Book contents
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions
- Escaping From Predators
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Part I Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
- Part II Escape and refuge use: theory and findings for major taxonomic groups
- Part III Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
- Part IV The application and study of escape
- 16 Best practice for the study of escape behavior
- 17 Afterword
- Index
- References
16 - Best practice for the study of escape behavior
from Part IV - The application and study of escape
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
Book contents
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions
- Escaping From Predators
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Part I Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
- Part II Escape and refuge use: theory and findings for major taxonomic groups
- Part III Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
- Part IV The application and study of escape
- 16 Best practice for the study of escape behavior
- 17 Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions, pp. 407 - 419Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Blumstein, D. T. (2003). Flight initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. Journal of Wildlife Management, 67, 852–857.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T. (2006). Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: How life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Animal Behaviour, 71, 389–399.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T. (2010). Flush early and avoid the rush: A general rule of antipredator behavior? Behavioral Ecology, 21, 440–442.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T. & Bouskila, A. (1996). Assessment and decision making in animals: A mechanistic model underlying behavioral flexibility can prevent ambiguity. Oikos, 77, 569–576.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T. & Pelletier, D. (2005). Yellow-bellied marmot hiding time is sensitive to variation in costs. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 363–367.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T., Runyan, A., Seymour, M. et al. (2004). Locomotor ability and wariness in yellow-bellied marmots. Ethology, 110, 615–634.Google Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H.R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, Y. L., Shen, B., Zung, L. & Blumstein, D. T. (2005). Evaluating temporal and spatial margins of safety in galahs. Animal Behaviour, 70, 1395–1399.Google Scholar
Chamaillé-Jammes, S. & Blumstein, D.T. (2012). A case for quantile regression in behavioral ecology: Getting more out of flight initiation distance data. Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 985–992.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (1997). Escape by a refuging prey: The broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75, 943–947.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (1998). Direction of predator turning, a neglected cue to predation risk. Behaviour, 135, 55–64.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2005). When and how do predator starting distances affect flight initiation distances? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 1045–1050.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2006). Dynamic risk assessment: Prey rapidly adjust flight initiation distance to changes in predator approach speed. Ethology, 112, 858–864.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2008a). Visual monitoring of predators: Occurrence, cost and benefit for escape. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1365–1372.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2008b). Strong artifactual effect of starting distance on flight initiation distance in the actively foraging lizard Aspidoscelis exsanguis. Herpetologica, 64, 200–206.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2012). Risk, escape from ambush, and hiding time by the lizard Sceloporus virgatus. Herpetologica, 68, 505–513.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Avalos, A. (2010). Escape decisions by the syntopic congeners Sceloporus jarrovii and S. virgatus: comparative effects of perch height and of predator approach speed, persistence, and direction of turning. Journal of Herpetology, 44, 425–430.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Blumstein, D. T. (2014). Novel effects of monitoring predators on costs of fleeing and not fleeing explain flushing early in economic escape theory. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 44–52.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Frederick, W. G. (2007). Optimal flight initiation distance. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244, 59–67.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr., Pérez-Mellado, V. & Hawlena, D. (2007). Number, speeds, and approach paths of predators affect escape behavior by the Balearic lizard, Podarcis lilfordi. Journal of Herpetology, 41, 197–204.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr., Hawlena, D. & Pérez-Mellado, V. (2009). Interactive effect of starting distance and approach speed on escape behavior challenges theory. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 542–546.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr., Hawlena, D. & Pérez-Mellado, V. (2010). Influence of risk on hiding time by Balearic lizards (Podarcis lilfordi): Predator approach speed, directness, persistence, and proximity. Herpetologica, 66, 131–141.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr., Pyron, R. A. & Garland, J. T. (2014). Island tameness: living on islands reduces flight initiation distance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 281, 20133019.Google Scholar
Cumming, G. & Finch, S. (2001). A Primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educational Psychology and Measurement, 61, 532–574.Google Scholar
Dumont, F., Pasquaretta, C., Réale, D., Bogliani, G. & Hardenberg, A. (2012). Flight initiation distance and starting distance: Biological effect or mathematical artefact? Ethology, 118, 1–12.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (2004). Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Vaca, R. & Schroeder, N. (2004). Spatial and temporal responses of forest birds to human approaches in a protected area and implications for two management strategies. Biological Conservation, 117, 407–416.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Venier, M. P., Renison, D. & Blumstein, D. T. (2005). Sensitivity of wildlife to spatial patterns of recreationist behavior: A critical assessment of minimum approaching distances and buffer areas for grassland birds. Biological Conservation, 125, 225–235.Google Scholar
Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. (2000). Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. American Naturalist, 155, 346–364.Google Scholar
Geist, C., Liao, J., Libby, S. & Blumstein, D. T. (2005). Does intruder group size and orientation affect flight initiation distance in birds? Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 69–73.Google Scholar
Gulbransen, D., Segrist, T., del Castillo, P. & Blumstein, D.T. (2006). The fixed slope rule: An inter-specific study. Ethology, 112, 1056–1061.Google Scholar
Lajeunesse, M. J. (2009). Meta-analysis and the comparative phylogenetic method. American Naturalist, 174, 369–381.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. (2008). Flight distance and blood parasites in birds. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 1305–1313.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. & Garamszegi, L. Z.(2012). Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 843–853.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S. & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 82, 591–605.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S. & Santos, E. S. A. (2012). Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Evolutionary Ecology, 26, 1253–1274.Google Scholar
Revell, L. J. (2010). Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 319–329.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. (1996). Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1077–1086.Google Scholar
Samia, D. S. M. & Blumstein, D. T. (2014). Phi index: A new metric to test the flush early and avoid the rush hypothesis. PLoS One, 9, e113134.Google Scholar
Samia, D. S. M., Nomura, F. & Blumstein, D. T. (2013). Do animals generally flush early and avoid the rush? A meta-analysis. Biology Letters, 9, 20130016.Google Scholar
Stankowich, T. (2008). Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 141, 2159–2173.Google Scholar
Stankowich, T. & Blumstein, D. T. (2005). Fear in animals: A meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 2627–34.Google Scholar
Stankowich, T. & Coss, R. G. (2006). Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 246–254.Google Scholar
Williams, D. M., Samia, D. S. M., Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Blumstein, D. T. (2014). The flush early and avoid the rush hypothesis holds after accounting for spontaneous behavior. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 1136–1147.Google Scholar
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. (1986). The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 16, 229–247.Google Scholar
- 18
- Cited by