Acs, Z. J. 1984. The Changing Structure of the U. S. Economy.New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J. 1999. Public policies to support new technology-based firms (NTBFs). Science and Public Policy 26 (4): 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J. 2002. Innovation and the Growth of Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L. and Varga, A.. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C.. 1998. Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) Documentation. Washington DC: Center for Economic Studies, U. S. Bureau of the Census, CES 98–99.

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C. 2004a. The Impact of Geographic Differences in Human Capital on Service Firm Formation Rates. Journal of Urban Economics 56: 244–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C. 2004b. Employment Growth and Entrepreneurial Activity in Cities. Regional Studies 38: 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C. 2005. Using Census BITS To Explore Entrepreneurship, Geography, and Economic Growth. Washington, DC:Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D.. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. 2001. The Emergence of the Entrepreneurial Society. Handout by Swedish Foundation for Small Business, Stockholm, Sweden, May.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. eds. 2003. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B.. 2004. The missing link: The knowledge filter and endogenous growth. Working paper No. 4783, Center for Economic Research, London.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B. 2005. A knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. Mimeographed.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. P.. 1992. Real effects of academic research: Comment. American Economic Review 82: 363–367.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. P. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economic Statistics 99: 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Braunerhjelm, P.. 2005. The entrepreneurship-philanthropy nexus: Implications for internationalization. Management International Review 45 (3): 111–144.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Carlsson, B. and Karlsson, C.. 1999. Entrepreneurship, Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., FitzRoy, F., and Smith, I.. 2002. High technology employment and R&D in cities: Heterogeneity vs. specialization. Annals of Regional Science 36: 269–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Phillips, R. J.. 2002. Entrepreneurship and philanthropy in American capitalism. Small Business Economics 19 (3): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Storey, D. J.. 2004. Introduction: Entrepreneurship and economic development. Regional Studies 38 (8): 871–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Varga, A.. 2002. Geography, endogenous growth and innovation. International Regional Science Review 25: 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Varga, A. 2005. Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics 24 (3): 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P.. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, S. A., and Barney, J. B.. 2005. How do enterpreneurs organize under conditions of uncertainty?Journal of Management 31 (5): 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs, Z. J.. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovation. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselin, L 2000. Geographic spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric approach. Growth and Change 31: 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armington, C. 1995. Deriving establishment births from unemployment insurance data. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Research Conference. Washington, DC:Bureau of the Census, U. S. Dept. of Commerce.Google Scholar

Armington, C 1997. Statistics of U. S. business – microdata and tables of SBA/Census data on establishment size. Washington, DC:Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. P. 2004. Development of business data: Tracking firm count, growth, and turnover by size of firms. Washington, DC: Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.

Armington, C., and Acs, Z. J.. 2002. The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies 36: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armington, C., and Acs, Z. J. 2004. Job creation and persistence in services and manufacturing. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. 1962. The economic implication of learning by doing. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D. 1995a. Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organizations 13: 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D 1995b. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D 1999. Small Firms and Efficiency. Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact.Massachusetts:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Feldman, M. P.. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 630–640.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Fritsch, M.. 1994. The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies 28: 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Fritsch, M. 2002. Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies 36: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Keilbach, M.. 2004. Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies 38: 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auerswald, P. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the theory of the firm: The microeconomics of long term growth. George Mason University. Manuscript.

Autant-Bernard, C. 2001. Science and knowledge flows: Evidence from the French case. Research Policy 30: 1069–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Ph. Martin, Ottaviano, G. and Rober-Nicoud, F.. 2003. Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X.. 1995. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. 1996. Convergence across state and region. Brookings Papers in Economic Activity 2: 107–158.Google Scholar

Bartik, T. J. 1989. Small business start-ups in the U. S.: Estimates of the effects of characteristics of states. Southern Economic Journal 55: 1004–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, T. 1991. Commercial bank financing of white and black owned small business start-ups. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 13: 64–80.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 1993. Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 2003. The Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 2004. Entrepreneurship, enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine. Small Business Economics 23: 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, M. C. 2005. The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter (1982): A review of the literature. Working Paper 03–06, Druid, Copenhagen Business School.

