Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic DatabasesEuropean Perspectives, pp. 257 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of International Property Rights (TRIPS), 15 April 1994, 1869 UNTS 299, (1994) 33 ILM 1197
Convention on Biological Diversity (excluding human genetic resources), Rio de Janeiro, 5 June 1992, in force 29 December 1993, 1760 UNTS 79; (1992) 31 ILM 818
Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4 April 1997, ETS 164, http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm (accessed on 18 February 2006)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, in force 3 January 1976, 993 UNTS 3, (1976) 6 ILM 360, http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm (accessed on 24 February 2006)
International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 32nd Session on 16 October 2003
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 33rd Session on 19 October 2005
Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 29th Session on 11 November 1997
Council Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ 1995 No. L281, 23 November 1995
Council Directive 97/80/EC of 15 December 1997 on the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex, OJ 1998 No. L014, 20 January 1998
Council of Europe, Recommendation No. R (92) 1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states. The use of analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) within the framework of the criminal justice system, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 February 1992 at the 47th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies
Human Genes Research Act 2000 (Inimgeeniuuringute seadus, RT I 2000, 104, 685), Estonian Parliament
Act on Biobanks no. 110/2000 (Lög um lífsynasöfn), Icelandic Parliament, http://ministryofhealth.is/laws-and-regulations/nr/31 (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Act on a Health Sector Database no. 139/1998 (Lög um gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi), Icelandic Parliament, http://ministryofhealth.is/laws-and-regulations/nr/659 (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Act on Patients' Rights no. 74/1997 (Lög um réttindi sjúklinga), Icelandic Parliament
Act on a Police Department's Genetic Database no. 88/2001 (Lög um erfdaefnisskrá lögreglu), Icelandic Parliament
Constitution of the Republic of Iceland 1944 (Stjórnarskrá lydveldisins Íslands 33/1944), http://www.government.is/constitution (accessed on 20 February 2006)
Biobanks in Medical Care Act 2002:297 (Lag om biobanker i hälso- och sjukvården m.m.), Swedish Parliament
Ethical Review Act Concerning Research Involving Humans 2003:460 (Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor), Swedish Parliament
Police Data Registers Act 1998 (Polisdatalagen 1998:622), Swedish Parliament
Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice Act 2003, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, UK Parliament
Data Protection Act 1998, UK Parliament
Health and Social Care Act 2001, UK Parliament
Human Organ Transplants Act 1989, UK Parliament
Human Tissue Act 2004, UK Parliament
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, UK Parliament
European Commission, 25 Recommendations on the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing, Brussels: EC Directorate-General for Research, 2004
European Commission,European Governance. A White Paper, Brussels: European Commission, 2001
European Commission,Innovation Tomorrow. Innovation Policy and the Regulatory Framework: Making Innovation an Integral Part of the Broader Structural Agenda, European Commission, Innovation Papers, 28, Brussels: European Commission, 2002
European Commission,Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A Strategy for Europe, Brussels: European Commission, 2002
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 154, ‘Europeans, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, December 2001
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 224, ‘Europeans, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, June 2005
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 225, ‘Social Values, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, June 2005
Gallup Organization Hungary, Candidate Countries Eurobarometer on Science and Technology, Cc-Eb 2002.3, Brussels: European Commission, 2003
Explanatory Report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, unclassified CM (96) 175 final (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, 1997)
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Geneva: CIOMS and WHO, 2002, http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm (accessed on 27 February 2006)
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS),International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies, Geneva: CIOMS, 1991, http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/intlgui3.htm (accessed on 27 February 2006)
Bill on Human Genes Research, submitted to the Estonian Parliament, Notes to the Bill, http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/saros-bin/mgetdoc?itemid=003672949&login=proov&password=&system=ems&server=ragne1 (in Estonian) (accessed on 21 February 2006)
Estonian Genome Project, Gene Donor Information Leaflet, http://www.geenivaramu.ee/index.php?lang=eng&sub=75 (accessed on 21 October 2003)
Agreement Between the Minister for Health and Social Security and Islensk Erfdagreining Ehf. Relating to the Issue of an Operating Licence for the Creation and Operation of a Health Sector Database, 21 January 2000
Bill on a Health Sector Database, submitted to the Icelandic Parliament at its 123rd session, 1998–1999, Notes to the Bill, s. I(2), http://www.mannvernd.is/english/laws/HSD.bill.html (accessed on 21 February 2006)
Operation Licence for the Creation and Operation of a Health Sector Database, Annex B. Transfer of Data to the Health Sector Database (Rekstrarleyfi til ad gera og starfrækja gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi, vidauki B. Flutningur upplysinga í gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi), Icelandic Ministry of Health and Social Security, January 2000
Agreement Between the State and the Swedish Insurance Association Regarding Genetic Examinations, 31 May 1999 (Avtal mellan staten och Sveriges Försäkringsförbund avseende genetiska undersökningar av den 31 maj 1999)
Code of Judicial Procedure 1942:740 (Rättegångsbalk), Swedish Parliament
SOU 2004:20 Genetics, Integrity and Ethics, Final Report from the Committee on Genetic Integrity (SOU 2004:20 Genetik, integritet och etik. Slutbetänkande av Kommittén om genetisk integritet)
Swedish Medical Research Council (MFR), ‘Research Ethics Guidelines for Using Biobanks, Especially Projects Involving Genome Research’, adopted by the Swedish Medical Research Council in June 1999 (Dnr 1999–570)
Department of Health, Genetics White Paper, Our Inheritance, Our Future – Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS, June 2003, Cm 5791
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Science and Society, Third Report, London: HMSO, 2000, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Information Commissioner, The Employment Practices Data Protection Code: Part 4: Information about Workers' Health, draft, 2004
Medical Research Council, Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research, Operational and Ethical Guidelines, April 2001
National DNA Database Annual Report 2002/2003, London: Forensic Sciences Services, 2003
UK Biobank, ‘The Ethics and Governance Framework’, http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ethics/efg.php (accessed on 11 February 2006)
UK Biobank,Ethics and Governance Framework background document, 2003
45 Code of Federal Regulations (USA) 46.116, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm (accessed on 24 May 2006)
Center for Disease Control, ‘Consent for CDC Research: A Reference for Developing Consent Forms and Oral Scripts’ (1998), http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/docs/consent.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2006)
President's Council on Bioethics, Beyond Therapy. Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. A Report by the President's Council on Bioethics, (US) President's Council on Bioethics, 2003
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 2, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949
World Medical Association Declaration on Ethical Considerations regarding Health Databases, 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington, DC, October 2002, http://www.wma.net/e/policy/d1.htm (accessed on 24 May 2006)
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, October 2000
Chatterton v. Gerson [1981] QB 432; [1981] 1 All ER 257
Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 AC 112; [1985] 3 All ER 402
Her Majesty's Advocate v. Stephan Robert Kelly [2001] ScotHC 7
Icelandic Supreme Court Decision of 27 November 2003 in case no. 151/2003 (R. Gudmundsdottir v. The State of Iceland), http://www.haestirettur.is/domar?nr=2566 (accessed on 18 February 2006)
Midwife v. Örebro County Council, Labour Court 1996 no. 41 (Sweden)
Midwife v. Örebro County Council, Labour Court 2001 no. 13 (Sweden)
Pate v. Threkel 661 So.2d 278 Fla. (1995)
R (on the application of Marper) v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2002] EWCA Civ 1275, [2003] HRLR 1 (CA)
Re C (Adult: Refusal of treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290; [1994] 1 All ER 819
Swedish Supreme Administrative Court, RÅ 2004 ref 102
, ‘Sweden Sets Ethical Standards for Use of Genetic “Biobanks” ’, Nature 400 (1999), 3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, London: Sage, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, A., ‘Genetic Privacy: Emerging Concepts and Values’, in , Genetic Secrets
Allen, A.,‘Privacy in American Law’, in , Privacies, 19–39
Almarsdóttir, A. B., J. M. Traulsen and I. Björnsdóttir, ‘ “We Don't Have That Many Secrets” – The Lay Perspective on Privacy and Genetic Data’, in and , Blood and Data, 193–200
Altman, L. K., ‘Genomic Chief Has High Hopes, and Great Fears, for Genetic Testing’, New York Times, 27 June 2000, D6
, ‘In Search of the Holy Grail: Media Discourse and the New Human Genetics’, New Genetics and Society 21 (2002), 327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, L. B., ‘Contacting Relatives and Recontacting Patients’, in and , Human DNA, 136–138
Annas, G. J., and S. Elias, ‘The Major Social Policy Issues Raised by the Human Genome Project’, in and , Gene Mapping, 10
, and (eds.), Gene Mapping. Using Law and Ethics as Guides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Blood and Data: Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases, Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press and Centre for Ethics, 2004Google Scholar
, ‘Coding and Consent. Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland’, Bioethics 18 (2004), 39–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Sensible Discussion in Bioethics: Reflections on Interdisciplinary Research’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2005), 322–328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Informed Democratic Consent? The Case of the Icelandic Database’, Trames 8 (2004), 164–177Google Scholar
, Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Facing the West London Database Project: A Review of the Literature, London: NHS Executive London Regular Office Research and Development Office, 2001Google Scholar
