Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:15:03.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

Steven J. Dick
Affiliation:
National Air and Space Museum
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Discovery and Classification in Astronomy
Controversy and Consensus
, pp. 371 - 428
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gingerich, Owen, “The Inside Story of Pluto’s Demotion,” Sky and Telescope, 112 (November 2006)Google Scholar
Soter, Steven, “What Is a Planet?”Scientific American (January 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen G., Nebulous Earth: The Origin of the Solar System and the Core of the Earth From Laplace to Jeffreys (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Tombaugh, Clyde W. and Moore, Patrick, Out of the Darkness: The Planet Pluto (New York: New American Library, 1980)Google Scholar
Brown, Michael, How I Killed Pluto and Why It Had It Coming (New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2010)Google Scholar
Hoyt, William G., Planets X and Pluto (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Reaves, Gibson, “The Prediction and Discoveries of Pluto and Charon,” in Pluto and Charon, Stern, S. Alan and Tholen, David J., eds. (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1997), pp. 3–25Google Scholar
Strauss, David, Percival Lowell: The Culture and Science of a Boston Brahmin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Levy, David H., Clyde Tombaugh: Discoverer of the Planet Pluto (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Putnam, William Lowell, The Explorers of Mars Hill: A Centennial History of Lowell Observatory, 1894–1994 (West Kennebunk, ME: Phoenix, 1994)Google Scholar
Brown, E. W., “On the Predictions of Trans-Neptunian Planets from the Perturbations of Uranus,”PNAS 16 (1930): 364–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, E. C., “On the Orbit and Mass of Pluto, with an Ephemeris for 1931–32,”Lick Observatory Bulletin 437, Sept. 26, 1931Google Scholar
Standish, E. M., “Planet X: No Dynamical Evidence in the Optical Observations,” AJ 105 (1993): 2000–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVorkin, David H., “Pluto: The Problem Planet and its Scientists,” in Launius, Roger, ed., Exploring the Solar System: The History and Science of Planetary Exploration (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013)Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J., Sky and Ocean Joined: The U. S. Naval Observatory, 1830–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 425–29; J. W. Christy Oral History Interview, June 16, 1989, copy deposited in U.S. Naval Observatory Library, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Christy, J. W., “The Discovery of Pluto’s Moon, Charon, in 1978,” in Stern, S. A. and Tholen, D. J., eds., Pluto and Charon (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Harrington, R. S. and Christy, J. W., “The Satellite of Pluto,” AJ, 83 (1978): 1005–8Google Scholar
Stern, A., “The Pluto-Charon System,” ARAA 30 (1992): 185–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Alan and Mitton, Jacqueline, Pluto and Charon: Ice Worlds on the Ragged Edge of the Solar System (New York: Wiley, 1999)Google Scholar
Marcialis, R. M., “The Discovery of Charon: Happy Accident or Timely Find?JBAA 99 (1989): 27–29Google Scholar
Dressler, A. J. and Russell, C. T., “The Pending Disappearance of Pluto,” Eos 61, no. 44 (1980): 690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, Kenneth, “The Evolution of our Planetary System,” JBAA 53 (1943): 181–88Google Scholar
Kuiper, Gerard P., Astrophysics: A Topical Symposium (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951)Google Scholar
McFarland, J., “Kenneth Essex Edgeworth – Victorian Polymath and Founder of the Kuiper Belt?”Vistas in Astronomy 40 (1996): 343–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Rex, “Is Pluto a Planet?Astronomy (July 1999): 42–47Google Scholar
Schilling, Govert, “Pluto: The Planet that Never Was,” Science 283 (January 8, 1999): 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, Robert L., Binzel, Richard P., Burns, Joseph A., Cruikshank, Dale P., McKinnon, William B., Meech, Karen J., and Stern, S. Aland, ‘Pluto’s Planetary Status,” Science 283 (February 12, 1999): 937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deGrasse, Neil, The Pluto Files: The Rise and Fall of America’s Favorite Planet (New York: W. W. Norton, 2009)Google Scholar
Michael, F. A’Hearn, “Pluto: A Planet or a Trans-Neptunian Object?” in Rickman, H., ed., Highlights of Astronomy, 12 (San Francisco: International Astronomical Union, 2002)Google Scholar
Boss, Alan, The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets (New York: Basic Books, 2009)Google Scholar
Soter, Steven, “What is a Planet?AJ 132 (2006): 2513–19, and a popular version in “What is a Planet?” Sci Am (January 2007): 34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. E., “History and Myth – Trans-Neptunian Objects and their Terminology,” BAAS 33 (2001): 1363Google Scholar
Weintraub, David, Is Pluto a Planet? A Historical Journey through the Solar System (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reports on Astronomy, Transactions of the IAU, 36A, Engvold, Oddbjorn, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Schilling, Govert, The Hunt for Planet X: New Worlds and the Fate of Pluto (New York: Copernicus Books, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, Owen, “The Inside Story of Pluto’s Demotion,” Sky and Telescope 112 (November 2006): 34–39Google Scholar
Christensen, Lars Lindberg, “The Pluto Affair: When Professionals Talk to Professionals with the Public Watching,” in Heck, A. and Houziaux, L., eds., Future Professional Communication in Astronomy (Memoires Academie Royale Belgique, 2007)Google Scholar
Gingerich, , “Planetary Perils in Prague,” Daedalus 136, no.1 (2007): 137–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, S., “New Mexico Declares Pluto a Planet,” Eos Transaction of the American Geophysical Union 88 (2007): 133Google Scholar
Messeri, Lisa, “The Problem with Pluto: Conflicting Cosmologies and the Classification of Planets,” Social Studies of Science 40/2 (April 2010): 187–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Sidereus Nuncius, or The Sidereal Messenger, translated with introduction, conclusion, and notes by Albert van Helden (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, John, Galileo (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Cunningham, Clifford J., The First Asteroid: Ceres, 1801–2001 (Surfside, FL: Star Lab Press, 2001)Google Scholar
van Helden, Albert, Dupré, Sven, van Gent, Rob, and Zuidervaart, Huib, eds., The Origins of the Telescope (Amsterdam: KNAW Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Camerota, Michele, “Galilei, Galileo,” NDSB 3 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 2008)Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman, “Galileo’s First Telescopic Observations,” JHA 7 (1976): 153–68Google Scholar
Kepler’s Conversation with Galileo’s Sidereal Messenger, trans. Rosen, Edward (New York and London, 1965)Google Scholar
Dick, Steven, Plurality of Worlds: The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Galileo on the World Systems, Finocchiaro, Maurice A., trans. and ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), pp. 243–44Google Scholar
van Helden, Albert, “Saturn and his Anses,” JHA 5 (1974): 105–21, 105Google Scholar
Van Helden, , “Annulo Cingitur: the Solution of the Problem of Saturn,” JHA 5 (1974): 155–74Google Scholar
Van Helden, A., “Christopher Wren’s De Corpore Saturni,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London xxiii (1968): 213–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen G., Garber, Elizabeth, and Everitt, C. W. F., eds., Maxwell on Saturn’s Rings (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983)
Bradley, and Mayer, Tobias, in The Planet Uranus: A History of Observation, Theory and Discovery (New York: American Elsevier, 1965), pp. 80–91Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G., “The Pre-Discovery Observations of Uranus,” in Hunt, Garry, Uranus and the Outer Planets (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Littmann, Mark, Planets Beyond: Discovering the Outer Solar System (New York: Wiley, 1988), pp. 24–28Google Scholar
Herschel, William, “Account of a Comet,” PTRSL 71 (1781): 492–501Google Scholar
Miner, Ellis D., Uranus: The Planet, Rings and Satellites (New York: Wiley, 1998)Google Scholar
Herschel, William, The Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel, Dreyer, J. L. E., ed. (London: Royal Society and Royal Astronomical Society, 1912)Google Scholar
Cunningham, Clifford J., The First Asteroid: Ceres, 1801–2001 (Surfside, FL: Star Lab Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G., “Gauss and the Discovery of Ceres,” JHA 2 (1971): 195–99Google Scholar
Hughes, David W. and Marsden, Brian G., “Planet, Asteroid, Minor Planet: A Case Study in Astronomical Nomenclature,” JAHH 10 (March 2007): 21–30Google Scholar
Bourtembourg, Rene, “Messier’s Missed Discovery of Pallas in April, 1779,” JHA 43 (2012): 209–14Google Scholar
Herschel, William, “Observations on the Two Lately Discovered Celestial Bodies,” PTRSL 92 (1802): 213–32Google Scholar
Cunningham, Clifford J. and Orchiston, Wayne, “Who Invented the Word Asteroid: William Herschel or Stephen Weston?JAHH 14 (2011): 230–34Google Scholar
Hughes, David W. and Marsden, Brian G., “Planet, Asteroid, Minor Planet: A Case Study in Astronomical Nomenclature,” JAHH 10 (2007): 21–30Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G., “Gauss and the Discovery of Ceres,” JHA 2 (1971): 195–99Google Scholar
Kowal, Charles T. and Drake, Stillman, “Galileo’s Observations of Neptune,” Nature 287 (25 September 1980): 311–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosser, Morton, The Discovery of Neptune (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962)Google Scholar
Sheehan, William, Kollerstrom, Nicholas, and Waff, Craig B., “The Case of the Pilfered Planet,” Scientific American 291 (December, 2004): 92–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. W., “The Cambridge Network in Action: The Discovery of Neptune,” Isis 80 (1989): 395–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosser, Morton’s The Discovery of Neptune (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962)Google Scholar
Chapman, A., “Private Research and Public Duty: George Biddell Airy and the Search for Neptune,” JHA 19 (1988): 121–39Google Scholar
Hubbell, J. G. and Smith, R. W., “Neptune in America: Negotiating a Discovery,” JHA 23 (1992): 261–90Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Westman, Robert S., “Two Cultures or One? A Second Look at Kuhn’s The Copernican Revolution,” Isis 85 (1994): 79–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Helden, Albert, Measuring the Universe: Cosmic Dimensions from Aristarchus to Halley (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J., Sky and Ocean Joined: The U. S. Naval Observatory, 1830–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan, The Celestial Worlds Discovered (London: Frank Cass and Co., 1968)Google Scholar
Clerke, Agnes, A Popular History of Astronomy During the Nineteenth Century (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1902; first edition, 1885)Google Scholar
Whewell, William, Of the Plurality of Worlds (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Hockey, Thomas, Galileo’s Planet (Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 1999)Google Scholar
DeVorkin, , “Stellar Evolution and the Origin of the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram,” in Gingerich, Owen, ed., Astrophysics and 20th-Century Astronomy to 1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Darwin, George H., “On Internal Densities of Planets, and on an Oversight in the Mécanique Céleste,” MNRAS 37 (1876): 77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Harold, “The Constitution of the Four Outer Planets,” MNRAS 83 (1923): 350–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marley, Mark, Encyclopedia of the Solar System (New York: Academic Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Leveringon, David, History of Astronomy from 1890 to the Present (London: Springer, 1995)Google Scholar
Kiess, C. C., Corliss, C. H., and Kiess, H. K., “High-Dispersion Spectra of Jupiter,” ApJ 132 (1960): 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, Fran, Dowling, Timothy, and McKinnon, William, Jupiter: The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Marley, Mark S., “Interiors of the Giant Planets,” in Weissman, Paul R., McFadden, Lucy-Ann, and Johnson, Torrence V., Encyclopedia of the Solar System (San Diego: Academic Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Petrie, R. M., “The Atmospheres of the Planets,” JRASC 34 (1940): 137–45: 143Google Scholar
Hammel, Heidi, “The Ice Giant Systems of Uranus and Neptune,” in Blonde, Phillippe and Mason, John, eds., Solar System Update (New York: Springer, 2006)Google Scholar