Bhide, A. 2000. The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Birch, D. 1987. Job Creation in America: How Our Smallest Companies Put the Most People to Work. New York:The Free Press.Google Scholar

Blanchflower, D., and Oswald, A.. 1998. What makes an entrepreneur?Journal of Labor Economics 16: 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braunerhjelm, P., and Borgman, B.. 2004. Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975–99. Regional Studies 38: 929–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braunerhjelm, P., and Carlsson, B.. 1999. Industry clusters in Ohio and Sweden, 1975–1995. Small Business Economics 12: 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., and Saxenian, A.. 2001. Old economy inputs for ‘New Economy’ outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 835–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnegie, A. 1889. Wealth. North American Review, June.Google Scholar

Carree, M., and Klomp, L.. 1996. Small business and job creation: A comment. Small Business Economics 8: 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carree, M., Stel, A., Thurik, R. and Wennekers, S.. 2002. Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics 19 (3): 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, G. R., and Hannan, M. T.. 2000. The Demography of Corporation and Industries.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Casson, Mark. 1995. Entrepreneurship and Business Culture. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT:Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Casson, Mark 2003. Entrepreneurship, business culture and the theory of the firm. In Z. Acs and D. Audretsch, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 223–246.Google Scholar

Casson, Mark 2005. The individual-opportunity nexus: A review of Scott Shane: A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 24 (5): 423–430.Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred. 2000. A Nation Transformed by Information: How Information Has Shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the Present. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ciccone, Antonio. 2002. Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review 46: 213–327.CrossRef

Ciccone, C., and Hall, R. E.. 1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86: 54–70.Google Scholar

Cohen, W., and Levin, D.. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99: 569–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curti, M. 1957. The history of American philanthropy as a field of research. American Historical Review 62 (2): 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daily, C. M., McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., and Dalton, D. R.. 2002. Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management 28 (3): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, P., Lindmark, L., and Olofsson, C.. 1994. New firm formation and regional development in Sweden. Regional Studies 38: 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, S., Haltiwanger,, J. and Schuh, S.. 1996. Job Creation and Job Destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Denison, E. 1967. Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1963. Philosophy and Civilization. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar

Dickinson, F. G. 1970. The changing position of philanthropy in the American economy. New York:National Bureau of Economic Research. Distributed by Columbia University Press, New York.

Dixit, A., and Stiglitz, J. E.. 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67: 297–308.Google Scholar

Domar, E. 1946. Capital Expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrica 14: 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunford, M., Perrons, D., Really, B., and Bull., R. 2002. Citations, authors and referees, regional studies, 1981–2002. Regional Studies 36: 1053–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duranton, Gilles, and Puga, Diego. 2000. Diversity and specialization in cities: Why, where and when does it matter. Urban Studies 37: 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Economist, The. 2000. Sachs on globalization. June 24: 81–83.

Economist, The 2004. Doing well and doing good. July 29: 83–84.

Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations.London:Pinter.Google Scholar

Evans, D., and Jovanovic, B.. 1989. Estimates of a model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy 95: 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, D., and Leighton, L. S.. 1990. Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics 2: 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget. 1987. Standard Industrial Classification Manual.Washington, DC:NTIS Order No 87-100012.

Feldman, M. P. 1994. The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly 8: 66–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. P., and Audretsch, D. B.. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, I. 1930. The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fisher, M., and Varga, A.. 2003. Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science 37: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fölster, S. 2002. Do lower taxes stimulate self-employment. Small Business Economics 19: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritsch, M. 1997. New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics 9: 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A.. 1999. The Spatial Economy. Cambridge, MA.:MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fujita, M., and Thisse, J.-F.. 2002. Economics of Agglomeration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galbraith, J. K. 1956. American Capitalism. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Garten, J. E. 1992. A Cold Peace: America, Japan, Germany, and the Struggle for Supremacy. New York: Times Books.

Gartner, W. T. 1989. “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geroski, P. 1995. What do we know about entry?International Journal of Industrial Organization 13: 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaeser, E. L. 2000. The new economics of urban and regional growth. In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, edited by G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A.. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A.. 1995. Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics 36: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glendon, S. 1998. Urban life cycles. Harvard University. Mimeographed.

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2001. London Business School.

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2002. London Business School.

Greenwood, J., and Jovanovic, B.. 1998. Accounting for growth. Working Paper 6647, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contributions of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E.. 1991. Innovation and Growth in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guesnier, B. 1994. Regional variations in new firm formation in France. Regional Studies 28: 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gylfasson, T. 1999. Principles of Economic Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haltiwanger, J., and Krizan, C. J.. 1999. Small business and job creation in the United States: The role of new and young business. In Are Small Firms Important? edited by Z. J. Acs. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Hamer, J. H. 1998. Money and the moral order in late nineteenth and early twentieth-century American capitalism. Anthropological Quarterly 71: 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J.. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, B., and Kanter, S.. 1978. The political economy of states: Job-creation business incentives. American Institute of Planning Journal 44 (4): 425–435.Google Scholar

Harrod, R. 1939. An essay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, D., ed. 2003. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the Knowledge Economy. New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, M., and Hanvey, E.. 1995. Job generation and new small firms: Some evidence from the late 1980s. Small Business Economics 7: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35: 519–530.Google Scholar

Hebert, R. F., and Link, A. N.. 1982. The Entrepreneur. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Heilbroner, R. L. 1984. Economics and political economy: Marx, Keynes and Schumpeter. Journal of Economics Issues 18 (September): 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, V., Kuncore, A., and Turner, M.. 1995. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy 103: 1067–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtz-Eakin, D., and Kao, C.. 2003. Entrepreneurship and economic growth: The proof is in the productivity. Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University. Mimeographed.

