Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 30
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
May 2012
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9781139107792

Book description

Ethical Problems and Genetics Practice provides a rich, case-based account of the ethical issues arising in the genetics clinic and laboratory. By analysing a wide range of evocative and often arresting cases from practice, Michael Parker provides a compelling insight into the complex moral world of the contemporary genetics professional and the challenges they face in the care of patients and their families. This book is essential reading for anyone interested in the ethical issues arising in everyday genetics practice. Ethical Problems and Genetics Practice is also a sustained engagement with the relationships between bioethics and social science. In proposing and exemplifying a new approach to bioethics, it makes a significant contribution to debates on methods and interdisciplinarity and will therefore also appeal to all those concerned with theoretical and methodological approaches to bioethics and social science.

Reviews

'This book is an extremely valuable addition to the ever-expanding library of contemporary bioethics texts. For me its real strength lies in the fact that it is very much grounded in real issues - using everyday practice and cases from clinical genetics settings - not simply theoretical 'what if' situations.'

Source: BioNews (bionews.org.uk)

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Appadurai, A. ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’, in A. Appadurai (ed.) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 3–63
Appadurai, A.Modernity at Large (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996)
Appadurai, A. (ed.) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 1986)
Appelbaum, P.S. and Roth, L.H.The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research’ (1982) 5 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 319–329
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (London: Penguin, 1976)
Armstrong, D., Michie, S. and Marteau, T.Revealed identity: a study of the process of genetic counselling’ (1998) 47 Social Science and Medicine, 11, 1653–1658
Ashcroft, R.E. ‘Ethical issues in statistical genetics’, in D.J. Balding, M.J. Bishop and C. Cannings (eds.) Handbook of Statistical Genetics, third edition (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2007), pp. 1325–1345
Ashcroft, R.E., Lucassen, A., Parker, M., Widdershoven, G. and Verkerk, M. (eds.) Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Bosk, C.All God’s Mistakes: Genetic Counseling in a Pediatric Hospital (University of Chicago Press, 1992)
Bosk, C. ‘Irony, ethnography, and informed consent’, in B. Hoffmaster (ed.) Bioethics in Social Context (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001), pp. 199–220
Bosk, C.Professional ethicist available: logical, secular, friendly’ (1999) 128 Daedalus, 47–68
Bosk, C.What Would You Do? Juggling Bioethics and Ethnography (University of Chicago Press, 2008)
Boulton, M. and Parker, M.Informed consent in a changing environment’ (2007) 65 Social Science and Medicine, 2187–2198
Bradley-Smith, G., Hope, S., Firth, H.V. and Hurst, J.A.Oxford Handbook of Genetics (Oxford University Press, 2010)
British Society for Human GeneticsGenetic Testing of Children (Birmingham: British Society for Human Genetics, 2010) available at www.bshg.org.uk/GTOC_2010_BSHG.pdf (accessed 1 August 2011)
Brown, N., Rappert, B. and Webster, A. ‘Introducing contested futures: from looking into the future to looking at the future’, in N. Brown, N. Rappertand A. Webster, Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Technoscience (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 3–20
Burke, B. and Kolker, A.Directiveness in prenatal genetics counselling’ (1994) 22 Women and Health, 31–53
Burke, S., Bennett, C., Bedward, J. and Fardon, P.The Experiences and Preferences of People Receiving Genetic Information from Healthcare Professionals (Birmingham: NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre, 2007)
Caplan, A. ‘Neutrality is not morality: the ethics of genetic counseling’, in A. Caplan, B. LeRoy and D. Bartels (eds.) Prescribing our Future: Ethical Challenges in Genetic Counseling (New York: Aldine Press, 1993), pp. 149–165
Carson, R.A.Interpretive bioethics: the way of discernment’ (1990) 11 Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 51–60
Chadwick, R.Genetics, choice and responsibility’ (1999) 1 Health, Risk and Society, 293–300