, ‘From Public Interest to Political Justice’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 20–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Genebanks: A Comparison of Eight Proposed International Genetic Databases’, Community Genetics 6 (2003), 37–45Google ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Monitoring Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Developing Population Genetic Databases’, Genetics in Medicine 5 (2003), 451–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The Genetic Gods: Evolution and Belief in Human Affairs, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998Google Scholar
, ‘Common-pool Resources and Population Genomics in Iceland, Estonia, and Tonga’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2003), 133–144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), Biotechnology – The Making of Global Controversy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002Google Scholar
, and , Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 1st edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 1979; 5th edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W., ‘Die Bedeutung der Unterscheidung von Staat und Gesellschaft im demokratischen Sozialstaat der Gegenwart’, in , Recht, Staat, Freiheit, 209–243
, and (eds.), The Ethics of Managed Care: Professional Integrity and Patient Rights, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Gender and Power in the Workplace. Analysing the Impact of Economic Change, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Regulating Human Genetics: New Dilemmas For a New Millennium’, Medical Law Review 12 (2004), 14–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Bioprospecting the Public Domain’, Cultural Anthropology 14 (1999), 535–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘An Ethical Framework for Biological Samples Policy: A Commissioned Paper’, in National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC), Research Involving Human Biological Materials, vol. II, B1–B31
, False Hopes. Overcoming the Obstacles to a Sustainable, Affordable Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999Google Scholar
, , and , ‘Populational Genetic Databases: Is a Specific Ethical and Legal Framework Necessary?’, GenEdit III (1) (2005), http://www.humgen.umontreal.ca/int/GE_Arch_v.cfm?an=2005&no=1 (accessed on 13 March 2006)Google Scholar
, ‘Ethical Aspects of Human Genetic Databases: Distinctions on the Nature, Provision, and Ownership of Genetic Information’, Trames 8 (2004), 34–45Google Scholar
Caulfield, T., ‘Regulating the Commercialization of Human Genetics: Can We Address the Big Concerns?’, in and , Genetic InformationCrossRef
, and , ‘DNA Databanks and Consent: A Suggested Policy Option Involving an Authorization Model’, BMC Medical Ethics 4 (2003), http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/4/1 (accessed on 27 February 2006)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Concise Encyclopedia of the Ethics of New Technologies, San Diego: Academic Press, 2001Google Scholar
, ‘Genetics, Choice and Responsibility’, Health, Risk and Society 1 (1999), 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Solidarity and Equity: New Ethical Framework for Genetic Databases’, Nature Review Genetics 2 (2001), 318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Genomic Databases as Global Public Goods?’, Res Publica 10 (2004), 123–134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conaghan, J., ‘Feminism and Labour Law: Contesting the Terrain’, in and , Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law, 31–32
, The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999Google Scholar
(ed.), Governance: Concepts and Applications, Brussels: International Institute of Administrative Sciences, 1999Google Scholar
, Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples, London: Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, 2000Google Scholar
Davis, D., Hastings Center report on Genetic Research and Communal Narratives, July/August 2004
, and (eds.), Identity and Statute of Human Embryo, Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1998Google Scholar
de Ortúzar, M. G., ‘Towards a Universal Definition of “Benefit-Sharing” ’, in , Populations and Genetics, 473–486
, In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics and the Rise of Technology, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997Google Scholar
, ‘Constructivism, Sociology and the New Genetics’, New Genetics and Society 21 (2002), 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Gesellschaft und Staat. Lexikon der Politik, 10th edn, Munich: Franz Vahlen (C. H. Beck), 2003Google Scholar
Drechsler, W., ‘Good Governance’, in and , Gesellschaft und Staat
, ‘Governance, Good Governance, and Government: The Case for Estonian Administrative Capacity’, Trames 8 (2004), 388–396Google Scholar
Drechsler, W.,‘New Public Management’, in and , Gesellschaft und Staat
, ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43 (1993), 51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Should Results from Genetic Research be Returned to Research Subjects and their Biological Relatives?’ Trames 8 (2004), 46–63Google Scholar
Erin, C., ‘Who Owns Mo?’, in and , Ethics and Biotechnology
, ‘The Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University’, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 1 (2004), 64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , A History and Theory of Informed Consent, New York: Oxford University Press, 1986Google Scholar
Feinberg, J., ‘Autonomy’, in , The Inner Citadel, 29
, ‘Field of Genes: The Politics of Science and Identity in the Estonian Genome Project’, New Genetics and Society 23 (2004), 3–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, R. G., ‘Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights’, in and , The Right to Privacy, 46
, Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002Google Scholar
, State Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century, London: Profile Books, 2004Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F., and C. S. Wagner (eds.), Information and Biological Revolutions: Global Governance Challenges, Summary of a Study Group (RAND MR-1139-DARPA, 2000), http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1139/ (accessed on 4 March 2006)
, ‘An Analysis of the Icelandic Supreme Court Judgement on the Health Sector Database Act’, SCRIPT-ed 1:2 (2004), http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/issue2/iceland.asp (accessed on 4 January 2006)Google Scholar
Gillon, R., ‘The Four Principles Revisited – A Reappraisal’, in (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics, 319–333
Global Forum for Health Research, ‘The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2000’, http://www.globalforumhealth.org/Site/002_What%20we%20do/005_Publications/001_10%2090%20reports.php (accessed on 25 February 2006)
, and , A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies. Blackwell Companions in Cultural Studies, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two-Culture Divide, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003Google Scholar
, and , ‘Genetic Privacy and the Law: An End to Genetics Exceptionalism’, Jurimetrics 40 (1999), 21–58Google Scholar
, ‘Breaking the Stalemate: A Prospective Regulatory Framework for Unforeseen Research Uses of Human Tissue Samples and Health Information’, Wake Forest Law Review 34 (1999), 737–766Google Scholar
, ‘Human Genomics Research: New Challenges for Research Ethics’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (2001), 221–229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Informed Consent and Other Ethical Issues in Human Population Genetics’, Annual Review of Genetics 35 (2001), 785–800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greely, H. T., and M. C. King, Public Letter to the Government of Iceland, http://www.mannvernd.is/english/articles/greely_&_king-e.html (accessed on 21 February 2006)
, ‘Economic Globalization and Institutions of Global Governance’, Development and Change 34 (2003), 789–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , ‘Ethical-Legal Problems of DNA Databases in Criminal Investigations’, Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2000), 266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutteling, J. M., A. Olofsson, B. Fjaestad, M. Kohring, A. Goerke, M. W. Bauer and T. Rusanen, ‘Media Coverage 1973–1996: Trends and Dynamics’, in and , Biotechnology – The Making of Global Controversy
, and , ‘Building Global Networks for Human Diseases: Genes and Populations’, Nature Medicine 10 (2004), 665–667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Science Communication and Science Policy: Estonian Media Discourse on the Genetic Database Project’, Trames 8 (2004), 217–240Google Scholar
, ‘Dissecting Discrimination’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2005), 455–463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Liberty Revisited. A Historical and Systematic Account of an Egalitarian Conception of Liberty and Legitimacy, Lund: Bokbox, 2001Google Scholar
, ‘Non-domination and Egalitarian Welfare Politics’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. An International Forum 1 (1998), 335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Solidaritet eller icke-dominans? Frågor om välfärdsstatens politiska legitimitet’, Tidskrift för politisk filosofi 4 (2000), 31–42Google Scholar
, and , ‘The Regulated Gene: New Legal Dilemmas’, Medical Law Review 12 (2004), 2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.,‘Pro-life is Anti-life: The Problematic Claims of Pro-life Positions in Ethics’, in and , Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, 99–109
, ‘The Human Genome Diversity Project: Implications for Indigenous Peoples’, Abya Yala News 8, 4 (1994), http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/41/024.html (accessed on 23 February 2006)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Public–Private Collaborations and the Race to Sequence Agrobacterium Tumefaciens’, Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004), 807–810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community 1900–1933, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
, ‘Another Look at Dignity’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Can Arguments Address Concerns?’, Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005), 598–600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Häyry, M.,‘Categorical Objections to Genetic Engineering – A Critique’, in and , Ethics and Biotechnology, 202–215
, ‘Ethics Committees, Principles and Consequences’, Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1998), 81–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘European Values in Bioethics: Why, What, and How to be Used?’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2003), 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Philosophical Arguments For and Against Human Reproductive Cloning’, Bioethics 17 (2003), 447–459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Precaution and Solidarity’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2005), 199–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The Tension Between Self Governance and Absolute Inner Worth in Kant's Moral Philosophy’, Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005), 645–647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Genetic Information, Rights, and Autonomy’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2001), 403–414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helgason, H. H., ‘Informed Consent for Donating Biosamples in Medical Research – Legal Requirements in Iceland’, in and , Blood and Data, 127–134
, ‘What Makes Genetic Discrimination Exceptional?’, American Journal of Law and Medicine 29 (2003), 77–116Google ScholarPubMed
Herissone-Kelly, P., ‘The Principlist Approach to Bioethics, and its Stormy Journey Overseas’, in and , Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, 65–77
