Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:07:52.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Potential trade with core and periphery: industry differences in trade patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2010

Stanley W. Black
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This paper analyzes the trade patterns that have evolved between a few Western European countries, on the one hand, and a group of formerly centrally planned economies in Europe, on the other hand, since the initiation of the transition process in these economies in the late 1980s. The analysis has two aims : first, to ascertain whether there have been significant differences, across Western countries, in the speed with which the potential macroeconomic benefits from the opening up of Eastern Europe have so far been realized ; and second, to assess whether there is any evidence to date to support the frequently voiced concern that east–west European economic integration might adversely affect output and employment in some “sensitive” sectors in Western Europe.

The group of transition economies considered in this study, denoted as CEEC-6, includes Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and the Slovak Republic. To keep the paper manageable, these countries have been grouped together, even though they differ from each other in some significant respects, including the extent to which they had historical ties with the Western countries in our sample and the precise time at which they began their transition to market-based systems. As for the sample of Western European countries, it includes the four largest economies of Europe (Germany, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom) and Portugal.

Germany is a natural choice given that it has had close historical ties with the transition economies and has quickly reestablished its position as a dominant trade partner for most of the CEEC-6 by virtue of its geographic location and economic size.

Type
Chapter
Information
Europe's Economy Looks East
Implications for Germany and the European Union
, pp. 67 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×