Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:47:48.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Multinationals and transnational social space for learning: knowledge creation and transfer through global R&D networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Alice Lam
Affiliation:
Professor of Organization Studies School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London
Karen R. Polenske
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are unique knowledge-creating organisations because of their superior ability to engage in knowledge transfer across national borders within the context of interorganisational networks (Kogut and Zander 1993; Gupta and Govindarajan 2000). The ways in which MNEs develop their transnational social space for learning, however, differ significantly between firms on the basis of the dominant organizational model and patterns of learning derived from the home contexts. In this chapter, I build on the institutional perspective, which stresses the strong influence of home-based institutions on the structure and behavior of MNEs (Pauly and Reich 1997; Doremus et al. 1998; Whitley 1999, 2001; Morgan 2001). I examine the ways in which national patterns of organization and innovation affect firms' global R&D networks and transnational learning activities. One notable recent trend in the management of innovation within MNEs has been the extension of R&D activities and competence portfolios on a global scale (Gerybadze and Reger 1999; Pearce 1999) to augment the knowledge base of the firm (Howells 1990; Florida 1997; Kuemmerle 1997, 1999a, 1999b). In the science-based high-technology industries in particular, a growing element of firms' strategies involves collaboration with world-class academic institutions and research centers, and recruitment of the best scientific personnel on a global scale (Kaounides 1999). Accordingly, I examine the organizational and human resource strategies adopted by US and Japanese MNEs in managing their global R&D networks and transnational learning in the pharmaceutical and ICT sectors.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asakawa, K., 2001. “Organisational Tension in International R&D Management: The Case of Japanese Firms,” Research Policy, 30: 735–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asakawa, K. and Lehrer, M., 2003. “Managing Local Knowledge Assets Globally: The Role of Regional Innovation Relays,” Journal of World Business, 38: 31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baba, Y., Kikuchi, J., and Mori, S., 1995. “Japan's R&D Strategy Reconsidered: Departure from the Manageable Risks,” Technovation, 15(2): 65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belderbos, R., 2001. “Overseas Innovations by Japanese Firms: An Analysis of Patent and Subsidiary Data,” Research Policy, 30: 313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, H. and Sierra, C., 1999. “The Internationalisation of R&D by Multinationals: A Trade-Off Between External and Internal Proximity,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., 1995. “The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model?,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 155–174Google Scholar
Chiesa, V., 1999. “Technology Development Control Styles in Multinational Corporations: A Case Study,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16: 191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikudate, N., 1999. “Generating Reflexivity from Partnership Formation: A Phenomenological Reasoning on the Partnership Between a Japanese Pharmaceutical Corporation and Western Laboratories,” Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 35(3): 287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. R., 1995. Places of Inquiry: Research and Advanced Education in Modern Universities, Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective of Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doremus, P. N., Keller, W., Pauley, L., and Reich, S., 1998. The Myth of the Global Corporation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. and C. Wymbs, 1999. “The Geographical Sourcing of Technology-Based Assets by Multinational Enterprises,” in Archibugi, D., Howells, J., and Michie, J. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, I., 1999. “The American University System as a Performer of Basic and Applied Research,” in Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., and Florida, R. (eds.), University–Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, Cambridge, MA and London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: 65–101Google Scholar
Financial Times (FT), 1990. “Japanese Put Pounds 50M into University Research,” Financial Times, September 12: 10
Florida, R., 1997. “The Globalization of R&D: Results of a Survey of Foreign-Affiliated R&D Laboratories in the United States,” Research Policy, 26: 85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, T. S., 2001. “The Geographic Sources of Foreign Subsidiaries' Innovations,” Strategic Management Journal, 22: 101–1233.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassman, O. and Zedwitz, M., 1999. “New Concepts and Trends in International R&D Organisation,” Research Policy, 28: 231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, M. S., 2001. “Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Convergence,” Journal of Economic Geography, 1: 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, M. S., Wolfe, D. A., and Garkut, D., 2000. “No Place Like Home? The Embeddedness of Innovation in a Regional Economy,” Review of International Political Economy, 7(4): 688–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerybadze, A. and Reger, G., 1999. “Globalization of R&D: Recent Changes in the Management of Innovation in Transnational Corporations,” Research Policy, 28: 251–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granstrand, O., 1999. “Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Study of Japanese and Swedish Corporations,” Research Policy, 28: 275–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronning, T., 2001. “Towards the ‘Integrated Network’ as an Organisational Mode for Global Innovative Activities? A Comparative Study of Two Japanese Pharmaceutical Corporations Eisai and Chugai,” Paper presented at ESRC Conference on Multinationals, University of Warwick, September
Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V., 2000. “Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations,” Strategic Management Journal, 21: 473–4963.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, J. and Hollingsworth, J. R., 2000. “A Strategy for the Analysis of Idea Innovation Networks and Institutions,” Organization Studies, 21(5): 971–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hane, G., 1999. “Comparing University–Industry Linkages in the United States and Japan,” in Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., and Florida, R. (eds.), University–Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, Cambridge, MA and London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: 20–61Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. R., 2000. “Doing Institutional Analysis: Implications for the Study of Innovations,” Review of International Political Economy, 7(4): 595–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, J., 1990. “The Internationalization of R&D and the Development of Global Research Networks,” Regional Studies, 24(6): 495–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaounides, L. C., 1999. “Science, Technology, and Global Competitive Advantage: The Strategic Implications of Emerging Technologies for Corporations and Nations,” International Studies of Management and Organisation, 29(1): 53–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H., 1991. “Industrial Governance Structures, Innovation Strategies, and the Case of Japan: Sectoral or Cross-National Comparative Analysis,” International Organisation, 45(4): 454–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodama, F. and L. M. Branscomb, 1999. “University Research as an Engine for Growth: How Realistic is the Vision?,” in Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., and Florida, R. (eds.), University–Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, Cambridge, MA and London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: 3–19Google Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U., 1993. “Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuemmerle, W., 1997. “Building Effective R&D Capabilities Abroad,” Harvard Business Review, March–April: 61–70Google ScholarPubMed
