Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:48:42.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Disabled Contract
Severe Intellectual Disability, Justice and Morality
, pp. 297 - 306
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed. (Arlington, VA: APA, 2013).Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. and Rosemont, Henry Jr., The Chinese Classic of Family Reverence: A Philosophical Translation of the Xiaojing (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, “What Is the Point of Equality?” (1999) 109:2 Ethics 287.Google Scholar
Andre, Judith, “Role Morality as a Complex Instance of Ordinary Morality” (1991) 28:1 Am Phil Q 73.Google Scholar
Appiah, Anthony, Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers (London: W. W. Norton, 2006).Google Scholar
Appiah, Anthony, The Ethics of Identity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Aragona, Massimiliano, “The Concept of Mental Disorder and the DSM-V” (2009) 2:1 Dial Phil Ment & Neuro Sci 1.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Meridian Books, 1958).Google Scholar
Bagnoli, Carol, “Book Review of The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global by Virginia Held,” Notre Dame Phil Rev (June 4, 2006), ndpr.nd.edu/news/25040-the-ethics- of-care-personal-political-global/.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette, “Trust and Antitrust” (1986) 96:2 Ethics 231.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette, “Trust,” Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Princeton University (March 1991), tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/b/baier92.pdf.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette, “Trusting People” (1992) 6 Ethics 137.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette, Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Baier, Annette, “Is Empathy All We Need?” (2010) Abstracta (Special Issue) V 28.Google Scholar
Barclay, Linda, “Cognitive Impairment and the Right to Vote: A Strategic Approach” (2013) 30:2 J Appl Phil 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnartt, Sharon N., “Using Role Theory to Describe Disability” in Barnartt, Sharon N. and Altman, Barbara M., eds., Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go (Bingley: Emerald Group, 2001), at 5375.Google Scholar
Barnes, Colin, “A Working Social Model? Disability, Work and Disability Politics in the 21st Century” (2000) 20:4 Critical Soc Pol’y 441.Google Scholar
Barnes, Elizabeth, The Minority Body (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, The Liberal Theory of Justice. A Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in a Theory of Justice by John Rawls (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “Of Apes and Men” in Huss, John, ed., Planet of the Apes and Philosophy: Great Apes Think Alike (Chicago: Open Court, 2013), at 8396.Google Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “From Autonomy to Habeas Corpus: Animal Rights Activists Take the Parameters of Legal Personhood to Court” (2016) 1 Global J Animal L 3.Google Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “Beyond (Models of) Disability?” (2016) 41:2 J Med & Phil 210.Google Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “The Vanishing Body of Disability Law: Power and the Making of the Impaired Subject” (2018) 31:1 Can J Fam L 7.Google Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “Welcoming Monsters: Disability as a Liminal Legal Concept” (2018) 29:2 Yale JL & Human 291.Google Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “Are Animals Persons? Why Ask?” (2019) 9:1 J Animal Ethics 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien, “Theoretical Strategies to Define Disability” in Wasserman, David and Cureton, Adam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Becker, Lawrence, “Reciprocity, Justice, and Disability” (2005) 116:1 Ethics 9.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander and Tobin, Emma, “Natural Kinds,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (February 2017), plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/natural-kinds/.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon, Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), sub verbo social contract.Google Scholar
Brel, Jacques, Ne me quitte pas (Philips Records, 1959).Google Scholar
British Psychological Society, “Response to the American Psychiatric Association: DSM-5 Development,” The British Psychological Society (2011), at 2, www1.bps. org.uk/system/files/consultationpapers/responses/DSM-5%202011%20-%20BPS%20 response.pdf.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice” (1990) 19:3 Phil & Pub Aff 227.Google Scholar
Byrne, Peter, Philosophical and Ethical Problems in Mental Handicap (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Callahan, Daniel, “Autonomy: A Moral Good, Not a Moral Obsession” (1984) 14:5 Hastings Center Report 40.Google Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird, “Intrinsic Value in Nature: A Metaethical Analysis” (1995) 3 Electronic J Analytic Phil.Google Scholar
Carlson, Licia, The Faces of Intellectual Disability (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cohen, Andrew, “Contractarianism, Other-Regarding Attitudes, and the Moral Standing of Nonhuman Animals” (2007) 24:2 J Appl Phil 188.Google Scholar
Cudd, Ann, “Contractarians,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 2012), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/contractarianism/.Google Scholar
Cureton, Adam, “A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled” (2008) 9:1 Essays Phil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, Donna K., Ardinger, Holly H., and Holmes, Grace E., “Identification and Evaluation of Mental Retardation” (2000) 61:4 Am Fam Phys 1059.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, Contractarianism / Contractualism (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J., Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body (London: Verso, 1995).Google Scholar
de Jasay, Anthony, Social Contract, Free Ride: A Study of the Public Goods Problem (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar
Debes, Remy, ed., Dignity: A History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Cora, “Eating Meat and Eating People” (1978) 53:206 Philosophy 465.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora, “The Importance of Being Human” (1991) 29 Royal Institute Phil Supplements 35.Google Scholar
