Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T19:41:52.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Self-regulation and embryo experimentation in Australia: A critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Pascal Kasimba
Affiliation:
Makerere University
Peter Singer
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Helga Kuhse
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Stephen Buckle
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Karen Dawson
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Pascal Kasimba
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

The question of what form IVF regulation should take is emerging as a rational consideration from the rather emotional excitement that has characterized the response to embryo experimentation. This chapter analyses self-regulation to see how far it is a satisfactory approach to regulating embryo experimentation. In order to examine the problem I shall define self-regulation, present and appraise the self-regulation structure in Australia and analyse the practical and theoretical arguments that surround it. Although the focus is on Australia, the issues to be examined are universal.

Before proceeding, a few broad observations need to be made. Although the predominant issue is human embryo experimentation, the self-regulation structure that has evolved in Australia has largely been in the area of human experimentation. It is this general scheme that some seek to extend to the embryo. While this may be a good starting point to assess the record of self-regulation, we need to keep in mind the shifting moral bases that underly human and human embryo experimentation. It is also worth observing that the ethical codes, guidelines and behaviour that form the core of the self-regulation approach revolve around the professional medical practitioner. This relationship should be kept in mind since the issue of embryo experimentation, perhaps more than human experimentation, is outside the doctor–patient relationship and encompasses researchers from other scientific disciplines.

What is self-regulation?

Although one hears of suggestions that embryo research should be left to self-regulation, the meaning of ‘self-regulation’ frequently varies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×