Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T09:46:09.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The bread that we break: controversies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

George Hunsinger
George Hunsinger
Affiliation:
Princeton Theological Seminary
Get access

Summary

No church should start down the road toward reunion, Hans Küng once remarked, without facing the imperative of conversion. He did not mean the conversion of one church to another, but a process that cut much deeper.

The road to unity is not the return of one church to another, or the exodus of one church to join another, but a common crossroads, the conversion of all churches to Christ and thus to one another. Unity is not the subjection of one church to another, but the mutual regeneration and mutual acceptance of community through mutual giving and receiving.

Greater mutuality among the churches through a deeper conversion to Christ, Küng believed, was the only way beyond the impasses of division. Ecclesial conversion would mean confronting significant challenges, sometimes painful, sometimes inspiring. Cherished traditions, venerable practices, hallowed institutions, and distinctive beliefs would need to be carefully scrutinized. No church should take the question of truth for granted. Here, again, Küng gave voice to the spirit of ecumenism. “All human truth,” he stated, “stands in the shadow of error. All error contains at least a grain of truth. What a true statement says is true; what it fails to say may also be true. What a false statement says is false; what it means but does not say may be true.” Looking for the grain of truth in every error, for the shadow of error in every truth, for the valid intention obscured in the false statement, and for the insight that has yet to be expressed – these are the practices necessary if the churches are to recover their visible unity in Christ.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Eucharist and Ecumenism
Let Us Keep the Feast
 , pp. 21 - 46
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Küng, Hans, The Church (New York: Sheed & Ward, 1967), p. 293.Google Scholar
Dombes, Groupe des, For the Conversion of the Churches (Geneva: WCC Publications, 1993).Google Scholar
Clifford, Catherine E., The Groupe des Dombes: A Dialogue of Conversion (New York: Peter Lang, 2005), pp. 146Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae 3.75.1 All quotations throughout the present volume are from the Blackfriars edition (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1964–)Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl, “The Presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper,” in Theological Investigations, vol. iv (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1966), pp. 287–311Google Scholar
Schroeder, H. J., Disciplinary Decrees of the General Councils: Text, Translation and Commentary (St. Louis: B. Herder, 1937), p. 236.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin, The Babylonian Captivity of the Church, in Luther's Works, American Edition, vol. 36 (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1959), p. 35Google Scholar
Sasse, Hermann, This Is My Body (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1959), pp. 261–62.Google Scholar
Zachman, Randall, John Calvin as Teacher, Pastor, and Theologian (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), pp. 25, 31–33Google Scholar
Bizer, Ernst, Studien zur Geschichte des Abendmahlsstreits im 16. Jahrhundert (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1962).Google Scholar
Eells, Hastings, Martin Bucer (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1931), pp. 191–204Google Scholar
Greschat, Martin, Martin Bucer (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 2004), pp. 132–42Google Scholar
Köhler, Walther, Zwingli und Luther, vol. ii (Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann Verlag, 1953), pp. 432–525.Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Institutes of the Christian Religion, ed. McNeill, John T., tr. Ford Lewis Battles (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960)Google Scholar
Gerrish, Brian, Grace and Gratitude (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993), p. 161 n. 10.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, Helmut, Coena Domini (Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1937), pp. 120–25Google Scholar
Thurian, Max, The Eucharistic Memorial, vol. ii (London: Lutterworth, 1961), p. 111.Google Scholar
Calvin, John, A Harmony of the Gospels, vol. iii (Comm. on Matt. 26:26 and par.) (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1972), p. 135Google Scholar
Needham, Nick, “Peter Martyr and the Eucharistic Controversy,” Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology 17 (1999), pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Vermigli, Peter Martyr, The Oxford Treatise and Disputation, On the Eucharist, 1549, ed. McLelland, Joseph C. (Kirksville: Truman State University Press, 2000), p. 93Google Scholar
Wallace, Ronald S., Calvin's Doctrine of Word and Sacrament (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd Ltd, 1953), p. 170.Google Scholar
McLelland, Joseph C., The Visible Words of God (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1957), pp. 132Google Scholar
McKinnon, Steven A., Words, Imagery, and the Mystery of Christ (Leiden: Brill, 2000), pp. 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucer, Martin, Censura, in Martin Bucer and the Book of Common Prayer, ed. Whitiker, E. C. (Great Wakering: Mayhew-McCrimmon, 1974), p. 56.Google Scholar
Thompson, Nicholas, Eucharistic Sacrifice and Patristic Tradition in the Theology of Martin Bucer, 1534–1546 (Leiden: Brill, 2005), pp. 240–41.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Thomas, “A Defence of the True and Catholic Doctrine of the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Our Saviour Christ,” in The Work of Thomas Cranmer, ed. Duffield, G. E. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1965), p. 187.Google Scholar
Zwingli, , “Friendly Exegesis,” in Writings of Huldrich Zwingli, vol. ii, ed. Pipkin, H. Wayne (Allison Park: Pickwick Publications, 1984), p. 321.Google Scholar
Torrance, T. F. in Theology in Reconciliation (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1975), p. 162Google Scholar
Torrance, Iain R., Christology After Chalcedon (Norwich: Canterbury Press, 1988), p. 77.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×