1999a. “Foreign Direct Investment in Industrial Research in the Pharmaceutical and Electronics Industries: Results from a Survey of Multinational Firms,” Research Policy, 28: 179–193CrossRef
1999b. “The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment Into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 1–25CrossRef
Lam, A., 2000. “Tacit Knowledge, Organisational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework,” Organisational Studies, 21(3): 487–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. “Alternative Societal Models of Learning and Innovation in the Knowledge Economy,” International Social Science Journal, 171: 67–82
Lundvall, B.-Å., 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: PinterGoogle Scholar
Mahroum, S., 2000. “Scientists and Global Spaces,” Technology in Society, 22: 513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Methé, D. T., 1995. “Basic Research in Japanese Electronic Companies: An Attempt at Establishing New Organisational Routines,” in Liker, J. K., Ettlie, J. E., and Campbell, J. C. (eds.), Engineered in Japan: Japanese Technology-Management Practices, New York: Oxford University Press: 17–39Google Scholar
Methé, D. T. and J. D. Penner-Hahn, 1999. “Globalization of Pharmaceutical Research and Development in Japanese Companies: Organisational Learning and the Parent–Subsidiary Relationship,” in Beechler, S. L. and Bird, A. (eds.), Japanese Multinationals Abroad: Individual and Organisational Learning, New York: Oxford University Press: 191–210Google Scholar
Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Reger, G., 1999. “New Perspectives on the Innovation Strategies of Multinational Enterprises: Lessons for Technology Policy in Europe,” Research Policy, 28: 751–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., 2001. “The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides,” in Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H., and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–24Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C. and N. Rosenberg, 1993. “The US National Innovation System,” in Nelson, R. R. (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 29–75Google Scholar
Nakayama, S. and Low, M. F., 1997. “The Research Function of Universities in Japan,” Higher Education, 34: 245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Odagiri, H. and Goto, A., 1996. Technology and Industrial Development in Japan, Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oka, H., 1993. “The Industrial Sector's Expectations of Engineering Education,” Economic Eye, 14: 12–15Google Scholar
Patel, P., 1995. “The Localised Production of Global Technology,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 141–153Google Scholar
Patel, P. and Vega, M., 1999. “Patterns of Internationalisation of Corporate Technology: Location vs. Home Country Advantages,” Research Policy, 28: 145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, L. W. and Reich, S., 1997. “National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behaviour: Enduring Differences in the Age of Globalization,” International Organisation, 51(1): 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavitt, P. and P. Patel, 1999. “Global Corporations and National Systems of Innovation,” in Archibugi, D., Howells, J., and Michie, J. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 94–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, R. D., 1999. “Decentralised R&D and Strategic Competitiveness: Globalised Approaches to Generation and Use of Technology in Multinational Enterprises (Multinational enterprises),” Research Policy, 28 (2–3): 157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, R. D. and Papanastassiou, M., 1999, “Overseas R&D and the Strategic Evolution of Multinational enterprises: Evidence from Laboratories in the United Kingdom,” Research Policy, 28(1): 23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. B., 2001. “Benchmarking Global Strategic Management of Technology,” Research Technology Management, 44(2): 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehl, T., W. Mitchell, and R. J. Slattery, 1995. “The Growth of R&D Investment and Organisational Changes by Japanese Pharmaceutical Firms, 1975–1993,” in Liker, J. K., Ettie, J. E., and Campbell, J. C. (eds.), Engineered in Japan, New York: Oxford University Press: 40–69Google Scholar
Sakakibara, K. and D. E. Westney, 1992. “Japan's Management of Global Innovation: Technology Management Crossing Borders,” in Rosenberg, N., Landau, R., and Mowery, D. (eds.), Technology and the Wealth of Nations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 327–343Google Scholar
Santoro, M. D. and Chakrabarti, A. K., 2001. “Corporate Strategic Objectives for Establishing Relationships with University Research Centres,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2): 157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional Advantage: Competition and Cooperation in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Spencer, J. W., 2001. “How Relevant is University-Based Scientific Knowledge to Private High-Technology Firms? A United States–Japan Comparison,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 432–440Google Scholar
Turner, L., Ray, D.,and Hayward, T., 1997. The British Research of Japanese Companies, London: Insight Japan/Anglo-Japanese Economic InstituteGoogle Scholar
Westney, D. E., 1993. “Country Patterns in R&D Organisation: The United States and Japan,” in Kogut, B. (ed.), Country Competitiveness and the Organizing of Work, New York: Oxford University Press: 36–53Google Scholar
1994. “The Evolution of Japan's Industrial Research and Development,” in Aoki, M. and Dore, R. (eds.), The Japanese Firm: The Sources of Competitive Strength, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 154–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. “Changing Perspectives on the Organisation of Japanese Multinational Companies,” in Beechler, S. L. and Bird, A. (eds.), Japanese Multinationals Abroad: Individual and Organisational Learning, New York: Oxford University Press: 11–29Google Scholar
Whitley, R., 1999. Divergent Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
2000. “The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies,” Organisation Studies, 21(5): 855–886CrossRef
2001. “How and Why are International Firms Different? The Consequences of Cross-Border Managerial Coordination for Firm Characteristics and Behaviour,” in Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H., and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 27–65Google Scholar
Zanfei, A., 2000. “Transnational Firms and the Changing Organisation of Innovation Activities,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24: 515–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×