Clarke, A.Genetic Counselling: Practice and Principles (London: Routledge, 1994)
Clarke, A. ‘Outcomes and process in genetic counselling’, in P. Harper and A. Clarke, Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice (Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishing, 1997), pp. 165–178
Clarke, A. ‘The process of genetic counselling: beyond nondirectiveness’, in P. Harper and A. Clarke, Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice (Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishing, 1997), pp. 179–200
Clarke, A., Richards, M., Kerzin-Storrar, L., et al., ‘Genetic professionals’ reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families’ (2005) 13 European Journal of Human Genetics, 556–562
Clinical Genetics Society, Guidelines for Pedigree Drawing (Birmingham: Clinical Genetics Society, 2001) available at www.clingensoc.org/Docs/Standards/CGSPedigree.pdf (accessed 29 July 2011)
Cunningham-Burley, S. and Kerr, A.Defining the “social”: towards an understanding of scientific and medical discourses on the social aspects of the new genetics’ (1999) 21 Sociology of Health and Illness, 647–668
D’Agincourt-Canning, L.Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility’ (2001) 15 Bioethics, 3, 231–247
Davis, D.S.Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices and Children’s Futures (New York: Routledge, 2001)
Davis, D.S.Rich cases: the ethics of thick description’ (1991) 21 Hastings Center Report, 4, 12–17
de Vries, R.G.Toward a sociology of bioethics’ (1995) 18 Qualitative Sociology, 1, 119–128
Dewey, J.Human Nature and Conduct (New York: Prometheus Books, 2002)
Dixon-Woods, M.Why is patient safety so hard? A selective review of ethnographic studies’ (2010) 15 (Suppl. 1) Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 11–16
Dolgin, J.Choice, tradition, and the new genetics: the fragmentation of the ideology of family’ (2000) 32 Connecticut Law Review, 523–566
Dunn, M., Sheehan, M., Hope, T. and Parker, M.Towards methodological innovation in empirical ethics research’ (in press) Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Dzur, A.Democratizing the hospital: deliberative-democratic bioethics’ (2002) 27 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2, 177–211
Edwards, J.Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England (Oxford University Press, 2000)
Faden, R. and Beauchamp, T.A History and Theory of Informed Consent (Oxford University Press, 1986)
Featherstone, K., Atkinson, P., Bharadwaj, A. and Clarke, A.Risky Relations: Family, Kinship and the New Genetics (Oxford: Berg, 2006)
Finkler, K.Experiencing the New Genetics: Family and Kinship on the Medical Frontier (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000)
Firth, H.V. and Hurst, J.A.Oxford Desk Reference: Clinical Genetics (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Fluehr-Lobban, C.Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for Ethically Conscious Practice, second edition (Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, 2003)
Fluehr-Lobban, C.Globalization of research and international standards of ethics in anthropology’ (2000) 925 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 37–44
Fortun, K. and Fortun, M.Scientific imaginaries and ethical plateaus in contemporary U.S. toxicology’ (2005) 107 American Anthropologist, 1, 43–54
Fortun, M. ‘Experiments in ethnography and its performance’ (posted on Mannvernd website, 2000) available at www.mannvernd.is/english/articles/mfortun.html (accessed 9 February 2007)
Fox, R.C.Advanced medical technology – social and ethical implications’ (1976) 2 Annual Review of Sociology, 231–268
Fox, R.C.Observations and reflections of a perpetual fieldworker’ (2004) 595 Annals of the American Academy, 309–326
Fox, R.C. and Swazey, J.P.Examining American bioethics: its problems and prospects’ (2005) 14 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 361–373
Fox, R.C. and Swazey, J.P.Observing Bioethics (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Franklin, S.Re-thinking nature-culture: anthropology and the new genetics’ (2003) 3 Anthropological Theory, 1, 65–85
Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S. ‘Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies’, in S. Franklin and S. McKinnon (eds.) Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 1–25
Freidson, F.Profession of Medicine: A Sociology of Applied Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, 1988)
Geertz, C.The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973)
