Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:45:43.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Morphology

from Part 1 - Diagnostic techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Wendy N. Erber
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

The diagnosis of hematological malignancies has benefited enormously from recent scientific advances. In spite of this, morphology remains critically important and is the key front-line diagnostic technique which must not be overlooked. The light microscopy appearances may be diagnostic but, in addition, they are the foundation upon which decisions about further scientific assessment are based. In the modern era that utilizes a multi-parameter approach to disease classification, morphology is the screening test that determines the further investigations necessary. This opening chapter describes the principles of morphological assessment of the blood and bone marrow in the diagnosis, staging and monitoring of hematological malignancies. It will guide the reader through the process of blood and bone marrow microscopy and demonstrate how morphology alone can often give an indication of the underlying diagnosis. The chapter is not intended as a textbook or atlas of hematological neoplasms; for this, the reader is referred to one of numerous excellent monographs and atlases.

Peripheral blood

Abnormalities on a blood count, be they quantitative or qualitative, may be the first indication of a hematological malignancy and will generally lead to a blood film being examined. Whereas currently this is most commonly performed by light microscopy, automated image capture methods are increasingly being used. It is recommended for the assessment of neoplastic cells that morphological review be performed manually as a well-trained pair of eyes is more discriminating than a programmed computer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Swerdlow, SH, Campo, E, Harris, NLet al. (eds.). WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th edn. Lyon: IARC; 2008.
Lewis, SM, Bain, BJ, Bates, I.Dacie and Lewis Practical Haematology, 10th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.Google Scholar
Hoffbrand, AV, Pettit, JE, Vyas, P.Color Atlas of Clinical Hematology, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.Google Scholar
Brown, D, Gatter, K, Natkunam, Y, Warnke, R (eds.). Bone Marrow Diagnosis: An Illustrated Guide, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2006.CrossRef
Bain, BJ, Clark, DM, Wilkins, BS. Bone Marrow Pathology, 4th edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.Google Scholar
Barnes, PW, McFadden, SL, Machin, SJ, Simson, E. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol 2005;11(2):83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C, Longair, I, Slavik, Met al. Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system. Int J Lab Hematol 2009;31(1):48–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simson, E, Gascon-Lema, MG, Brown, DL. Performance of automated slidemakers and stainers in a working laboratory environment – routine operation and quality control. Int J Lab Hematol 2010;32(1 Pt 1):e64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, SH, Erber, WN, Porwit, A, Tomonaga, M, Peterson, LC.ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports. Int J Lab Hematol 2008;30(5):349–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bain, BJ. Bone marrow aspiration. J Clin Pathol 2001;54(9):657–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bain, BJ. Bone marrow trephine biopsy. J Clin Pathol 2001;54(10):737–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fend, F, Tzankov, A, Bink, Ket al. Modern techniques for the diagnostic evaluation of the trephine bone marrow biopsy: methodological aspects and applications. Prog Histochem Cytochem 2008;42(4):203–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, CS (ed.). Leukaemia Cytochemistry and Diagnosis: Principles and Practice. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; 1989.
Hayhoe, FGJ, Quaglino, D (eds.). Haematological Cytochemistry, 3rd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
Orazi, A, O'Malley, DP., Arber, DA (eds.). Illustrated Pathology of the Bone Marrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.CrossRef
Brunning, R, McKenna, RW (eds.). Tumors of the Bone Marrow, Atlas of Tumor Pathology, 3rd series. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1994.
Torlakovic, EE, Naresh, K, Kremer, M, Walt, J, Hyjek, E, Porwit, A.Call for a European programme in external quality assurance for bone marrow immunohistochemistry; report of a European Bone Marrow Working Group pilot study. J Clin Pathol 2009;62(6):547–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisch, B, Bartl, R (eds.). Biopsy Interpretation of Bone and Bone Marrow. London: Edward Arnold; 1999.
Gatter, KC, Heryet, A, Brown, DC, Mason, DY.Is it necessary to embed bone marrow biopsies in plastic for haematological diagnosis?Histopathology 1987;11(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, J, Kvasnicka, HM, Facchetti, Fet al. European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica 2005;90(8):1128–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Peterson, LC, Agosti, SJ, Hoyer, JD.Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with hematopoietic neoplasms of the bone marrow: a basis for checklists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126(9):1050–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheson, BD, Bennett, JM, Kopecky, KJet al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(24):4642–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greef, GE, Putten, WL, Boogaerts, Met al. Criteria for defining a complete remission in acute myeloid leukaemia revisited. An analysis of patients treated in HOVON-SAKK co-operative group studies. Br J Haematol 2005;128(2):184–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durie, BG, Harousseau, JL, Miguel, JSet al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006;20(9):1467–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, RA, Rajkumar, SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23(1):3–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirnhofer, S, Went, P, Tichelli, A. Diagnostic problems in follow-up bone marrow biopsies of patients treated for acute and chronic leukaemias and MDS. Pathobiology 2007;74(2):115–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raynaud, P, Caulet-Maugendre, S, Foussard, Cet al. T-cell lymphoid aggregates in bone marrow after rituximab therapy for B-cell follicular lymphoma: a marker of therapeutic efficacy?Hum Pathol 2008;39(2):194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, DH, Kamel-Reid, S, Chang, Het al. Natural killer or natural killer/T cell lineage large granular lymphocytosis associated with dasatinib therapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemia. Haematologica 2009;94(1):135–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mustjoki, S, Ekblom, M, Arstila, TPet al. Clonal expansion of T/NK-cells during tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib therapy. Leukemia 2009;23(8):1398–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimsza, LM, Larson, RS, Winter, SSet al. Benign hematogone-rich lymphoid proliferations can be distinguished from B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia by integration of morphology, immunophenotype, adhesion molecule expression, and architectural features. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114(1):66–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Morphology
  • Edited by Wendy N. Erber
  • Book: Diagnostic Techniques in Hematological Malignancies
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760273.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Morphology
  • Edited by Wendy N. Erber
  • Book: Diagnostic Techniques in Hematological Malignancies
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760273.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Morphology
  • Edited by Wendy N. Erber
  • Book: Diagnostic Techniques in Hematological Malignancies
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760273.002
Available formats
×