Holtz-Eakin, D. and Rosen, H., eds. 2004. Public Policy and the Economy of Entrepreneurship. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hoover, E., and Vernon, R.. 1959. Anatomy of a Metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howitt, P. 1996. The Implications of Knowledge-Based Growth for Micro-Based Policies. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar

Illeris, S. 1986. New firm creation in Denmark: The importance of the cultural background. In New Firms and Regional Development in Europe, edited by B. Keeble and E. Wever. Croom Helm, UK:Beckerham.Google Scholar

Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. 1989. The real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957–970.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R.. 1993. Geography, location of knowledge spillovers as evidence of patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johannisson, B. 1984. A cultural perspective on small business – local climate. International Small Business Journal 2 (2): 31–41.Google Scholar

Jones, C. I. 1995a. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. I. 1995b. Time series test of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 495–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. I. 2002. Sources of U. S. economic growth in a world of ideas. American Economic Review 92: 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, W. K. 1961. The English background of modern philanthropy. American Historical Review 66 (2): 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorgenson, D. W. 2001. Information technology and the U. S. economy. American Economic Review 91: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanovic, B. 1982. Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanovic, B 2001. New technology and the small firm. Small Business Economics 16: 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanovic, B., and Rob, R.. 1989. The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Review of Economic Studies 56: 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judd, Kenneth L. 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53 (3): 567–585.CrossRef

Kaldor, N. 1961. Capital accumulation and economic growth. In The Theory of Capital, edited by F. Lutz and D. Hague. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Karlsson, C., and Acs, Z. J.. 2002. Institutions, entrepreneurship and firm growth: The case of Sweden. Special issue of Small Business Economics 19 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar

Keeble, D., and Walker, S.. 1994. New firms, small firms and dead firms: Spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies 28: 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, W. 2002. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review 92: 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, J. M. 1963. Essays in Persuasion. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Kieschnick, M. D. 1981. Taxes and Growth: Business Incentives and Economic Development. Washington, DC:Council of State Planning Agencies.Google Scholar

Kihlstrom, R., and Laffont, J.. 1979. A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy 59: 719–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchoff, B. 1994. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, B. A., Armington, C., Hasan, I., and Newbert, S.. 2002. The influence of R&D expenditures on new firm formation and economic growth. Washington, DC:Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.

Kirchhoff, B. A., and Greene, P. G.. 1998. Understanding the theoretical and empirical content of critiques of U. S. job creation research. Small Business Economics 10: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Knight, F 1944. Diminishing returns from investment. Journal of Political Economy 52: 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, P. 1991a. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, P 1991b. History and industry location: The case of the manufacturing belt. American Economic Review 81: 80–83.Google Scholar

Krugman, P 1998. Space: The final frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazear, E. P. 2002. Entrepreneurship. Working Paper 9106, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Lee, A. Y., Florida, R., and Acs., Z. J. 2004. Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation, Regional Studies 38 (8): 879–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, J. 2004. When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective public venture capital programs. In Public Policy and the Economics of Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Holtz-Eakin and H. Rosen. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1–22.Google Scholar

Levy, J. D. 1999. Tocqueville's Revenge: State, Society and Economics in Contemporary France.Boston:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Link, A. 1995. A Generosity of Spirit: The Early History of the Research Triangle Park.Research Triangle Park:The Research Triangle Foundation of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Link, A., and Scott, J.. 2003. The growth of Research Triangle Park. Small Business Economics 20: 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littunen, Hannu. 2000. “Networks and Locan environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms.”Small Business Economics 15 (1): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. E. 1979. On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. E. 1993. Making a miracle. Econometrica 61: 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luger, Michael. 2001. “Technology-led development.” Invited speech at National Economic Development Forum, Washington, DC, May 31.

Lundström, A., and Stevenson, L.. 2005. Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice. Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. 1988. Corruption and the Decline of Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. 8th ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mason, C. 1994. Spatial variations in enterprise: The geography of new firm formation. In Deciphering the Enterprise Culture, edited by R. Burows. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar

McKenzie, L. 1959. On the existence of a general equilibrium for a competitive market. Econometrica 27: 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelacci, C. 2003. Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. Economic Journal 113: 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R. 1992. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., Peck, M. J., and Kalachek, E. D.. 1967. Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy.Washington, D. C.:The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economics Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newsweek. 1997. The land of the handout. September 29: 34–36.