Dimock, Susan, “Defending Non-Tuism” (1999) 29:2 Can J Phil 251.Google Scholar
Dimock, Susan, “Why All Feminists Should Be Contractarians” (2008) 47:2 Dialogue: Can Phil Rev 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Sue and Kymlicka, Will, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Downie, Jocelyn Grant and Llewellyn, Jennifer J., Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dumas, Alexander, The Count of Monte Cristo (Open Road Media, 2014; originally published 1844).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013).Google Scholar
Faraday, Fay, Denike, Margaret, and Stephenson, M. Kate, eds., Making Equality Rights Real: Securing Substantive Equality under the Charter (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2006).Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A., “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition” (2008) 20:1 Yale JL & Feminism 1.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A., “The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State” (2010) 60:2 Emory LJ 251.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Reason in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie, “Understanding Autonomy in Light of Intellectual Disability” in Brownlee, Kimberley and Cureton, Adam, eds., Disability and Disadvantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), at 200–16.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie and Silvers, Anita, “Justice through Trust: Disability and the ‘Outlier Problem’ in Social Contract Theory” (2005) 116:1 Ethics 40.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie and Silvers, Anita, “Liberalism and Individually Scripted Ideas of the Good: Meeting the Challenge of Dependent Agency” (2007) 33:2 Soc Theory & Prac 311.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie and Silvers, Anita, “Thinking about the Good: Reconfiguring Liberal Metaphysics (or Not) for People with Cognitive Disabilities” in Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia, eds., Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 237.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry, “Equality and Respect” (1997) 64:1 Social Research 3.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, “Rethinking Recognition” (2000) 3 New Left Review 107.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Gauthier, David, Morals by Agreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J., Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Griffin, James, Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Grimké, Sarah, Letters on the Equality of the Sexes and the Condition of Woman, Letter II (Boston, 1837).Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean, “The Wisdom of the Egoist: The Moral and Political Implications of Valuing the Self” (1997) 14:1 Social Phil & Pol’y 21.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean, The Intrinsic Worth of Persons: Contractarianism in Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Farnham, Daniel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Harrison, Paul et al., Shorter Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Hartley, Christie, “Justice for the Disabled: A Contractualist Approach” (2009) 40:1 J Soc Phil 17.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia, Rights and Goods: Justifying Social Actions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Held, Virginia, “Non-Contractual Society: A Feminist View” (1987) 13: sup1 Can J Phil 111.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hershock, Peter and Ames, Roger, Confucian Cultures of Authority (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendall, “The Path of the Law” (1897) 10 Harv L Rev 457.Google Scholar
Jaworska, Agnieszka, “Caring and Full Moral Standing” (2007) 117:3 Ethics 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeske, Diane, “Special Obligations,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 2019), plato.stanford.edu/entries/special-obligations/.Google Scholar
Johnson, Harriet McBryde, “Unspeakable Conversations,” The New York Times (February 16, 2003), www.nytimes.com/2003/02/16/magazine/unspeakable- conversations.html.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Lectures on Ethics, ed. Schneewind, J. B., trans. Heath, Peter (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Kernohan, Andrew, “Rawls and the Collective Ownership of Natural Abilities” (1990) 20:1 Can J Phil 19.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, Warren, “The Biopolitics of Defining ‘Mental Disorder’” in Paris, Joel and Phillips, James, eds., Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies (New York: Springer, 2013), 47.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, “At the Margins of Moral Personhood” (2008) 5:2–3 J Bioethical Inquiry 137–56.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, “The Personal Is Philosophical Is Political: A Philosopher and a Mother of a Cognitively Disabled Person Send Notes from the Battlefield” (2009) 40:3–4 Metaphilosophy 606.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, “When Caring Is Just and Justice Is Caring: Justice and Mental Retardation” in Kittay, Eva Feder and Feder, Ellen K., eds., The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012), at 257–76.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia, Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar
Koggel, Christine M., Perspectives on Equality: Constructing a Relational Theory (Lanham MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, “Two Distinctions in Goodness” (1983) 92:2 Philosophical Review 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, “Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals,” Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of Michigan (2004), tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/k/korsgaard_2005.pdf.Google Scholar
Le Méné, Jean-Marie, La trisomie est une tragédie grecque (Paris: Salvator, 2009).Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Lomasky, Loren E., Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives” in Gambetta, Diego, ed., Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (New York: Basic Blackwell, 1988), at 94107.Google Scholar
Machan, Tibor, Putting Humans First: Why We Are Nature’s Favorite (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues (Chicago: Open Court, 1999).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, eds., Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan, eds., Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff and Lickiss, Norelle, eds., Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
Mbembe, J.-A., “Necropolitics” (2003) 15:1 Pub Culture 11.Google Scholar
McAfee, Noëlle Claire, “Book Review of Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency by Eva Feder Kittay” (2001) 32:3 Metaphilosophy 344.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, “Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and Justice” (1996) 25:1 Phil & Pub Aff 3.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, “Our Fellow Creatures” (2005) 9:3–4 J Ethics 353.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, “Challenges to Human Equality” (2008) 12:1 J Ethics 81.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T., Self, Society and Personal Choice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Mills, Charles, The Racial Contract (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Molesworth, William, ed., The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, vol. iii: Leviathan (London: John Bohn, 1839–45).Google Scholar
Morris, Christopher, “Moral Standing and Rational-Choice Contractarianism” in Vallentyne, Peter, ed., Contractarianism and Rational Choice: Essays on David Gauthier’s Morals by Agreement (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), at 7695.Google Scholar
Mosoff, Judith, “Is the Human Rights Paradigm ‘Able’ to Include Disability: Who’s In – Who Wins – What – Why” (2000) 26:1 Queen’s LJ 225.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris, The Sovereignty of Good (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, The View from Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Neal, Patrick, Liberalism and Its Discontents (Washington Square: New York University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer, Law’s Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, “Beyond the Social Contract: Toward Global Justice,” Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Canberra, November 2002 and Cambridge, March 2003), tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/volume24/nussbaum_2003.pdf.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael, The Politics of Disablement (London: Macmillan, 1990).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ozon, François, Potiche (France: Mandarin Cinéma, 2010).Google Scholar
Paris, Joel, “Preface” in Paris, Joel and Phillips, James, eds., Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies (New York: Springer, 2013), at vvi.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole, The Sexual Contract (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L., The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000).Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, David, “The Conceptualization of Disability” in Barnartt, Sharon N. and Altman, Barbara M., eds., Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go (Research in Social Science and Disability, vol. 2) (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 2001), at 29–52.Google Scholar
Pothier, Dianne and Devlin, Richard, eds., Critical Disability Theory (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Rachels, James, Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory” (1980) 77:9 J Phil 515.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Kelly, Erin (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, expand. ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Value, Respect, and Attachment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Regan, Tom, The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: Berkeley University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry, “Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled” (2006) 10:4 J Ethics 419.Google Scholar
Richardson, Janice, “On Not Making Ourselves the Prey of Others: Jean Hampton’s Feminist Contractarianism” (2007) 15:1 Fem Legal Stud 33.Google Scholar
Rohrer, Judy, “Ableism” in Burch, Susan, ed., Encyclopedia of American Disability History, vol. 1 (New York: Facts On File, 2009), at 13.Google Scholar
Rounsaville, B. J., et al., “Basic Nomenclature Issues for DSM-V” in Kupfer, David J., First, Michael B., and Regier, Darrel A., eds., A Research Agenda for DSM-V (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2002), at 129.Google Scholar
Sample, Ruth, “Why Feminist Contractarianism?” (2002) 33:2 J Soc Phil 257.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self” (1984) 12:1 Political Theory 81.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, “What Money Shouldn’t Buy” (2003) 5:2 Hedgehog Review 7797.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schalock, Robert L. et al., Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 11th ed. (Washington, DC: AAIDD, 2009)Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, expand. ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Schneider, Richard D. and Bloom, Hy, Law and Mental Disorder: A Comprehensive and Practical Approach (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2013).Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, “Reconciling Equality to Difference: Caring (F)or Justice for People with Disabilities” (1995) 10:1 Hypatia 30.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, “Formal Justice” in Silvers, Anita, Wasserman, David, and Mahowald, Mary, Disability, Difference, Discrimination (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998), at 13145.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, “On the Possibility and Desirability of Constructing a Neutral Conception of Disability” (2003) 24:6 Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics 471.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, “No Talent? Beyond the Worst Off! A Diverse Theory of Justice for Disability” in Brownlee, Kimberley and Cureton, Adam, eds., Disability and Disadvantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), at 163–99.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, “Moral Status: What a Bad Idea!” (2012) 56:11 J Intellectual Disability Research 1014.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita and Stein, Michael Ashley, “Disability and the Social Contract,” Book Review of Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (2007) 74:4 U Chicago L Rev 1615 at 1620.