Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T09:18:56.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Coevolution and community structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2010

Anthony K. Lee
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Andrew Cockburn
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Hitherto we have been concerned with the tactics adopted by individuals and the performance of populations, and we have demonstrated a number of applications of evolutionary theory to these levels of organisation. However, one of the most active areas of both theoretical and empirical ecological research concerns the interspecific interactions among individuals and populations. Such interactions fall within the ambit of community ecology or synecology. Most community properties are the sum of the properties of individuals and consequently reflect the separate adaptations of species. This causes difficulty in the application of evolutionary theory to explain the apparent structure and resilience exhibited by some communities with regard to phenomena such as species diversity (for an alternative view see Wilson (1980)). One type of individual selection which can increase the structure and stability of communities is evolutionary change in a trait of the individuals in one population in response to a trait exhibited by the individuals in a second population, followed by an evolutionary response by the second population to the change in the first. This process is called coevolution (Janzen, 1980), and may arise in a number of circumstances, depending on the nature of the effects of the interacting species on each other (Table 7.1).

Where two species interact to the benefit of both, the interaction is termed mutualism. Mutualism and other two-species interactions may arise without coevolution, but coevolution may enhance the relationship to the extent that the species become obligatorily interdependent (symbiosis). A more immediately obvious interaction is one where one species enhances its fitness to the detriment of another through predation or parasitism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×