, ‘Industrial Biotechnology – A Chance at Redemption’, Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004), 671–675CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘C. Elegans SGK-1 is the Critical Component in the Akt/PKB Kinase Complex to Control Stress Response and Life Span’, Developmental Cell 6 (2004), 577–588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, T., ‘The Kantian Conception of Autonomy’, in , The Inner Citadel, 91–105
, , , , , , , , , and , ‘An Empirical Survey on Biobanking of Human Genetic Material and Data in Six EU Countries’, European Journal of Human Genetics 11 (2003), 475–488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The First Grace: Rediscovery of the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World, Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2003Google Scholar
, ‘ “Science is Really Needed – That's All I Know”: Informed Consent and the Non-Verbal Practices of Collecting Blood for Genetic Research in Northern Sweden’, New Genetics and Society 22 (2003), 229–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , ‘Informed Consent and Biobanks: A Population-Based Study of Attitudes Towards Tissue Donation for Genetic Research’, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 32 (2004), 224–229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Not Just Autonomy – The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics’, Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1995), 332–338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, S. ‘ “Parity of Reasoning Arguments in Bioethics” – Some Methodological Considerations’, in and , Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, 47–56
Holmberg, S., and L. Weibull, ‘Vetenskapen står stark i folkopinionen’, in and , Ju mer vi är tillsammans, 93–102
, ‘Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1994), 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUGO Ethics Committee, ‘Genetic Benefit-Sharing’, Science 290 (2000), 5489
HUGO Ethics Committee,Statement on Benefit-Sharing, London: Human Genome Organization, 2000, http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/hugo/benefit.html (accessed on 24 February 2006)
HUGO Ethics Committee,‘Statement on Human Genomic Databases’, 2002, http://www.hugo-international.org/Statement_on_Human_Genomic_Databases.htm (accessed on 4 January 2006)
Human Genetics Commission, Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the Use of Personal Genetic Data (May 2002)
Human Genetics Commission,Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information – People's Panel Quantitative Study Conducted for the Human Genetics Commission (March 2001)
, , , , and , Biobanks for Health – Report and Recommendations from an EU Workshop, Oslo: Technical Report to EU Commission, 2003Google Scholar
International HapMap Consortium, ‘Integrating Ethics and Science in the International HapMap Project’, Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (2004), 467–475CrossRef
, Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versus einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, 7th edn, Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1987Google Scholar
Judson, H. F., ‘A History of the Science and Technology Behind Gene Mapping and Sequencing’, in and , The Code of Codes, 37–42
, ‘Insurance Companies’ Access to Genetic Information: Why Regulation Alone is Not Enough', Monash Bioethics Review 22 (2003), 25–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , Att nyttja genetisk information. Hur mycket ska försäkringsbolagen få veta?, Stockholm: SNS Förlag, 2002Google Scholar
, ‘African-American Population Biobank Proposed’, Science 300 (2003), 1485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘ “The Precautionary Principle and its Implications for Science” – Introduction’, Foundations of Science 2 (1997), 201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ethical Philosophy, 2nd edn, translated by J. W. Ellington and with an introduction by W. A. Wick, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994Google Scholar
, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by L. W. Beck, New York: Macmillan, 1959 [1875]Google Scholar
, Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. The Challenge for Bioethics, San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2002Google Scholar
, and , ‘Estonian Genome Foundation and Economic Development’, Trames 8 (2004), 106–128Google Scholar
, ‘Genetic Research on the UK Population – Do New Principles Need to be Developed?’, Trends in Molecular Medicine 7 (2001), 528–530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and , ‘Population Genetic Databases: A Comparative Analysis of the Law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and the UK’, Trames 8 (2004), 15–33Google Scholar
, Making Sense of Life. Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003Google Scholar
, and (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, 37–42Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M., ‘Human Genetic Material: Commodity of a Gift?’, in , Stored Tissue Samples, 226–235
(ed.), Populations and Genetics. Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003Google Scholar
, and , ‘Human Genomic Databases: A Global Public Good?’, European Journal of Health Law 10 (2003), 27–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), Human DNA: Law and Policy. International and Comparative Perspectives, The Hague: Kluwer, 1997Google Scholar
König, K., ‘Good Governance – As Steering and Value Concept for the Modern Administrative State’, in , Governance: Concepts and Applications, 67–93
Korts, K., ‘Becoming Masters of Our Genes: Public Acceptance of the Estonian Genome Project’, in and , Blood and Data, 187–192
, ‘Introducing Gene Technology to the Society: Social Implications of the Estonian Genome Project’, Trames 8 (2004), 241–253Google Scholar
, and , ‘Genetic Databases and Public Attitudes: A Comparison of Iceland, Estonia and the UK’, Trames 8 (2004), 131–149Google Scholar
Kristinsson, S., ‘Databases and Informed Consent: Can Broad Consent Legitimate Research?’, in and , Blood and Data, 111–119
, ‘Don't Leave Dignity Out of the Cloning Debate’, Nature 388 (1997), 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacey, N., ‘Interpreting Doctrines of Privacy: A Comment on Anita Allen’, in , Privacies, 40–51
, Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-legal Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, M., and S. Weldon, ‘Genetic Databases and Public Trust’, in and , Blood and Data, 175–179
, ‘Im Supermarkt der Biotechnik. Eine Reportage’, Gegenworte. Hefte für den Disput über Wissen 13 (2004), 30–35Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
, Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Now You See It, Now You Don't: Consent and the Legal Protection of Autonomy’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2000), 277–288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Taming the Prince. The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993Google Scholar
, ‘Gene Discovery, Ownership and Access for Developing Countries in the Era of Molecular Genetics’, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 5, 1 (15 April 2002), http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol5/issue1/issues/05/ (accessed on 24 February 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Genetic Governance: The Risks, Oversight and Regulation of Genetic Databases in the UK’, New Genetics and Society 20 (2001), 157–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The New Public: Professional Communication and the Means of Social Influence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, J. E., ‘DNA Data Banks’, in , Genetic Secrets
, ‘The Threat to Medical Records Research’, New England Journal of Medicine 337 (1997), 1466–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘ “Iceland Inc.”? On the Ethics of Commercial Population Genomics’, Social Science and Medicine 58 (2004), 1201–1209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, On Liberty and The Subjection of Women, Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1996 [1859/1869]Google Scholar
, ‘Managing Government – Governing Management’, Harvard Business Review 74 (1996), 75–83Google Scholar
Morgunbladid, ‘Meirihluti landsmanna fylgjandi gagnagrunnsfrumvarpinu’ [‘Majority of population supports database bill’], 18 November 1998
Morgunbladid, ‘Rúmt 81% fylgjandi gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi’ [‘Over 81% support the Health Sector Database’], 27 April 2000
, and (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law, London: Cavendish Publishing, 1999Google Scholar
Murray, T., ‘Genetic Exceptionalism and “Future Diaries”: Is Genetic Information Different from Other Medical Information?’, in , Genetic Secrets, 61
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC), Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, 2 vols., Rockville, MD: NBAC, 2000
, ‘Molecular Metaphors: The Gene in Popular Discourse’, Nature Reviews Genetics 2 (2001), 555–559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Sweden Takes Steps to Protect Tissue Banks’, Science 286 (1999), 894CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public’, Law and Philosophy 17 (1998), 559–596Google Scholar
Nõmper, A., ‘What is Wrong with Using Anonymized Data and Tissue for Research Purposes?’, in and , Blood and Data, 121–126
Nõmper, A., and K. Kruuv, ‘The Estonian Gene Project’, in , Society and Genetic Information, 216
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, ‘The Ethics of Research Related to Health Care in Developing Countries’, 24 April 2002, http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/developingcountries/publication_309.html (accessed on 25 February 2006)
Nuffield Council on Bioethics,‘Pharmacogenetics, Ethical Issues’, 20 September 2003, http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/pharmacogenetics/publication_314.html (accessed on 23 February 2006)
, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Informed Consent and Genetic Information’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2001), 689–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Stealing from the Past: Globalization, Strategic Formation and the Use of Indigenous Intellectual Property in the Biotechnology Industry’, Third World Quarterly 22 (2001), 643–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘For Whom the Cell Tolls: Debates About Biomedicine’, Current Anthropology 43 (2002), 271–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
People Science and Policy Ltd, Biobank UK. A Question of Trust: A Consultation Exploring and Addressing Questions of Public Trust, London: Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, 2002
, and , ‘Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (1998), 223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media’, Social Science and Medicine 52 (2001), 1255–1268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippine Solidarity Group Toronto, ‘PSG Supports Indigenous Peoples’, NativeNet (1993), http://www.native-net.org/archive/nl/9312/0089.html (accessed on 24 February 2006)
, ‘Experiments in the Governance of Biotechnology: A Case Study of the UK National Consensus Conference’, New Genetics and Society 18 (1999), 79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw, 2 vols., Copenhagen and Barcelona: Centre for Ethics and Law and Institut Borja de Bioètica, 2000Google Scholar
, ‘Genetic Links, Family Ties and Social Bonds: Rights and Responsibilities in the Face of Genetic Knowledge’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1998), 10–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