Nijkamp, P., and Poot, J.. 1998. Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Annals of Regional Science 32: 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, S. 2004. The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. 1967. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, M. E. 2000. Can Japan Compete?London:Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, J. E. 1993. Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from the cities. Journal of Urban Economics 34: 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, P. D. 1994. Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the United States, 1986–1990. Regional Studies 28: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, P. D. 1999. Creative destruction. In Entrepreneurship, Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy, edited by N. J. Acs, B. Carlsson and C. Karlsson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–136.Google Scholar

Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., and Maki, W. R.. 1994. Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U. S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics 7: 387–407.Google Scholar

Reynolds, P. D., Storey, D., and Westhead, P.. 1994. Cross national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies 28: 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robb, A. 1999. New data for dynamic analysis: The Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) File. Washington, DC: Center for Economic Studies, U. S. Bureau of the Census, CES 99–18.

Rocha, H. O. 2004. Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics 23: 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and economic growth. American Economic Review 94: 1002–1037.Google Scholar

Romer, P 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romer, P 1994. New goods, old theory and the cost of welfare restrictions. Journal of Development Economics 39 (1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, N. 1963. Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. Journal of Economic History 23: 414–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostow, W. 1990. Theories of Economic Growth from David Hume to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. 1983. Thunen at two hundred. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 1468–1488.Google Scholar

Savage, M., Dickens, P., and Fielding, T.. 1988. Some social and political implications of the contemporary fragmentation of the service class in Britain. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies 12 (3): 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitz, J. 1989. Imitation, entrepreneurship, and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 97: 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramm, C. F. 2004. Building entrepreneurial economies. Foreign Affairs July/August: 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramm, Carl J. 2005. Law outside the market: The social utility of the private foundation. The Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO.

Schumpeter, J. 1911. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. [English translation: The Theory of Economic Development.] Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J [1942] 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3d. ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J 1947. The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History 7: 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, J 2005. Development. Journal of Economic Literature 43 (March): 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S. 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S.. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25: 217–221.Google Scholar

Sharma, P., and Chrisman, J. J.. 1999. Towards a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 23 (3): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheshinski, E. 1967. Optimal accumulation with learning by doing. In Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, edited by K. Shell. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 31–52.Google Scholar

Simon, C., and Nardinelli, C.. 1996. The talk of the town: Human capital, information and the growth of English cities, 1861–1961. Explorations in Economic History 33: 384–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, C., and Nardinelli, C. 2002. Human capital and the rise of American cities, 1900–1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics 32: 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solow, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 614–623.Google Scholar

Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, Rolf, and Wennekers, Sander. 2005. Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Special issue on Causes and Effects of New Business Creation, guest eds. Sternberg and Wennekers. Small Business Economics 24 (3): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 1997. Wither Socialism? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. The Roaring Nineties.New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Storey, D. J. 1984. Editorial. Regional Studies 18: 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storey, D. J. 1991. The birth of new firms – does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics 3: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storey, D. J. 2003. Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by Z. J. Acs and D. Audretsch. Boston: Kluwer, 473–514.Google Scholar

Storey, D. J., and Johnson, A. M.. 1987. Job Generation and Labour Market Change. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streech, W., and Yamamura, K.. 2002. The Origins of Non-liberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison. New York:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sutton, J. 1997. Gibrat's legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 40–59.Google Scholar

Swan, T. 1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record 32: 334–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweeney, G. P. 1987. Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sweeney, G. P. 1991. Technical culture and the local dimension of entrepreneurial vitality. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 3: 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweeney, G. P. 1996. Learning efficiency, technological change and economic progress. International Journal of Technology Management 11: 5–27.Google Scholar

Thornton, P., and Flynn, K.. 2003. Entrepreneurship, networks and geographies. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by Z. J. Acs and D. Audretsch. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Tolbert, C. M., and Sizer, M.. 1996. U. S. commuting zones and Labor Market Areas: A 1990 update. Staff Paper No. AGES-9614, Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

U. S. Office of Management and Budget. 1987. Standard Industrial Classification Manual, Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

U. S. Small Business Administration. 1999. Statistics of U. S. Business – Microdata and Tables of SBA/Census Data. Washington DC: Office of Advocacy.

Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Varga, A. 1998. University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varga, A., and Schalk, H. J.. 2004. Knowledge spillovers, agglomeration and macroeconomic growth: An empirical approach. Regional Studies 38: 977–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Washington Post, The. 1996. US sails on tranquil economic seas. December 2.