Stern, S. A., “The Third Zone: Exploring the Kuiper Belt,” Sky and Telescope, 106 (2003): 31–36Google Scholar
Davies, John K. et al., “The Early Development of Ideas Concerning the Transneptunian Region,” in Barucci, M. A. et al., eds., The Solar System Beyond Neptune (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Edgeworth, K. E., “The Evolution of our Planetary System,” JBAA 53 (1943): 181–88Google Scholar
Edgeworth, , “The Origin and Evolution of the Solar System,” MNRAS 109 (1949): 600–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, Gerard, “On the Origin of the Solar System,” in Hynek, J. A., ed., Astrophysics: A Topical Symposium (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951)Google Scholar
Whipple, F., “Evidence for a Comet Belt Beyond Neptune,” PNAS 51 (1964): 711–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, J., “On the Existence of a Comet Belt Beyond Neptune,” MNRAS 192 (1980): 481–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, M. et al., “The Origin of Short-period Comets,” ApJ 328 (1988): L69–L73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, David and Luu, Jane, “Discovery of the Candidate Kuiper Belt Object 1992 QB1,” Nature 362 (1993): 730–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, David, Is Pluto a Planet? A Historical Journey through the Solar System (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, Govert, The Hunt for Planet X: New Worlds and the Fate of Pluto (New York: Copernicus Books, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael, How I Killed Pluto and Why It Had It Coming (New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2010)Google Scholar
Luu, Jane, Marsden, Brian G., Jewitt, David et al., “A New Dynamical Class of Object in the Outer Solar System,” Nature 387 (1997): 573–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Trujillo, Chadwick, and Rabinowitz, David, “Discovery of a Candidate Inner Oort Cloud Planetoid,” ApJ 617 (2004): 645–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, David C., “The Kuiper Belt as an Evolved Circumstellar Disk,” in The Origin of Stars and Planets: The VLT View (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002)Google Scholar
Herschel, William, “On Nebulous Stars, Properly so Called,” PTRSL 81 (1791): 71–88Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, The Construction of the Heavens: William Herschel’s Cosmology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “Herschel in Bedlam: Natural History and Stellar Astronomy,” BJHS 13 (1980): 211–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Helden, Albert, Measuring the Universe: Cosmic Dimensions from Aristarchus to Halley (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, Alan W., Parallax: The Race to Measure the Cosmos (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2001)Google Scholar
Ptolemy’s Almagest, translated and annotated by Toomer, G. J. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Jones, Kenneth Glyn, The Search for the Nebulae (Chalfont St. Giles: Science History Publications, 1975)Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Sidereus Nuncius, or The Sidereal Messenger, translated with introduction, conclusion, and notes by van Helden, Albert (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, Owen gives this interpretation in “The Mysterious Nebulae, 1610–1924,” in The Great Copernicus Chase (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 225–37: 229Google Scholar
Chapin, S. L., “The Astronomical Activities of Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc,” Isis 1 (1957): 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebert, Harald, “Peiresc’s Nebel im Sternbild Orion – eine neue Textgrundlage fur die Geschichte on M42,” [Peiresc’s Nebula in the constellation of Orion, a new textual basis for the history of M42,] Annals of Science 66 (2009): 231–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, E. S., “Monograph of the Central Parts of the Nebula of Orion,” appendix I of Astronomical and Meteorological Observations made during the year 1878 at the United States Naval Observatory (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1882)Google Scholar
Homer, , The Odyssey (New York: Penguin Books, 1997)Google Scholar
Hodges, Laurent, “Michell,” BEA 2: 778–9
Gingerich, Owen, “Messier and His Catalogue,” in Mallas, John H. and Kreimer, Evered, The Messier Album (Cambridge, MA: Sky Publishing, 1978)Google Scholar
Jones, Kenneth Glyn, Messier’s Nebulae and Star Clusters, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Steinicke, Wolfgang’s recent volume, Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, , “On the Construction of the Heavens,” PTRSL 75 (1785): 213–66Google Scholar
Herschel, , “Catalogue of a Second Thousand of new Nebulae and Clusters of Stars; with a few introductory Remarks on the Construction of the Heavens,” PTRSL 79 (1789): 212–26Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen G., Nebulous Earth: The Origin of the Solar System and the Core of the Earth From Laplace to Jeffreys (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Hoskin, , “William Herschel’s Early Investigations of Nebulae: A Reassessment,” JHA x (1979): 165–76Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, “Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part I,” JHA 39 (2008): 91–119Google Scholar
Smith, , The Expanding Universe: Astronomy’s Great Debate, 1900–1931 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “Herschel in Bedlam: Natural History and Stellar Astronomy,” BJHS 13 (1980): 211–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, , “William Herschel’s Early Investigations of Nebulae: A Reassessment,” JHA x (1979): 165–76Google Scholar
Newcomb, Simon and Holden, E. S., Astronomy for High Schools and Colleges (New York: Henry Holt, 1881)Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, “Herschel, Bath and the Philosophical Society,” in Hunt, Garry, ed., Uranus and the Outer Planets (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Random House, 1970)Google Scholar
Sticker, Bernhard, “‘Artificial’ and ‘Natural’ Classifications of Celestial Bodies in the Work of William Herschel,” Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of the History of Science (Ithaca, 1962)Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, “Rosse, Robinson, and the Resolution of the Nebulae,” JHA 21 (1990): 331–44Google Scholar
Huggins, William, “On the Spectra of Some of the Nebulae,” PTRSL 154 (1864): 437–44Google Scholar
Becker, Barbara, Unravelling Starlight: William and Margaret Huggins and the Rise of the New Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearnshaw, John B., The Analysis of Starlight: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Astronomical Spectroscopy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Struve, Otto, “Recent Progress in the Study of Reflection Nebulae,” PA 45 (1937): 9–22Google Scholar
Slipher, V. M., “On the Spectrum of the Nebula in the Pleiades,” Lowell Observatory Bulletin 1 (1912): 26–27Google Scholar
Slipher, , “On the Spectrum of the Nebula about Rho Ophiuchi,” PA 24 (1916): 542–43Google Scholar
Struve, Otto, “Recent Progress in the Study of Reflection Nebulae,” PA 45 (1937): 9–22Google Scholar
Houghton, H. E., “Sir William Herschel’s ‘Hole in the Sky’,” Monthly Notices of the Astronomical Society of South Africa 1 (1942): 107Google Scholar
Barnard, E. E., “On the Vacant Regions of the Sky,” PA 14 (1906): 579–83Google Scholar
Sheehan, William, The Immortal Fire Within: The Life and Work of Edward Emerson Barnard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Barnard, E. E., “Some of the Dark Markings on the Sky and What they Suggest,” ApJ 43 (1916): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, E. E., “On the Dark Markings of the Sky, with a Catalogue of 182 Such Objects,” ApJ 49 (1919): 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, E. E., A Photographic Atlas of Selected Regions of the Milky Way, Frost, E. B. and Calvert, M. R., eds. (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington,1927)Google Scholar
Hale, George Ellery, “Barnard’s Dark Nebulae,” The Depths of the Universe (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1924)Google Scholar
Lynds, B. T., “Dark Nebulae,” in Middlehurst, Barbara and Aller, Lawrence, eds., Nebulae and Interstellar Matter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Hubble, E. P., “The Source of Luminosity in Galactic Nebulae,” ApJ 56 (1922): 400–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Henry Norris, “Dark Nebulae,” PNAS 8 (1922): 115–18: 117, where he cites his earlier work in The Observatory 44 (1921): 72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menzel, D. H., “The Planetary Nebulae,” PASP 38 (1926): 295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanstra, H., Physical Review 27 (1926): 644
Struve, and Zebergs, Velta, Astronomy of the 20th Century (New York: Macmillan, 1962)Google Scholar
Osterbrock, Donald, “Herman Zanstra, Donald H. Menzel, and the Zanstra Method of Nebular Astrophysics,” JHA 32 (2001): 93–108Google Scholar
Redman, R. O., “The Award of The Gold Medal to Professor Herman Zanstra,” QJRAS 2 (1961): 109–11Google Scholar
Zanstra, ’s summary of his own work at “The Gaseous Nebula as a Quantum Counter (George Darwin Lecture),” QJRAS 2 (1961): 137–48Google Scholar
Hubble, E. P., “The Source of Luminosity in Galactic Nebulae.” ApJ 56 (1922): 400–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, Otto and Elvey, , “Emission Nebulosities in Cygnus and Cepheus,” ApJ 88 (1938): 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, and Elvey, C. T., “Observations Made with the Nebular Spectrograph of the McDonald Observatory,” series of three articles in ApJ 89 (1939): 119ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, Arthur S., “The Density of Interstellar Calcium and Sodium,” MNRAS 95 (1934): 2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömgren, Bengt, “The Physical State of Interstellar Hydrogen,” ApJ 89 (1939): 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömgren, , “On the Density Distribution and Chemical Composition of the Interstellar Gas,” ApJ 108 (1948): 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpless, Stewart, “A Catalogue of H II Regions,” AJ Supplement, vol. 4 (1959): 257Google Scholar
Morgan, W. W., Sharpless, S., and Osterbrock, D., “Some Features of Galactic Structure in the Neighbourhood of the Sun,” AJ 57, no. 3 (1952); and Sky and Telescope 11, no. 134 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, J., “Investigations of the Spectrum and Orbit of delta Orionis,” ApJ 19 (1904): 268–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, Otto, “On the Calcium Clouds,” PA 34 (1926): 10Google Scholar
Struve, Otto, “The Physical State of Interstellar Gas Clouds,” PNAS 25 (1939): 36–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struve, Otto and Zebergs, Velta, Astronomy of the Twentieth Century, (New York and London: Macmillan, 1962)Google Scholar
Struve, , “Note on Calcium Clouds,” ApJ (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, ’s work is “The density of interstellar calcium and sodium,” MNRAS 95 (1934): 2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, Theodore’s is “Interstellar Neutral Potassium and Neutral Calcium,” PASP 49 (1937): 26–8, and “Forbidden Transition in the Spectrum of Interstellar Ionized Titanium,” Nature 139 (1937): 246–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, H. I. and Purcell, E. M., “Observation of a Line in the Galactic Radio Spectrum: Radiation from Galactic Hydrogen at 1,420 Mc/sec,” Nature 168 (1951): 356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Woodruff T., III, Cosmic Noise: A History of Early Radio Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Westerhout, Gart, “The Pioneers of H I,” in Taylor, A. R., Landecker, T. L., and Willis, A. G., eds., Seeing through the Dust: The Detection of H I and the Exploration of the ISM in Galaxies (San Francisco: ASP, 2002)Google Scholar
Oort, J. H., Westerhout, G., and Kerr, F. J., “The Galactic System as a Spiral Nebula,” MNRAS 118 (1958): 379–89Google Scholar
Kalberla, Peter M. W. and Kerp, Jurgen, “The H I Distribution of the Milky Way,” ARAA 47 (2009): 27–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, J. M. and Lockman, F. J., “H I in the Galaxy,” ARAA 28 (1990): 215–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockman, Felix J., “Discovery of a Population of H I Clouds in the Galactic Halo,” ApJ 580 (2002): L47–L50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocconi, G. and Morrison, P., “Search for Interstellar Communications,” Nature 184 (September 1959): 844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Steven, The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Merrill, P. W., “Unidentified Interstellar Lines,” PASP 46 (1934): 206–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, , “Stationary Lines in the Spectrum of the Binary Star Boss 6142,” ApJ 83 (1936): 126–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, T., Jr., “Interstellar Neutral Potassium and Neutral Calcium,” PASP 49 (1937): 26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, , “Forbidden Transition in the Spectrum of Interstellar Ionized Titanium,” Nature 139 (1937): 246–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKellar, Andrew, “Evidence for the Molecular Origin of Some Hitherto Unidentified Interstellar Lines,” PASP 52 (1940): 187–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swings, P. and Rosenfeld, L., “Considerations Regarding Interstellar Molecules,” ApJ 86 (1937): 483–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, and Elvey, , “Emission Nebulosities in Cygnus and Cepheus,” ApJ 88 (1938): 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaler, , Cosmic Clouds: Birth, Death and Recycling in the Galaxy (New York: Scientific American, 1997), 104Google Scholar