General Medical Council, Confidentiality (London: General Medical Council, 2009)
General Medical Council, Good Medical Practice (London: General Medical Council, 2006)
Gieryn, T.F.Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists’ (1983) 48 American Sociological Review, 6, 781–795
Glover, J.Causing Death and Saving Lives (London: Penguin Books, 1977)
Goethe, J.W. Von, Elective Affinities (London: Penguin Books, 1971 [1809])
Hallowell, N.Doing the right thing: genetic risk and responsibility’ (1999) 21 Sociology of Health and Illness, 5, 597–621
Hallowell, N., Cooke, S., Crawford, G., Lucassen, A. and Parker, M.Distinguishing research from clinical care in cancer genetics: theoretical justifications and practical strategies’ (2009) 68 Social Science and Medicine, 2010–2017
Hallowell, N., Cooke, S., Crawford, G., Parker, M. and Lucassen, A.Defining research and clinical care: health care professionals’ and researchers’ understanding of cancer genetics activities’ (2009) 35 Journal of Medical Ethics, 113–119
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P.Ethnography: Principles in Practice (London: Routledge, 2006)
Harper, P.Practical Genetic Counselling, sixth edition (London: Edward Arnold, 2004)
Harper, P.A Short History of Medical Genetics (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Hoeyer, K.“Ethics wars”: reflections on the antagonism between bioethicists and social science observers of biomedicine’ (2006) 29 Human Studies, 203–227
Hoffmaster, B. (ed.) Bioethics in Social Context (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001)
Hoffmaster, B.Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics?’ (1992) 35 Social Science and Medicine, 12, 1421–1432
Hoffmaster, B. and Hooker, C.How experience confronts ethics’ (2009) 23 Bioethics, 4, 214–225
Hope, A.Empirical medical ethics’ (1999) Journal of Medical Ethics, 219–220
Human Genetics Commission, Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the Use of Personal Data (London: UK Department of Health, 2002)
Human Genetics Commission, Making Babies: Reproductive Decisions and Genetic Technologies (London: UK Department of Health, 2006)
Jennings, B. (1990) ‘Ethics and ethnography in neonatal intensive care’, in G. Weisz (ed.) Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990), pp. 261–272
Joint Committee on Medical Genetics, Consent and Confidentiality in Genetic Practice: Guidance on Genetic Testing and Sharing Genetic Information (London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 2006)
Katz, J.The Silent World of Doctor and Patient (New York: Free Press, 1984)
Katz-Rothman, B.The Tentative Pregnancy (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1986)
Kee, F., Tiret, L., Robo, J.Y., Nicaud, V., McCrum, E., Evans, A. and Cambien, F.Reliability of reported family history of myocardial infarction’ (1993) 307 British Medical Journal, 6918, 1528–1530
Kerr, A. and Cunningham-Burley, S.On ambivalence and risk: reflexive modernity and the new human genetics’ (2000) 34 Sociology, 2, 283–304
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A.Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: examining contemporary professionals’ accounts’ (1998) 23 Science, Technology and Human Values, 2, 175–198
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A.The new genetics: professionals’ discursive boundaries’ (1997) 45 The Sociological Review, 2, 279–303
Kleinman, A.Moral experience and ethical reflection: can ethnography reconcile them? A quandary for “the new bioethics”’ (1999) 128 Daedalus, 4, 69–97
Kleinman, A.Writing at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)
Kon, A.A.The role of empirical research in bioethics’ (2009) 6 American Journal of Bioethics, 3, 59–65
Konrad, M.Narrating the New Predictive Genetics (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Kopytoff, I. ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process’, in A. Appadurai (ed.) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 64–94
Law, J. and Urry, J.Enacting the social’ (2004) 33 Economy and Society, 3, 390–410
Lippman, A. ‘The genetic construction of prenatal testing: choice, consent or conformity for women?’, in K. Rothenberg and F. Thomsen (eds.) Women and Prenatal Testing (Ohio State University Press, 1991), pp. 9–34
Lippman, A.Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the human genome and health care’ (1992) 35 Social Science and Medicine, 12, 1469–1476
Lucassen, A. and Parker, M.Revealing false paternity: some ethical considerations’ (2001) 357 The Lancet, 1033–1035