Weizman, M. 1998. Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wennekers, S., and Thurik, R.. 1999. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics 13: 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York:The Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Winter, S. 1984. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J. 1984. The Changing Structure of the U. S. Economy.New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J. 1999. Public policies to support new technology-based firms (NTBFs). Science and Public Policy 26 (4): 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J. 2002. Innovation and the Growth of Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L. and Varga, A.. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C.. 1998. Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) Documentation. Washington DC: Center for Economic Studies, U. S. Bureau of the Census, CES 98–99.

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C. 2004a. The Impact of Geographic Differences in Human Capital on Service Firm Formation Rates. Journal of Urban Economics 56: 244–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C. 2004b. Employment Growth and Entrepreneurial Activity in Cities. Regional Studies 38: 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Armington, C. 2005. Using Census BITS To Explore Entrepreneurship, Geography, and Economic Growth. Washington, DC:Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D.. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. 2001. The Emergence of the Entrepreneurial Society. Handout by Swedish Foundation for Small Business, Stockholm, Sweden, May.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. eds. 2003. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B.. 2004. The missing link: The knowledge filter and endogenous growth. Working paper No. 4783, Center for Economic Research, London.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B. 2005. A knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. Mimeographed.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. P.. 1992. Real effects of academic research: Comment. American Economic Review 82: 363–367.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. P. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economic Statistics 99: 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Braunerhjelm, P.. 2005. The entrepreneurship-philanthropy nexus: Implications for internationalization. Management International Review 45 (3): 111–144.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., Carlsson, B. and Karlsson, C.. 1999. Entrepreneurship, Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Acs, Z. J., FitzRoy, F., and Smith, I.. 2002. High technology employment and R&D in cities: Heterogeneity vs. specialization. Annals of Regional Science 36: 269–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Phillips, R. J.. 2002. Entrepreneurship and philanthropy in American capitalism. Small Business Economics 19 (3): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Storey, D. J.. 2004. Introduction: Entrepreneurship and economic development. Regional Studies 38 (8): 871–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Varga, A.. 2002. Geography, endogenous growth and innovation. International Regional Science Review 25: 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, Z. J., and Varga, A. 2005. Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics 24 (3): 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P.. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, S. A., and Barney, J. B.. 2005. How do enterpreneurs organize under conditions of uncertainty?Journal of Management 31 (5): 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs, Z. J.. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovation. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselin, L 2000. Geographic spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric approach. Growth and Change 31: 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armington, C. 1995. Deriving establishment births from unemployment insurance data. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Research Conference. Washington, DC:Bureau of the Census, U. S. Dept. of Commerce.Google Scholar

Armington, C 1997. Statistics of U. S. business – microdata and tables of SBA/Census data on establishment size. Washington, DC:Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. P. 2004. Development of business data: Tracking firm count, growth, and turnover by size of firms. Washington, DC: Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.

Armington, C., and Acs, Z. J.. 2002. The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies 36: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armington, C., and Acs, Z. J. 2004. Job creation and persistence in services and manufacturing. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. 1962. The economic implication of learning by doing. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D. 1995a. Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organizations 13: 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D 1995b. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D 1999. Small Firms and Efficiency. Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact.Massachusetts:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Feldman, M. P.. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 630–640.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Fritsch, M.. 1994. The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies 28: 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Fritsch, M. 2002. Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies 36: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audretsch, D., and Keilbach, M.. 2004. Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies 38: 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auerswald, P. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the theory of the firm: The microeconomics of long term growth. George Mason University. Manuscript.

Autant-Bernard, C. 2001. Science and knowledge flows: Evidence from the French case. Research Policy 30: 1069–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Ph. Martin, Ottaviano, G. and Rober-Nicoud, F.. 2003. Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X.. 1995. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. 1996. Convergence across state and region. Brookings Papers in Economic Activity 2: 107–158.Google Scholar

Bartik, T. J. 1989. Small business start-ups in the U. S.: Estimates of the effects of characteristics of states. Southern Economic Journal 55: 1004–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, T. 1991. Commercial bank financing of white and black owned small business start-ups. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 13: 64–80.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 1993. Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 2003. The Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 2004. Entrepreneurship, enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine. Small Business Economics 23: 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, M. C. 2005. The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter (1982): A review of the literature. Working Paper 03–06, Druid, Copenhagen Business School.

