Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T21:14:51.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - A case study: interactions among nectarivores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Get access

Summary

In the previous chapter, I described the difficulties of demonstrating interspecific competition and linking it with community patterns. Birds that feed chiefly upon floral nectar, however, are especially well-suited to investigations of competitive interactions, and it is therefore appropriate to consider their ecology in some detail.

In most parts of the world, a relatively small number of taxonomically related species comprise the chief members of the nectar-feeding guild: hummingbirds (Trochilidae) in the New World, honeyeaters (Meliphagidae) in Australasia, sunbirds (Nectariniidae) in Africa and parts of Asia, and honeycreepers (Drepanididae) in Hawaii. The species are often nectar specialists, and the resource of primary importance to them is thus clearly defined. Moreover, the abundance and availability of the nectar resource can be quantified with precision and related directly to the energetics of the birds. Many plants are adapted to pollination by nectarivorous birds (Stiles 1978, Feinsinger 1978, Feinsinger et al. 1982, Kodric-Brown and Brown 1979, Brown and Kodric-Brown 1979, Grant and Grant 1968), and in some cases the linkage between birds and plants suggests a tightly coevolved system. Because the flowers are adapted to make their nectar available to certain bird pollinators (Murray et al. 1987), measurements of nectar standing crop may accurately reflect resource availability as it is viewed by the foragers (Carpenter 1978). For these reasons, nectar-feeding birds and their resources have been popular subjects for investigations of time-energy budgeting (e.g. Wolf et al. 1975, Gill and Wolf 1977, Hixon et al. 1983), optimal foraging behavior (e.g. Pyke 1978), ecophysiology (e.g. Calder and Booser 1973), and species interactions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×