Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T00:37:49.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Strength of Reflection Principles

from Part III - Reflection Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2017

Cezary Cieśliński
Affiliation:
University of Warsaw
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I am going to discuss various reflection principles, taking into account both their arithmetical and truth-theoretical strength. As for the arithmetical component, it would be good to know at least whether adding a given reflection principle leads us beyond the base theory (Peano arithmetic). On the other hand, when assessing truth-theoretic strength, one needs to know how powerful the reflection principles are in proving truth-theoretic generalisations. All in all, one needs to be clear about how helpful reflection can be in solving the problem of deductive weakness of some truth theories (conservative or disquotational ones).Without such a knowledge, there seems to be little point of entering a philosophical debate about reflection.

Definition 1.5.1 has introduced three types of reflection principles for an arithmetical theory S: the global, the uniform, and the local one. Here I will consider reflection in a more general setting. Intuitively, a reflection principle for a class Γ (there is no assumption that Γ contains arithmetical sentences only) is a sentence or a set of sentences stating the soundness of Γ. The principle in question can have a form of a global principle, or it can be a schematic expression of soundness, in the style of (UR) or (LR), that is, it can be (cf. again Definition 1.5.1). In general, the strength of the principle will depend on the choice of Γ.

In the context of discussing axiomatic characterisations of light notions of truth, an obvious choice of Γ is the set of disquotational axioms. Indeed, it turns out that, when applied to such a set, some forms of reflection produce theories which are truth-theoretically strong. I will start, however, with a discussion of reflection for some classes Γ containing arithmetical sentences only. This will permit to get a clearer overall picture of the situation. At this initial stage, before venturing further, I want (at the very least) to indicate some classes Γ for which reflection seems intuitively natural and obvious. A more ambitious objective would be to approach the question of what really explains the arithmetical strength of reflection principles.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Epistemic Lightness of Truth
Deflationism and its Logic
, pp. 207 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×