W. B. (1987). Self-disclosure of homosexual orientation. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 191–197.
Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., and Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207.
Zaalberg, R., Manstead, A. S. R., and Fischer, A. H. (2004). Relations between emotions, display rules, social motives, and facial behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 182–207.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.