Bhide, A. 2000. The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Birch, D. 1987. Job Creation in America: How Our Smallest Companies Put the Most People to Work. New York:The Free Press.Google Scholar

Blanchflower, D., and Oswald, A.. 1998. What makes an entrepreneur?Journal of Labor Economics 16: 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braunerhjelm, P., and Borgman, B.. 2004. Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975–99. Regional Studies 38: 929–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braunerhjelm, P., and Carlsson, B.. 1999. Industry clusters in Ohio and Sweden, 1975–1995. Small Business Economics 12: 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., and Saxenian, A.. 2001. Old economy inputs for ‘New Economy’ outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 835–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnegie, A. 1889. Wealth. North American Review, June.Google Scholar

Carree, M., and Klomp, L.. 1996. Small business and job creation: A comment. Small Business Economics 8: 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carree, M., Stel, A., Thurik, R. and Wennekers, S.. 2002. Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics 19 (3): 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, G. R., and Hannan, M. T.. 2000. The Demography of Corporation and Industries.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Casson, Mark. 1995. Entrepreneurship and Business Culture. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT:Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Casson, Mark 2003. Entrepreneurship, business culture and the theory of the firm. In Z. Acs and D. Audretsch, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 223–246.Google Scholar

Casson, Mark 2005. The individual-opportunity nexus: A review of Scott Shane: A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 24 (5): 423–430.Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred. 2000. A Nation Transformed by Information: How Information Has Shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the Present. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ciccone, Antonio. 2002. Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review 46: 213–327.CrossRef

Ciccone, C., and Hall, R. E.. 1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86: 54–70.Google Scholar

Cohen, W., and Levin, D.. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99: 569–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curti, M. 1957. The history of American philanthropy as a field of research. American Historical Review 62 (2): 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daily, C. M., McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., and Dalton, D. R.. 2002. Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management 28 (3): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, P., Lindmark, L., and Olofsson, C.. 1994. New firm formation and regional development in Sweden. Regional Studies 38: 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, S., Haltiwanger,, J. and Schuh, S.. 1996. Job Creation and Job Destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Denison, E. 1967. Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1963. Philosophy and Civilization. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar

Dickinson, F. G. 1970. The changing position of philanthropy in the American economy. New York:National Bureau of Economic Research. Distributed by Columbia University Press, New York.

Dixit, A., and Stiglitz, J. E.. 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67: 297–308.Google Scholar

Domar, E. 1946. Capital Expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrica 14: 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunford, M., Perrons, D., Really, B., and Bull., R. 2002. Citations, authors and referees, regional studies, 1981–2002. Regional Studies 36: 1053–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duranton, Gilles, and Puga, Diego. 2000. Diversity and specialization in cities: Why, where and when does it matter. Urban Studies 37: 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Economist, The. 2000. Sachs on globalization. June 24: 81–83.

Economist, The 2004. Doing well and doing good. July 29: 83–84.

Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations.London:Pinter.Google Scholar

Evans, D., and Jovanovic, B.. 1989. Estimates of a model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy 95: 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, D., and Leighton, L. S.. 1990. Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics 2: 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget. 1987. Standard Industrial Classification Manual.Washington, DC:NTIS Order No 87-100012.

Feldman, M. P. 1994. The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly 8: 66–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. P., and Audretsch, D. B.. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, I. 1930. The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fisher, M., and Varga, A.. 2003. Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science 37: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fölster, S. 2002. Do lower taxes stimulate self-employment. Small Business Economics 19: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritsch, M. 1997. New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics 9: 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A.. 1999. The Spatial Economy. Cambridge, MA.:MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fujita, M., and Thisse, J.-F.. 2002. Economics of Agglomeration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galbraith, J. K. 1956. American Capitalism. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Garten, J. E. 1992. A Cold Peace: America, Japan, Germany, and the Struggle for Supremacy. New York: Times Books.

Gartner, W. T. 1989. “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geroski, P. 1995. What do we know about entry?International Journal of Industrial Organization 13: 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaeser, E. L. 2000. The new economics of urban and regional growth. In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, edited by G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A.. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A.. 1995. Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics 36: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glendon, S. 1998. Urban life cycles. Harvard University. Mimeographed.

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2001. London Business School.

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2002. London Business School.

Greenwood, J., and Jovanovic, B.. 1998. Accounting for growth. Working Paper 6647, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contributions of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E.. 1991. Innovation and Growth in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guesnier, B. 1994. Regional variations in new firm formation in France. Regional Studies 28: 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gylfasson, T. 1999. Principles of Economic Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haltiwanger, J., and Krizan, C. J.. 1999. Small business and job creation in the United States: The role of new and young business. In Are Small Firms Important? edited by Z. J. Acs. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Hamer, J. H. 1998. Money and the moral order in late nineteenth and early twentieth-century American capitalism. Anthropological Quarterly 71: 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J.. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, B., and Kanter, S.. 1978. The political economy of states: Job-creation business incentives. American Institute of Planning Journal 44 (4): 425–435.Google Scholar

Harrod, R. 1939. An essay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, D., ed. 2003. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the Knowledge Economy. New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, M., and Hanvey, E.. 1995. Job generation and new small firms: Some evidence from the late 1980s. Small Business Economics 7: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35: 519–530.Google Scholar

Hebert, R. F., and Link, A. N.. 1982. The Entrepreneur. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Heilbroner, R. L. 1984. Economics and political economy: Marx, Keynes and Schumpeter. Journal of Economics Issues 18 (September): 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, V., Kuncore, A., and Turner, M.. 1995. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy 103: 1067–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtz-Eakin, D., and Kao, C.. 2003. Entrepreneurship and economic growth: The proof is in the productivity. Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University. Mimeographed.