Weinreb, S., Barrett, A. H., Meeks, M. L., and Henry, J. C., “Radio Observations of OH in the Interstellar Medium,” Nature 200 (1963): 829–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellermann, K. and Sheets, B., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)Google Scholar
Scoville, N. Z. and Solomon, P. M., “Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy,” ApJ 199 (1975): L105–L109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Lewis, “The Search for Biomolecules in Space,” in Kellermann, K. I. and Seielstad, G. A., eds., The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (Green Bank: NRAO, 1986)Google Scholar
Snyder, Lew et al., “A Rigorous Attempt to Verify Interstellar Glycine,” ApJ 619 (2005): 914–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuan, Yi-Jehng et al., “Interstellar Glycine,” ApJ 593 (2003): 848–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Eric and van Dishoeck, Ewine F., “Complex Organic Interstellar Molecules,” ARAA 47 (2009): 427–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, Bart J. and Reilly, Edith F., “Small Dark Nebulae,” ApJ 105 (1947): 255–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackeray, A. D., “Some Southern Stars Involved in Nebulosity,” MNRAS 110 (1950): 524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reipurth, Bo, “Star formation in Bok globules and low-mass clouds. I – The cometary globules in the GUM Nebula,” A & A 117 (1983): 183–98Google Scholar
Scoville, N. Z. and Solomon, P. M., “Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy,” ApJ 199 (1975): L105–L109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, P. M., Sanders, D. B., and Scoville, N. Z., “Giant Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy: A Survey of the Distribution and Physical Properties of GMC’s,” BAAS 9 (1977): 554Google Scholar
Solomon, , Sanders, , and Scoville, , “Giant Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy – The Distribution of 13CO Emission in the Galactic Plane,” ApJ 232 (1979): L89–L93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Yasuo and Kawamura, Akiko, “Molecular Clouds in Nearby Galaxies,” ARAA 48 (2010): 547–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVorkin, David, Henry Norris Russell: Dean of American Astronomers (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Henry Norris, “Giant and Dwarf Stars,” The Observatory 36 (1913): 324–29Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S., Stars and Atoms (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927)Google Scholar
DeVorkin, David H., “A Fox Raiding the Hedgehogs: How Henry Norris Russell Got to Mt. Wilson,” in Good, Gregory A., ed., The Earth, the Heavens and the Carnegie Institution of Washington (New York: American Geophysical Union, 1994)Google Scholar
Meadows, A. J., “The Origins of Astrophysics,” in Gingerich, Owen, ed., Astrophysics and 20th Century Astronomy to 1950: Part A (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, John B., The Analysis of Starlight: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Astronomical Spectroscopy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Jones, Bessie and Boyd, Lyle, The Harvard College Observatory (1839–1919) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welther, Barbara L., “Pickering’s Harem,” Isis 73 (1982): 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffleit, Dorrit, in Notable American Women (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Hoffleit, Dorrit, “Reminiscences on Antonia Maury and the c-Characteristic,” in Corbally, C. J., Gray, R. O., and Garrison, R. F., eds., The MK Process at 50 Years (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1994)Google Scholar
Welther, Barbara, “Annie J. Cannon: Classifier of the Stars” in Mercury (Jan/Feb. 1984): 28Google Scholar
Greenstein, George, “The Ladies of Observatory Hill: Annie Jump Cannon and Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin,” in Portraits of Discovery: Profiles in Scientific Genius (New York: Wiley, 1998)Google Scholar
Russell, , Henry Norris Russell: Dean of American Astronomers (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Monck, William, “The Spectra and Colours of Stars,” JBAA 5 (1895): 416–19Google Scholar
DeVorkin, David, “Stellar Evolution and the Origin of the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram,” in Gingerich, Owen, ed., Astrophysics and 20th Century Astronomy to 1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Hertzsprung, Ejnar, “Zur Stralung der Sterne [On the Radiation of Stars],” Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Photographie 3 (1905): 429–42, translated into English in Lang and Gingerich, Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, pp. 208–211Google Scholar
Herrmann, ’s Ejnar Hertzsprung: Pionier der Sternforschung (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Karl, “Über das System der Fixsterne,” Himmel und Erde 21 (1909): 433–51Google Scholar
Sandage, Allan, The Mount Wilson Observatory, volume 1 of the Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Russell, Henry Norris, “Giant and Dwarf Stars,” The Observatory 36 (1913): 324–29: 325–26Google Scholar
Lundmark, , “Luminosities, Colours, Diameters, Densities, Masses of the Stars,” in Handbuch der Astrophysik, vol. 5, part 1 (1932), pp. 210–574: 443Google Scholar
Russell, , “Relations between Spectra and Other Characteristics of Stars,” PA 22 (1914): 275–94, continued at 331–51; the same article appears in Nature 93 (May 7, 1914): 227–30Google Scholar
Eddington, Arthur S., The Internal Constitution of the Stars (1st ed.1926; reprinted New York: Dover, 1959)Google Scholar
Adams, W. S. and Kohlschutter, A., “Some Spectral Criteria for the Determination of Absolute Stellar Magnitudes,” ApJ 40 (1914): 385–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVorkin, David, “The Changing Place of Red Giant Stars in the Evolutionary Process,” JHA 37 (2006): 429–69Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Karl, “Stellar Structure and Evolution, 1924–1939,” JHA 37 (2006): 203–32Google Scholar
Stromberg, Gustaf, “The Distribution of Absolute Magnitudes among K and M Stars Brighter than the Sixth Apparent Magnitude as Determined from Peculiar Velocities,” ApJ 71 (1930): 175–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, W. S. and Joy, A. H., “The Luminosities and Parallaxes of Five Hundred Stars,” ApJ 46 (1917): 313–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Lori Lubin, and VandenBerg, Don, “The Discovery of Subgiants (1922–1935),” PASP 115 (2003): 1187–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. W., Keenan, P. C., and Kellman, E., Atlas of Stellar Spectra, with an Outline of Spectral Classification (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943)Google Scholar
Sandage, , “The Color-magnitude Diagram for the Globular Cluster M 3,” AJ 58 (1953): 61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Weizsäcker, C. F., “Element Transformation Inside Stars. II,” Physikalische Zeitschrift 39 (1938): 633–46Google Scholar
Bethe, Hans, “Energy Production in Stars,” Physical Review 55 (March 1, 1939): 434–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethe, H. A. and Critchfield, C. L., “The Formation of Deuterons by Proton Combination, “ Physical Review 54 (1938): 248–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A. and Schwarzschild, M., “Inhomogeneous Stellar Models. II. Models with Exhausted Cores in Gravitational Contraction,” ApJ 116 (1952): 463–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. L. and Sandage, A. R., “The Galactic Cluster M67 and its Significance for Stellar Evolution,” ApJ 121 (1955): 616–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Walter S., “Some Radial Velocity Results,” PASP 25 (1913): 259–60Google Scholar
Kuiper, Gerard, “Two New White Dwarfs; Notes on Proper Motion Stars,” ApJ 89 (1939): 548–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosswell, Ken, “The Rise of the Subdwarfs,” chapter 8 in Alchemy of the Heavens (New York: Doubleday, 1995)
Roman, Nancy, “A Catalogue of High-Velocity Stars,” ApJ Supplement 2 (1955): 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, and Morgan, , Transactions of the IAU 11A (New York: Academic Press, 1962)Google Scholar
Keenan, , in Stars and Stellar Systems, 3, Basic Astronomical Data (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Joseph W. and Aller, Lawrence H., “The Atmospheres of A-Type Subdwarfs and 95 Leonis,” ApJ 114 (1951): 52–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Henry Norris, “Notes on White Dwarfs and Small Companions,” AJ 51 (1944): 13–17: 13. White Dwarfs, E. Schatzman, ed. (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1958), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holberg, J. B. and Wesemael, F., “The Discovery of the Companion of Sirius and its Aftermath,” JHA 38 (2007): 161–74Google Scholar
Holberg, J. B., “The Discovery of the Existence of White Dwarf Stars: 1860 to 1930,” JHA 30 (2009): 137–54Google Scholar
Adams, Walter S., “An A-type Star of Very Low Luminosity,” PASP 26 (1914): 198, and “The Spectrum of the Companion of Sirius,” PASP 27 (1915): 236–37, both in Bartusiak, 329–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Maanen, A., “Two Faint Stars with Large Proper Motions,” PASP 29 (1917): 258–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holberg, J. B., “How Degenerate Stars Came to be Known as White Dwarfs,” BAAS 37 (2005), p. 150Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S., Stars and Atoms (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927)
Holberg, J. B., “The Discovery of the Existence of White Dwarf Stars: 1860 to 1930,” JHA 30 (2009): 137–54Google Scholar
Fowler, Ralph, “On Dense Matter,” MNRAS 87 (Dec. 1926): 114–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S., “The Maximum Mass of Ideal White Dwarfs,” ApJ 74 (1931): 81–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauenberg, Michael, “Edmund C. Stoner and the Discovery of the Maximum Mass of White Dwarfs,” JHA 39 (2008): 297–312Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur, Empire of the Stars (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 2005)Google Scholar
Stanley, Matthew, Practical Mystic: Religion, Science and A. S. Eddington (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Baade, Walter and Zwicky, Fritz, “Remarks on Super-Novae and Cosmic Rays,” Phys. Rev. 46 (193): 76–77CrossRef
Kellermann, Ken and Sheets, B., eds., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)
Longair, Malcolm, “The Discovery of Pulsars and the Aftermath,” Proceedings of the APS 155 (2011): 147–57Google Scholar
Hewish, Anthony, Bell, S. Jocelyn, Pilkington, John D. H. et al., “Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source,” Nature 217 (February 24, 1968): 709–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Thomas, “Rotating Neutron Stars as the Origin of the Pulsating Radio Sources,” Nature 218 (1968): 731–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staelin, David H. and Reifenstein, Edward C. III, “Pulsating Radio Sources near the Crab Nebula,” Science 162 (1968): 1481–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocke, W. J., Disney, M. J., and Taylor, D. J., “Discovery of Optical Signals from Pulsar NP 0532,” Nature 221 (Feb. 8, 1969): 525–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, Kaj, “61 Cygni as a Triple System,” PASP 55 (Feb. 1943): 29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, , The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Reuyl, Dirk and Holmberg, E., “On the Existence of a Third Component in the System 70 Ophiuchi,” ApJ 97 (1943): 41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, , “Physical Characteristics of Stellar Companions of Small Mass,” PASP 55 (April 1943): 79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Kamp, , “Stars or Planets?Sky and Telescope 4 (December 1944)Google Scholar
Russell, , “Physical Characteristics,” 79–86, and “Notes on White Dwarfs and Small Companions,” AJ 52 (June 1944): 13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Shiv S., “The Structure of Stars of Very Low Mass,” ApJ 137 (1963): 1121–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafatos, Minas C., Harrington, Robert S., Maran, Stephen P., eds., Astrophysics of Brown Dwarfs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)
