Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T02:11:45.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12.2 - Challenging fidelity: the physician's role in rationing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2009

Nancy S. Jecker
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Department of Medical History and Ethics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
Lorry R. Frankel
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Amnon Goldworth
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Mary V. Rorty
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
William A. Silverman
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Dr. Douglas Diekema has set forth a series of cases illustrating ethical concerns that arise for pediatricians practicing medicine in managed care settings. This chapter explores how the environments of managed care alter the physician's ethical role as patient advocate. The approach to this topic will be twofold. I begin by exploring rationing within managed care organizations (MCOs), using the cases set forth in the previous chapter to illustrate distinct rationing methods and criteria. Then I identify the limits these forms of rationing impose on patient advocacy, with an eye to clarifying the pediatrician's ethical role in healthcare rationing.

Possible methods of rationing within MCOs

Rationing occurs whenever physicians, hospitals, MCOs, purchasers, or others deny beneficial health care to patients under conditions of scarcity. But what is scarcity? In some instances, the raw materials from which healthcare services are made are themselves limited and there is not enough to provide them to everyone who stands to benefit. This first kind of scarcity is referred to as “resource scarcity” to emphasize the finite nature of the resources required to produce healthcare services (Morreim 1995). One example of resource scarcity is organ transplantation. The supply of hearts, lungs, kidneys, and other organs required for transplantation is currently insufficient to meet demand. Another example of resource scarcity is specialty care. In rural areas of the United States, medical specialists may be unavailable to patients who need them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethical Dilemmas in Pediatrics
Cases and Commentaries
, pp. 267 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×