Holtz-Eakin, D. and Rosen, H., eds. 2004. Public Policy and the Economy of Entrepreneurship. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hoover, E., and Vernon, R.. 1959. Anatomy of a Metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howitt, P. 1996. The Implications of Knowledge-Based Growth for Micro-Based Policies. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar

Illeris, S. 1986. New firm creation in Denmark: The importance of the cultural background. In New Firms and Regional Development in Europe, edited by B. Keeble and E. Wever. Croom Helm, UK:Beckerham.Google Scholar

Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. 1989. The real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957–970.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R.. 1993. Geography, location of knowledge spillovers as evidence of patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johannisson, B. 1984. A cultural perspective on small business – local climate. International Small Business Journal 2 (2): 31–41.Google Scholar

Jones, C. I. 1995a. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. I. 1995b. Time series test of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 495–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. I. 2002. Sources of U. S. economic growth in a world of ideas. American Economic Review 92: 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, W. K. 1961. The English background of modern philanthropy. American Historical Review 66 (2): 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorgenson, D. W. 2001. Information technology and the U. S. economy. American Economic Review 91: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanovic, B. 1982. Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanovic, B 2001. New technology and the small firm. Small Business Economics 16: 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovanovic, B., and Rob, R.. 1989. The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Review of Economic Studies 56: 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judd, Kenneth L. 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53 (3): 567–585.CrossRef

Kaldor, N. 1961. Capital accumulation and economic growth. In The Theory of Capital, edited by F. Lutz and D. Hague. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Karlsson, C., and Acs, Z. J.. 2002. Institutions, entrepreneurship and firm growth: The case of Sweden. Special issue of Small Business Economics 19 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar

Keeble, D., and Walker, S.. 1994. New firms, small firms and dead firms: Spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies 28: 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, W. 2002. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review 92: 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, J. M. 1963. Essays in Persuasion. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Kieschnick, M. D. 1981. Taxes and Growth: Business Incentives and Economic Development. Washington, DC:Council of State Planning Agencies.Google Scholar

Kihlstrom, R., and Laffont, J.. 1979. A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy 59: 719–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchoff, B. 1994. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, B. A., Armington, C., Hasan, I., and Newbert, S.. 2002. The influence of R&D expenditures on new firm formation and economic growth. Washington, DC:Office of Advocacy, U. S. Small Business Administration.

Kirchhoff, B. A., and Greene, P. G.. 1998. Understanding the theoretical and empirical content of critiques of U. S. job creation research. Small Business Economics 10: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Knight, F 1944. Diminishing returns from investment. Journal of Political Economy 52: 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, P. 1991a. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, P 1991b. History and industry location: The case of the manufacturing belt. American Economic Review 81: 80–83.Google Scholar

Krugman, P 1998. Space: The final frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazear, E. P. 2002. Entrepreneurship. Working Paper 9106, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Lee, A. Y., Florida, R., and Acs., Z. J. 2004. Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation, Regional Studies 38 (8): 879–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, J. 2004. When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective public venture capital programs. In Public Policy and the Economics of Entrepreneurship, edited by D. Holtz-Eakin and H. Rosen. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1–22.Google Scholar

Levy, J. D. 1999. Tocqueville's Revenge: State, Society and Economics in Contemporary France.Boston:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Link, A. 1995. A Generosity of Spirit: The Early History of the Research Triangle Park.Research Triangle Park:The Research Triangle Foundation of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Link, A., and Scott, J.. 2003. The growth of Research Triangle Park. Small Business Economics 20: 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littunen, Hannu. 2000. “Networks and Locan environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms.”Small Business Economics 15 (1): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. E. 1979. On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. E. 1993. Making a miracle. Econometrica 61: 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luger, Michael. 2001. “Technology-led development.” Invited speech at National Economic Development Forum, Washington, DC, May 31.

Lundström, A., and Stevenson, L.. 2005. Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice. Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. 1988. Corruption and the Decline of Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. 8th ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mason, C. 1994. Spatial variations in enterprise: The geography of new firm formation. In Deciphering the Enterprise Culture, edited by R. Burows. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar

McKenzie, L. 1959. On the existence of a general equilibrium for a competitive market. Econometrica 27: 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelacci, C. 2003. Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. Economic Journal 113: 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R. 1992. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., Peck, M. J., and Kalachek, E. D.. 1967. Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy.Washington, D. C.:The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economics Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newsweek. 1997. The land of the handout. September 29: 34–36.