Becklin, E. E. and Zuckerman, B., “A Low-temperature Companion to a White Dwarf Star,” Nature 336 (1988): 656–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, David W. et al., “The Unseen Companion of HD114762 – A Probable Brown Dwarf,” Nature 339 (1989): 38–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, T., Oppenheimer, B. R., Kulkarni, S. R. et al., “Discovery of a Cool Brown Dwarf,” Nature 378 (1995): 463–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebolo, R., Osorio, M. R. Zapatero, and Martin, E. L., “Discovery of a Brown Dwarf in the Pleiades Star Cluster,” Nature 377 (1995): 129–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgasser, Adam J., “The T-type Dwarfs,” in Gray, Richard O. and Corbally, Christopher J., Stellar Spectral Classification (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Mayor, Michel and Queloz, Didier, “A Jupiter-mass companion to a Solar-type star,” Nature 378 (1995): 355–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, Geoff, Butler, Paul et al., “The Planet around 51 Pegasi,” ApJ 481 (2007): 926–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Jason et al., “The Exoplanet Orbit Database,” PASP 123 (2011): 412–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Kevin et al., “Possible Thermochemical Disequilibrium in the Atmosphere of the Exoplanet GJ 436b,” Nature 464 (2010): 1161–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, G., “The Stellar Metallicity-giant Planet Connection,” MNRAS 285 (1997): 403–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Debra and Valenti, Jeff, “The Planet-Metallicity Correlation, ApJ 622 (2005): 1102–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sozzetti, A. et al., “A Keck HIRES Doppler Search for Planets Orbiting Metal-Poor Dwarfs. II. On the Frequency of Giant Planets in the Metal-Poor Regime,” ApJ 697 (2009): 544–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortney, J. J. et al., “Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magnitude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits,” ApJ 659 (2007): 1661–72Google Scholar
Marchi, S., “Extrasolar Planet Taxonomy: A New Statistical Approach,” ApJ 666 (2007): 475–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, Robert Grant, The Binary Stars (New York: D. C. McMurtrie, 1918)Google Scholar
Ondra, Leos, “A New View of Mizar,” Sky and Telescope 108 (2004): 72ffGoogle Scholar
Graney, Christopher M., “The Accuracy of Galileo’s Observations,” Baltic Astronomy 16 (2007): 443–49Google Scholar
Herschel, William, “Catalogue of Double Stars,” PTRSL 72 (1782): 112–62Google Scholar
Herschel, William, “Account of the Changes that have happened, during the last Twenty-Five Years, in the relative Situation of Double-stars, with an investigation of the Cause to which they are owing,” PTRSL 93 (1803): 339–82Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, William Herschel and the Construction of the Heavens (London: Oldbourne, 1963)Google Scholar
Blaauw, Adriaan, “A Study of the Scorpio–Centaurus Cluster,” Publications of the Kapteyn Astronomical Laboratory at Groningen 52 (1946 PhD thesis)Google Scholar
Ambartsumian, V. A., in Stellar Evolution and Astrophysics (Yerevan: Armenian Academy of Sciences, 1947)Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, Sydney, “A Study of Reflection Nebulae,” AJ 71 (1966): 990–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, W., “R associations. I – UBV Photometry and MK Spectroscopy of Stars in Southern Reflection Nebulae,” AJ 80 (1976): 212–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, Walter, “The Resolution of Messier 32, NGC 205, and the Central Region of the Andromeda Nebula,” ApJ 100 (1944): 137–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl of Rosse, “Observations on the Nebulae,” PTRSL 140 (1850): 499–514Google Scholar
Hubble, Edwin, “Photographic Investigations of the Faint Nebulae,” Publications of the Yerkes Observatory 4, pt. 2 (dissertation completed in 1917, published in 1920)Google Scholar
Schmidt, Maarten, “Discovery of Quasars,” in Kellermann, K. and Sheets, B., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)Google Scholar
Berenzden, Richard, Hart, Richard, and Seeley, Daniel, Man Discovers the Galaxies (New York: Science History Publications, 1976)Google Scholar
Whitney, Charles A., The Discovery of Our Galaxy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971)Google Scholar
Clerke, Agnes, The System of the Stars, 1st ed. (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1890), p. 368Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, The Expanding Universe: Astronomy’s ‘Great Debate,’ 1900–1931 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, “Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part 1,” JHA 39 (2008): 91–119Google Scholar
Steinicke, Wolfgang, Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Allan, “Classification and Stellar Content of Galaxies,” in Sandage, Allan, Sandage, Mary, and Kristian, Jerome, eds., Galaxies and the Universe (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Wolf, Max, “Die Klassifizierung der kleinen Nebelflecken,” Publikationen des Astrophysikalischen Instituts Königstuhl-Heidelberg 3, no. 5 (1909): 109–12Google Scholar
Dick, Steven, The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Christianson, Gale E., Edwin Hubble: Mariner of the Nebulae (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1995)Google Scholar
Hubble, , “Photographic Investigations of the Faint Nebulae,” Publications of the Yerkes Observatory 4, pt. 2 (1920): 1Google Scholar
Hubble, , “A General Study of Diffuse Galactic Nebulae,” ApJ 56 (1922): 162–99: 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R. and Berenzden, R., “Hubble’s Classification of Non-Galactic Nebulae,” JHA 2 (1971): 109–19: 113Google Scholar
Earl of Rosse, “Observations on the Nebulae,” PTRSL 140 (1850): 499–514Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, “Rosse, Robinson and the Resolution of the Nebulae,” JHA 21 (1990): 331–44Google Scholar
Dewhirst, D. W. and Hoskin, M., “The Rosse Spirals,” JHA 22 (1991): 257–65Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, “The ‘Great Debate’: What Really Happened,” JHA 7 (1976): 169–82Google Scholar
Trimble, Virginia, “The 1920 Shapley-Curtis Discussion: Background, Issues and Aftermath,” PASP 107 (1995): 1133–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leavitt, Henrietta, “1777 Variables in the Magellanic Clouds,” HCO Annals 60 (1908): 87–108Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen, “Harlow Shapley and the Cepheids,” in The Great Copernicus Chase (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Berenzden, Richard, “Hubble’s Announcement of Cepheids in Spiral Nebulae,” PASP 10 (1967), pp. 425–40Google Scholar
Hubble, , “Cepheids in Spiral Nebulae,” PA 33 (1925): 252ff., reprinted in part in Bartusiak, Archives, pp. 407–14, and “A Spiral Nebula as a Stellar System, Messier 31,” ApJ 63 (1926): 236–74Google Scholar
Hubble, , “NGC 6822, A Remote Stellar System,” ApJ 62 (1925): 409–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Robert, Expanding Universe, pp. 111–36, and Smith, , “Beyond the Galaxy,” Part 2, JHA 40 (2009): 71–107Google Scholar
Hubble, , “Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” ApJ 64 (1926): 321–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Allan, The Mount Wilson Observatory: Breaking the Code of Cosmic Evolution, vol. 1 of the Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Buta, Ronald J., Corwin, Harold G., Jr., and Odewahn, Stephen C., The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Hubble, , The Realm of the Nebulae (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1936)Google Scholar
Seyfert, C. K., “Nuclear Emission in Spiral Nebulae,” ApJ 97 (1943): 28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fath, E. A., “The Spectra of Some Spiral Nebulae and Globular Star Clusters,” Lick Obs. Bulletin 5 (1909): 71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J. S., Parsons, S. J., and Philips, J. W., “Fluctuations in Cosmic Radiation at Radio Frequencies,” Nature 158 (1946): 234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, Woodruff T. III, Cosmic Noise: A History of Early Radio Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Baade, W. and Minkowski, R., “Identification of the Radio Sources in Cassiopeia, Cygnus A and Puppis A,” ApJ 119 (1954): 206–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, J. G., “Discrete Sources of Galactic Radio Frequency Noise,” Nature 162 (1948): 141–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, John G., Stanley, Gordon J., and Slee, O. B., “Positions of Three Discrete Sources of Galactic Radio-Frequency Radiation,” Nature 164 (1949): 101–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, W. and Minkowski, R., “Identification of the Radio Sources in Cassiopeia, Cygnus A and Puppis A,” ApJ 119 (1954): 206–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfven, Hannes and Herlofson, Nicolai, “Cosmic Radiation and Radio Stars,” Physical Review 78 (1950): 616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, G. R., “Estimates of the Total Energy in Particles and Magnetic Field in the Non-Thermal Radio Sources,” ApJ 129 (1959): 849–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alimi, Jean-Michel and Fuzfa, Andre, eds., Albert Einstein Century International Conference vol. 861 (Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics, 2006)Google Scholar
Schmidt, Maarten, “Discovery of Quasars,” in Kellermann, K. and Sheets, B., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)Google Scholar
Schmidt, Maarten, “The Discovery of Quasars,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 155 (2011): pp. 142–6Google Scholar
Preston, Richard, “Beacons in Time – Maarten Schmidt and the Discovery of Quasars,” Mercury 17 (1988): 2–11Google Scholar
Hazard, Cyril et al., “Investigation of Radio Source 3C 273 by the Method of Lunar Occultations,” Nature 197 (1963): 1037–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Maarten, “3C 273: A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift,” Nature 197 (1963): 1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Jesse and Matthews, Thomas A., “Red-Shift of the Unusual Radio Source: 3C 48,” Nature 197 (1963): 1041–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oke, John, “Absolute Energy Distribution in the Optical Spectrum of 3C 273,” Nature 197 (1963): 1040–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Maarten and Matthews, Thomas A., “Redshift of the Quasi-Stellar Radio Sources 3C 47 and 3C 147,” ApJ 139 (1964): 781–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Jesse L. and Schmidt, Maarten, “The Quasi-Stellar Radio Sources 3C 48 and 3C 273,” ApJ 140 (1964): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Norris, “Sirius B and Gravitational Redshift – An Historical Review,” QJRAS 21 (1980): 246–52Google Scholar
Science and Objectivity: Episodes in the History of Astronomy (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1988)
Smith, H. J. and Hoffleit, D., “Light Variations in the Superluminous Radio Galaxy 3C273,” Nature 198 (1963): 650–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, and Hoffleit, , “Light Variability and Nature of 3C273,” AJ 68 (1963): 292–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salpeter, E. E., “Accretion of Interstellar Matter by Massive Objects,” ApJ 140 (1964): 796–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zel’Dovich, Y. B., “Probability of Quasar Production,” Soviet Astronomy 9 (1965): 221–23Google Scholar
Arp, Halton, Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies (Berkeley: Interstellar Media, 1987)Google Scholar
Schmidt, Maarten, “Discovery of Quasars,” in Kellermann and Sheets, Serendipitous Discoveries, p. 171
Strittmatter, P. A., Serkowski, K., Carswell, R. et al., “Compact Extragalactic Nonthermal Sources,” ApJ 175 (1972): L7–L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oke, J. B. and Gunn, J. E., “The Distance of BL Lacertae,” ApJ Letters 189 (1974): 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, J. F. C. et al., “The Radio Morphology of Blazars and Relationships to Optical Polarization and to Normal Radio Galaxies,” ApJ 279 (1984): 93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, Cuno, “354 Neue Veranderliche,” AN 236 (1929): 233–44Google Scholar
Schmitt, John L., “BL Lac Identified as Radio Source,” Nature 218 (1968): 663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “John Michell and Black Holes,” JHA 10 (1979): 42–43Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S., “The Maximum Mass of Ideal White Dwarfs,” ApJ 74 (1931): 81–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauenberg, Michael, “Edmund C. Stoner and the Discovery of the Maximum Mass of White Dwarfs,” JHA 39 (2008): 297–312Google Scholar
