Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:36:31.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

7 - EU law and international law

Bart Van Vooren  and
Ramses A. Wessel
Bart Van Vooren
Affiliation:
ALTIUS, Brussels
Ramses A. Wessel
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Central issues

  • The EU is usually considered a special, or sui generis, organization (see Chapter 1). This special status does not only flow from the relationship with its Member States (which indeed differentiates it from other international organizations), but also from its position towards international law. In the early days in particular, the CJEU tended to underline this special position by referring to the ‘autonomous’ legal order that was created in which the relationship between the Member States was no longer primarily regulated by international law, but by EU law. Indeed, the states were first and foremost Member States.

  • Yet, without international law, the EU would not exist. It is based on a treaty concluded within the framework of international treaty law. At the same time, and keeping in mind the rule of pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt, third states are in principal not bound by the EU Treaty since to them it is an agreement between others. This implies that in its external legal relations the EU will have to act under international law and will also have to respect its basic rules. Within the EU legal order, however, this may lead to conflicting norms, and over the years the Court has had quite a task in finding solutions for these conflicts.

  • This leads to a number of questions that will be addressed in this chapter: what is the hierarchical position of international law within the EU legal order? What are the effects of international law (both written and unwritten) in the EU legal order? How did the ECJ solve conflicts between EU law and international law?

  • …

    • Type
    Chapter
    Information
    EU External Relations Law
    Text, Cases and Materials
     , pp. 208 - 245
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2014

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Blokker, N. M., ‘Abuse of the Members: Questions Concerning Draft Art. 16 of the Draft Arts. on Responsibility of International Organizations’ (2010) 7 International Organizations Law Review 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cannizzaro, E., ‘The Neo-Monism of the European Legal Order’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
    Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar
    Casolari, F., ‘Giving Indirect Effect to International Law’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 395–415.Google Scholar
    d’Aspremont, J., ‘Abuse of the Legal Personality of International Organizations and the Responsibility of Member States’ (2007) 4 International Organizations Law Review 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    De Búrca, G. ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’ (2010) 51 Harvard International Law Journal 1–49.Google Scholar
    De Búrca, G., The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi (Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/09).Google Scholar
    De Witte, B., ‘Direct Effect, Primacy and the Nature of the Legal Order’, in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 323–362.Google Scholar
    Dunne, T., ‘Good Citizen Europe’ (2008) 84 International Affairs 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Eckes, C., ‘International Law as Law of the EU: The Role of the Court of Justice’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 351–377.Google Scholar
    Gattinara, G., ‘Consistent Interpretation of WTO Rulings in the EU Legal Order?’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 269–287.Google Scholar
    Gattini, A., ‘Effects of Decisions of the UN Security Council in the EU Legal Order’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 213–227.Google Scholar
    Gianelli, A., ‘Customary International Law in the European Union’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 93–110.Google Scholar
    Griller, S., ‘International Law, Human Rights and the European Community’s Autonomous Legal Order: Notes on the European Court of Justice Decision in Kadi’ (2008) 4 European Constitutional Law Review, 3, 528–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Hillion, C. and Wessel, R. A., ‘Restraining External Competences of EU Member States under CFSP’, in Cremona, M. and de Witte, B. (eds.), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 79–121.Google Scholar
    Hoffmeister, F., ‘Litigating against the European Union and its Member States – Who Responds under the ILC’s Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 723–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Jacobs, F. G., ‘Direct Effect and Interpretation of International Agreements in the Recent Case Law of the European Court of Justice’, in Dashwood, A. and Maresceau, M. (eds.), Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Klabbers, J., ‘International Law in Community Law: The Law and Politics of Direct Effect’ (2001) 21 Yearbook of European Law 263–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Koutrakos, P., ‘International Agreements in the Area of the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 157–187.Google Scholar
    Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Kuijper, P. J., ‘Customary International Law, Decisions of International Organisations and Other Techniques for Ensuring Respect for International Legal Rules in European Community Law’, in Wouters, J., Nollkaemper, A. and de Wet, E. (eds.), The Europeanisation of International Law: The Status of International Law in the EU and its Member States (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008), pp. 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Mayer, F. C., ‘European Law as a Door Opener for Public International Law?’, in Thouvenin, J. M. and Tomuschat, C. (eds.), Droit International et Diversité des Cultures Juridiques – International Law and Diversity of Legal Cultures (Paris: Pédone, 2008), pp. 241–255.Google Scholar
    Naert, F., ‘The Application of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in CSDP Operations’ in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
    Palchetti, P., ‘Judicial Review of the International Validity of UN Security Council Resolutions by the European Court of Justice’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 379–393.Google Scholar
    Pescatore, P., ‘Die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs zur gemeinschaftlichen Wirkung völkerrechtlicher Abkommen’, in Festschrift für, H. Mosler, Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung, Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit Menschenrechte (Berlin: Springer, 1983).Google Scholar
    Pescatore, P., Le Droit de l’Intégration. Emergence d’un Phénomène Nouveau dans les Relations Internationales selon l’Expérience des Communautés Européennes (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972).Google Scholar
    Schermers, H., ‘Community Law and International Law’ (1975) 12 Common Market Law Review 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Timmermans, C., ‘The EU and International Public Law’ (1999) 4 European Foreign Affairs Review 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Tizzano, A., ‘Quelques Réflexions sur la doctrine du Droit de l’Union Européenne: les ‘Communautaristes’ et les Autres’ (2008) Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 225–235.Google Scholar
    Van Rossem, J. W., ‘Interaction between EU Law and International Law in the Light of Intertanko and Kadi: The Dilemma of Norms Binding the Member States but not the Community’ (2009) 40 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 183–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Rossem, J. W., ‘The EU at Crossroads: A Constitutional Inquiry into the Way International Law Is Received within the EU Legal Order’, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp. 59–89.Google Scholar
    Wessel, R. A. and Blockmans, S. (eds.), Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press/Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Wouters, J. and Van Eeckhoute, D., ‘Giving Effect to Customary International Law through European Community law’, in Prinssen, J. N. and Schrauwen, A. (eds.), Direct Effect (Groningen: European Law Publishing, 2004), pp. 183–234.Google Scholar
    Wouters, J., Nollkaemper, A. and de Wet, E. (eds.), The Europeanisation of International Law: The Status of International Law in the EU and its Member States (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Dunne, T., ‘Good Citizen Europe’ (2008) 84 International Affairs 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    de Búrca, G., ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’ (2010) 51 Harvard International Law Journal 1–49Google Scholar
    Mayer, F. C., ‘European Law as a Door Opener for Public International Law?’, in Thouvenin, J. M. and Tomuschat, C. (eds.), Droit International et Diversité des Cultures Juridiques – International Law and Diversity of Legal Cultures (Paris: Pédone, 2008), pp. 241–255 at 253.Google Scholar
    Wouters, J., Nollkaemper, A. and de Wet, E., ‘Introduction: The “Europeanisation” of International Law’, in Wouters, , Nollkaemper, and de Wet, (eds.), The Europeanisation of International Law: The Status of International Law in the EU and its Member States (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008), pp. 1–13 at 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union (Boston/Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011)Google Scholar
    Gianelli, A., ‘Customary International Law in the European Union’, in Cannizzaro, Palchetti and Wessel (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union, pp. 93–110 at 99.Google Scholar
    Hoffmeister, , ‘Litigating against the European Union and its Member States – Who Responds under the ILC’s Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 723–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×