Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:11:05.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Historical Context in Media Narratives in Search of Peaceful Resolution to the Israel–Palestine Conflict

A Comparative Study of BBC and Al Jazeera

from Part III - Media Discourse and Conflict Resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

By
Jelena Timotijevic
Edited by
Innocent Chiluwa
Innocent Chiluwa
Affiliation:
Covenant University, Nigeria
Get access

Summary

The chapter engages in a Critical Discourse Analysis of the language used in the media reporting of the most recent prime ministerial elections in Israel, in 2019. It draws on the tradition of Cultural-Historical and Activity Theory to highlight the impact of the wider historical context of the Israel–Palestine conflict in the media reporting of events in the region. It is a comparative study of the BBC’s and Al Jazeera’s reporting of the elections, examining a period from August 2019 (the pre-election period) through to October 2019 (the immediate post-election period). The data collected consists of six and nine online reports by the BBC and Al Jazeera, respectively. An overriding aim is an examination of the impact and the role of the history of the region in reporting on significant events. The work aims to contribute to other studies on the Israel–Palestine conflict which have argued that media is a contested space, and the news is not a neutral product.

Keywords

Critical Discourse Analysiscultural-historical and activity theoryhistorical materialismIsrael–Palestine conflictdialecticshegemonyAl JazeeraBBC
Type
Chapter
Information
Discourse, Media, and Conflict
Examining War and Resolution in the News
 , pp. 257 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badarin, Emile. 2016. Palestinian Political Discourse between Exile and Occupation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barker, Colin, and Dale, Gareth. 1997. “Class Will Out? Some Remarks on Social Movements in Europe.” Paper for theEuropean Sociological Association Conference, University of Essex, August 1997.Google Scholar
Barkho, Leon. 2008. “The Discursive and Social Power of News Discourse: The Case of Aljazeera in Comparison and Parallel with the BBC and CNN.” Studies in Language and Capitalism 3, 111–159.Google Scholar
Barkho, Leon. 2010. News from the BBC, CNN and Al-Jazeera: How the Three Broadcasters Cover the Middle East. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Barkho, Leon. 2011. “The Role of Internal Guidelines in Shaping News Narratives: Ethnographic Insights into the Discursive Rhetoric of Middle East Reporting by the BBC and Al-Jazeera English.” Critical Discourse Studies 8(4), 297–309.Google Scholar
Barkho, Leon, and John, E. Richardson. 2010. “A Critique of BBC’s Middle East News Production Strategy.” American Communication Journal 12(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chik. 1996. “To Concede or to Contest? Language and Class Struggle.” In To Make Another World: Studies in Protest and Collective Action, ed. by Barker, Collin and Kennedy, Paul, 69–90. Aldershot: Averbury.Google Scholar
Collins, Chik. 2000. “Vygotsky on Language and Social Consciousness: Underpinning the Use of Voloshinov in the Study of Popular Protest.” Historical Materialism 7(1), 41–69.Google Scholar
Collins, Chik, and Jones, Peter E.. 2006. “Analysis of Discourse as ‘a Form of History Writing’: A Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis and an Illustration of a Cultural-Historical Alternative.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 14(1&2), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deprez, Annelore, and Raeymaeckers, Karin. 2010. “Bias in the News? The Representation of Palestinians and Israelis in the Coverage of the First and Second Intifada.” The International Communication Gazette 72(1), 91–109.Google Scholar
Downey, John, Deacon, David, Golding, Peter, Oldfield, Ben, and Wring, Dominic. 2006. The BBC’s Reporting of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. A report for the BBC Board of Governors, March. Loughborough, UK: Communications Research Centre, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001a. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael, 121–137. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001b. “The Dialectics of Discourse.” Textus 12(2), 231–242.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2012. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Gee, James P. and Handford, Michael, 9–20. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1996. “On Critical Linguistics.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen R. and Coulthard, Malcolm, 3–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaber, Ivor, Seymour, Emily, and Thomas, Lisa. 2009. “Is the BBC Biased? The Corporation and the Coverage of the 2006 Israeli–Hezbollah War.” Journalism 10(2), 239–259.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter E. 2000. “The Dialectics of the Ideal and Symbolic Mediation.” In Evald Ilyenkov’s Philosophy Revisited, ed. by Oittinen, V.. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter E. 2004. “Discourse and Materialist Conception of History: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis.” Historical Materialism 12(1), 97–125.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. E. 2007. “Why There Is No Such Thing as ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’.” Language & Communication 27, 337–368.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. E. , and Collins, Chik. 2006. “Political Analysis Versus Critical Discourse Analysis in the Treatment of Ideology: Some Implications for the Study of Communication.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 14 (1&2), 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalb, Marvin, and Saivetz, Carol. 2007. “The Israeli–Hezbollah War of 2006: The Media as a Weapon in Asymmetrical Conflict.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 12(3), 43–66.Google Scholar
Karmi, Ghada, and Cotran, Eugene (Eds.). 1999. The Palestinian Exodus 1948–1998. London: Garnet Publishing.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich 1845 [1974]. The German Ideology, ed. by Christopher J. Arthur. New York: New York International Publishers.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael. 2001. “Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael, 14–31. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pappe, Ilan. 2006. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Pappe, Ilan. 2015. The Idea of Israel: A History of Power and Knowledge. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Philo, Greg. 2007. “Can Discourse Analysis Successfully Explain the Content of Media and Journalistic Practice?” Journalism Studies 8(2), 175–196.Google Scholar
Philo, Greg, and Berry, Mike. 2004. Bad News from Israel. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Philo, Greg, and Berry, Mike. 2011. More Bad News from Israel. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. and Barkho, Leon. 2009. “Reporting Israel/Palestine: Ethnographic Insights into the Verbal and Visual Rhetoric of BBC Journalism.” Journalism Studies 10(5), 594–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saïd, W. Edward. 1992. The Question of Palestine. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Saïd, W. Edward, and Mohr, Jean. 1998. After the Last Sky. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Timotijevic, Jelena. 2016. “The Sociolinguistic Transition of the Discourse of Nationalism in Serbia from Tito to Neoliberal Crash in the 2000s.” In Sociolinguistic Transition in Former Eastern Bloc Countries: Two Decades after the Regime Chang,. Volume 4, ed. by Sloboda, Marian, Laihonen, Petteri, and Zabrodskaja, Anastassia, 207–231. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Timotijevic, Jelena. 2018. “The Relevance of Marx to Contemporary Perspectives on Utterance Meaning in Context: A Re-examination of Voloshinov’s Philosophy of Language.” Language Sciences 70, 193–204.Google Scholar
The Glasgow Media Group. 1976. “Bad News.” Theory and Society 3(3), 339–363.Google Scholar
van Dijk, A. Teun 2001. “Multidisciplinarity in CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael, 95–120. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, N. Valentin. 1929 [1986]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, S. Lev. 1934 [1986]. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, S. Lev. 1934 [1987]. “Thinking and Speech.” In The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1, ed. by Rieber, Robert W. and Carton, Aaron S.. London: Plenum.Google Scholar
Widdowson, G. Henry. 1998. “The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Applied Linguistics 19(1), 136–151.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA Is about – A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Barbie, Park, David, and Gudelunas, David. 2002. “How Bias Shapes the News: Challenging the New York Times’ Status as a Newspaper of Record on the Middle East.” Journalism 3(3), 283–307.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×