Holberg, J. B., “The Discovery of the Existence of White Dwarf Stars: 1860 to 1930,” JHA 30 (2009): 137–54Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur, Empire of the Stars (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 2005)Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. R. and Volkoff, G. M., “On Massive Neutron Cores, “Physical Review 55 (1939): 374–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, and Snyder, Hartland, “On Continued Gravitational Contraction,” Physical Review 56 (1939): 455–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., “Galactic Nuclei as Collapsed Old Quasars,” Nature 223 (1969): 690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Martin J., “Dissipative Processes, Galaxy Formation and ‘Early’ Star Formation,” Symposium on Quasars and Active Nuclei of Galaxies, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 27–July 2, 1977, Physica Scripta 17 (1978): 371–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, John Archibald, Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics (New York: W. W. Norton, 1998)Google Scholar
Hirsh, Richard F., Glimpsing an Invisible Universe: The Emergence of X-Ray Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Webster, B. Louise and Murdin, Paul, “Cygnus X-1-a Spectroscopic Binary with a Heavy Companion?”Nature 235 (1972): 37–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Lynden, “Galactic Nuclei”; R. D. Blandford and M. Rees, “A Twin-Exhaust Model for Double Radio Sources,” MNRAS 169 (1974): 395Google Scholar
Tonry, John, “Evidence for a Central Mass Concentration in M32,” ApJ 283 (1984): L27–L30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Marel, Roeland P., Gerssen, Joris et al., “Hubble Space Telescope Evidence for an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole in The Globular Cluster M15,” Parts I and II, AJ 124 (2002): 3255–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, William, “Astronomical Observations Relating to the Construction of the Heavens, Arranged for the Purpose of a Critical Examination, the Result of Which Appears to Throw Some New Light upon the Organization of the Celestial Bodies,” PTRSL 101 (1811): 269–336Google Scholar
Hoskin, , The Construction of the Heavens: William Herschel’s Cosmology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Holmberg, Erik, A Study of Double and Multiple Galaxies, in Annals of the Observatory of Lund (Lund: Lund Observatory, 1937)Google Scholar
Mallas, John H. and Kreimer, Evered, The Messier Album (Cambridge, MA: Sky Publishing, 1978)Google Scholar
Baade, , “The Globular Cluster NGC 2419,” ApJ 82 (1935): 396–412: 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, , “NGC 147 and NGC 185, “Two New Members of the Local Group of Galaxies,” ApJ 100 (1944): 147–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, Harlow and Ames, Adelaide, “A Study of a Cluster of Bright Spiral Nebulae,” HCO Circular, vol. 294 (1926): pp. 1–8Google Scholar
Hubble, E. and Humason, M., “The Velocity-Distance Relation among Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” ApJ 74 (1931): 43–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, Harlow, “Luminosity Distribution and Average Density of Matter in Twenty-five Groups of Galaxies,” PNAS (1933): 19, 591–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwicky, Fritz, “On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae,” ApJ 86 (1937): 217–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van denBergh, Sidney, “The Early History of Dark Matter,” PASP 111 (1999): 657–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, F., “On the Formation of Clusters of Nebulae and the Cosmological Time Scale,” PNAS 25 (1939): 604–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwicky, , “On the Clustering of Nebulae,” PASP 50 (1938): 218–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, George, “The Distribution of Rich Clusters of Galaxies,” ApJ Supplement, 3 (1958): 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, G., Corwin, H. G., and Olowin, R. P., “A Catalog of Rich Clusters of Galaxies,” ApJ Supplement, 70 (1989): 1–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humason, Milton L., Mayall, Nicholas U., and Sandage, Allan R., “Redshifts and Magnitudes of Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” AJ 61 (1956): 97–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammann, G. A., in Richter, O.-G. and Binggeli, B., eds., The Virgo Cluster, ESO Workshop Proceedings No. 20 (Garching: ESO 1985)Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H., Cosmologische Briefe über die Einrichtung des Weltbaues (Augsburg, 1761), translated by Stanley L. Jaki as Cosmological Letters on the Arrangement of the Universe (New York: Science History Publications, 1976)Google Scholar
Harrison, Edward R., Darkness at Night: A Riddle of the Universe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, , “The Local Supercluster of Galaxies,” Astronomical Society of India Bulletin 9 (1981): 1–23: 6Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, Gerard, “Evidence for a Local Supergalaxy,” AJ 58 (1953): 30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, , “Further Evidence for a Local Super-cluster of Galaxies: Rotation and Expansion,” AJ 63 (1958): 253–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, C. D. and Wirtanen, C. A., “The Distribution of Galaxies,” Publications of the Lick Observatory 22 (1957): 1–60Google Scholar
Seldner, M., Siebars, B., Groth, E. J., and Peebles, P. J. E., “New Reduction of the Lick Catalog of Galaxies,” AJ 82 (1977): 249–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudnicki, Zwicky, “Zur Nichtexistenz von Haufen von Galaxienhaufen,” Zeitschrift für Astrophysik 64 (1966): 246–55Google Scholar
Karpowicz, Maria, “On the Non-Existence of Clusters of Clusters of Galaxies. II,” Zeitschrift für Astrophysik 66 (1967): 301–7Google Scholar
Joeveer, M. and Einasto, J., “Has the Universe the Cell Structure?” in Longair, M. S. and Einasto, J., eds., The Large Scale Structure of the Universe(Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978)Google Scholar
Einasto, J., “Dark Matter and Large Scale Structure,” in Historical Development of Modern Cosmology,” in PASP Conference series, vol. 252, ed. Martinez, V. J., Trimble, V., and Pons-Bordeia, M. J. (San Francisco: ASP, 2001)Google Scholar
De Vaucouleurs, , “Who Discovered the Local Supercluster of Galaxies?” letter in The Observatory 109 (1989): 237–38Google Scholar
De Vaucouleurs, , “Evidence for a Local Supergalaxy,” AJ 58 (1953): 30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahav, O. et al., “The Supergalactic Plane Revisited with the Optical Redshift Survey,” MNRAS 312 (2000): 166–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, Harlow, “Note on a Remote Cloud of Galaxies in Centaurus,” HCO Bulletin 874 (1930): 9–12Google Scholar
Raychaudhury, Somak, “The Distribution of Galaxies in the Direction of the ‘Great Attractor’,” Nature 342 (1989): 251–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, M. J. and Huchra, J. P., “Mapping the Universe,” Science 246 (1989): 897–903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirshner, R. P. et al., “A Million Cubic Megaparsec Void in Boötes,” ApJ 248 (1981): L57–L60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldovich, Ia. B. et al., “Giant Voids in the Universe,” Nature 300 (1982): 407–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, S. A. and Thompson, L. A., “The Coma/A1367 Supercluster and Its Environs,” ApJ 222 (1978): 784–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovanelli, R. and Haynes, M. P., “The Lynx-Ursa Major Supercluster,” AJ 87 (1982): 1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lapparent, Valerie, Geller, Margaret J., and Huchra, John P., “A Slice of the Universe,” ApJ 302 (1986): L1–L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparke, Linda S. and Gallagher, John S., Galaxies in the Universe: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Kirshner, R. P. et al., “A Survey of the Boötes Void,” ApJ 314 (1987): 493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, M. J. and Huchra, J. P., “Mapping the Universe,” Science 246 (1989): 897–903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, N. et al., “The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Number and Luminosity Density of Galaxies,” MNRAS 324 (2001): 825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gott, J. Richard III et al., “A Map of the Universe,” ApJ 624 (2005): 463–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962, expanded edition, 1970)Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell, “An Anatomy of Discovery,” Journal of Philosophy 64 (June 8, 1967): 321–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Ludwik, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Trenn, Thaddeus J. and Merton, Robert K., eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979Google Scholar
Caneva, Ken, “‘Discovery’ as a Site for the Collective Construction of Scientific Knowledge,” HSPS 35 (2005): 175–291Google Scholar
Lund, Matthew D., N. R. Hanson: Observation, Discovery, and Scientific Change (New York: Humanity Books, 2010)Google Scholar
Grau, Kevin T., “Force and Nature: The Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Indiana University, 1960–1998,” Isis 90 (1999): S295–S318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arabatzis, Theodore, “On the Inextricability of the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification,” in Schickore, J. and Steinle, F., eds., Revisiting Discovery and Justification (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006), pp. 215–30. Kuhn distinguished two classes of discovery in “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery,” Science 136 (1962): 760–64Google Scholar
Kuhn, , The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Wray, K. Brad, “Assessing the Influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Metascience 21 (2012): 1–10CrossRef
Kellermann, K. and Sheets, B., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)Google Scholar
Harwit, Martin, Cosmic Discovery: The Search, Scope & Heritage of Astronomy (New York: Basic Books, 1981)Google Scholar
Heilbron, John, Galileo (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
van Helden, Albert, “Galileo and Scheiner on Sunspots: A Case Study in the Visual Language of Astronomy,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 140 (1995): 358–96Google Scholar
On Sunspots, Reeves, Eileen and van Helden, Albert, trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010)
Biagoli, Mario, Galileo’s Instruments of Credit: Telescopes, Images, Secrecy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Helden, Albert, “Saturn and his Anses,” JHA 5 (1974): 105–21Google Scholar
Cunningham, Clifford J., The First Asteroid: Ceres, 1801–2001 (Surfside, FL: Star Lab Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G., “Gauss and the Discovery of Ceres,” JHA 2 (1971): 195–99Google Scholar
Cunningham, , The Collected Correspondence of Baron von Zach (Surfside, FL: Star Lab Press), vol. 1 (2004) and vol. 2 (2006)Google Scholar
Herschel, William, “Observations on the two lately discovered celestial Bodies,” PTRSL 92 (1802): 213–32Google Scholar
Hughes, David W. and Marsden, Brian, “Planet, Asteroid, Minor Planet: A Case Study in Astronomical Nomenclature,” JAHH 10 (March 2007): 21–30Google Scholar
Histories of Scientific Observation, Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011)
Huggins, , “The New Astronomy,” The Nineteenth Century 41 (June 1897): 907–29Google Scholar
Sheehan, William, Planets and Perception: Telescopic Views and Interpretations, 1609–1909 (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1988)
Hanson, Norwood Russell, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K., “Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England,” Osiris, 4, pt. 2 (1938): pp. 360–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), and The Tacit Dimension (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966)Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as If It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010), and references therein, as well as Robert E. Kohler’s review, “A Naturalizer’s Vision,” in Science 330 (2010): 450–51Google Scholar
Brannigan, Augustine, The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Galison, Peter, How Experiments End (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Aubin, David et al., eds., The Heavens on Earth: Observatories and Astronomy in Nineteenth-Century Science and Culture (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2010)CrossRef
Huff, Toby E., Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Sun, Xiao-Chun, “The Impact of the Telescope on Astronomy and Society in China,” in York, Donald G., Gingerich, Owen, and Zhang, Shuang-Nan, eds., The Astronomy Revolution: 400 Years of Exploring the Cosmos (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Edge, David O. and Mulkay, Michael J., Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain (New York: Wiley, 1976)
Collin, Suzy, “Quasars and Galactic Nuclei, a Half Century Agitated Story,” in Alimi, Jean-Michel and Fuzfa, Andre, eds., Albert Einstein Century International Conference, vol. 861 (Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics, 2006)Google Scholar
Collins, Harry, Gravity’s Ghost: Scientific Discovery in the Twenty-first Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Schechner, Sara, Comets, Popular Culture, and the Birth of Modern Cosmology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Yeomans, Donald, Comets: A Chronological History of Observation, Science, Myth, and Folklore (New York: Wiley, 1991)Google Scholar
Pankenier, David, Xu, Zhentao and Jiang, Yaotiao, East Asian Archaeoastronomy: Historical Records of Astronomical Observations of China, Japan, and Korea (New York and London: Cambria Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Ramsay, John T. and Licht, A. Lewis, The Comet of 44 B.C. and Caesar’s Funeral Games (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Christianson, J. R., “Tycho Brahe’s German Treatise on the Comet of 1577: A Study in Science and Politics,” Isis 70 (1979): 110–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoren, Victor E., The Lord of Uraniborg (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Hellman, C. Doris, The Comet of 1577: Its Place in the History of Astronomy (New York: AMS Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Westman, , The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism and Celestial Order (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. L., Galileo (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Whipple, Fred L., “A Comet Model I. The Acceleration of Comet Encke,” ApJ 111 (1950): 375–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oort, Jan H., “The Structure of the Cloud of Comets Surrounding the Solar System and a Hypothesis Concerning Its Origin,” BAIN 11 (1950): 91–110Google Scholar
Clark, David H. and Stephenson, F. Richard, The Historical Supernovae (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Stephenson, F. R. and Green, D. A., Historical Supernovae and Their Remnants (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, and Zwicky, , “On Supernovae,” PNAS 20 (May 15, 1934): 254–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, and Zwicky, , “Supernovae and Cosmic Rays,” Physical Review 45 (1934): 138Google Scholar
Osterbrock, Donald E., “Who Really Coined the Word Supernova/Who First Predicted Neutron Stars,” BAAS 33 (2001): 1330–31Google Scholar
Duerbeck, Hilmar, “Novae: An Historical Perspective,” in Bode, Michael F. and Evans, Adeurin, eds., Classical Novae (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2008)Google Scholar
Zwicky, Fritz, “On the Theory and Observation of Highly Collapsed Stars,” Physical Review 55 (1939): 726–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkowski, R., “Spectra of Supernovae,” PASP 53 (1941): 224–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littmann, Mark, The Heavens on Fire: The Great Leonid Meteor Storms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Olmsted, D., “Observations on the Meteors of 13 Nov. 1833,” AJSA 25 (1834): 363–411Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J., “Observation and Interpretation of the Leonid Meteors Over the Last Millennium,JAHH 1 (1998): 1–20Google Scholar
Newton, H. A., “Evidence of the Cosmical Origin of Shooting Stars Derived from the Dates of Early Star-showers,” AJSA 36 (1863): 145–49Google Scholar
Friedlander, Michael W., A Thin Cosmic Rain: Particles from Outer Space (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crease, Robert P. and Mann, Charles C., The Second Creation: Makers of the Revolution in 20th-Century Physics (New York: MacMillan, 1986)Google Scholar
Carlson, Per, “A Century of Cosmic Rays,” Physics Today 65 (2012): 30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, V. F., “Über Beobachtungen der durchdringenden Strahlung bei sieben Freiballonfahrt,” Physikalische Zeitschrift 13 (1912): 1084–91Google Scholar
Kolhörster, W., Physicakische Zeitschrift 14 (1913): 1153; Carlson (2012): 30–36
Otis, R. M. and Millikan, R. A., Phys. Rev. 23 (1924): 778
Millikan, Robert A. and Cameron, G. H., “The Origin of the Cosmic Rays,” Physical Review 32 (Oct. 1928): 533–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter, How Experiments End (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel, The Physicists (New York: Vintage Books, 1971)Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart, The Sun Kings: The Unexpected Tragedy of Richard Carrington and the Tale of How Modern Astronomy Began (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Parker, Eugene N., “Dynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Field,” ApJ 128 (1958): 664–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, , “Cosmic-ray Modulation by Solar Wind,” Physical Review 110 (1958): 1445–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, Karl, Exploring the Sun: Solar Science Since Galileo (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
van Allen, James, “Interplanetary Particles and Fields,” SciAm (September 1975), reprinted in The Solar System (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975)Google Scholar
Howard, R. A., “A Historical Perspective on Coronal Mass Ejections,” in Gopalswamy, N., Mewaldt, R., and Torsti, J., eds., Solar Eruptions and Energetic Particles (New York: American Geophysical Union, 2006)Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J., Sky and Ocean Joined, The U. S. Naval Observatory, 1830–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Dick, , “Discovering the Moons of Mars,” Sky and Telescope 76 (Sept. 1988): 242–43Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge, The Moon that Wasn’t: The Saga of Venus’ Spurious Satellite (Berlin: Birkhauser Basel, 2008)Google Scholar
Kragh, , “The Second Moon of the Earth,” JHA 40 (2009): 1–10Google Scholar
Baum, Richard and Sheehan, William, In Search of Planet Vulcan: The Ghost in Newton’s Clockwork Universe (New York and London: Plenum, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Robert and Baum, Richard, “William Lassell and the Ring of Neptune: A Case Study in Instrumental Failure,” JHA 15 (1984): 1–17Google Scholar
Elliot, J. L., Dunham, E., and Mink, D., “The Rings of Uranus,” Nature 267 (1977): 328–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, , Dunham, , and Millis, R. L., “Discovering the Rings of Uranus,” ST 53 (1977): 412–16Google Scholar
Smith, B. A., Soderblom, L. A., Johnson, T. V. et al., “The Jupiter System Through the Eyes of Voyager 1,” Science 204 (1979): 951–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. A., Soderblom, L. A., Banfield, D. et al., “Voyager 2 at Neptune: Imaging Science Results,” Science 246 (1989): 1422CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacking, Ian, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, John, The Measure of the Universe: A History of Modern Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Hetherington, Norris, Hubble’s Cosmology: A Guided Study of Selected Texts (Tucson: Pachart Publishing, 1996)Google Scholar
Hetherington, , The Edwin Hubble Papers: Previously Unpublished Manuscripts of the Extragalactic Nature of Spiral Nebulae (Tucson: Pachart Publishing, 1990)Google Scholar
Kragh, , Cosmology and Controversy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, The Expanding Universe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Smith, , “Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy, 1885–1965, Part 2,” JHA 40 (2009): 71–107Google Scholar
Nussbaumer, Harry and Bieri, Lydia, Discovering the Expanding Universe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Smith, , “Beyond the Galaxy,” Part 1,JHA (2008): 104Google Scholar
de Sitter, Willem, “On Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation, and Its Astronomical Consequences. Third Paper,” MNRAS 78 (1917): 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubble, Edwin, “A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” PNAS 15 (March 15, 1929): 168–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, , “Beyond the Galaxy,” JHA 40 (2009): 88Google Scholar
Hetherington, , “Philosophical Values and Observation in Edwin Hubble’s Choice of a Model of the Universe,” HSPS 13 (1982): 42–67Google Scholar
Hetherington, Norris, Hubble’s Cosmology: A Guided Study of Selected Texts (Tucson: Pachart Publishing, 1996)Google Scholar
Smith, , “Beyond the Galaxy,” JHA 40 (2009): 91Google Scholar
Hetherington, Norris, “Sirius B and Gravitational Redshift – An Historical Review,” QJRAS 21 (1980): 246–52Google Scholar
Hetherington, ’s Science and Objectivity: Episodes in the History of Astronomy (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge and Smith, Robert, “Who Discovered the Expanding Universe?History of Science 41 (2003): 141–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaître, G., “Un univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactic,” Annales de sociétés scientifique de Bruxelles 47 (1927): Annales sociétés, 49–56Google Scholar
Riess, Adam G., Filipchenko, Alexei, et al., “Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant,” AJ 116 (1998): 1009–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, Saul et al., “Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae,” ApJ 517 (June 1, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Robert, The Extravagant Universe: Exploding Stars, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Cosmos (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Filippenko, Alex, “Einstein’s Biggest Blunder? High-Redshift Supernovae and the Accelerating Universe,” PASP 113 (2001): 1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit, “A Week in Stockholm,” Science 336 (2012): 26–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, Woodruff T., III, Cosmic Noise: A History of Early Radio Astronomy (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Kellermann, K. and Sheets, B., eds., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)
Sullivan, , The Early Years of Radio Astronomy: Reflections Fifty Years after Jansky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzias, Arno A. and Wilson, Robert W., “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s,” ApJ 142 (July 1, 1965): 419–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H., Peebles, P. J. E., Roll, P. G., and Wilkinson, D. T., “Cosmic Black-Body Radiation,” ApJ 142 (1965): 416–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoot, George and Davidson, Keay, Wrinkles in Time (New York: Avon Books, 1993)Google Scholar
Mather, John C. and Boslough, John, The Very First Light (New York: Basic Books, 1996; revised edition, 2008)Google Scholar
Linnaeus, Carolus, Systema naturae: Facsimile of the First Edition (1735; Niewwkoop: B. DeGraaf, 1964)Google Scholar
Farber, Paul L., Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Sandage, Allan, The Mount Wilson Observatory: Breaking the Code of Cosmic Evolution, vol. 1 of the Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Morgan, W. W., “Remarks on the MK System,” in McCarthy, M. F., Philip, A. G. D., and Coyne, G. V., eds., Spectral Classification of the Future, Proceedings of IAU Colloq. 47, held in Vatican City, July 11–15, 1978 (Rome: Vatican Observatory, 1979)Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Star, Susan Leigh, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, in Foreword to Margulis, Lynn and Schwartz, Karlene V., Five Kingdoms: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth (New York: W. H. Freeman, 2nd ed., 1988)Google Scholar
Farber, Paul L., Finding Order in Nature; Ernst Mayr, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Sapp, Jan, The New Foundations of Evolution on the Tree of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Hull, David L., Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst, “Species Concepts and Their Application,” chapter 2 of Populations, Species and Evolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc, ed., The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)
Mayr, Ernst, Toward a New Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst, Systematics and the Origin of Species (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1942)Google Scholar
Gibbons, Ann, “The Species Problem,” Science 331 (Jan. 28, 2011)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margulis, Lynn and Schwartz, Karlene V., Five Kingdoms: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth (New York: W. H. Freeman, 2nd ed., 1988)Google Scholar
Sapp, Jan, The New Foundations of Evolution on the Tree of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Margulis, Lynn and Chapman, Michael J., Kingdoms & Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2010)Google Scholar
Dietrich, M., “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution within Evolutionary Biology,” JHB 31 (1998): 87–111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordin, Michael D., A Well-Ordered Thing: Dmitrii Mendeleev and the Shadow of the Periodic Table (New York: Basic Books, 2004)Google Scholar