Nijkamp, P., and Poot, J.. 1998. Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Annals of Regional Science 32: 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, S. 2004. The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. 1967. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, M. E. 2000. Can Japan Compete?London:Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, J. E. 1993. Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from the cities. Journal of Urban Economics 34: 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, P. D. 1994. Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the United States, 1986–1990. Regional Studies 28: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, P. D. 1999. Creative destruction. In Entrepreneurship, Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy, edited by N. J. Acs, B. Carlsson and C. Karlsson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–136.Google Scholar

Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., and Maki, W. R.. 1994. Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U. S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics 7: 387–407.Google Scholar

Reynolds, P. D., Storey, D., and Westhead, P.. 1994. Cross national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies 28: 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robb, A. 1999. New data for dynamic analysis: The Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) File. Washington, DC: Center for Economic Studies, U. S. Bureau of the Census, CES 99–18.

Rocha, H. O. 2004. Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics 23: 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and economic growth. American Economic Review 94: 1002–1037.Google Scholar

Romer, P 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romer, P 1994. New goods, old theory and the cost of welfare restrictions. Journal of Development Economics 39 (1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, N. 1963. Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. Journal of Economic History 23: 414–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostow, W. 1990. Theories of Economic Growth from David Hume to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. 1983. Thunen at two hundred. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 1468–1488.Google Scholar

Savage, M., Dickens, P., and Fielding, T.. 1988. Some social and political implications of the contemporary fragmentation of the service class in Britain. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies 12 (3): 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitz, J. 1989. Imitation, entrepreneurship, and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 97: 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramm, C. F. 2004. Building entrepreneurial economies. Foreign Affairs July/August: 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramm, Carl J. 2005. Law outside the market: The social utility of the private foundation. The Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO.

Schumpeter, J. 1911. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. [English translation: The Theory of Economic Development.] Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J [1942] 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3d. ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J 1947. The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History 7: 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, J 2005. Development. Journal of Economic Literature 43 (March): 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S. 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S.. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25: 217–221.Google Scholar

Sharma, P., and Chrisman, J. J.. 1999. Towards a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 23 (3): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheshinski, E. 1967. Optimal accumulation with learning by doing. In Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, edited by K. Shell. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 31–52.Google Scholar

Simon, C., and Nardinelli, C.. 1996. The talk of the town: Human capital, information and the growth of English cities, 1861–1961. Explorations in Economic History 33: 384–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, C., and Nardinelli, C. 2002. Human capital and the rise of American cities, 1900–1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics 32: 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solow, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 614–623.Google Scholar

Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, Rolf, and Wennekers, Sander. 2005. Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Special issue on Causes and Effects of New Business Creation, guest eds. Sternberg and Wennekers. Small Business Economics 24 (3): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 1997. Wither Socialism? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. The Roaring Nineties.New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Storey, D. J. 1984. Editorial. Regional Studies 18: 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storey, D. J. 1991. The birth of new firms – does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics 3: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storey, D. J. 2003. Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by Z. J. Acs and D. Audretsch. Boston: Kluwer, 473–514.Google Scholar

Storey, D. J., and Johnson, A. M.. 1987. Job Generation and Labour Market Change. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streech, W., and Yamamura, K.. 2002. The Origins of Non-liberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison. New York:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sutton, J. 1997. Gibrat's legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 40–59.Google Scholar

Swan, T. 1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record 32: 334–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweeney, G. P. 1987. Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sweeney, G. P. 1991. Technical culture and the local dimension of entrepreneurial vitality. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 3: 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweeney, G. P. 1996. Learning efficiency, technological change and economic progress. International Journal of Technology Management 11: 5–27.Google Scholar

Thornton, P., and Flynn, K.. 2003. Entrepreneurship, networks and geographies. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by Z. J. Acs and D. Audretsch. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Tolbert, C. M., and Sizer, M.. 1996. U. S. commuting zones and Labor Market Areas: A 1990 update. Staff Paper No. AGES-9614, Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

U. S. Office of Management and Budget. 1987. Standard Industrial Classification Manual, Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

U. S. Small Business Administration. 1999. Statistics of U. S. Business – Microdata and Tables of SBA/Census Data. Washington DC: Office of Advocacy.

Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Varga, A. 1998. University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers. Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varga, A., and Schalk, H. J.. 2004. Knowledge spillovers, agglomeration and macroeconomic growth: An empirical approach. Regional Studies 38: 977–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Washington Post, The. 1996. US sails on tranquil economic seas. December 2.

Weizman, M. 1998. Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wennekers, S., and Thurik, R.. 1999. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics 13: 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York:The Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Winter, S. 1984. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar