Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T16:51:40.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Public policy in a pluralist society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

R.M. Hare
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Peter Singer
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Helga Kuhse
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Stephen Buckle
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Karen Dawson
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Pascal Kasimba
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

What is the proper relation between the moral principles that should govern public policy, including legislation, and moral principles which may be held—often passionately—by individuals, including individual legislators? The adherents of such ‘personal’ principles often object that proposed laws would allow people, or even compel them, to transgress the principles. Obvious examples are homosexuality and abortion law reform. People who think homosexuality an abominable sin object to the repeal of laws that make it a crime; and those who think that abortion is as wrong as murder of grown people object that a law permitting abortion in certain cases might make it permissible for other people to—as they would say—murder unborn children, or even, if they are nurses and want to keep their jobs, compel them to do so themselves.

So the question we have to consider is really this: what weight ought to be given to the objections of these people when framing and debating legislation and policy? We live in a pluralist society, which means that the moral principles held sacred among different sections of society are divergent and often conflicting; and we live in a democratic society, in which, therefore, policy and legislation have to be decided on by procedures involving voting by all of us or by our representatives; so the question becomes: what attention should we pay, whether we are legislators in parliaments or simply voters in a constituency, to the personal moral opinions of other people, or even to our own?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×