Adserà, Alícia, and Boix, Carles. 2002. “Trade, Democracy and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness.” International Organization 56 (2): 229–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, Alberto, and Drazen, Allan. 1991. “Why Are Stabilizations Delayed.” American Economic Review 81(5): 1170–1188.Google Scholar

Alesina, A., John Londregan, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1993. “A Model of the Political Economy of the United States.” American Political Science Review 87: 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A., and Rosenthal, H.. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A., Roubini, N., and Cohen, G.. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alford, Robert R. 1963. Party and Society: The Anglo-American Democracies. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Alt, James E. 1991. “Ambiguous Intervention: The Role of Government Action in Public Evaluation of the Economy.” In Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Jean-Dominique Lafay, , eds., Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Alt, James E., and Chrystal, K. Alec. 1983. Political Economics. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Press.Google Scholar

Alt, James, and Lassen, David. 2006. “Transparency, Political Polarization and Political Business Cycles in OECD Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3) (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael, Cheibub, Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Summer): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1995. “Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 39(3): 714–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998a. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998b. “Economics, Entitlements and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 1349–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael,Nagler, Jonathan, and Jennifer, R. Willette. 2000. “Measuring the Relative Impact of Issues and the Economy in Democratic Elections.” Electoral Studies 19: 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael, Nagler, Jonathan, and Bowler, Shaun. 2000. “Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections.” American Political Science Review 94: 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Cameron D. 2006. “Economic Voting and Multi-Level Governance: A Comparative Individual-Level Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2) (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Christopher J. 1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Anderson, Christopher J. 2000. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 19: 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Andy. 2003. “Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences.” World Politics 55: 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Andy. 2005. “Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 925–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barro, Robert. 1973. “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model.” Public Choice 14: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M., and Zaller, John. 2001. “Presidential Vote Models: A Recount.” Political Science and Politics 34: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartle, John. 2001. “The Measurement of Party Identification in Britain: Where Do We Stand Now?” In Tonge, Jon, Bennie, Lynn, Denver, David, and Harrison, Lisa (eds.), British Elections & Parties Review, Volume 11. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar

Bartollini, S., and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bean, Clive, and Mughan, Anthony. 1989. “Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain.” American Political Science Review 83: 1165–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bean, Clive. 1996. “Partisanship and Electoral Behaviour in Comparative Perspective.” In Simms, M., ed., The Paradox of Parties: Australian Political Parties in the 1990s. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Bean, Clive. 2001 “Party Politics, Political Leaders and Trust in Government in Australia.” Political Science 53: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Nathaniel. 1991. “The Economy and Presidential Approval: An Information Theoretic Perspective.” In Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Jean-Dominique Lafay, , eds., Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Gary, Becker S. 1983. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 371–400.Google Scholar

Begg, David K. H. 1982. The Rational Expectations Revolution in Macroeconomics: Theories and Evidence. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bellucci, Paolo. 1985. “Economic Concerns in Italian Electoral Behavior: Toward a Rational Electorate?” In Eulau, Heinz and Michael, S. Lewis-Beck, eds., Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The United States and Western Europe. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar

Bellucci, Paolo. 1991. “Italian Economic Voting: A Deviant Case or Making a Case for a Better Theory? 1953–1979.” In Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Jean-Dominique Lafay, , eds., Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.

Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Blais, Andre, Turgeon, Mathieu, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard. 2004. “Which Matters Most? Comparing the Impact of Issues and the Economy in American, British and Canadian Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, Howard, and Price, Douglas. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession.” American Political Science Review 69: 124–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borre, Ole. 1984. “Critical Electoral Change in Scandinavia.” In Russell, J. Dalton, Scott, C. Flannigan, and Beck, Paul Allen, eds., Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Borre, Ole. 1997. “Economic Voting in Danish Electoral Surveys 1987–1994.” Scandinavian Political Studies 20(4): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, Jake, and Katherine, W. Drake. 2005. “EDA for HLM.” Political Analysis (Autumn) 13(4): 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun. 1990. “Consistency and Inconsistency in Canadian Party Identifications: Toward an Institutional Approach.” Electoral Studies 9: 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 1994. “Economic Conditions and Voting on Ballot Propositions.” American Politics Quarterly 22: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W. 1993. “The Causes and Consequences of Divided Government: Toward a New Theory of American Politics.” American Political Science Review 77(2): 407–19.Google Scholar

Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis 11(3): 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brug, Wouter, Eijk, Cees, and Franklin, Mark. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Effects of Economic Conditions on Voter Preferences and Election Outcomes in Fifteen Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, Ian. 1994. “A New Spatial Model of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally.” British Journal of Political Science 24(4): 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Denis, eds. 1976. Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

De, BuenoMesquita, Bruce, and Randolph, M. Siverson. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89: 841–855.Google Scholar

Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1976. Political Change in Britain. Second College Edition. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Butler, David, and Kavanagh, Dennis. 1997. The British General Election of 1997. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, B. E. (1978): “Strategic Voting in Britain.” American Journal of Political Science, 22(3): 639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callaghan, James. 1987. Time and Chance. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Cameron, David R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72: 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Chaffee, Steven H., and Kanihan, Stacey Frank. 1996. “How Americans Get Political Information: Print versus Broadcast News.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546: 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Henry, and Keech, William. 1985. “A New View of Political Accountability of Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review 79: 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Henry, and Linda, G. Viega. 2000. “Economics and Elections in Western Europe: 1960–1997.” Electoral Studies 19: 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Adam Przeworski. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Przeworski, Adam, Susan, C. Stokes, and Manin, Bernard, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, William R., Reichert, Usha, Lomas, Sandra, and Parker, Kevin L.. 1998. “International and Domestic Constraints on Political Budget Cycles in OECD Economies.” International Organization 52: 7–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold, Kornberg, Allan, and Wearing, Peter. 2000. A Polity on the Edge: Canada and the Politics of Fragmentation. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Marianne, C. Stewart, and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold, and Marianne, C. Stewart. 1995. “Economic Evaluations, Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support: Rival Models Considered.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold, and Marianne, C. Stewart. 1996. “Economists and Electorates: The Subjective Economy of Governing Party Support in Canada.” European Journal of Political Research 28: 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold, Marianne, C. Stewart, and Whiteley, Paul. 1997. “Tory Trends: Party Identification and the Dynamics of Conservative Support since 1992.” British Journal of Political Science 27: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Apter, D., ed., Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Munger, Michael. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections.” American Political Science Review 83 (March): 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cukierman, Alex, and Allan Meltzer. 1986. “A Theory of Ambiguity, Credibility, and Inflation under Discretion and Asymmetric Information.” Econometrica 54: 1099–1128.

Cukierman, Alex, and Allan, H. Meltzer. 1989. “A Political Theory of Government Debt and Deficits in a Neo-Ricardian Framework.” American Economics Review 79: 713–733.Google Scholar

Cutler, F. 2004. “Electoral Behaviour in a Federal Context: The Consequences of Confusion.” Publius 34 (Spring): 19–38.

Dalton, Russell J. 2002. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell, and Wattenberg, Martin, eds. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Suzanna, Boef, and Paul, M. Kellstedt. 2004. “The Political (and Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 633–649.Google Scholar

Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dow, Jay K., and James, W. Endersby. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Duch, Raymond M. 2001. “A Developmental Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 895–910.Google Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., and Palmer, Harvey. 2002a. “Heterogeneous Perceptions of Economic Conditions in Cross-National Perspective.” In Dorussen, Han and Taylor, Michaell, eds. Economic Voting.Google Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., and Palmer, Harvey. 2002b. “Strategic Voting in Post-Communist Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science (Spring): 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., Harvey, D. Palmer, and Christopher, J. Anderson. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 635–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., Randy Stevenson, and Jeff May. 2007. “Comparing Multinomial Estimation Methods.” Unpublished manuscript, Nuffield College, Oxford.

Duch, Raymond M., and Randy Stevenson. 2007. “The Economy: Do Voters Get It Right?” Manuscript, Nuffield College University of Oxford, available at http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/economicvoting.

Raymond, Duch M., and Stevenson, Randy. 2005. “Context and the Economic Vote: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Political Analysis 13(4): 387–409.Google Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., and Strom, Kaare. 2004. “Liberty, Authority, and the New Politics: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16(3): 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., and Taylor, Michael. 1993. “Post-Materialism and the Economic Condition.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 747–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebeid, Michael, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2006. “Economic Geography and Economic Voting: Evidence from the U.S. States.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elgie, Robert. 1999. “The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism.” In Elgie, Robert, ed., Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 2004. “Macro vs. Micro-Level Perspectives on Economic Voting: Is the Micro-Level Evidence Endogenously Induced?” Paper prepared for the 2004 Political Methodology Meetings, July 29–31, Stanford University.

Erikson, Robert S. 1990. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macro-Level Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83: 568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., Michael, B. MacKuen, and James, A. Stimson. 2000. “Bankers or Peasants Revisited: Economic Expectations and Presidential Approval.” Electoral Studies 19: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., Michael, B. MacKuen, and James, A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Geoffrey. 1999a. “Economics and Politics Revisited: Exploring the Decline in Conservative Support, 1992–1995.” Political Studies 47: 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Geoffrey. 1999b. The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Geoffrey, and Andersen, Robert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics 68(1): 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fair, Ray C. 1978. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Przeworski, Adam, Susan, C. Stokes, and Manin, Bernard, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fey, Mark. 1997. “Stability and Coordination in Duverger's Law: A Formal Model of Preelection Polls and Strategic Voting.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 426–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel Abrams, and Jeremy Pope. 2003. “The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: Can Retrospective Voting Be Saved?” British Journal of Political Science 33: 163–187.

Fischer, Stanley. 2003. “Globalization and Its Challenges.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 93(2): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maldonado, Fraile Marta. 2001. Does the Economy Enter the Ballot-Box? A Study of the Spanish Voters' Decisions. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar

Franklin, Mark, Mackie, Tom, Valen, Henry, et al. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Franzese, Robert J. 2002a. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franzese, Robert J. 2002b. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 369–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franzese, Robert J. 2003. “Multiple Hands on the Wheel: Empirically Modeling Partial Delegation and Shared Policy Control in the Open and Institutionalized Economy.” Political Analysis 11: 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, John. 2007. “Democracy and Markets in the Twenty-first Century: An Agenda.” In Peter Nardulli, ed., Democracy in the Twenty-first Century: International Perspectives. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Frey, B. 1979. “Politometrics of Government Behavior in a Democracy.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81: 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, Bruno S., and Garbers, Hermann. 1971. “Politicio-Economics – On Estimation in Political Economy.” Political Studies 19: 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frieden, Jeffrey A. 1991. “Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance.” International Organization 45: 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, Dieter, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1989. “The Left-Right Schema.” In Jennings, M. Kent and Deth, J., eds., Continuities in Political Action. Berlin: deGruyter.Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey. 2000. “Capital Mobility, Exchange Rates and Fiscal Policy in the Global Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 7: 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffery. 1998a. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffery. 1998b. “Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle?” International Organization 52(4): 787–824.

Gavin, Michael, and Hausmann, Ricardo. 1996. “Sources of Macroeconomic Volatility in Developing Economies.” Manuscript. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, February 1996.Google Scholar

Gavin, Neil, and David Sanders. 1997. “The Economy and Voting.” In Norris, Pippa and Gavin, N., eds., Britain Votes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, A. 1973: “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result.” Econometrica 41: 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, Miriam. 2000. “Is Increasing International Economic Integration Bad for Labor?” Los Angeles: University of California, available at http://www.shelley.polisci.ucla.edu/data/papers/g98.pdf.Google Scholar

Golden, Miriam, Peter Lange, and Michael Wallerstein. 1995. “The End of Corporatism? Wage Setting in the Nordic and Germanic Countries.” In Sanford, M. Jacoby, ed., Workers of Nations: Industrial Relations in a Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H. 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H., Browne, W. J., and Rasbash, J. 2002. “Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models.” Understanding Statistics 1: 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomez, Brad T., and Wilson, J. Matthew. 2006. “Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates,” American Journal of Political Science 50: 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodhart, Charles A. E., and Bhansali, R. J.. 1970. “Political Economy.” Political Studies 18: 43–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Gwartney, James, and Lawson, Robert. 2006. Economic Freedom of the World: 2006 Annual Report. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute, available at http://www.freetheworld.com/release.html.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter. 1999. “The Political Economics of Europe in an Era of Interdependence.” In Kitschelt, Herbery, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and John, D. Stephens, eds., Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Peter, ed. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Haller, Brandon H., and Norpoth, Helmut. 1994. “Let the Good Times Roll: The Economic Expectations of U.S. Voters.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallerberg, Mark. 2000. “The Role of Parliamentary Committees in the Budgetary Process within Europe.” In Strauch, R. and Hagen, J., eds., Institutions, Politics and Fiscal Policy. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Havrilesky, Thomas M. 1987. “A Partisanship Theory of Fiscal and Monetary Regimes.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 19: 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellwig, Timothy T. 2001. “Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting.” Journal of Politics 63(4): 1141–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellwig, Timothy T. 2006. “Globalization, Room to Maneuver Constraints and Vote Choice.” Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Hellwig, Timothy T., and Samuels, David. 2007. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 37: 1–26.Google Scholar

Henisz, Witold J. 2004. “Political Institutions and Policy Volatility.” Economics and Politics 16: 1954–1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, Douglas. 1993. Solidarity or Egoism?Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr. 2000. “Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Public Choice 104(1–2): 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, Douglas A., Jr. 2006. “Voting and the Macro-Economy.” In Weingast, Barry and Whittman, Donald, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Douglas A., Jr., and Vasilatos, Nicholas. 1981. “Economics and Politics in France: Economic Performance and Political Support for Presidents Pompidou and Giscard d'Estaing.” European Journal of Political Research 9:133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael, C. Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmberg, Soren. 1994. “Party Identification Compared across the Atlantic.” In Jennings, M. Kent and Thomas, E. Mann, eds., Elections at Home and Abroad. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D., and Matthew, J. Gabel. 2000. “Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifesto Data.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 94–103.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1984. “The Changing Structure of Political Cleavages in Western Society.” In Dalton, Russell J., Scott, C. Flanagan, and Beck, Paul Allen, eds., Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

International Monetary Fund. 2005. World Economic Outlook April 2005: Globalization and External Imbalances. Washington, DC: IMF.

Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2nd Edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jenson, Jane. 1976. “Party Loyalty in Canada: The Question of Party Identification.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 8: 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Henry, E. Brady, and Crête, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Jusko, Karen Long, and Shively, W. Phillips. 2005. “A Two-Step Strategy for the Analysis of Cross National Public Opinion Data.” Political Analysis (Autumn) 13(4): 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, P. J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kayser, Mark A., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote.”, Washington, DC, September 1–4.Google Scholar

Kedar, Orit. 2005a. “How Diffusion in Parliament Affects Vote Choice: Two-Step Analysis.” Political Analysis 13(4): 410–29.Google Scholar

