Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:10:23.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Environmental Impacts of Shipbreaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

Stephen de Mora
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Timothy Fileman
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Thomas Vance
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Get access

Summary

Ships are mobile structures of comprehensive size and at the end of their active life (20 - 30 years of operation), they become a sought-after source of steel. In recent years, over 1000 ships were dismantled worldwide. Shipping companies sell old ships in return for a last profit: about 90% of a ship’s structure is made of steel which is recovered during the demolition process and provides several millions USD of profit for the owner – the amount depending on the size and type of vessel. Obsolete vessels available for scrapping may also represent a useful source of supply for second hand equipment and components. The very nature of vessels represents risks both to the environment, as well as to general safety aspects in the dismantling context. The considerable dimensions, their mobility and the presence of materials and polluting substances, both those integrated in the structure as well as those required for operation, are all factors contributing to such risks. There are at present no international regulatory standards relating to shipbreaking. As a result of this inconsistency, practices and procedures for decommissioning and dismantling, which are in grave breach of basic environmental and human health protection norms, have been adopted in many countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ATSDR. 1998. The Nature and Extent of Lead Poisoning in Children in the United States: A Report to Congress, July 1988. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.Google Scholar
ATSDR. 2008a. Asbestos – Health Effects. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.Google Scholar
ATSDR. 2008b. Asbestos – Detecting Asbestos-related Health Problems. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.Google Scholar
Basel Convention. 2003. Technical Guidelines for the Environmentally Sound Management of the Full and Partial Dismantling of Ships. Basel Convention series/SBC. Châtelaine: Secretariat of the Basel Convention.Google Scholar
BBC. 2010a. Praise for ‘toxic’ ship scrapping. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/8439308.stmGoogle Scholar
DNV. 1999. Decommissioning of Ships, Environmental Protection and Demolition Practices. Report No. 99-3065. Oslo: DNV.Google Scholar
DNV. 2001. Decommissioning of Ships – Environmental Standards Ship-Breaking Practices/On-Site Assessment Bangladesh – Chittagong. Oslo: DNV.Google Scholar
EPA. 1998. Chromium(III), Insoluble Salts, CASRN 16065-83-1. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
EPA. 2000. A Guide for Ship Scrappers: Tips for Regulatory Compliance. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Frey, R. S. 2015. Breaking Ships in the World System: An Analysis of two Ship Breaking Capitols, Alang -Sosiya, India and Chittagong, Bangladesh. Journal of World System Research, 21(1): 2549.Google Scholar
Greenpeace. 1999. Ships for Scrap II, Steel and Toxic Wastes for Asia. Worker Health & Safety and Environmental Problems at the Chang Jiang Shipbreaking Yard Operated by the China National Ship Breaking Corporation in Xiagang Near Jiangyin. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
Greenpeace. 2001. Ships for Scrap III, Steel and Toxic Wastes for Asia. Findings of a Greenpeace Study on Workplace and Environmental Contamination in Alang-Sosya. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
Greenpeace. 2005. End of Life Ships: The Human Cost of Breaking Ships. www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/shipbreaking2005a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hossain, M. M. 1989. Contamination of some commercially important marine shrimp and fish species from Bangladesh by organochlorine pesticides, PCB’s and total mercury. MSc thesis, Vrije University of Brussels.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. 1994. Concentration of total mercury in marine shrimps and fish species from the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. ‘Marine Reserch’ Journal of Marine Biology Pakistan, 3(2): 2732.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. 2002. PCB’s Organic pollutants: Threatening Marine Marine Environments and Bangladesh Scenario. Presented at: 2nd International Seminar on Bangladesh Environment – 2002 (ICBEN, 2002). Dhaka, 19–21 December.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. 2004. Sustainable Management of the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME). National Report of BOBLME-Bangladesh. (GCP/RAS/179/WBG/179). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. 2010. Ship Breaking Activities: Threat to Coastal Environment, Biodiversity and Fishermen Community in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Chittagong: Young Power Social Action (YPSA).Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. & Islam, M. M. 2006. Ship Breaking Activities and Its Impact on the Coastal Zone of Chittagong, Bangladesh: Towards Sustainable Management. Chittagong: Young Power Social Action (YPSA).Google Scholar
ILO. 2003. Draft Guidelines on Safety and Health in Ship Breaking. Interregional Tripartite Meeting of Experts on Safety and Health in Ship Breaking for Selected Asian Countries and Turkey Bangkok, 20–27 May 2003. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
ILPI. 2016. Shipbreaking Practices in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: An Investor Perspective on the Human Rights and Environmental Impacts of Beaching. Sørkedalsveien: International Law and Policy Institute.Google Scholar
IMO. 2002. Recycling of Ships – Development of Guidelines on Recycling of Ships. London: Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC).Google Scholar
Isabell, H., Wieland, W. & Bernhard, Z. 2013. ‘Booming Scrap Business: Ship-Breaking Lessons from the Exxon Valdez’. Spiegel Online.Google Scholar
Islam, K. L. and Hossain, M. M. 1986. Effect of ship scrapping on the soil and sea environment in the coastal area of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 17(10): 462463.Google Scholar
Khan, A. 1994. Study on oil pollution caused by ocean going vessels in Chittagong port and abandoned vessels in ship breaking area (Fauzdarhat) with reference to MARPOL 73/78. MSc dissertation (unpublished). University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Latarche, M. 2017. Other lubricants and greases used on a ship. https://shipinsight.com/articles/other-lubricants-and-greases-used-on-a-shipGoogle Scholar
Local Environmental Consultants. 2016. Bangladesh Hazardous Waste Assessment Report – 2016. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
NCI. 2012Asbestos Exposure and Cancer. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
NGOSP. 2015. Annual Report 2015. Brussels: NGO Shipbreaking Platform.Google Scholar
NGOSP. 2016. Substandard Shipbreaking: A Global Challenge. Brussels: NGO Shipbreaking Platform.Google Scholar
OSHA. 2001. Ship Breaking Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration.Google Scholar
OSHA. 2014. Safety and Health Topics: Asbestos. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration.Google Scholar
Peter, G. 2014The Ship-BreakersWashington, DC: National Geographic Society.Google Scholar
Rivera, A. T. F., Cortes-Maramba, N. P. & Akagi, H. 2003. Health and environmental impact of mercury: past and present experience. Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings), 107: 1139.Google Scholar
Rousmaniere, P. & Raj, N. 2007. Shipbreaking in the developing world: problems and prospects. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13: 359368.Google Scholar
Sarraf, M., Stuer-Lauridsen, L., Dyoulgerov, M. et al. 2010. Ship Breaking and Recycling Industry in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Report No. 58275-SAS. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
SCF. 2002. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on the risks to human health of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food. SCF/CS/CNTM/PAH/29 Final. Scientific Committee on Food. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out153_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Steingraber, S. 2004. Update on the Environmental Health Impacts of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) as a Building Material: Evidence from 2000–2004. A commentary for the U.S. Green Building Council, Healthy Building Network. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b45f/a39cab5d491f5a5bd225ccc31e500ee41a2a.pdfGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×