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, Wasserman, David, and Mahowald, Mary, “Introduction” in Silvers, Anita, Wasserman, David, and Mahowald, Mary, Disability, Difference, Discrimination (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998).Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J., Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, Unsanctifying Human Life: Essays on Ethics, ed. Kuhse, Helga (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002).Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, “Speciesism and Moral Status” (2009) 40:3–4 Metaphilosophy 567 at 568.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, Practical Ethics, 3rd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Slote, Michael, The Ethics of Care and Empathy (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Slote, Michael, Moral Sentimentalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Slote, Michael, From Enlightenment to Receptivity: Rethinking Our Values (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, Christian, Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Snow, Nancy E., “Iris Murdoch’s Notion of a Loving Gaze” (2007) 39:3–4 J Value Inquiry 487.Google Scholar
Southwood, Nicholas, Contractualism and the Foundations of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Stark, Cynthia, “How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice” (2007) 15:2 J Political Phil 127.Google Scholar
Stark, Cynthia, “Respecting Human Dignity: Contract versus Capabilities” in Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia, eds., Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 111.Google Scholar
Stoljar, Natalie and Voigt, Kristin, Autonomy and Equality: Relational Approaches (in press).Google Scholar
Tassé, Marc J., Luckasson, Ruth, and Nygren, Margaret, “AAIDD Proposed Recommendations for ICD–11 and the Condition Previously Known as Mental Retardation” (2013) 51:2 Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 127.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Taylor, Sunaura, Beasts of Burden: Animal and Disability Liberation (New York: The New Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Teichman, Jenny, “The Definition of Person” (1985) 60:232 Philosophy 175.Google Scholar
Teichman, Jenny, “The False Philosophy of Peter Singer,The New Criterion 2:8 (April 1993), www.newcriterion.com/issues/1993/4/the-false-philosophy-of-peter-singer.Google Scholar
Teichman, Jenny, Social Ethics: A Student’s Guide (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
Tremain, Shelley, “On the Government of Disability” (2001) 27:4 Soc Theory & Prac 617.Google Scholar
Tully, James, Public Philosophy in a New Key: Volume 1, Democracy and Civic Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Vehmas, Simo, “Discriminative Assumptions of Utilitarian Bioethics Regarding Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities” (1999) 14:1 Disability & Society 37.Google Scholar
Velleman, David J., “Love as a Moral Emotion” (1999) 109:2 Ethics 338.Google Scholar
Velleman, David J., “A Right to Self-Termination?” (1999) 109:3 Ethics 606.Google Scholar
Vorhaus, John, Valuing Profoundly Disabled People: Fellowship, Community and Ties of Birth (New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “John Rawls and the Social Minimum” (1986) 3:1 J Appl Phil 21.Google Scholar
Walvisch, Jamie, “Defining ‘Mental Disorder’ in Legal Contexts” (2017) 52 Int’l JL & Psychiatry 7.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1977).Google Scholar
Warren, Mary A., Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Wasserman, David, et al., “Cognitive Disability and Moral Status,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 2017), plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-disability/.Google Scholar
Wasserman, David and Cureton, Adam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Wasserman, David and McMahan, Jeff, “Cognitive Surrogacy, Assisted Participation, and Moral Status” in Rhodes, Rosamond, Battin, Margaret P., and Silvers, Anita, eds., Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 325.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, “The Human Prejudice” in Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wong, David, “Chinese Ethics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (September 2018), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/ethics-chinese/.Google Scholar
Wong, Sophia Isako, “Duties of Justice to Citizens with Cognitive Disabilities” in Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia, eds., Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 127.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia, “Professions for Women” in The Death of the Moth and Other Essays (London: Hogarth Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Young, Bruce, Hotel California (Vancouver: Good Earth, 1979).Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, “Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model” (2006) 23:1 Social Phil & Pol’y 102.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, Responsibility for Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles, La décision métaphysique de Hobbes: conditions de la politique (Paris: J Vrin, 1987).Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles, Hobbes and Modern Political Thought, trans. Griffith, James (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

An Act to Ensure a Barrier-Free Canada, RSC 2019, c 10.Google Scholar
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, March 30, 2007, 2515 UNTS 3 (entered into force May 3, 2008).Google Scholar
US Const art I, § 2, cl 3 (1788).Google Scholar
Johns-Manville Canada Inc v. John Carlo Ltd, [1980] OJ No 3084, 113 DLR (3d) 686.Google Scholar
Louth v. Diprose, (1992) 175 CLR 621 (High Court of Australia).Google Scholar
Re Schebsman, [1994] Ch 83 (CA).Google Scholar
Reference re: Meaning of the Word “Persons” in s 24 of the BNA Act, [1928] SCR 276.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: The Disabled Contract
  • Online publication: 15 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316591482.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: The Disabled Contract
  • Online publication: 15 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316591482.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: The Disabled Contract
  • Online publication: 15 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316591482.009
Available formats
×