Kedar, Orit. 2005b. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99(2): 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keech, William. 1995. Economic Politics and the Costs of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Udell, Michael. 1998. “Twenty-Five Years after Kramer: An Assessment of Economic Retrospective Voting Based upon Improved Estimates of Income and Unemployment.” Economics in Politics 10: 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Grievances and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Discontents and Collective Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, and Jonathan, N. Katz. 1999. A Statistical Model for Multi-Party Electoral Data.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 15–32.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingemann, Hans Dieter. 1979. “The Background of Ideological Conceptualization.” In Samuel, H. Barnes and Kaase, M., eds., Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65: 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate-Versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77: 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, Jonathan, and Lenz, Gabriel. 2004. “Emotions and Voting Behavior: A Critique.”, Chicago, IL, April 15–18.Google Scholar

Lafay, Jean-Dominique. 1977. “Les conséquences électorales de la conjoncture économique: Essaie de prévision chiffrée pour Mars 1978.” Vie et Sciences Economiques 75:1–7.Google Scholar

Lane, Philip R. 1997. “Inflation in Open Economies.” Journal of International Economics 42: 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, Philip R. 2001. “The New Open Economy Macroeconomics: A Survey.” Journal of International Economics 54 (August) 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lau, Richard R. 1994. “An Analysis of the Accuracy of ‘Trial Heat’ Polls During the 1992 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58(1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael, and W. Ben Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.

Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” American Political Science Review 84: 873–890.

Laver, Michael, and Budge, Ian, eds. 1992. Party, Policy, and Government Coalitions. London: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lecaillon, J. 1981. “Popularite des Gouverments et Popularite Economique.” Consummation 3: 17–50.Google Scholar

LeDuc, Lawrence. 1981. “The Dynamic Properties of Party Identification: A Four-Nation Comparison.” European Journal of Political Research 9: 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmbrunch, Gerhard, and Schmitter, Philippe, eds. 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jeff, and Linzer, Drew. 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates.” Political Analysis 13(4): 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1980. “Economic Conditions and Executive Popularity: The French Experience.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1983. “Economics and the French Voter: A Microanalysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1996. “Electoral Inquiry Cross-National Election Surveys: A French Pre-test.” Electoral Studies 15(4): 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1997a. “Le vote du ‘porte-monnaie’ en question.” In Boy, D., and Mayer, N., eds., L'Electeur a Ses Raisons. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Naitonale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1997b. “Who's the Chief? Economic Voting under a Dual Executive.” European Journal of Political Research 31: 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2001. Evaluation economique et vote en France et en Allemagne, L'Opinion Europeenne. In Dominique Reyniè and Bruno Cautrés eds., Presses de Sciences po, Paris, 101–122.

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Nadeau, Richard. 2000. “French Electoral Institutions and the Economic Vote.” Electoral Studies 19: 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mitchell, Glenn. 1990. “Modelos Transnacionales de Voto Economico: Estudio de un Conjunto de Paises Europeos.” Revista del Instituto de Estudios Economicos 4: 65–81.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Heinz Eulau. 1985. “Introduction: Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes in Trans-National Perspective.” In Eulau, Heinz and Michael, S. Lewis-Beck, eds., Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The United States and Western Europe. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Paldam, Martin. 2000. “Editorial: Economic Voting: An Introduction.” Electoral Studies 2: 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Richard Nadeau. 2004. “Dual Governance and Economic Votings: France and the United States. In The French Voter Before and After the 2002 Election, ed. Michael Lewis-Beck. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2006. “Economic Models of Voting.” In Dalton, Russell and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, , eds. Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leyden, Kevin M., and Stephen A. Borrelli. 1995. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on Gubernatorial Elections: Does Unified Government Make a Difference?” Political Research Quarterly 48: 275–300.

Lijphart, Arend. 1981. “Political Parties: Ideologies and Programs.” In Butler, David, Howard, R. Penniman, and Ranney, Austin, eds., Democracy at the Polls: A Comparative Study of Competitive National Elections. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Reprinted in Peter Mair, ed., 1990. The West European Party System. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lindbeck, A. 1975. “Business Cycles, Politics and International Economic Depedence.” Skandinaviska Enskilden Bank Quarterly Review 2: 53–68.Google Scholar

Lindbeck, A. 1976. “Stabilization in Open Economies with Endogenous Politicians.” American Economics ReviewPapers and Proceedings (May): 1–19.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1: 51–69.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential versus Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In Linz, Juan and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy,Volume 2: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–90.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Seymour, M. Lipset and Rokkan, Stein, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lockerbie, Brad. 1992. “Prospective Voting in Presidential Elections, 1956–1988.” American Politics Quarterly 20: 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau. 1995 “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89 (June): 309–326.

