INTRODUCTION

The European Commission has identified the completion of the Digital Single Market (DSM) as one of its main political priorities. The Commission's Website states that the

That sounds quite good. And again one is deeply impressed by the Commission's quantification skills: it is not €400 or €480 billion but rather €415 billion per year that moving to a single market could contribute to the European economy. However, according to the Commission's so-called Digital Single Market Factsheet, ‘obstacles remain to unlock these potentials’. In reality, cross-border online services seem to represent only a small percentage of overall EU online services. The Commission's website with reference to its priorities points out:

My focus in this article is on such cross-border contracts and specifically on what might be perceived as a barrier, a regulatory wall, or an obstacle, namely formal requirements in contracts concluded online.

There is little doubt that the way we conclude contracts today has dramatically changed as compared to 25 years ago. In the digital world, the formal requirements of a contract may seem to be a throwback to the old world, the non-digital world. By formal requirements I do not mean those specific ‘formal requirements’ for consumer contracts concluded by electronic means which are meant to enable consumers to be informed about all the costs before entering into a binding contract. In that regard, Article 8(2) of the Consumer Rights Directive introduced a so-called ‘button solution’ in order to provide sanctions for ‘internet cost traps’. Nor do I mean domestic contracts entered into by parties based in one jurisdiction. I mean cross-border contracts, the kind of contracts which the Commission has in mind when it complains about the largely domestic nature of markets in the context of the digital single market. But what is special about cross-border contracts in terms of formal requirements?