, ‘The New Governance: Governing Without Government’, Political Studies 64 (1996), 652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Communication and Health in a Multi-Ethnic Society, Bristol: Policy Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Commodification of Bioinformation: The Icelandic Health Sector Database, London: Wellcome Trust, 2001Google Scholar
Rose, H.,‘The Commodification of Virtual Reality: The Icelandic Health Sector Database’, in and , Genetic Nature/Culture, 80
, ‘An Ethical Dilemma. The Rise and Fall of UmanGenomics – The Model Biotech Company?’, Nature 425 (2003), 123–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H.,‘Risk, Trust and Scepticism in the Age of the New Genetics’, in and , The Risk Society and Beyond, 63–77
, , , , , and , ‘Genetic Structure of Human Populations’, Science 298 (2002), 2381–2385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(ed.), Privacies. Philosophical Evaluations, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004Google Scholar
(ed.), Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997Google Scholar
Sade, R. M., ‘Medicine and Managed Care, Morals and Markets’, in and , The Ethics of Managed Care, 55–74
, and , ‘Regulating Human Genetics: The Changing Politic of Biotechnology Governance in the European Union’, Health, Risk and Society 4 (2002), 325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Society and Genetic Information: Codes and Laws in the Genetic Era, Budapest: CPS and CEU Press, 2003Google Scholar
, ‘The Performing State: Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has Come but Whose Implementation Has Not’, OECD Journal on Budgeting 3 (2003), 71–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrecker, T., ‘Benefit-Sharing in the New Genomic Marketplace’, in , Populations and Genetics, 405–422
, Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, 1939Google Scholar
, ‘The Economy as a Whole. Seventh Chapter of The Theory of Economic Development’, Industry and Innovation 1/2 (2002), 93–145Google Scholar
, A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar
, and , ‘Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2000), 41–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Leaky Bodies and Boundaries. Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)ethics, London: Routledge, 1997Google Scholar
, ‘Benefit-Sharing: An Inquiry Regarding the Meaning and Limits of the Concept in Human Genetic Research’, Genomics, Society and Policy 1, 2 (2005), 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A Third Concept of Liberty’, Proceedings of the British Academy 117 (2003), 237–268Google Scholar
, and , Building Trust in Business, Politics, Relationships, and Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Sorenson, J., ‘What We Still Don't Know about Genetic Screening and Counselling’, in and , Gene Mapping, 208
, and , ‘The Estonian Health Care System and the Genetic Database Project: From Limited Resources to Big Hopes’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 254–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The (Im)morality of (Un)naturalness’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 15–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘What is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations of the Four Principles Approach’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2001), 72–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Genetic Ignorance, Moral Obligations and Social Duties’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2000), 107–113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Constructing Public Images of New Genetics and Gene Technology: The Media Discourse on the Estonian Human Genome Project’, Trames 8 (2004), 192–216Google Scholar
, ‘Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent’, Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2004), 15–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Bioethics in a European Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), The Foundations of Health Care, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, forthcoming
, and (eds.), Genetic Information: Acquisition, Access, and Control, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Genes of a Nation: The Promotion of Iceland's Genetic Information’, Trames 8 (2004), 178–191Google Scholar
, ‘UK Government Science Policy: The “Enterprise Deficit” Fallacy’, Technovation 23 (2003), 785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonti-Filippini, N., ‘The Concept of Human Dignity in the International Human Rights Instruments’, in and , Identity and Statute of Human Embryo, 381–404
, and , ‘Governing UK Biobank: The Importance of Ensuring Public Trust’, Trends in Biotechnology 22 (2004), 284–285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics, New York: New York University Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Das Merkantilsystem in seiner historischen Bedeutung. Städtische, territoriale und staatliche Wirtschaftspolitik, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1944 [1884]Google Scholar
, and , Gene Technology and Social Acceptance, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999Google Scholar
, ‘A Shared Success, 2 Rivals’ Announcement Marks New Medical Era, Risks and All', New York Times, 27 June 2000, A1 and A21Google Scholar
(ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 1998Google Scholar
Weldon, S., and M. Levitt, ‘Public Databases and Privat(ized) Property? A UK Study of Public Perceptions of Privacy in Relation to Population Based Human Genetic Databases’, in and , Blood and Data, 181–186
Wexler, N., ‘Clairvoyance and Caution: Repercussions from the Human Genome Project’, in and , The Code of Codes, 211–243
, ‘Population Biobanks and Social Justice: Commercial or Communitarian Models? A Comparative Analysis of Benefit Sharing, Ownership and Access Arrangements’, Trames 8 (2004), 80–90Google Scholar
, and , ‘The Charitable Trust as a Model for Genomic Biobanks’, New England Journal of Medicine 349 (2003), 1180–1184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, Genetic Databases: Assessing the Benefits and the Impact on Human and Patient Rights, Geneva: WHO, 2003
World Health Organization,Genomics and World Health, Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research, Geneva: WHO, 2001, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/a74580.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2006)
World Health Organization,Human Genetics Programme, ‘Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and Genetic Services’, WHO, 1998
, , , , , , and , ‘Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples’, Journal of the American Medical Association 274 (1995), 1786–1788CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deCODE Inc., website, http://www.decode.com (accessed on 11 February 2006)
Ensembl, website, http://www.ensembl.org/ (accessed on 17 February 2006)
Estonian Genome Foundation, website, http://www.genomics.ee (accessed on 4 January 2006)
Estonian Genome Project, website, http://www.geenivaramu.ee (accessed on 4 January 2006)
Public Population Project in Genomics, website, http://www.p3gconsortium.org/ (accessed on 23 February 2006)
UK Biobank, website, http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk (accessed on 11 February 2006)
UmanGenomics, website, http://www.umangenomics.com (accessed on 4 January 2006; at the time of writing the website is under reconstruction)
Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of International Property Rights (TRIPS), 15 April 1994, 1869 UNTS 299, (1994) 33 ILM 1197
Convention on Biological Diversity (excluding human genetic resources), Rio de Janeiro, 5 June 1992, in force 29 December 1993, 1760 UNTS 79; (1992) 31 ILM 818
Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4 April 1997, ETS 164, http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm (accessed on 18 February 2006)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, in force 3 January 1976, 993 UNTS 3, (1976) 6 ILM 360, http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm (accessed on 24 February 2006)
International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 32nd Session on 16 October 2003
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 33rd Session on 19 October 2005
Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 29th Session on 11 November 1997
Council Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ 1995 No. L281, 23 November 1995
Council Directive 97/80/EC of 15 December 1997 on the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex, OJ 1998 No. L014, 20 January 1998
Council of Europe, Recommendation No. R (92) 1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states. The use of analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) within the framework of the criminal justice system, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 February 1992 at the 47th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies
Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of International Property Rights (TRIPS), 15 April 1994, 1869 UNTS 299, (1994) 33 ILM 1197
Convention on Biological Diversity (excluding human genetic resources), Rio de Janeiro, 5 June 1992, in force 29 December 1993, 1760 UNTS 79; (1992) 31 ILM 818
Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4 April 1997, ETS 164, http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm (accessed on 18 February 2006)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, in force 3 January 1976, 993 UNTS 3, (1976) 6 ILM 360, http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm (accessed on 24 February 2006)
International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 32nd Session on 16 October 2003
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 33rd Session on 19 October 2005
Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO at its 29th Session on 11 November 1997
Council Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ 1995 No. L281, 23 November 1995
Council Directive 97/80/EC of 15 December 1997 on the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex, OJ 1998 No. L014, 20 January 1998
Council of Europe, Recommendation No. R (92) 1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states. The use of analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) within the framework of the criminal justice system, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 February 1992 at the 47th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies
Human Genes Research Act 2000 (Inimgeeniuuringute seadus, RT I 2000, 104, 685), Estonian Parliament
Act on Biobanks no. 110/2000 (Lög um lífsynasöfn), Icelandic Parliament, http://ministryofhealth.is/laws-and-regulations/nr/31 (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Act on a Health Sector Database no. 139/1998 (Lög um gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi), Icelandic Parliament, http://ministryofhealth.is/laws-and-regulations/nr/659 (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Act on Patients' Rights no. 74/1997 (Lög um réttindi sjúklinga), Icelandic Parliament
Act on a Police Department's Genetic Database no. 88/2001 (Lög um erfdaefnisskrá lögreglu), Icelandic Parliament
Constitution of the Republic of Iceland 1944 (Stjórnarskrá lydveldisins Íslands 33/1944), http://www.government.is/constitution (accessed on 20 February 2006)
Biobanks in Medical Care Act 2002:297 (Lag om biobanker i hälso- och sjukvården m.m.), Swedish Parliament
Ethical Review Act Concerning Research Involving Humans 2003:460 (Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor), Swedish Parliament
Police Data Registers Act 1998 (Polisdatalagen 1998:622), Swedish Parliament
Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice Act 2003, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, UK Parliament
Data Protection Act 1998, UK Parliament
Health and Social Care Act 2001, UK Parliament
Human Organ Transplants Act 1989, UK Parliament
Human Tissue Act 2004, UK Parliament
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, UK Parliament
Human Genes Research Act 2000 (Inimgeeniuuringute seadus, RT I 2000, 104, 685), Estonian Parliament
Act on Biobanks no. 110/2000 (Lög um lífsynasöfn), Icelandic Parliament, http://ministryofhealth.is/laws-and-regulations/nr/31 (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Act on a Health Sector Database no. 139/1998 (Lög um gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi), Icelandic Parliament, http://ministryofhealth.is/laws-and-regulations/nr/659 (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Act on Patients' Rights no. 74/1997 (Lög um réttindi sjúklinga), Icelandic Parliament
Act on a Police Department's Genetic Database no. 88/2001 (Lög um erfdaefnisskrá lögreglu), Icelandic Parliament
Constitution of the Republic of Iceland 1944 (Stjórnarskrá lydveldisins Íslands 33/1944), http://www.government.is/constitution (accessed on 20 February 2006)
Biobanks in Medical Care Act 2002:297 (Lag om biobanker i hälso- och sjukvården m.m.), Swedish Parliament
Ethical Review Act Concerning Research Involving Humans 2003:460 (Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor), Swedish Parliament
Police Data Registers Act 1998 (Polisdatalagen 1998:622), Swedish Parliament
Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice Act 2003, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, UK Parliament
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, UK Parliament
Data Protection Act 1998, UK Parliament
Health and Social Care Act 2001, UK Parliament
Human Organ Transplants Act 1989, UK Parliament
Human Tissue Act 2004, UK Parliament
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, UK Parliament
European Commission, 25 Recommendations on the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing, Brussels: EC Directorate-General for Research, 2004
European Commission,European Governance. A White Paper, Brussels: European Commission, 2001
European Commission,Innovation Tomorrow. Innovation Policy and the Regulatory Framework: Making Innovation an Integral Part of the Broader Structural Agenda, European Commission, Innovation Papers, 28, Brussels: European Commission, 2002
European Commission,Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A Strategy for Europe, Brussels: European Commission, 2002
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 154, ‘Europeans, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, December 2001
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 224, ‘Europeans, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, June 2005
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 225, ‘Social Values, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, June 2005
Gallup Organization Hungary, Candidate Countries Eurobarometer on Science and Technology, Cc-Eb 2002.3, Brussels: European Commission, 2003
Explanatory Report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, unclassified CM (96) 175 final (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, 1997)
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Geneva: CIOMS and WHO, 2002, http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm (accessed on 27 February 2006)
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS),International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies, Geneva: CIOMS, 1991, http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/intlgui3.htm (accessed on 27 February 2006)
Bill on Human Genes Research, submitted to the Estonian Parliament, Notes to the Bill, http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/saros-bin/mgetdoc?itemid=003672949&login=proov&password=&system=ems&server=ragne1 (in Estonian) (accessed on 21 February 2006)
Estonian Genome Project, Gene Donor Information Leaflet, http://www.geenivaramu.ee/index.php?lang=eng&sub=75 (accessed on 21 October 2003)
Agreement Between the Minister for Health and Social Security and Islensk Erfdagreining Ehf. Relating to the Issue of an Operating Licence for the Creation and Operation of a Health Sector Database, 21 January 2000
Bill on a Health Sector Database, submitted to the Icelandic Parliament at its 123rd session, 1998–1999, Notes to the Bill, s. I(2), http://www.mannvernd.is/english/laws/HSD.bill.html (accessed on 21 February 2006)
Operation Licence for the Creation and Operation of a Health Sector Database, Annex B. Transfer of Data to the Health Sector Database (Rekstrarleyfi til ad gera og starfrækja gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi, vidauki B. Flutningur upplysinga í gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi), Icelandic Ministry of Health and Social Security, January 2000
Agreement Between the State and the Swedish Insurance Association Regarding Genetic Examinations, 31 May 1999 (Avtal mellan staten och Sveriges Försäkringsförbund avseende genetiska undersökningar av den 31 maj 1999)
Code of Judicial Procedure 1942:740 (Rättegångsbalk), Swedish Parliament
SOU 2004:20 Genetics, Integrity and Ethics, Final Report from the Committee on Genetic Integrity (SOU 2004:20 Genetik, integritet och etik. Slutbetänkande av Kommittén om genetisk integritet)
Swedish Medical Research Council (MFR), ‘Research Ethics Guidelines for Using Biobanks, Especially Projects Involving Genome Research’, adopted by the Swedish Medical Research Council in June 1999 (Dnr 1999–570)
Department of Health, Genetics White Paper, Our Inheritance, Our Future – Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS, June 2003, Cm 5791
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Science and Society, Third Report, London: HMSO, 2000, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Information Commissioner, The Employment Practices Data Protection Code: Part 4: Information about Workers' Health, draft, 2004
Medical Research Council, Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research, Operational and Ethical Guidelines, April 2001
National DNA Database Annual Report 2002/2003, London: Forensic Sciences Services, 2003
UK Biobank, ‘The Ethics and Governance Framework’, http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ethics/efg.php (accessed on 11 February 2006)
UK Biobank,Ethics and Governance Framework background document, 2003
45 Code of Federal Regulations (USA) 46.116, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm (accessed on 24 May 2006)
Center for Disease Control, ‘Consent for CDC Research: A Reference for Developing Consent Forms and Oral Scripts’ (1998), http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/docs/consent.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2006)
President's Council on Bioethics, Beyond Therapy. Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. A Report by the President's Council on Bioethics, (US) President's Council on Bioethics, 2003
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 2, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949
World Medical Association Declaration on Ethical Considerations regarding Health Databases, 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington, DC, October 2002, http://www.wma.net/e/policy/d1.htm (accessed on 24 May 2006)
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, October 2000
European Commission, 25 Recommendations on the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing, Brussels: EC Directorate-General for Research, 2004
European Commission,European Governance. A White Paper, Brussels: European Commission, 2001
European Commission,Innovation Tomorrow. Innovation Policy and the Regulatory Framework: Making Innovation an Integral Part of the Broader Structural Agenda, European Commission, Innovation Papers, 28, Brussels: European Commission, 2002
European Commission,Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A Strategy for Europe, Brussels: European Commission, 2002
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 154, ‘Europeans, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, December 2001
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 224, ‘Europeans, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, June 2005
European Commission,Special Eurobarometer 225, ‘Social Values, Science and Technology’, Brussels: European Commission, June 2005
Gallup Organization Hungary, Candidate Countries Eurobarometer on Science and Technology, Cc-Eb 2002.3, Brussels: European Commission, 2003
Explanatory Report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, unclassified CM (96) 175 final (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, 1997)
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Geneva: CIOMS and WHO, 2002, http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm (accessed on 27 February 2006)
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS),International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies, Geneva: CIOMS, 1991, http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/intlgui3.htm (accessed on 27 February 2006)
Bill on Human Genes Research, submitted to the Estonian Parliament, Notes to the Bill, http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/saros-bin/mgetdoc?itemid=003672949&login=proov&password=&system=ems&server=ragne1 (in Estonian) (accessed on 21 February 2006)
Estonian Genome Project, Gene Donor Information Leaflet, http://www.geenivaramu.ee/index.php?lang=eng&sub=75 (accessed on 21 October 2003)
Agreement Between the Minister for Health and Social Security and Islensk Erfdagreining Ehf. Relating to the Issue of an Operating Licence for the Creation and Operation of a Health Sector Database, 21 January 2000
Bill on a Health Sector Database, submitted to the Icelandic Parliament at its 123rd session, 1998–1999, Notes to the Bill, s. I(2), http://www.mannvernd.is/english/laws/HSD.bill.html (accessed on 21 February 2006)
Operation Licence for the Creation and Operation of a Health Sector Database, Annex B. Transfer of Data to the Health Sector Database (Rekstrarleyfi til ad gera og starfrækja gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi, vidauki B. Flutningur upplysinga í gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi), Icelandic Ministry of Health and Social Security, January 2000
Agreement Between the State and the Swedish Insurance Association Regarding Genetic Examinations, 31 May 1999 (Avtal mellan staten och Sveriges Försäkringsförbund avseende genetiska undersökningar av den 31 maj 1999)
Code of Judicial Procedure 1942:740 (Rättegångsbalk), Swedish Parliament
SOU 2004:20 Genetics, Integrity and Ethics, Final Report from the Committee on Genetic Integrity (SOU 2004:20 Genetik, integritet och etik. Slutbetänkande av Kommittén om genetisk integritet)
Swedish Medical Research Council (MFR), ‘Research Ethics Guidelines for Using Biobanks, Especially Projects Involving Genome Research’, adopted by the Swedish Medical Research Council in June 1999 (Dnr 1999–570)
Department of Health, Genetics White Paper, Our Inheritance, Our Future – Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS, June 2003, Cm 5791
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Science and Society, Third Report, London: HMSO, 2000, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm (accessed on 12 February 2006)
Information Commissioner, The Employment Practices Data Protection Code: Part 4: Information about Workers' Health, draft, 2004
Medical Research Council, Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research, Operational and Ethical Guidelines, April 2001
National DNA Database Annual Report 2002/2003, London: Forensic Sciences Services, 2003
