Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: October 2014

8 - Prosecutors

Summary

In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories.

Anyone who has turned on a television set in the past twenty years, anywhere in the English-speaking world, has heard the voiceover introduction of the long-running and endlessly replayed series Law and Order. (Admit it – you heard the “chung CHUNG” sound in your head when you read those lines.) But notice something strange in those familiar words: The people are represented by prosecuting attorneys. The assistant district attorneys shown investigating the facts, talking to witnesses, and trying cases in the courtroom have a boss – an elected or appointed political official – but, in theory, their client is an abstraction called “the people” or, in Commonwealth countries, the Crown. Criminal cases in these nations are captioned R v. Defendant, with the “R” standing for Rex or Regina – king or queen. Prosecutors claim to act in the name of the sovereign or society as a whole, seeking to punish offenses against the common good. That makes them different from most other lawyers who work on behalf of an identifiable client whose interests may differ from the common good. Although in theory they represent the public interest, prosecutors are employed by the state. All lawyers are, in principle, “officers of the court,” meaning that their authority is derived in some way from that of the judicial system. Prosecutors are, in addition, subject to the direction of government officials. In most common law countries, the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Crown Attorney is an appointed position. (As in so many things, the United States is an outlier, and the chief prosecutor in many cities and counties is an elected office.) Just as lawyers representing a corporation in principle represent the shareholders acting through an elected board of directors, prosecuting attorneys represent all citizens, acting through some combination of elected and appointed political officials.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Code, Michael, “Ethics and Criminal Law Practice,” in Woolley, Alice et al., eds., Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2008)
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963)
Berger v. United States, 295 U. S. 78, 88 (1935)
Simon, William H., The Practice of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1998), p. 2
R. v. Boucher, [1954] S.C.J. No. 54, 110 C.C.C. 263 at 272 (internal quotations, citations, and alterations omitted)
Woolley, Alice, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2011), pp. 278–80
Cassidy, R. Michael, “Character and Context: What Virtue Theory Can Teach Us About a Prosecutor’s Ethical Duty to ‘Seek Justice,’Notre Dame Law Review 82: 635–97 (2006)
Cassidy, R. Michael, “Some Reflections on Ethics and Plea Bargaining: An Essay in Honor of Fred Zacharias,” San Diego Law Review 48: 93–110, p. 95
Butler, Paul, “How Can You Prosecute Those People?,” in Smith, Abbe and Freedman, Monroe H., eds., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013), p. 16
Coates, Ta-Nehisi, “The Gangs of Chicago,” The Atlantic (Dec. 18, 2013)
Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98 (1956)
U.S. v. Williams, 504 U. S. 36 (1992)
Kramer, Marcia and Lombardi, Frank, “New Top State Judge: Abolish Grand Juries and Let Us Decide,” New York Daily News (January 31, 1985)
U.S. v. Batchelder, 442 U. S. 114 (1979)
Loo, Dennis D. and Grimes, Ruth-Ellen M., “Polls, Politics, and Crime: The ‘Law and Order’ Issue of the 1960s,” Western Criminology Review 5: 50–67 (2004)
Johnston, David, A Brief History of Justice (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell 2011), pp. 76–77 (discussing Aristotle’s theory of corrective justice)
Morris, Herbert, “Persons and Punishment,” The Monist 52: 475–501 (1968), p. 477
Raz, Joseph, “Incorporation by Law,” Legal Theory 10: 1–17 (2004)
Luban, David, “The Conscience of a Prosecutor,” Valparaiso University Law Review 45: 1–31 (2010)
Cohen, Steven M., “What Is True? Perspectives of a Former Prosecutor,” Cardozo Law Review 23: 817–28 (2002)
Gellman, Barton, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished,” Washington Post (Dec. 23, 2013)
Bamford, James, “They Know Much More Than You Think,” New York Review of Books (Aug. 15, 2013)
Bazelon, Emily, “Playing Dirty in the Big Easy,” Slate (Apr. 18, 2012)
Zimbardo, Philip, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (New York: Random House 2008)
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farar, Straus & Giroux 2011), pp. 252–58
Weiser, Benjamin, “Doubting Case, a Prosecutor Helped the Defense,” New York Times (Jun. 23, 2008)
Levin, Yuval, The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left (New York: Basic Books 2014)
Simon, William H., “Authoritarian Legal Ethics: Bradley Wendel and the Positivist Turn,” Texas Law Review 90: 709–26 (2012), pp. 711–12