Book contents
- EthnoprimatologyA Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Ethnoprimatology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Methods
- 1 Introduction: Doing Ethnoprimatology in the Anthropocene
- Part I Characterizing the Interface
- 2 Introduction to Part I
- Section I Behavioral Ecology
- Section II Epidemiological Studies
- Section III Predator–Prey Studies
- Section IV Human–Primate Conflict
- 11 Flexibility in Javan Gibbon (Hylobates moloch) Response to Human Disturbance
- 12 Conflicted Primatologists: A Survey on Primatologists’ Views on Conflict and Resolution Between Human and Nonhuman Primates
- Part II Following the Data: Incorporating Ethnography
- Part III Implications for Conservation
- Index
- References
12 - Conflicted Primatologists: A Survey on Primatologists’ Views on Conflict and Resolution Between Human and Nonhuman Primates
from Section IV - Human–Primate Conflict
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2017
Book contents
- EthnoprimatologyA Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Ethnoprimatology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Methods
- 1 Introduction: Doing Ethnoprimatology in the Anthropocene
- Part I Characterizing the Interface
- 2 Introduction to Part I
- Section I Behavioral Ecology
- Section II Epidemiological Studies
- Section III Predator–Prey Studies
- Section IV Human–Primate Conflict
- 11 Flexibility in Javan Gibbon (Hylobates moloch) Response to Human Disturbance
- 12 Conflicted Primatologists: A Survey on Primatologists’ Views on Conflict and Resolution Between Human and Nonhuman Primates
- Part II Following the Data: Incorporating Ethnography
- Part III Implications for Conservation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- EthnoprimatologyA Practical Guide to Research at the Human-Nonhuman Primate Interface, pp. 154 - 168Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bond, J. (2014). A holistic approach to natural resource conflict: The case of Laikipia County, Kenya. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 117–127.Google Scholar
Estrada, A., Raboy, B. E., & Oliveira, L. C. (2012). Agroecosystems and primate conservation in the tropics: A review. American Journal of Primatology, 74(8), 696–711.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2006). Human–nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2011). Being human and doing primatology: National, socioeconomic, and ethnic influences on primatological practice. American Journal of Primatology, 73(3), 233–237.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. & Wolfe, L. D. (eds.) (2002). Primates Face to Face: The Conservation Implications of Human–Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandiwa, E., Heitkönig, I. M.A., Lokhorst, A. M., Prins, H. H.T., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). CAMPFIRE and human–wildlife conflicts in local communities bordering northern Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 7.Google Scholar
Hill, C. M. (2000). Conflict of interest between people and baboons: Crop raiding in Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 21(2), 299–315.Google Scholar
Hill, C. M. & Wallace, G. E. (2012). Crop protection and conflict mitigation: Reducing the costs of living alongside non-human primates. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(10), 2569–2587.Google Scholar
Hill, C. M. & Webber, A. D. (2010). Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human–wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology, 72(10), 919–924.Google Scholar
Hockings, K. & Humle, T. (2009). Best practice guidelines for the prevention and mitigation of conflict between humans and great apes. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockings, K. J. & McLennan, M. R. (2012). From forest to farm: Systematic review of cultivar feeding by chimpanzees – management implications for wildlife in anthropogenic landscapes. PLoS One, 7(4), e33391.Google Scholar
Hockings, K. J., Yamakoshi, G., Kabasawa, A., & Matsuzawa, T. (2010). Attacks on local persons by chimpanzees in Bossou, Republic of Guinea: Long-term perspectives. American Journal of Primatology, 72(10), 887–896.Google Scholar
Hoffman, T. S. & O’Riain, M. J. (2012). Monkey management: Using spatial ecology to understand the extent and severity of human–baboon conflict in the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 13.Google Scholar
Hopper, L. M., Morgan, D. B., & Ross, S. R. (2014). The next direction for primatology? A commentary on Setchell (2013). International Journal of Primatology, 35, 341–348.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B. S., O’Riain, M. J., Van Eeden, R., & King, A. J. (2011). A low-cost manipulation of food resources reduces spatial overlap between baboons (Papio ursinus) and humans in conflict. International Journal of Primatology, 32(6), 1397–1412.Google Scholar
Kling, K. J. & Hopkins, M. E. (2015). Are we making the grade? Practices and reported efficacy measures of primate conservation education programs. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 434–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, W. F., Goosem, M., & Laurence, S. G.W. (2009). Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24(12), 659–669.Google Scholar
Lee, P. C. (2010). Sharing space: Can ethnoprimatology contribute to the survival of nonhuman primates in human-dominated globalized landscapes? American Journal of Primatology, 72(10), 925–931.Google Scholar
Lee, P. C. & Priston, N. E. C. (2005). Human attitudes to primates: Perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for conservation. In Paterson, J. D. (ed.) Commensalism and Conflict: The Primate–Human Interface. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Hignell Printing.Google Scholar
Malone, N., Wade, A. H., Fuentes, A., et al. (2014). Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinary and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 34, 8–29.Google Scholar
Mojo, D., Rothschuh, J., & Alebachew, M. (2014). Farmers’ perceptions of the impacts of human–wildlife conflict on their livelihood and natural resource management efforts in Cheha Woreda of Guraghe Zone, Ethiopia. Human–Wildlife Interactions, 8(1), 67–77.Google Scholar
Molur, S., Brandon-Jones, D., Dittus, W., et al. (eds.) (2003). Status of South Asian Primates: Conservation, Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) Workshop Report, 2003. Coimbatore, India: Zoo Outreach Organisation, IUCN/SCC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group South Asia.Google Scholar
Nekaris, K. A. I., Shepherd, C. R., Starr, C. R., & Nijman, V. (2010) Exploring cultural drivers for wildlife trade via an ethnoprimatological approach: A case study of slender and slow lorises (Loris and Nycticebus) in South and Southeast Asia. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 877–886.Google Scholar
Nekaris, K. A. I., Boulton, A., & Nijman, V. (2013). An ethnoprimatological approach to assessing levels of tolerance between human and commensal non-human primates in Sri Lanka. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 91, 219–231.Google Scholar
Parker, L., Nijman, V., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2008). When there is no forest left: Fragmentation, local extinction, and small population sizes in the Sri Lankan western purple-faced langur. Endangered Species Research, 5, 29–36.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J. L., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 3, 74–82.Google Scholar
Rees, A. (2001). Anthropomorphism, anthropocentrism, and anecdote: Primatologists on primatology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(2), 227–247.Google Scholar
Rees, A. (2007). Reflections on the field: Primatology, popular science and the politics of personhood. Social Studies of Science, 37, 881–907.Google Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2006). Ethnoprimatology: Toward reconciliation between biological and cultural anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2(2), 75–86.Google Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2007). The human–macaque interface: Conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 109(3), 473–484.Google Scholar
Riley, E. & Priston, N. E. C. (2010). Macaques in farms and folklore: Exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 1–7.Google Scholar
Saj, T. L., Sicotte, P., & Paterson, J. D. (2001). The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 39(2), 195–199.Google Scholar
Saraswat, R., Sinha, A., & Radhakrishna, S. (2015). A god becomes a pest? Human–rhesus macaque interactions in Himachal Pradesh, northern India. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61(3), 435–443.Google Scholar
Sillero-Zubiri, C. & Switzer, D. (2001). Crop Raiding Primates: Searching for Alternative, Humane Ways to Resolve Conflict with Farmers in Africa. Oxford: Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Sorensen, T. C. & Fedigan, L. M. (2000). Distribution of three monkey species along a gradient of regenerating tropical dry forest. Biological Conservation, 92, 227–240.Google Scholar
Sousa, J., Vicente, L., Gippoliti, S., Casanova, C., & Sousa, C. (2014). Local knowledge and perceptions of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 122–134.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. & Byrne, R. W. (1988). The manipulation of attention in primate tactical deception. In Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (eds.) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 211–223.Google Scholar
Wittemeyer, G., Elsen, P., Bean, W. T., et al. (2008). Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science, 321(5885), 123–126.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by