Lucassen, A., Wheeler, R. and Parker, M.Implications of data protection legislation for family history’ (2006) 332 British Medical Journal, 299–301
Mandelbaum, M.Phenomenology of Moral Experience (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969)
Marcus, G.E. ‘The uses of complicity in the changing mis-en-scène of anthropological fieldwork’ in G.E. Marcus (ed.) Ethnography Through Thick and Thin (Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 105–132
Marcus, G.E. and Fischer, M.M.J.Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences (University of Chicago Press, 1986)
Marshall, P.A.Anthropology and bioethics’ (1992) 6 Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1, 49–73
Marteau, T. and Drake, H.Attributions for disability: the influence of genetic screening’ (1995) 40 Social Science and Medicine, 1127–1132
Marteau, T., Drake, H. and Bobrow, M.Counselling following diagnosis of a foetal abnormality: the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists and genetic nurses’ (1994) 31 Journal of Medical Genetics, 864–867
McMillan, J. and Hope, A. ‘The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics’, in G. Widdershoven, T. Hope, J. McMillan and L. van der Scheer (eds.) Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 9–22
Meskell, L. and Pels, P. (eds.) Embedding Ethics (Oxford: Berg, 2005)
Michaels, M. and Morgan, L. ‘Introduction: the fetal imperative’, in L. Morgan and M. Michaels (eds.) Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), pp. 1–10
Mol, A.The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002)
Muller, J.H.Anthropology, bioethics and medicine: a provocative trilogy’ (1994) 8 Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 4, 448–467
Murphy, E. and Dingwall, R.Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice’ (2007) 65 Social Science and Medicine, 11, 2223–2234
Newson, A.J. and Humphries, S.E.Cascade testing in familial hypercholesterolaemia: how should family members be contacted?’ (2005) 13 European Journal of Human Genetics, 401–408
NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre, Taking and Drawing a Family History (Birmingham: NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre, 2008)
Novas, C. ‘Genetic advocacy groups, science and biovalue: creating political economies of hope’, in P. Atkinson, P. Glasner and H. Greenslade (eds.) New Genetics, New Identities (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 11–27
Novas, C. and Rose, N.Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual’ (2000) 29 Economy and Society, 4, 485–513
Nugaka, Y. and Cambrosio, A. ‘Medical pedigrees and the visual production of family disease in Canadian and Japanese genetic counselling practice’, in M.A. Elston (ed.) The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp. 29–56
Parens, E. and Asch, A.The disability rights critique of prenatal testing: reflections and recommendations’ (2003) 9 Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 1, 40–47
Parker, M. ‘Children who run: ethics and homelessness’, in B. Almond, Introducing Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995), pp. 58–70
Parker, M. ‘Deliberative bioethics’, in R.E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper and J. McMillan (eds.) Principles of Health Care Ethics, second edition (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2007), pp. 185–191
Parker, M.Ethnography/ethics’ (2007) 65 Social Science and Medicine, 2248–2259
Parker, M.Genetic testing in children and young people’ (2009) 9 Familial Cancer, 1, 15–18
Parker, M., Ashcroft, R., Wilkie, A. and Kent, A.Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders’ (2004) 329 British Medical Journal, 288–289
Parker, M. and Dickenson, D.The Cambridge Medical Ethics Workbook (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
Parker, M. and Lucassen, A.Concern for individuals and families in clinical genetics’ (2003) 29 Journal of Medical Ethics, 70–73
Parker, M. and Lucassen, A.Genetic information: a joint account?’ (2004) 329 British Medical Journal, 165–167
Parker, M., Williamson, R. and Savulescu, J.Ethical Issues in Genetics Research: An Introduction for Members of Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (Melbourne: Cooperative Research Centre for the Discovery of Genes for Common Human Diseases, 2003)
Pels, P.Professions of duplexity: a prehistory of ethical codes in anthropology’ (1999) 40 Current Anthropology, 2, 101–136
Pels, P. ‘The trickster’s dilemma: ethics and the technologies of the anthropological self’, in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 135–172
