Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-wph62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T23:15:42.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Quantification revisited: revenge and social equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Linda Woodbridge
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

The desire for revenge

Is in the children of a tender age.

Locrine

Why were revenge plays so useful for exploring egalitarianism? The answer returns us to mathematics and quantification. Enamored of systems in balance – equations, double-entry bookkeeping, balance of trade, equally matched armies arranged in squares, the body's balanced humors, architectural symmetry – the age was starting to identify fairness with equal-sidedness. And revenge was symmetrical. A perfectly executed condign revenge was beautiful, with the bilateral symmetry of high Renaissance architecture – the Strozzi Palace in Florence, England's Longleat. The medieval word for beautiful, “fair,” came also in the Renaissance to mean “free from … injustice; equitable, legitimate” (OED). Fairness in human conduct was beautiful; and injustice could be re-beautified – made symmetrical, equitable – by compensatory action: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

Even such humble texts as William Scott's Essay on Drapery idealized bilateral equality. Trade's purpose was “the good of both parties,” a fair deal for buyer and seller: “If the price exceed the worth of the thing, or the thing exceed the price, the equality of justice is taken away” (18). Fairness meant equal satisfaction: “In the buying and selling of commodities,” a price is “agreed upon between both parties,” reflecting “equality in the value of things” (Malynes, Lex 91). Like an equation, ledger, or symmetrical palace, a mutually satisfactory commercial transaction embodied an ideal of balance.

Type
Chapter
Information
English Revenge Drama
Money, Resistance, Equality
, pp. 254 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×