UK Biobank, ‘The Ethics and Governance Framework’, http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ethics/efg.php (accessed on 11 February 2006)
UK Biobank,Ethics and Governance Framework background document, 2003
45 Code of Federal Regulations (USA) 46.116, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm (accessed on 24 May 2006)
Center for Disease Control, ‘Consent for CDC Research: A Reference for Developing Consent Forms and Oral Scripts’ (1998), http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/docs/consent.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2006)
President's Council on Bioethics, Beyond Therapy. Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. A Report by the President's Council on Bioethics, (US) President's Council on Bioethics, 2003
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 2, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949
World Medical Association Declaration on Ethical Considerations regarding Health Databases, 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington, DC, October 2002, http://www.wma.net/e/policy/d1.htm (accessed on 24 May 2006)
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, October 2000
Chatterton v. Gerson [1981] QB 432; [1981] 1 All ER 257
Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 AC 112; [1985] 3 All ER 402
Her Majesty's Advocate v. Stephan Robert Kelly [2001] ScotHC 7
Icelandic Supreme Court Decision of 27 November 2003 in case no. 151/2003 (R. Gudmundsdottir v. The State of Iceland), http://www.haestirettur.is/domar?nr=2566 (accessed on 18 February 2006)
Midwife v. Örebro County Council, Labour Court 1996 no. 41 (Sweden)
Midwife v. Örebro County Council, Labour Court 2001 no. 13 (Sweden)
Pate v. Threkel 661 So.2d 278 Fla. (1995)
R (on the application of Marper) v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2002] EWCA Civ 1275, [2003] HRLR 1 (CA)
Re C (Adult: Refusal of treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290; [1994] 1 All ER 819
Swedish Supreme Administrative Court, RÅ 2004 ref 102
, ‘Sweden Sets Ethical Standards for Use of Genetic “Biobanks” ’, Nature 400 (1999), 3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, London: Sage, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, A., ‘Genetic Privacy: Emerging Concepts and Values’, in , Genetic Secrets
Allen, A.,‘Privacy in American Law’, in , Privacies, 19–39
Almarsdóttir, A. B., J. M. Traulsen and I. Björnsdóttir, ‘ “We Don't Have That Many Secrets” – The Lay Perspective on Privacy and Genetic Data’, in and , Blood and Data, 193–200
Altman, L. K., ‘Genomic Chief Has High Hopes, and Great Fears, for Genetic Testing’, New York Times, 27 June 2000, D6
, ‘In Search of the Holy Grail: Media Discourse and the New Human Genetics’, New Genetics and Society 21 (2002), 327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, L. B., ‘Contacting Relatives and Recontacting Patients’, in and , Human DNA, 136–138
Annas, G. J., and S. Elias, ‘The Major Social Policy Issues Raised by the Human Genome Project’, in and , Gene Mapping, 10
, and (eds.), Gene Mapping. Using Law and Ethics as Guides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Blood and Data: Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases, Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press and Centre for Ethics, 2004Google Scholar
, ‘Coding and Consent. Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland’, Bioethics 18 (2004), 39–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Sensible Discussion in Bioethics: Reflections on Interdisciplinary Research’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2005), 322–328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Informed Democratic Consent? The Case of the Icelandic Database’, Trames 8 (2004), 164–177Google Scholar
, Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Facing the West London Database Project: A Review of the Literature, London: NHS Executive London Regular Office Research and Development Office, 2001Google Scholar
, ‘From Public Interest to Political Justice’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 20–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Genebanks: A Comparison of Eight Proposed International Genetic Databases’, Community Genetics 6 (2003), 37–45Google ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Monitoring Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Developing Population Genetic Databases’, Genetics in Medicine 5 (2003), 451–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The Genetic Gods: Evolution and Belief in Human Affairs, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998Google Scholar
, ‘Common-pool Resources and Population Genomics in Iceland, Estonia, and Tonga’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2003), 133–144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), Biotechnology – The Making of Global Controversy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002Google Scholar
, and , Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 1st edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 1979; 5th edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W., ‘Die Bedeutung der Unterscheidung von Staat und Gesellschaft im demokratischen Sozialstaat der Gegenwart’, in , Recht, Staat, Freiheit, 209–243
, and (eds.), The Ethics of Managed Care: Professional Integrity and Patient Rights, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Gender and Power in the Workplace. Analysing the Impact of Economic Change, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Regulating Human Genetics: New Dilemmas For a New Millennium’, Medical Law Review 12 (2004), 14–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Bioprospecting the Public Domain’, Cultural Anthropology 14 (1999), 535–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘An Ethical Framework for Biological Samples Policy: A Commissioned Paper’, in National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC), Research Involving Human Biological Materials, vol. II, B1–B31
, False Hopes. Overcoming the Obstacles to a Sustainable, Affordable Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999Google Scholar
, , and , ‘Populational Genetic Databases: Is a Specific Ethical and Legal Framework Necessary?’, GenEdit III (1) (2005), http://www.humgen.umontreal.ca/int/GE_Arch_v.cfm?an=2005&no=1 (accessed on 13 March 2006)Google Scholar
, ‘Ethical Aspects of Human Genetic Databases: Distinctions on the Nature, Provision, and Ownership of Genetic Information’, Trames 8 (2004), 34–45Google Scholar
Caulfield, T., ‘Regulating the Commercialization of Human Genetics: Can We Address the Big Concerns?’, in and , Genetic InformationCrossRef
, and , ‘DNA Databanks and Consent: A Suggested Policy Option Involving an Authorization Model’, BMC Medical Ethics 4 (2003), http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/4/1 (accessed on 27 February 2006)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Concise Encyclopedia of the Ethics of New Technologies, San Diego: Academic Press, 2001Google Scholar
, ‘Genetics, Choice and Responsibility’, Health, Risk and Society 1 (1999), 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Solidarity and Equity: New Ethical Framework for Genetic Databases’, Nature Review Genetics 2 (2001), 318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Genomic Databases as Global Public Goods?’, Res Publica 10 (2004), 123–134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conaghan, J., ‘Feminism and Labour Law: Contesting the Terrain’, in and , Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law, 31–32
, The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999Google Scholar
(ed.), Governance: Concepts and Applications, Brussels: International Institute of Administrative Sciences, 1999Google Scholar
, Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples, London: Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, 2000Google Scholar
Davis, D., Hastings Center report on Genetic Research and Communal Narratives, July/August 2004
, and (eds.), Identity and Statute of Human Embryo, Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1998Google Scholar
de Ortúzar, M. G., ‘Towards a Universal Definition of “Benefit-Sharing” ’, in , Populations and Genetics, 473–486
, In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics and the Rise of Technology, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997Google Scholar
, ‘Constructivism, Sociology and the New Genetics’, New Genetics and Society 21 (2002), 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Gesellschaft und Staat. Lexikon der Politik, 10th edn, Munich: Franz Vahlen (C. H. Beck), 2003Google Scholar
Drechsler, W., ‘Good Governance’, in and , Gesellschaft und Staat
, ‘Governance, Good Governance, and Government: The Case for Estonian Administrative Capacity’, Trames 8 (2004), 388–396Google Scholar
Drechsler, W.,‘New Public Management’, in and , Gesellschaft und Staat
, ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43 (1993), 51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Should Results from Genetic Research be Returned to Research Subjects and their Biological Relatives?’ Trames 8 (2004), 46–63Google Scholar
Erin, C., ‘Who Owns Mo?’, in and , Ethics and Biotechnology
, ‘The Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University’, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 1 (2004), 64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , A History and Theory of Informed Consent, New York: Oxford University Press, 1986Google Scholar
Feinberg, J., ‘Autonomy’, in , The Inner Citadel, 29
, ‘Field of Genes: The Politics of Science and Identity in the Estonian Genome Project’, New Genetics and Society 23 (2004), 3–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, R. G., ‘Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights’, in and , The Right to Privacy, 46
, Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002Google Scholar
, State Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century, London: Profile Books, 2004Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F., and C. S. Wagner (eds.), Information and Biological Revolutions: Global Governance Challenges, Summary of a Study Group (RAND MR-1139-DARPA, 2000), http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1139/ (accessed on 4 March 2006)
, ‘An Analysis of the Icelandic Supreme Court Judgement on the Health Sector Database Act’, SCRIPT-ed 1:2 (2004), http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/issue2/iceland.asp (accessed on 4 January 2006)Google Scholar
Gillon, R., ‘The Four Principles Revisited – A Reappraisal’, in (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics, 319–333
Global Forum for Health Research, ‘The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2000’, http://www.globalforumhealth.org/Site/002_What%20we%20do/005_Publications/001_10%2090%20reports.php (accessed on 25 February 2006)
, and , A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies. Blackwell Companions in Cultural Studies, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two-Culture Divide, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003Google Scholar
, and , ‘Genetic Privacy and the Law: An End to Genetics Exceptionalism’, Jurimetrics 40 (1999), 21–58Google Scholar
, ‘Breaking the Stalemate: A Prospective Regulatory Framework for Unforeseen Research Uses of Human Tissue Samples and Health Information’, Wake Forest Law Review 34 (1999), 737–766Google Scholar