Lowry, Robert C., James, E. Alt, and Karen, E. Ferree. 1998. “Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States.” American Political Science Review 92: 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKuen, Michael B., and Steven, L. Coombs. 1981. More Than News: Media Power in Public Affairs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

MacKuen, Michael B., Robert, S. Erikson, and James, A. Stimson. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers?: The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madsen, H. 1980. “Electoral Outcomes and Macro-Economic Policies: The Scandinavian Cases.” In Whitely, P., ed., Models of Political Economy. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. 1997. Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, Gregory. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marra, Robin F., and Charles, W. Ostrom. 1989. “Explaining Seat Change in the US House of Representatives, 1950–1986.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 541–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, Gregory. 1992. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Maravall, José Maria, and Adam Przeworski. 1998. “Political Reactions to the Economy: The Spanish Experience.” Estudio/Working Paper 1998/127. Juan March Institute, Madrid, December.

Martin, Larry, and Randolf Stevenson. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science. 45(1): 33–50.CrossRef

Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?” European Economic Review 49(6): 1393–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKelvey, Richard, and Peter Ordeshook. 1972. “A General Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” In Herndon, J. F. and Bernd, J. L, eds., Mathematical Applications in Political Science, vol. 6. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar

Meisel, John. 1975. Working Papers on Canadian Politics. 2nd edition. Montreal and Kingston: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Arthur H., and Ola Listhaug. 1985. “Economic Effects on the Vote in Norway.” In Eulau, Heinz and Michael, S. Lewis-Beck, eds., Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The United States and Western Europe. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar

Miller, William L., and Mackie, Myles. 1973. “The Electoral Cycle and the Asymmetry of Government and the Opposition Popularity: An Alternative Model of the Relationship between Economic Conditions and Political Popularity.” Political Studies 621: 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, W. E., and Shanks, J. M.. (1996). The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, W. L., and R. G. Niemi. 2002. “Voting: Choice, Conditioning, and Constraint.” In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R., and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Mueller, John. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review 65: 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mundell, Robert A. 1962. “The Appropriate Use of Monetary and Fiscal Policy under Fixed Exchange Rates.” IMF Staff Paper 9: 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mundell, Robert A. 1963. “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 29: 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mundell, Robert A. 1964. “A Reply: Capital Mobility and Size.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 30: 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myerson, R. 1999. “Theoretical Comparison of Electoral Systems. 1998 Joseph Schumpeter Lecture.” European Economic Review 43: 671–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myerson, R. 1993. “Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption: A Game Theoretic Analysis.” Games and Economic Behaviour 5: 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myerson, Roger, and Weber, Robert. 1993. “A Theory of Voting Equilibria.” American Political Science Review 87: 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadeau, Richard, and Blais, A.. 1993. “Explaining Elections Outcomes in Canada: Economy and Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26: 775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadeau, Richard, Richard, G. Niemi, David, P. Fan, and Amato, Timothy. 1999. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics 61(1): 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadeau, , and Lewis-Beck, . 2004. “Dual Governance and the Economic Vote: France and the United States.” in The French Voter: Before and After the 2002 Elections. Palgrave Macmillan.