Pels, P. ‘ “Where there aren’t no ten commandments”: redefining ethics during the Darkness in El Dorado scandal’, in L. Meskell and P. Pels (eds.) Embedding Ethics (Oxford: Berg, 2005), pp. 69–99
PFG Foundation, Genetics and Mainstream Medicine: Service Development and Integration (Cambridge: PFG Foundation, 2011)
Press, N. and Browner, C.H.Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis’ (1997) 45 Social Science and Medicine, 7, 979–989
Rapp, R.Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America (New York and London: Routledge, 2000)
Rapp, R., Heath, D. and Taussig, K. ‘Genealogical disease: where heredity, abnormality, biomedical explanation, and family responsibility meet’, in S. Franklin and S. McKinnon (eds.) Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 384–409
Reed, S.C.A short history of genetic counselling’ (1971) 21 Social Biology, 4, 332–339
Rose, P. ‘Taking a family history’, in P. Rose and A. Lucassen, Practical Genetics for Primary Care (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 57–75
Ruskin, J. ‘The Nature of Gothic’, in J. Ruskin, Unto this Last and Other Writings (London: Penguin Books, 1997), pp. 77–110
Ryle, G. ‘The thinking of thoughts: What is “le Penseur” doing?’, in G. Ryle, Collected Papers II: Collected Essays 1929–1968 (London: Hutchinson, 1971)
Scheper-Hughes, N.The primacy of the ethical: propositions for a militant anthropology’ (1995) 36 Current Anthropology, 3, 409–440
Schneider, D.Critique of the Study of Kinship (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1984)
Schneider, D. ‘Kinship and biology’, in A.J. Coale, L.A. Fallers, M. Levy, D. Schneider and S. Tomkins (eds.) Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure (Princeton University Press, 1965), pp. 83–101
Sennett, R.The Craftsman (London: Penguin, 2008)
Shakespeare, T.Back to the future? New genetics and disabled people’ (1995) 44 Critical Social Policy, 45, 22–35
Shakespeare, T.Disability Rights and Wrongs (London: Routledge, 2006)
Shaw, A.Interpreting images: diagnostic skill in the genetics clinic’ (2003) 9 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1, 39–55
Shaw, A.Kinship and Continuity: Pakistani Families in Britain (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000)
Shelton, W.Empirical bioethics: present and future possibilities’ (2009) 9 American Journal of Bioethics, 6–7, 74–75
Stacey, M. ‘The new genetics: a feminist view’, in T. Marteau and M. Richards (eds.) The Troubled Helix (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 331–349
Strathern, M. ‘Accountability and ethnography’, in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 279–304
Strathern, M.After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century (Cambridge University Press, 1992)
Strathern, M.Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Turner, L.Anthropological and sociological critiques of bioethics’ (2009) 6 Bioethical Inquiry, 83–98
van der Scheer, L. and Widdershoven, G.Integrated empirical ethics: loss of normativity?’ (2004) 7 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 71–79
Vaughan, D.The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster’ (1999) 25 Annual Review of Sociology, 271–305
Wachbroit, R. and Wasserman, D.Patient autonomy and value-neutrality in nondirective genetic counselling’ (1995) 6 Stanford Law and Policy Review, 2, 103–111
Wertz, D.C., Fletcher, J.C. and Mulvihill, J.J.Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: cross-cultural comparisons among 18 nations’ (1990) 46 American Journal of Human Genetics, 1200–1213
Widdershoven, G., Abma, T. and Molewijk, B.Empirical ethics as dialogical practice’ (2009) 23 Bioethics, 4, 236–248
Williams, B.Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Penguin Books, 2006)
Williams, C.Framing the fetus in medical work: rituals and practices’ (2005) 60 Social Science and Medicine, 2085–2095
Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B.Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?’ (2002) 54 Social Science and Medicine, 339–347
Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B.Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal testing’ (2002) 55 Social Science and Medicine, 743–753
Yanagisako, S.J. and Collier, J.F. ‘Toward a unified analysis of gender and kinship’, in J.F. Collier and S.J. Yanagisako (eds.) Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis (Stanford University Press, 1987), pp. 14–50

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.