Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:41:20.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Environmental justice in the use, knowledge and exploitation of genetic resources

from Part V - Access to natural resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2009

Jonas Ebbesson
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Phoebe Okowa
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Access to and use of genetic resources have become increasingly contentious at the national and international levels over the past couple of decades. The importance of genetic resources in law and policy debates in recent years has largely been linked to their new-found economic importance in the context of the development of agricultural and pharmaceutical biotechnology. As a result, questions concerning transfers of and trade in genetic resources as well as questions concerning the protection of knowledge related to genetic resources have been given a lot of attention by policy-makers.

This has resulted in a flurry of new rules and regulations fostering the use of genetic resources, for instance, as a raw material for biotechnology products. In particular, the use of genetic resources in transgenic products has been encouraged by the progressive introduction in most countries of patents on life forms in the context of the implementation of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

While legal incentives for the use of genetic resources in industrial applications have rapidly developed over the past couple of decades, much less has been done with regard to the protection of the rights and interests of the holders of genetic resources and associated knowledge concerning their useful characteristics. Nevertheless, a number of initiatives have been taken in different contexts. The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (‘Biodiversity Convention’) has been one of the focal points for addressing some of the concerns related to access to and use of genetic resources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, , 1991. The Nicomachean Ethics 112, trans. Ross, D., revised by Ackrill, J. L. and Urmson, J. O., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, J. H., and Berger, P., 2001. ‘Patenting Agriculture’. Issues in Science and Technology Online.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. D., 2002. ‘The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’. 11 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullet, P., 2003. Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cullet, P., 2005. Intellectual Property Protection and Sustainable Development. New Delhi: Butterworths/Lexis-Nexis.Google Scholar
Dawe, D., Robertson, R., and Unnevehr, L., 2002. ‘Golden Rice: What Role Could It Play in Alleviation of Vitamin A Deficiency?’. 27 Food Policy541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FloresPalacios, X. Palacios, X., 1997. Contribution to the Estimation of Countries’ Interdependence in the Area of Plant Genetic Resources. Rome: Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hamilton, N. D., 2001. ‘Legal Issues Shaping Society's Acceptance of Biotechnology and Genetically Modified Organisms’. 6 Drake Journal of Agircultural Law81.Google Scholar
MacDonald, R. St. J., 1995. ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind’, in Beyerlin, U.et al. (eds.), Recht Zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung. Berlin: Springer, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, P., 2004. ‘Biopiracy and Commercialization of Ethnobotanical Knowledge’, in Finger, J. M. and Schuler, P. (eds.), Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, D., 2005. ‘Rice in a Private Grip’. 113 South Bulletin532.Google Scholar
Sharma, R., and Poleman, T. T., 1994. The New Economics of India's Green Revolution: Income and Employment Diffusion in Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Sittenfeld, A., and Gámez, R., 1993. ‘Biodiversity Prospecting by INBio’, in Reid, W. V.et al., Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Genetic Resources for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×