Scerri, Eric, The Periodic Table: Its Story and Significance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge, Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray, The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1994)Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, John, “Auguste Comte’s Blunder: An Account of the First Century of Stellar Spectroscopy and How it Took One Hundred Years to Prove that Comte was Wrong!JAHH 13 (2010): 90–104Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, John, The Analysis of Starlight : One Hundred and Fifty Years of Astronomical Spectroscopy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Curtiss, Ralph H., “Classification and Description of Stellar Spectra,” Handbuch der Astrophysik, vol. 5, part 1 (1932): 1–108Google Scholar
Jackson, Myles, Spectrum of Belief (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen, ed., Astrophysics and 20th Century Astronomy to 1950: Part A, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)
Morgan, W. W., Keenan, P. C., and Kellman, E., Atlas of Stellar Spectra, with an Outline of Spectral Classification (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943)Google Scholar
DeVorkin, David and Kenat, Ralph, “Quantum Physics and the Stars (I): Establishment of a Stellar Temperature Scale,” JHA 14 (1983): 102–32Google Scholar
Curtiss, Ralph H., “Classification and Description of Stellar Spectra,” Handbuch der Astrophysik, vol. 5, part 1 (1932), pp. 1–108Google Scholar
Russell, H. N., Payne-Gaposhkin, C. H., and Menzel, D. H., “The Classification of Stellar Spectra,” ApJ 81 (1935): 107–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. W., “A Morphological Life,” ARAA 26 (1988): 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterbrock, Donald, Yerkes Observatory, 1892–1950: The Birth, Near Death and Resurrection of a Scientific Research Institution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Morgan, W. W., “On the Spectral Classification of the Stars of Types A to K,” ApJ 85 (1937): 380–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. W., “On the Determination of Color Indices of Stars from a Classification of Their Spectra,” ApJ 87 (1938): 460–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterbrock, Donald, “Fifty Years Ago: Astronomy; Yerkes Observatory; Morgan, Keenan and Kellman,” in Corbally, C. J., Gray, R. O., and Garrison, R. F., eds., The MK Process at 50 Years (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1994)Google Scholar
Feast, M. W. and Thackeray, A. D., “Red Supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud,” MNRAS 116 (1956): 587–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. W. and Keenan, P. C., “Spectral Classification,” ARAA 11 (1973): 29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinicke, Wolfgang, Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, , “The Classification of Galaxies: Early History and Ongoing Developments,” ARAA 43 (2005): 581–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubble, Edwin, The Realm of the Nebulae (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1936)Google Scholar
Hart, R. and Berenzden, R., “Hubble, Lundmark and the Classification of Non-Galactic Nebulae,” JHA 2 (1971): 200Google Scholar
Hart, R. and Berendzen, R., “Hubble’s Classification of Non-Galactic Nebulae, 1922–1926,” JHA 2 (1971): 109–19Google Scholar
Teerikorpi, Pekka, “Lundmark’s Unpublished 1922 Nebula Classification,” JHA 20 (1989): 165–70Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, The Expanding Universe: Astronomy’s Great Debate, 1900–1931 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Smith, , “Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part 2,” JHA 40 (2009): 78Google Scholar
Block, David L. and Freeman, Kenneth C., Shrouds of the Night: Masks of the Milky Way and Our Awesome New View of Galaxies (New York: Springer, 2008)Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, Gérard, “Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies,” “Handbuch der Physik 53 (1959): 275ffGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, Sidney, Galaxy Morphology and Classification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buta, Ronald J., Corwin, Harold G., Jr., and Odewahn, Stephen C., The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Marsden, , “On the Relationship between Comets and Minor Planets,” AJ 75 (1970): 206–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A’Hearn, Michael F., “Pluto: A Planet or a Trans-Neptunian Object? in Rickman, Hans, ed., IAU Highlights of Astronomy, 12 (San Francisco: ASP Conference series, 2002)
Carroll, Sean B., Remarkable Creatures: Epic Adventures in the Search for the Origins of Species (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt, 2009)Google Scholar
Latham, D. et al., “Kepler-7b: A Transiting Planet with Unusually Low Density,” ApJ Letters 713 (2010): L140–L144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. R. et al., “Wasp-17b: An Ultra-Low Density Planet in a Probable Retrograde Orbit,” ApJ 709 (2010): 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortney, J. J. et al., “Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magnitude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits,” ApJ 659 (2007): 1661–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, S., “Extrasolar Planet Taxonomy: A New Statistical Approach,” ApJ 666 (2007): 475–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwit, Martin, Cosmic Discovery: The Search, Scope and Heritage of Astronomy (New York: Basic Books, 1981)Google Scholar
Sapp, Jan, The New Foundations of Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Gordin, Michael D., A Well-Ordered Thing: Dmitrii Mendeleev and the Shadow of the Periodic Table (New York: Basic Books, 2004)Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray, The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1994)Google Scholar
Davies, Paul, Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Universe Is Just Right for Life (Boston and New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 2007)Google Scholar
Asimov, Isaac has made the same point in his popular books; for example, Atom: Journey Across the Subatomic Cosmos (New York: Penguin, 1992)Google Scholar
Gray, Richard O. and Corbally, Christopher J., Stellar Spectral Classification (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Morgan, , “On the Spectral Classification of the Stars of Types A to K,ApJ 85 (1937): 380ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O., Foreword to Margulis, Lynn and Chapman, Michael, Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla on Earth (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2010)Google Scholar
Strain, Daniel, “8.7 Million: A New Estimate for All the Complex Species on Earth,” Science 333 (2011): 1083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messeri, Lisa, “The Problem with Pluto: Conflicting Cosmologies and the Classification of Planets,” Social Studies of Science 40/2 (April 2010): 187–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Hughes, and Marsden, , JAHH 10 (2007): 22
Cunningham, C. J., The First Asteroid: Ceres 1801–2001, Historical Studies in Asteroid Research, volume 1 (Surfside, FL: Star Lab Press, 2002), pp. 251–52Google Scholar
Hughes and Marsden, JAHH 10 (2007): 21–30: 23
Nielsen, A. V., “History of the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram,” Centaurus 9 (1963): 219–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, A. H., Review of Morgan, Keenan and Kellman’s An Atlas of Stellar Spectra, ApJ 98 (1943): 240Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. H., “The Classification of the Spiral Nebulae,” The Observatory 50 (1927): 185–89Google Scholar
Ekers, R. D. and Kellermann, K. I., “Discoveries in Astronomy,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 155 (2011): 129–33Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, “Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, part 2,” JHA 40 (2009): 72Google Scholar
van Helden, Albert and Hankins, Thomas, “Introduction: Instruments in the History of Science,” Osiris, 2nd series, ix (1994): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. N., Kellermann, K. I., Ekers, R. D., Cordes, J. M., and Lazio, T. J., “The Exploration of the Unknown,” New Astronomy Reviews 48 (2004): 1551–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sessler, Andrew and Wilson, Edmund, Engines of Discovery: A Century of Particle Accelerators (Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter, How Experiments End (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Galison, , Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, “Engines of Discovery: Scientific Instruments and the History of Astronomy and Planetary Science in the United States in the Twentieth Century,” JHA 32 (1997): 49–77Google Scholar
Huff, Toby E., “Inventing the Discovery Machine,” in Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Van Helden, , “Telescopes and Authority from Galileo to Cassini,” Instruments, Osiris, second series, vol. 9 (1994): 8–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinicke, Wolfgang, Observing Nebulae and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidel, Charles C. et al., “Lyα Imaging of a Proto-Cluster Region at <z>=3.09,” ApJ 532 (2000): 170–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Ann, A Grand and Bold Thing (New York and London: Free Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Sandage, Allan, “The Ability of the 200-inch Telescope to Discriminate Between Selected World Models,ApJ 133 (1961): 355–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Steven, Sky and Ocean Joined: The U.S. Naval Observatory, 1830–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Jewitt, David and Luu, Jane, “Discovery of the Candidate Kuiper Belt Object 1992 QB1,” Nature 362 (1993): 730–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frercks, Jan, Weber, Heiko, and Wiesenfeldt, Gerhard, “Reception and Discovery: The Nature of Johann Wilhelm Ritter’s Invisible Rays,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40, no. 2 (2009): 143–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchwald, Jed Z., The Creation of Scientific Effects (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, James Clerk, “A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 155 (1865): 459–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, Basil, The Man Who Changed Everything: The Life of James Clerk Maxwell (Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003)Google Scholar
Rieke, George H., “History of Infrared Telescopes and Astronomy,” Experimental Astronomy 25 (2009): 125–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, Lyman, Jr., “Ultraviolet Spectra of the Stars,” in Hanle, Paul and von del Chamberlain, , eds., Space Science Comes of Age: Perspectives in the History of the Space Sciences (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Friedman, Herbert, The Astronomer’s Universe: Stars, Galaxies and Cosmos (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990)Google Scholar
Sullivan, Woodruff T., III, Cosmic Noise: A History of Early Radio Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Hirsh, Richard F., Glimpsing an Invisible Universe: The Emergence of X-ray Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Barstow, Martin A. and Holberg, Jay B., Extreme Ultraviolet Astronomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVorkin, David H., Science with a Vengeance: How the Military Created the US Space Sciences After World War II (New York: Springer, 1992)Google Scholar
Weinreb, S., Barrett, A. H., Meeks, M. L., and Henry, J. C., “Radio Observations of OH in the Interstellar Medium,” Nature 200 (1963): 829–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellermann, K. and Sheets, B., Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy (Green Bank: NRAO, 1983)Google Scholar
Carruthers, George, “Rocket Observation of Interstellar Molecular Hydrogen,” ApJ 161 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, , “Atomic and Molecular Hydrogen in Interstellar Space,” SSR 10 (1970): 459–82Google Scholar
Scoville, N. Z. and Solomon, P. M., “Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy,” ApJ 199 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Lewis, “The Search for Biomolecules in Space,” in Kellermann, K. I. and Seielstad, G. A., eds., The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence” (Green Bank, WVA: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 1986)Google Scholar
Scoville, and Solomon, , “Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy,” ApJ 199 (1975): L105–L109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, P. M., Sanders, D. B., and Scoville, N. Z., “Giant Molecular Clouds in the Galaxy: A Survey of the Distribution and Physical Properties of GMC’s,” BAAS 9 (1977): 554Google Scholar
Michel, F. Curtis, “Pulsar Planetary Systems,” ApJ 159 (Jan. 1970): L25–L28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J. G., “Planetary Companions to Pulsars,” Nature 226 (1970): 730–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rees, M. J., Trimble, V. L., and Cohen, J. M., “Planet, Pulsar, ‘Glitch’ and Wisp,” Nature 229 (1971): 395–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell, , Out of the Zenith: Jodrell Bank, 1957–1970 (New York: Harper & Row, 1974)Google Scholar
