Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:59:23.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Patient Assessment: Pain Scales and Observation in Clinical Practice

from SECTION TWO - ANALGESIA FOR THE EMERGENCY PATIENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

John H. Burton
Affiliation:
Albany Medical College, New York
James Miner
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Tania D. Strout
Affiliation:
Maine Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Portland, ME
Dawn B. Kendrick
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
Get access

Summary

SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM

The measurement of a patient's pain intensity is inherently complex. The pain experience is unique to each individual, influenced by many factors such as medical condition, developmental level, emotional and cognitive state, culture, the hospital environment, family issues and attitudes, language barriers, and levels of fear and anxiety. The often chaotic, loud, and hurried emergency department (ED) environment only serves to compound these difficulties. It is well documented in scientific literature that oligoanalgesia is a significant issue within emergency medicine. In order to appropriately manage patients' pain, we must attempt to accurately assess their pain.

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT

There are multiple barriers to the clinical assessment of pain, including, but not limited to, provider biases, patient anxiety, family attitudes, cultural beliefs, and provider suspicion of “drug-seeking” behavior. The National Institutes of Health has stated that patient self-report is the most reliable indicator of the existence and intensity of pain. Barriers to pain assessment are greatest for those patient populations who cannot self-report their pain experience.

Pediatric patients and those with impaired cognition communicate and display pain in very different ways. Infants and young children often cry or whimper when they are in pain. They often cannot localize or describe their pain and, therefore, it may be difficult to assess and quantify. This may be similar in the elderly patient with dementia or other cognitive and communicative impairments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Summers, S.Evidence-based practice part 2: Reliability and validity of selected acute pain instruments. J Perianesth Nurs 2001;16(1):35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, KH.Pain assessment instruments for use in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005;23: 285–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melzack R, Casey KL. Sensory, motivational, and central control determinants of pain. A new conceptual model. In The skin senses, ed. Kenshalo, DR. Springfield, MA: Charles C. Thomas, 1968, pp. 423–443.Google Scholar
Bijur, PE, Latimer, CT, Gallagher, EJ.Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med2003;10(4):390–392.
Berthier, F, Potel, G, Leconte, P, Touze, MD, Baron, D.Comparative study of methods of measuring acute pain intensity in an ED. Am J Emerg Med1998;16(2):132–136.
Kendrick, DB, Strout, TD.The minimum clinically significant difference in patient-assigned numeric scores for pain. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23(7):828–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acute Pain Management Guideline Panel. Acute pain management: Operative or medical procedures and trauma: Clinical practice guideline. AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0032. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
McCormack, HM, Horne, DJ, Sheather, S.Clinical applications of visual analog scales: A critical review. Psychol Med 1998;18(4):1007–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, MP, Karoly, P, Braver, S.The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27(1):117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong DL. Validity of a FACES Pain Rating Scale with an adult population. Published online March 15, 2002, http://www3.us.elsevierhealth.com/WOW/faces11.html, last accessed on August 15, 2006.
Berg DM. Pain assessment tool preference among adults. Published online on March 15, 2002, http://www3.us.elsevierhealth.com/WOW/faces16Berg.html, last accessed on August 15, 2006.
Krulewitch, H, London, MR, Skakel, VJ, Lundstedt, GJ, Thomason, H, Brummel-Smith, K.Assessment of pain in cognitively impaired older adults: A comparison of pain assessment tools and their use by nonprofessional caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;48(12):1607–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, CF, Ling, SM, Remsburg, R.Comparison of pain assessment instruments in cognitively intact and impaired nursing home residents. Geriatr Nurs 2000;21(1):20–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bieri, D, Reeve, RA, Champion, GD, Addicoat, L, Ziegler, JB.The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain 1990;41(2):139–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuppy, DJ.The Faces Pain Scale: Reliability and validity with mature adults. Appl Nurs Res 1988;11(2):84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, AA, Murphy, E, Morton, J, Stempel, A, Messenger-Rioux, C, Bennett, K.Preverbal, Early Verbal Pediatric Pain Scale (PEPPS): Development and early psychometric testing. J Pediatr Nurs 1999;14(1):19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, AA, Strout, TD, Jordan, P, Worthing, B.Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of iontophoresis with lidocaine for dermal anesthesia in ED pediatric patients. J Emerg Nurs 2002;28(4):289–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krechel, SW, Bildner, J.CRIES: A new neonatal postoperative pain measurement score. Initial testing of validity and reliability. Pediatr Anesth 1995;5(1):53–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, KD, Asmundson, GJ, McCreary, DR.Factorial validity of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Eur J Pain 2001;5(3):279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzack, R.The McGill Pain Questionnaire: From description to measurement. Anesthesiology 2005;103(1):199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, B, Pasternak, S, Wallenstein, SL, Houde, RW, Holland, JC, Foley, KM.The Memorial Pain Assessment Card: A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain. Cancer 1987;60(5):1151–1158.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdek, MA, Pronovost, PJ.Improving assessment and treatment of pain in the critically ill. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16(1):59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labus, JS, Keefe, FJ, Jensen, MP.Self-reports of pain intensity and direct observations of pain behavior: When are they correlated?Pain 2003;102(1–2):109–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, DB, Dahl, JL.Editorial quality improvement challenges in pain management. Pain 2004;107(1–2):1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×