Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T16:00:22.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Expanding the evidence base

from Part 4 - Special topics in psychiatric rehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Helen Killaspy
Affiliation:
Professor of Rehabilitation Psychiatry, Mental Health Sciences Unit, University College London
Steffan Davies
Affiliation:
Consultant Forensic and Rehabilitation Psychiatrist, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Tuke's (1813) Description of The Retreat (see Chapter 17, ‘Rehabilitation in hospital settings’) compares outcomes for ‘moral treatment’ favourably with the less progressive Leeds Asylum and Bethlem Hospital. Moral treatment has many parallels with modern rehabilitation (see below) and emphasised: strengthening and assisting the patient to control the disorder; coercion being employed only when absolutely necessary; and promoting the general comfort of the insane, including occupation and physical health. While attempts were made to provide evidence for programmes of treatment aimed at ‘rehabilitation’, the first high-quality evidence for their effectiveness probably came from the highly influential Three Hospitals Study (Wing & Brown, 1970), which compared the characteristics of longstay patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and the clinical culture of the wards in which they were receiving treatment. The study was carried out over an 8-year period and its cohort design allowed for investigation of the ‘direction of causality’. One of the three hospitals had a good reputation for the care of long-stay patients, including a focus on occupation and rehabilitation. The main finding was a positive association between the degree of stimulation of the therapeutic environment and the severity of patients’ ‘clinical poverty syndrome’ (characterised by social withdrawal, poverty of thought and blunted affect). Patients at the hospital that provided better-quality rehabilitation also showed less clinical disturbance and more autonomy than those in the comparison hospitals, and staff had greater optimism regarding their recovery. The Three Hospitals Study highlighted the negative consequences of ‘institutionalism’, a concept now very familiar to us, eloquently described by Erving Goffman in his book Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, published in 1961.

The social and political desire to ‘deinstitutionalise’ mental healthcare was one of the major drivers in the development of community-based services that took place in the latter half of the 20th century in the UK and other countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Enabling Recovery , pp. 436 - 448
Publisher: Royal College of Psychiatrists
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×