, ‘Human Genomics Research: New Challenges for Research Ethics’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (2001), 221–229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Informed Consent and Other Ethical Issues in Human Population Genetics’, Annual Review of Genetics 35 (2001), 785–800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greely, H. T., and M. C. King, Public Letter to the Government of Iceland, http://www.mannvernd.is/english/articles/greely_&_king-e.html (accessed on 21 February 2006)
, ‘Economic Globalization and Institutions of Global Governance’, Development and Change 34 (2003), 789–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , ‘Ethical-Legal Problems of DNA Databases in Criminal Investigations’, Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2000), 266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutteling, J. M., A. Olofsson, B. Fjaestad, M. Kohring, A. Goerke, M. W. Bauer and T. Rusanen, ‘Media Coverage 1973–1996: Trends and Dynamics’, in and , Biotechnology – The Making of Global Controversy
, and , ‘Building Global Networks for Human Diseases: Genes and Populations’, Nature Medicine 10 (2004), 665–667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Science Communication and Science Policy: Estonian Media Discourse on the Genetic Database Project’, Trames 8 (2004), 217–240Google Scholar
, ‘Dissecting Discrimination’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2005), 455–463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Liberty Revisited. A Historical and Systematic Account of an Egalitarian Conception of Liberty and Legitimacy, Lund: Bokbox, 2001Google Scholar
, ‘Non-domination and Egalitarian Welfare Politics’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. An International Forum 1 (1998), 335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Solidaritet eller icke-dominans? Frågor om välfärdsstatens politiska legitimitet’, Tidskrift för politisk filosofi 4 (2000), 31–42Google Scholar
, and , ‘The Regulated Gene: New Legal Dilemmas’, Medical Law Review 12 (2004), 2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.,‘Pro-life is Anti-life: The Problematic Claims of Pro-life Positions in Ethics’, in and , Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, 99–109
, ‘The Human Genome Diversity Project: Implications for Indigenous Peoples’, Abya Yala News 8, 4 (1994), http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/41/024.html (accessed on 23 February 2006)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Public–Private Collaborations and the Race to Sequence Agrobacterium Tumefaciens’, Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004), 807–810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community 1900–1933, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
, ‘Another Look at Dignity’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Can Arguments Address Concerns?’, Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005), 598–600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Häyry, M.,‘Categorical Objections to Genetic Engineering – A Critique’, in and , Ethics and Biotechnology, 202–215
, ‘Ethics Committees, Principles and Consequences’, Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1998), 81–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘European Values in Bioethics: Why, What, and How to be Used?’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2003), 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Philosophical Arguments For and Against Human Reproductive Cloning’, Bioethics 17 (2003), 447–459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Precaution and Solidarity’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2005), 199–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The Tension Between Self Governance and Absolute Inner Worth in Kant's Moral Philosophy’, Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005), 645–647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Genetic Information, Rights, and Autonomy’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2001), 403–414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helgason, H. H., ‘Informed Consent for Donating Biosamples in Medical Research – Legal Requirements in Iceland’, in and , Blood and Data, 127–134
, ‘What Makes Genetic Discrimination Exceptional?’, American Journal of Law and Medicine 29 (2003), 77–116Google ScholarPubMed
Herissone-Kelly, P., ‘The Principlist Approach to Bioethics, and its Stormy Journey Overseas’, in and , Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, 65–77
, ‘Industrial Biotechnology – A Chance at Redemption’, Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004), 671–675CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘C. Elegans SGK-1 is the Critical Component in the Akt/PKB Kinase Complex to Control Stress Response and Life Span’, Developmental Cell 6 (2004), 577–588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, T., ‘The Kantian Conception of Autonomy’, in , The Inner Citadel, 91–105
, , , , , , , , , and , ‘An Empirical Survey on Biobanking of Human Genetic Material and Data in Six EU Countries’, European Journal of Human Genetics 11 (2003), 475–488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The First Grace: Rediscovery of the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World, Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2003Google Scholar
, ‘ “Science is Really Needed – That's All I Know”: Informed Consent and the Non-Verbal Practices of Collecting Blood for Genetic Research in Northern Sweden’, New Genetics and Society 22 (2003), 229–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , ‘Informed Consent and Biobanks: A Population-Based Study of Attitudes Towards Tissue Donation for Genetic Research’, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 32 (2004), 224–229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Not Just Autonomy – The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics’, Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1995), 332–338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, S. ‘ “Parity of Reasoning Arguments in Bioethics” – Some Methodological Considerations’, in and , Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, 47–56
Holmberg, S., and L. Weibull, ‘Vetenskapen står stark i folkopinionen’, in and , Ju mer vi är tillsammans, 93–102
, ‘Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1994), 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUGO Ethics Committee, ‘Genetic Benefit-Sharing’, Science 290 (2000), 5489
HUGO Ethics Committee,Statement on Benefit-Sharing, London: Human Genome Organization, 2000, http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/hugo/benefit.html (accessed on 24 February 2006)
HUGO Ethics Committee,‘Statement on Human Genomic Databases’, 2002, http://www.hugo-international.org/Statement_on_Human_Genomic_Databases.htm (accessed on 4 January 2006)
Human Genetics Commission, Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the Use of Personal Genetic Data (May 2002)
Human Genetics Commission,Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information – People's Panel Quantitative Study Conducted for the Human Genetics Commission (March 2001)
, , , , and , Biobanks for Health – Report and Recommendations from an EU Workshop, Oslo: Technical Report to EU Commission, 2003Google Scholar
International HapMap Consortium, ‘Integrating Ethics and Science in the International HapMap Project’, Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (2004), 467–475CrossRef
, Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versus einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, 7th edn, Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1987Google Scholar
Judson, H. F., ‘A History of the Science and Technology Behind Gene Mapping and Sequencing’, in and , The Code of Codes, 37–42
, ‘Insurance Companies’ Access to Genetic Information: Why Regulation Alone is Not Enough', Monash Bioethics Review 22 (2003), 25–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , Att nyttja genetisk information. Hur mycket ska försäkringsbolagen få veta?, Stockholm: SNS Förlag, 2002Google Scholar
, ‘African-American Population Biobank Proposed’, Science 300 (2003), 1485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘ “The Precautionary Principle and its Implications for Science” – Introduction’, Foundations of Science 2 (1997), 201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ethical Philosophy, 2nd edn, translated by J. W. Ellington and with an introduction by W. A. Wick, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994Google Scholar
, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by L. W. Beck, New York: Macmillan, 1959 [1875]Google Scholar
, Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. The Challenge for Bioethics, San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2002Google Scholar
, and , ‘Estonian Genome Foundation and Economic Development’, Trames 8 (2004), 106–128Google Scholar
, ‘Genetic Research on the UK Population – Do New Principles Need to be Developed?’, Trends in Molecular Medicine 7 (2001), 528–530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and , ‘Population Genetic Databases: A Comparative Analysis of the Law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and the UK’, Trames 8 (2004), 15–33Google Scholar
, Making Sense of Life. Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003Google Scholar
, and (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, 37–42Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M., ‘Human Genetic Material: Commodity of a Gift?’, in , Stored Tissue Samples, 226–235
(ed.), Populations and Genetics. Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003Google Scholar
, and , ‘Human Genomic Databases: A Global Public Good?’, European Journal of Health Law 10 (2003), 27–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), Human DNA: Law and Policy. International and Comparative Perspectives, The Hague: Kluwer, 1997Google Scholar
König, K., ‘Good Governance – As Steering and Value Concept for the Modern Administrative State’, in , Governance: Concepts and Applications, 67–93
Korts, K., ‘Becoming Masters of Our Genes: Public Acceptance of the Estonian Genome Project’, in and , Blood and Data, 187–192
, ‘Introducing Gene Technology to the Society: Social Implications of the Estonian Genome Project’, Trames 8 (2004), 241–253Google Scholar
, and , ‘Genetic Databases and Public Attitudes: A Comparison of Iceland, Estonia and the UK’, Trames 8 (2004), 131–149Google Scholar
Kristinsson, S., ‘Databases and Informed Consent: Can Broad Consent Legitimate Research?’, in and , Blood and Data, 111–119
, ‘Don't Leave Dignity Out of the Cloning Debate’, Nature 388 (1997), 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacey, N., ‘Interpreting Doctrines of Privacy: A Comment on Anita Allen’, in , Privacies, 40–51
, Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-legal Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, M., and S. Weldon, ‘Genetic Databases and Public Trust’, in and , Blood and Data, 175–179
, ‘Im Supermarkt der Biotechnik. Eine Reportage’, Gegenworte. Hefte für den Disput über Wissen 13 (2004), 30–35Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
, Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Now You See It, Now You Don't: Consent and the Legal Protection of Autonomy’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2000), 277–288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Taming the Prince. The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993Google Scholar
, ‘Gene Discovery, Ownership and Access for Developing Countries in the Era of Molecular Genetics’, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 5, 1 (15 April 2002), http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol5/issue1/issues/05/ (accessed on 24 February 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Genetic Governance: The Risks, Oversight and Regulation of Genetic Databases in the UK’, New Genetics and Society 20 (2001), 157–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The New Public: Professional Communication and the Means of Social Influence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, J. E., ‘DNA Data Banks’, in , Genetic Secrets
, ‘The Threat to Medical Records Research’, New England Journal of Medicine 337 (1997), 1466–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘ “Iceland Inc.”? On the Ethics of Commercial Population Genomics’, Social Science and Medicine 58 (2004), 1201–1209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, On Liberty and The Subjection of Women, Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1996 [1859/1869]Google Scholar
, ‘Managing Government – Governing Management’, Harvard Business Review 74 (1996), 75–83Google Scholar
Morgunbladid, ‘Meirihluti landsmanna fylgjandi gagnagrunnsfrumvarpinu’ [‘Majority of population supports database bill’], 18 November 1998
Morgunbladid, ‘Rúmt 81% fylgjandi gagnagrunn á heilbrigdissvidi’ [‘Over 81% support the Health Sector Database’], 27 April 2000
, and (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law, London: Cavendish Publishing, 1999Google Scholar
Murray, T., ‘Genetic Exceptionalism and “Future Diaries”: Is Genetic Information Different from Other Medical Information?’, in , Genetic Secrets, 61
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC), Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, 2 vols., Rockville, MD: NBAC, 2000
, ‘Molecular Metaphors: The Gene in Popular Discourse’, Nature Reviews Genetics 2 (2001), 555–559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Sweden Takes Steps to Protect Tissue Banks’, Science 286 (1999), 894CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public’, Law and Philosophy 17 (1998), 559–596Google Scholar
Nõmper, A., ‘What is Wrong with Using Anonymized Data and Tissue for Research Purposes?’, in and , Blood and Data, 121–126
Nõmper, A., and K. Kruuv, ‘The Estonian Gene Project’, in , Society and Genetic Information, 216
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, ‘The Ethics of Research Related to Health Care in Developing Countries’, 24 April 2002, http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/developingcountries/publication_309.html (accessed on 25 February 2006)
Nuffield Council on Bioethics,‘Pharmacogenetics, Ethical Issues’, 20 September 2003, http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/pharmacogenetics/publication_314.html (accessed on 23 February 2006)
, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Informed Consent and Genetic Information’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2001), 689–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Stealing from the Past: Globalization, Strategic Formation and the Use of Indigenous Intellectual Property in the Biotechnology Industry’, Third World Quarterly 22 (2001), 643–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘For Whom the Cell Tolls: Debates About Biomedicine’, Current Anthropology 43 (2002), 271–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
People Science and Policy Ltd, Biobank UK. A Question of Trust: A Consultation Exploring and Addressing Questions of Public Trust, London: Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, 2002
, and , ‘Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (1998), 223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media’, Social Science and Medicine 52 (2001), 1255–1268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippine Solidarity Group Toronto, ‘PSG Supports Indigenous Peoples’, NativeNet (1993), http://www.native-net.org/archive/nl/9312/0089.html (accessed on 24 February 2006)
, ‘Experiments in the Governance of Biotechnology: A Case Study of the UK National Consensus Conference’, New Genetics and Society 18 (1999), 79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw, 2 vols., Copenhagen and Barcelona: Centre for Ethics and Law and Institut Borja de Bioètica, 2000Google Scholar
, ‘Genetic Links, Family Ties and Social Bonds: Rights and Responsibilities in the Face of Genetic Knowledge’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1998), 10–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.), Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
, ‘The New Governance: Governing Without Government’, Political Studies 64 (1996), 652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Communication and Health in a Multi-Ethnic Society, Bristol: Policy Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Commodification of Bioinformation: The Icelandic Health Sector Database, London: Wellcome Trust, 2001Google Scholar
Rose, H.,‘The Commodification of Virtual Reality: The Icelandic Health Sector Database’, in and , Genetic Nature/Culture, 80
, ‘An Ethical Dilemma. The Rise and Fall of UmanGenomics – The Model Biotech Company?’, Nature 425 (2003), 123–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H.,‘Risk, Trust and Scepticism in the Age of the New Genetics’, in and , The Risk Society and Beyond, 63–77
, , , , , and , ‘Genetic Structure of Human Populations’, Science 298 (2002), 2381–2385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(ed.), Privacies. Philosophical Evaluations, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004Google Scholar
(ed.), Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997Google Scholar
Sade, R. M., ‘Medicine and Managed Care, Morals and Markets’, in and , The Ethics of Managed Care, 55–74
, and , ‘Regulating Human Genetics: The Changing Politic of Biotechnology Governance in the European Union’, Health, Risk and Society 4 (2002), 325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Society and Genetic Information: Codes and Laws in the Genetic Era, Budapest: CPS and CEU Press, 2003Google Scholar
, ‘The Performing State: Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has Come but Whose Implementation Has Not’, OECD Journal on Budgeting 3 (2003), 71–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrecker, T., ‘Benefit-Sharing in the New Genomic Marketplace’, in , Populations and Genetics, 405–422
, Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, 1939Google Scholar
, ‘The Economy as a Whole. Seventh Chapter of The Theory of Economic Development’, Industry and Innovation 1/2 (2002), 93–145Google Scholar
, A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar
, and , ‘Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2000), 41–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Leaky Bodies and Boundaries. Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)ethics, London: Routledge, 1997Google Scholar
, ‘Benefit-Sharing: An Inquiry Regarding the Meaning and Limits of the Concept in Human Genetic Research’, Genomics, Society and Policy 1, 2 (2005), 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A Third Concept of Liberty’, Proceedings of the British Academy 117 (2003), 237–268Google Scholar
, and , Building Trust in Business, Politics, Relationships, and Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Sorenson, J., ‘What We Still Don't Know about Genetic Screening and Counselling’, in and , Gene Mapping, 208
, and , ‘The Estonian Health Care System and the Genetic Database Project: From Limited Resources to Big Hopes’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 254–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The (Im)morality of (Un)naturalness’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2004), 15–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘What is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations of the Four Principles Approach’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2001), 72–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , ‘Genetic Ignorance, Moral Obligations and Social Duties’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2000), 107–113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Constructing Public Images of New Genetics and Gene Technology: The Media Discourse on the Estonian Human Genome Project’, Trames 8 (2004), 192–216Google Scholar
, ‘Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent’, Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2004), 15–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Bioethics in a European Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), The Foundations of Health Care, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, forthcoming
, and (eds.), Genetic Information: Acquisition, Access, and Control, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Genes of a Nation: The Promotion of Iceland's Genetic Information’, Trames 8 (2004), 178–191Google Scholar
, ‘UK Government Science Policy: The “Enterprise Deficit” Fallacy’, Technovation 23 (2003), 785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonti-Filippini, N., ‘The Concept of Human Dignity in the International Human Rights Instruments’, in and , Identity and Statute of Human Embryo, 381–404
, and , ‘Governing UK Biobank: The Importance of Ensuring Public Trust’, Trends in Biotechnology 22 (2004), 284–285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics, New York: New York University Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Das Merkantilsystem in seiner historischen Bedeutung. Städtische, territoriale und staatliche Wirtschaftspolitik, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1944 [1884]Google Scholar
, and , Gene Technology and Social Acceptance, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999Google Scholar
, ‘A Shared Success, 2 Rivals’ Announcement Marks New Medical Era, Risks and All', New York Times, 27 June 2000, A1 and A21Google Scholar
(ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 1998Google Scholar
Weldon, S., and M. Levitt, ‘Public Databases and Privat(ized) Property? A UK Study of Public Perceptions of Privacy in Relation to Population Based Human Genetic Databases’, in and , Blood and Data, 181–186
Wexler, N., ‘Clairvoyance and Caution: Repercussions from the Human Genome Project’, in and , The Code of Codes, 211–243
, ‘Population Biobanks and Social Justice: Commercial or Communitarian Models? A Comparative Analysis of Benefit Sharing, Ownership and Access Arrangements’, Trames 8 (2004), 80–90Google Scholar
, and , ‘The Charitable Trust as a Model for Genomic Biobanks’, New England Journal of Medicine 349 (2003), 1180–1184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, Genetic Databases: Assessing the Benefits and the Impact on Human and Patient Rights, Geneva: WHO, 2003
World Health Organization,Genomics and World Health, Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research, Geneva: WHO, 2001, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/a74580.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2006)
World Health Organization,Human Genetics Programme, ‘Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and Genetic Services’, WHO, 1998
, , , , , , and , ‘Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples’, Journal of the American Medical Association 274 (1995), 1786–1788CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deCODE Inc., website, http://www.decode.com (accessed on 11 February 2006)
Ensembl, website, http://www.ensembl.org/ (accessed on 17 February 2006)
Estonian Genome Foundation, website, http://www.genomics.ee (accessed on 4 January 2006)
Estonian Genome Project, website, http://www.geenivaramu.ee (accessed on 4 January 2006)
Public Population Project in Genomics, website, http://www.p3gconsortium.org/ (accessed on 23 February 2006)
UK Biobank, website, http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk (accessed on 11 February 2006)
UmanGenomics, website, http://www.umangenomics.com (accessed on 4 January 2006; at the time of writing the website is under reconstruction)