Nadeau, Richard, and Michael, S. Lewis-Beck. 2001. “National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections,” Journal of Politics 63: 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadeau, Richard, Richard, G. Niemi, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2002. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context across Time and Nations.” Electoral Studies 21: 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, Peter and Paldam, Martin. 1995. “It's the Government's Fault! A Cross-Section Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1990/93.” European Journal of Political Research 28: 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 1997a. “From the Pocketbook of the Welfare Man: A Pooled Cross-Section Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1986–1992.” British Journal of Political Science 27: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 1997b. “The Grievance Asymmetry Revisited: A Micro Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1986–92.” European Journal of Political Economy 13: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 2000. “Into Pandora's Box of Economic Evaluations. A Study of the Danish Macro VP-Function 1986–1997.” Electoral Studies 19: 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickelsburg, Michael, and Norpoth, Helmut. 2000. “Commander-in-Chief or Chief Economist? The President in the Eye of the Public.” Electoral Studies 19: 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemi, Richard, and Weisberg, Herb. 1992. Controversies in Voting Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 1985. “Politics, Economics, and the Cycle of Presidential Popularity.” In Eulau, Heinz and Michael, S. Lewis-Beck, eds., Economic and Electoral Outcomes. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 1987. “Guns and Butter and Government Popularity in Great Britain.” American Political Science Review 81: 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 1992. Confidence Regained: Economics, Mrs. Thatcher, and the British Voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 1996a. “The Economy.” In LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, R. G., and Norris, P., eds., Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 2001. “Divided Government and Economic Voting.” Journal of Politics 63(2): 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut (2002). “On a Short Leash: Term Limits and the Economic Voter.” In Dorussen, Han and Taylor, Michaell, eds., Economic Voting, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut, Michael Lewis-Beck, and Jean-Dominique Lafay, eds. Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support and? Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Oatley, Thomas. 1999. “How Constraining Is Mobile Capital? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1003–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD. 2002. Quarterly National Accounts. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Ogg, F. A. 1936. English Government and Politics. 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur Jr. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Pacek, Alexander C., and Radcliff, Benjamin. 1995. “Economic Voting and the Welfare State: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Politics 57(1): 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paldam, Martin. 1986. “The distribution of Election Results and the Two Explanations of the Cost of Ruling.” European Journal of Political Economy 2: 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” In Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Jean-Dominique Lafay, , eds., Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Paldam, Martin, and Nannestad, Peter. 2000. “What do Voters Know about the Economy? A Study of Danish Data, 1990–1993.” Electoral Studies 19: 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paldam, Martin, and Schneider, F.. 1980. “The Macroeconomic Aspects of Government and Opposition Popularity in Denmark, 1957–1978.” National Okonomisk Tidsskrift 118: 149–170.Google Scholar

Palfrey, Thomas. 1989. “A Mathematical Proof of Duvergen's Law.” In Peter C. Crdeshook, ed., Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Palmer, Harvey, and Raymond, M. Duch. 2001. “Do Surveys Provide Representative or Whimsical Assessments of the Economy” Political Analysis. 9: 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, Harvey D., and Guy, D. Whitten. 2000 “Government Competence, Economic Performance and Endogenous Election Dates.” Electoral Studies 19: 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, Harvey D., and Guy, D. Whitten. 2003a. “Questionable Analyses with No Theoretical Innovation: A Response to Royed, Leyden and Borrelli.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 139–149.Google Scholar

Palmer, Harvey D., and Guy, D. Whitten. 2003b. “Ignorance Is No Excuse: Data Mining versus Theoretical Formulation of Hypotheses.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 159–160.Google Scholar

Papke, Leslie, and Jeffrey Wooldridge. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with An Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics (11): 619–632.

Parrish, S. 1998. “Presidential Decree Authority in Russia, 1991–1995.” In Carey, J. and Shugart, M., eds., Executive Decree Authority. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Election.” American Economic Review 77(2): 293–297.

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 1990. Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility, and Politics. New York: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effect of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2004. “Constitutional Rules and Fiscal Policy Outcomes.” American Economic Review 94: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy, D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Simon, and Sanders, David. 1995. “Economic Expectations and Voting Intentions in the UK, 1979–1987: A Pooled Cross-Section Approach.” Political Studies 43: 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, Dennis P., and John, T. Woolley. 2001. “Democracy and National Economic Performance: The Preference for Stability.” American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 634–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, Kevin M.,Andrew, D. Martin, and Andrew, B. Whitford. 1999. “Voter Choice in Multi-Party Democracies: A Test of Competing Theories and Models.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1231–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1997a. Has Globalization Gone Too Far?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1997b. “Democracy and Economic Performance.” Available at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼drodrik/demoecon.PDF.

Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Larger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy 106(5): 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, Kenneth, and Sibert, Anne. 1988. “Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles.” Review of Economic Studies 55: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Richard. 1974. Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Richard, and Thomas Mackie. 1983. “Incumbency in Government: Asset or Liability?” In Daalder, Hans P. Mair, eds., Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Royed, Terry J., Kevin, M. Leyden, and Stephen, A. Borrelli. 2000. “Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's Hypothesis.” British Journal of Politics 30: 669–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003. “Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 698–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, David, David Marsh, and Hugh Ward. 1987. “Government Popularity and the Falklands War.” British Journal of Political Science. 17: 281–313.

Sanders, David. 2003b. “Party Identification, Economic Perceptions, and Voting in British General Elections, 1974–97.” Electoral Studies 22: 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, David, Burton, Jonathan, and Kneeshaw, Jack. 2003. “Identifying the True Identifiers: A Question Wording Experiment.” Party Politics 8(2):193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarno, Lucio. 2000. “Towards a Paradigm in New Open Economy Modeling: Where Do We Stand?” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 83(3): 21–26.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Analysis. New York: New York University Press.

Satterthwaite, M. A. 1975. “Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 10: 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheve, Kenneth, . 2004. “Democracy and Globalization: Candidate Selection in Open Economies.” Mimeograph, Yale University, May 6.Google Scholar

Schickler, Eric, and Green, Donald Philip. 1997. “The Stability of Party Identification in Eight Western Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 30: 450–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe, and Lehmbrunch, Gerhard, eds. 1979. Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silver, Brian D., Barbara, A. Anderson, and Paul, R. Abramson. 1986. “Who Overreports Voting?” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snijders, Tom A. B., and Roel, J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Spiller, Pablo. 1990. “Politicians, Interest Groups, and Regulation: A Multiple-Principals Agency Theory of Regulation, or Let Them Be Bribed.” Journal of Law and Economics 33: 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Robert M. 1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” Journal of Politics 52(1): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, Randolph T. 2001. “Economy and Policy Preferences: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Marianne, and Clarke, Harold. 1998. “The Dynamics of Party Identification in Federal Systems: The Canadian Case.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1973. “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.” American Economic Review 63: 160–164.Google Scholar

Strom, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomassen, J. 1976. “Party Identification as a Cross-National Concept: Its Meaning in the Netherlands.” In Budge, Ian, Crewe,, Ivor and Farlie, Denis, eds., Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Train, Kenneth. 2003. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, Joshua A. 2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, 1990–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufte, Edward R. 1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 69: 812–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Verzichelli, Luca, and Maurizio Cotta. 2000. “Italy: From ‘Constrained’ Coalitions to Alternating Governments?” In Wolfgang, C. Mueller and Strom, Kaare, eds., Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Welch, S., and Hibbing, J. 1992. “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (Febraury): 194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteley, Paul F. 1986. “Macroeconomic Performance and Government Popularity in Britain: The Short-Run Dynamics.” European Journal of Political Research 14: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher, Franklin, Mark, and Twiggs, Daniel. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior 19: 7–17.CrossRef

Wolfinger, Raymond, and Steven, J. Rosenstone, 1980. Who Votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

World Bank. 2004. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zaller, John. 2004. “Floating Voters in US Presidential Elections, 1948–2000. In Sniderman, Paul and Saris, W., eds., The Issue of Belief: Essays in the Intersection of Nonattitudes and Attitude Change. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Alan S. 1982. “New Approaches to Political Cleavages.” Comparative Politics 15: 131–144.Google Scholar