Wolszczan, A., and Frail, D. A., “A Planetary System around the Millisecond Pulsar PSR 1257+12,” Nature 355 (1992): 145–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolszczan, A., “Confirmation of Earth – Mass Planets Orbiting the Millisecond Pulsar PSR B1257+12,” Science 264 (1994): 538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backer, D. C. et al., “A Second Companion of the Millisecond Pulsar 1620–26,” Nature 365 (1993): 817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsett, S. E. et al., “PSR B1620–26: A Binary Radio Pulsar with a Planetary Companion?ApJ Letters 412 (1993): L33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurdsson, S. et al., “A Young White Dwarf Companion to Pulsar B1620–26: Evidence for Early Planet Formation,” Science 301 (2003): 193–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieke, George, The Last of the Great Observatories: Spitzer and the Era of Faster, Better, Cheaper at NASA (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Aumann, H. H., Gillett, F. C. et al., “Discovery of a Shell around Alpha Lyrae,” ApJ Letters 278 (1984): L23–L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. A. and Terrile, R. J., “A Circumstellar Disk around Beta Pictoris,” Science 226 (1984): 1421–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, Karl, Logik der Forschung, 1934 (The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1959)Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Curd, Martin and Cover, J. A., Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (New York: W.W. Norton, 1998)Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex, Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction (London and New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar
Gilder, Joshua and Gilder, Anne-Lee, Heavenly Intrigue: Johannes Kepler, Tycho Brahe, and the Murder Behind One of History’s Greatest Scientific Discoveries (New York: Doubleday, 2004)Google Scholar
Caspar, Max, Kepler, trans. Hellman, C. Doris (New York: Dover Publications, 1993), p. 197Google Scholar
Huff, Toby E., Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 57–59Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G., “Gauss and the Discovery of Ceres,” JHA 2 (1971): 195–99Google Scholar
Holberg, J. B. and Wesemael, F., “The Discovery of the Companion of Sirius and Its Aftermath,” JHA 38 (2007): 161–74Google Scholar
Holberg, , “The Discovery of the Existence of White Dwarf Stars: 1860 to 1930,” JHA 30 (2009): 137–54Google Scholar
Adams, J. C., “On the Orbit of the November Meteors,” MNRAS 27 (1867): 247–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiaparelli, G. V., “Intorno al corso ed all’origine probabile delle telle meteoriche,” Bulletin meteorologico dell’osservatorio del Collegio omano 5 (1867): 8–12Google Scholar
Peters, C. F. W., Letter dated January 29, Astronomische Nachrichten 68 (1867): 287–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Steven J., “Observation and Interpretation of the Leonid Meteors Over the Last Millennium,” JAHH 1 (1998): 1–20Google Scholar
von Humboldt, Alexander, Cosmos: A Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe, vol. 1 (New York: Harper & Brothers (1850)Google Scholar
Brown, E. W., “On the Predictions of Trans-Neptunian Planets from the Perturbations of Uranus,” PNAS 16 (1930): 364–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reaves, Gibson, “The Prediction and Discoveries of Pluto and Charon,” in Stern, S. Alan and Tholen, David J., eds., Pluto and Charon (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Tombaugh, Clyde W. and Moore, Patrick, Out of the Darkness: The Planet Pluto (New York: New American Library, 1980)Google Scholar
Edgeworth, K. E., “The Evolution of our Planetary System,” JBAA 53 (1943): 181–88Google Scholar
Edgeworth, , “The Origin and Evolution of the Solar System,” MNRAS 109 (1949): 600–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, Gerard, “On the Origin of the Solar System,” in Hynek, J. A., ed., Astrophysics: A Topical Symposium (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951)Google Scholar
Gold, Thomas, “Rotating Neutron Stars as the Origin of the Pulsating Radio Sources,” Nature 218 (1968): 731–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, Walter and Zwicky, Fritz, “Remarks on Super-Novae and Cosmic Rays,” Physical Review 46 (1934): 76–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzer, David and Thorne, Kip, “Normal Modes of Radial Pulsation of Stars at the End Point of Thermonuclear Evolution,” ApJ 145 (1966): 514–43CrossRef
Oppenheimer, J. R. and Volkoff, G. M., “On Massive Neutron Cores,” Physical Review 55 (1939): 374–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, and Snyder, Hartland, “On Continued Gravitational Contraction,” Physical Review 56 (1939): 455–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur I. in more popular fashion in Empire of the Stars: Obsession, Friendship, and Betrayal in the Quest for Black Holes (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2005)Google Scholar
Whitney, Charles A., The Discovery of Our Galaxy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971)Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex, Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction (London and New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar
Hart, R. and Berenzden, R., “Hubble’s Classification of Non-Galactic Nebulae,” JHA 2 (1971): 109–19Google Scholar
Ewen, H. I. and Purcell, E. M., “Observation of a Line in the Galactic Radio Spectrum: Radiation from Galactic Hydrogen at 1,420 Mc/sec,” Nature 168 (1951): 356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, D. H., “The Planetary Nebulae,” PASP 38 (1926): 295–312; H. Zanstra, Physical Review 27 (1926): 644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, William, “Catalogue of a second Thousand Nebulæ and Clusters of Stars; with a few introductory Remarks on the Construction of the Heavens,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 79 (1789): 212–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, Harlow, Beyond the Observatory (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1967)Google Scholar
Sessler, Andrew and Wilson, Edmund, Engines of Discovery: A Century of Particle Accelerators (Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Steven J., “Cosmic Evolution: History, Culture, and Human Destiny,” in Dick, Steven J. and Lupisella, Mark L., Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context (Washington, DC: NASA SP 4802, 2009)Google Scholar
Greene, John, Science, Ideology, and World View: Essays in the History of Evolutionary Ideas (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Secord, James, Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “The Nebular Hypothesis and the Science of Progress,” in Moore, J. R., ed., History, Humanity and Evolution: Essays in Honor of John C. Greene (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard, “The Evolution of the Evolutionary Epic,” in Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragh, Helge, Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen and Goodfield, June, The Discovery of Time (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Burchfield, Joe D., Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S., Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Allan, “Current Problems in the Extragalactic Distance Scale,” ApJ 127 (1958): 513–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, David A., How Old Is the Universe? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge and Smith, Robert, “Who Discovered the Expanding Universe?History of Science 41 (2003): 141–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Allan, The Mount Wilson Observatory: Breaking the Code of Cosmic Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen G., Nebulous Earth: The Origin of the Solar System and the Core of the Earth from Laplace to Jeffreys (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L., Creation by Natural Law: Laplace’s Nebular Hypothesis in American Thought (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J., The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Abell, G. O. and Goldreich, P., “On the Origin of Planetary Nebulae,” PASP 78 (1966): 232–41; Abell and Goldreich cite I. S. Shklovskii, Astr. Zhurnal USSR 33 (1956): 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dell, C. R., “The Evolution of the Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae,” ApJ 138 (1963): 67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, E. Margaret, Burbidge, Geoffrey R., Fowler, William A., and Hoyle, Fred, “Synthesis of the Elements in Stars,” Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (1957): 547–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., Evolution: The History of an Idea (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Baker, Catherine, The Evolution Dialogues: Science, Christianity, and the Quest for Understanding (Washington, DC: AAAS), 2006Google Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord, The Meaning of Evolution: A Study of the History of Life and of Its Significance for Man (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950)Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian, Evolutionary Humanism (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1992; first ed., 1964)Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius, Mankind Evolving: The Evolution of the Human Species (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1969; first ed., 1962)Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Vassily Betty, Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Shapley, Harlow, The View from a Distant Star: Man’s Future in the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1963)Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J. and Lupisella, Mark L., Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context (Washington, DC: NASA SP 4802, 2009)Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart, At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Wheeler, John A., At Home in the Universe (New York: American Institute of Physics, 1997)Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ursula, The Sacred Depths of Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Dowd, Michael, Thank God for Evolution: How the Marriage of Science and Religion will Transform Your Mind and Our World (New York: Viking, 2008)Google Scholar
Greene, John C., Science, Ideology and World View: Essays in the History of Evolutionary Ideas (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Durant, John, “Evolution, Ideology and World View: Darwinian Religion in the Twentieth Century,” in Moore, James R., ed., History, Humanity and Evolution: Essays for John C. Greene (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Carter, Brandon, “Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology,” in Longair, M. S., ed., Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data (Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing, 1974)Google Scholar
Barrow, John D. and Tipler, Frank J., The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Carr, Bernard, editor, Universe or Multiverse? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit, “A Week in Stockholm,” Science 336 (2012): 26–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, Arthur, Empire of the Stars (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 2005)Google Scholar
Cho, Adrian, “Last Hurrah: Final Tevatron Data Show Hints of Higgs Boson,” Science 335 (2012): 1159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Adrian, “Who Invented the Higgs Boson?Science 337 (2012): 1286–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Adrian, “Higgs Boson Makes Its Debut After Decades-Long Search,” Science 337 (2012): 141–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, Johanna, “The Higgs Particle, or Something Much Like It, Has Been Spotted,” Physics Today 65 (2012): 12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Jane, Fred Hoyle’s Universe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Lindley, David, The End of Physics (New York: Basic Books, 1994)Google Scholar
Horgan, John, The End of Science (New York: Addison Wesley, 1996)Google Scholar
Harwit, Martin, Cosmic Discovery: The Search, Scope and Heritage of Astronomy (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 39–44Google Scholar
Nielsen, Michael, Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Notes
  • Steven J. Dick
  • Book: Discovery and Classification in Astronomy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139521499.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Notes
  • Steven J. Dick
  • Book: Discovery and Classification in Astronomy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139521499.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Notes
  • Steven J. Dick
  • Book: Discovery and Classification in Astronomy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139521499.021
Available formats
×