Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T22:02:33.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Entrepreneurship at American Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Nathan Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Zoltan J. Acs
Affiliation:
George Mason School of Public Policy, Fairfax
David B. Audretsch
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Robert J. Strom
Affiliation:
Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City
Get access

Summary

Innovations, almost by definition, are one of the least analyzed parts of economics, in spite of the verifiable fact that they have contributed more to per capita economic growth than any other factor.

Ken Arrow

Some Historical Perspectives

My central concern in this chapter is with innovation in the American university community. I have chosen to begin with the term “innovation” rather than “entrepreneurship” because I propose to deal with issues that take us well beyond “entrepreneurship,” as that term is ordinarily used. I by no means ignore the traditional entrepreneur, but I also address larger themes such as the creation and the institutionalization of new academic disciplines and the roles that they have played, in turn, in the discovery and the diffusion of (potentially) useful knowledge.

The trajectory taken in the United States versus Europe owes a great deal to the political system in which it occurs. After the Napoleonic Wars, institutions of higher education in much of continental Europe became, overwhelmingly, public. In effect, they were nationalized, with extensive centralized control as the inevitable accompaniment of centralized funding. University faculty became civil servants.

Higher education in the United States was shaped by a very different set of political forces, the most distinguishing feature of which was an aversion to the centralization of power. The federalization of the country in the last two decades of the eighteenth century translated into the localization of decision making as well as financial support of the educational system.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, John D. 1997. A History of Aerodynamics. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, Ashish, and Gambardella, Alfonso. 1994. “The Changing Technology of Technical Change: General and Abstract Knowledge and the Division of Innovative Labour.”Research Policy, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, Ashish, Landau, Ralph, and Rosenberg, Nathan. 1998. Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth: Insights from the Chemical Industry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Aspray, William, and Williams, Bernard O.. 1994. “Arming American Scientists: NSF and the Provision of Scientific Computing Facilities for Universities, 1950–1973.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 16(4), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Dietmar. 1994. Structure and Dynamics of Health Research and Public Funding: An International Institutional Comparison. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Elder, Albert. 1970. The History of Penicillin Production. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.Google Scholar
Enos, John L. 1962. Petroleum Progress and Profits: A History of Process Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gelijns, Annetine, and Rosenberg, Nathan. 1995. “From the Scalpel to the Scope: Endoscopic Innovations in Gastroenterology, Gynecology, and Surgery.” In Sources of Medical Technology: Universities and Industry, Gilijns, A. and Rosenberg, N., eds. National Academies Press, chap. 4.Google Scholar
Gelijns, Annetine, and Rosenberg, Nathan. 1999. “Diagnostic Devices: An Analysis of Comparative Advantages.” In Sources of Industrial Leadership, Mowery, David and Nelson, Richard, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, chap. 8.Google Scholar
Goodstein, Judith R. 1991. Millikan's School: A History of the California Institute of Technology. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hanle, Paul A. 1982. Bringing Aerodynamics to America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jahnig, C. E., Martin, H. Z., and Campbell, D. L.. 1983. “The Development of Fluid Catalytic Cracking.” In Heterogeneous Catalysis: Selected American Histories, Davis, Burton and Hettinger, William, eds. American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Karman, Theodore, and Edson, Lee. 1967. The Wind and Beyond. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Klug, A., and Crowther, R. A.. 1972. “Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction from the Viewpoint of Information Theory.” Nature, 238, 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Ralph. 1966. The Chemical Plant: From Process Selection to Commercial Operation. New York: Reinhold Publishing.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Mowery, David C.. 1996. “The Federal Government Role in the Development of the U.S. Software Industry.” In The International Computer Software Industry: A Comparative Study of Industry Evolution and Structure, Mowery, David C., ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 53–85.Google Scholar
Levine, David O. 1986. The American College and the Culture of Aspiration, 1915–1940. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Warren K., Walker, William H., and McAdams, William H.. 1923. Principles of Chemical Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Little, Arthur D. 1933. “Chemical Engineering Research.”In Twenty-five Years of Chemical Engineering Progress, Kirkpatrick, S. D., ed. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, chap. 1.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald, and Sawers, David. 1970. The Technical Development of Modern Aviation. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. 1996. The International Computer Software Industry: A Comparative Study of Industry Evolution and Structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. 2004. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
,National Academy of Science. 1999. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Norberg, Arthur, and O'Neill, Judy. 1996. Transforming Computer Technology: Information Processing for the Pentagon, 1962–1986. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 289–90.Google Scholar
Resch, Helmuth, Blankenhorn, Paul R., Haygreen, John G., and Thompson, Warren S.. 1985. “Forest Products Research at U.S. Universities in 1982.” Wood and Fiber Science, 17(4), 568–584.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1998. “Technological Change in Chemicals: The Role of University-Industry Relations.” In Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth, Arora, A., Landau, R., and Rosenberg, N., eds. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 2000. “Chemical Engineering as a General Purpose Technology.” In Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives, Rosenberg, Nathan, ed. London: Routledge, chap. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmueller, W. Edward. 1996. “The U.S. Software Industry: An Analysis and Interpretive History.” In The International Computer Software Industry: A Comparative Study of Industry Evolution and Structure, Mowery, David C., ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 15–52.Google Scholar
,The Stanford Bulletin 2006–07. Publication of the Office of the University Registrar, Stanford University. Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/dept/registrar/bulletin/current/index.html.
Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1990. Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
,UNIDO. 2005. Capability Building for Catching-up. UNIDO, Vienna, 46.
Vincenti, Walter. 1990. What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 141.Google Scholar
Walker, William H., Lewis, Warren K., and McAdams, William H.. 1937. Principles of Chemical Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weber, Harold C. 1980. The Improbable Achievement: Chemical Engineering at MIT. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wildes, Karl, and Lindgren, Nilo. 1985. A Century of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, 1882–1982. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 378–379.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×