Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:11:19.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Etiology of Developmental Dyslexia

from Part II - Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Developmental Dyslexia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

By
Richard K. Olson ,
Janice M. Keenan ,
Brian Byrne  and
Stefan Samuelsson
Edited by
Ludo Verhoeven ,
Charles Perfetti  and
Kenneth Pugh
Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth Pugh
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Identical and fraternal twin pairs reared together have been key to understanding the genetic and environmental etiology of dyslexia and of individual differences in reading. In this chapter, we begin with a brief overview of the methods of twin research, and the historical development and application of these methods to understanding the etiology of individual differences and deficits in reading and related skills. Then we examine results from predominantly English-language twin research on dyslexia. The next section on twin studies of individual differences in reading ability introduces a broader cross-language perspective that includes comparisons of findings from studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, and China. Then we expand the reading phenotype beyond word recognition to reading comprehension, the ultimate goal of reading.

Type
Chapter
Information
Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems , pp. 391 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

107th Congress. (2002). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107–110, Stat. 1425. Washington, DC: United States Congress.Google Scholar
Betjemann, R. S., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2011). Choice of reading comprehension test influences the outcomes of genetic analyses. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 363–382. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.493965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, J. (1977). Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: use and acquisition. In LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: perception and comprehension (pp. 175–216). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663–687.Google Scholar
Boker, S. M., Neale, M. C., Maes, H. H. et al. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Christopher, M., Coventry, W. et al. (2013). Subsample standardization in twin studies of academic achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, Marseilles, France, June 29, 2013.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K. et al. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on aspects of literacy and language in early childhood: Continuity and change from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, B., Delaland, C., Fielding-Barnsley, R. et al. (2002). Longitudinal twin study of early reading development in three countries: Preliminary results. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Samuelsson, S., Wadsworth, S. et al. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Wadsworth, S., Boehme, K. et al. (2013). Multivariate genetic analysis of learning and early reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 224–242. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.654298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written text: A cognitive perspective. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 41–75.Google Scholar
Castles, A. E., & Coltheart, M. C. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.Google Scholar
Castles, A., Datta, H., Gayán, J., & Olson, R.K. (1999). Varieties of developmental reading disorder: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 73–94. PMID: 9927524.Google Scholar
Chow, B. W. Y., Ho, C. S. H., Wong, S. W. L., Waye, M., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on Chinese language and reading abilities. PLoS One, 6(2): e16640. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016640.Google Scholar
Christopher, M. E., Hulslander, J., Byrne, B. et al. (2013a). The genetic and environmental etiologies of individual differences in early reading growth in Australia, the United States, and Scandinavia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 453–467. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christopher, M. E., Hulslander, J., Byrne, B. et al. (2013b). Modeling the etiology of individual differences in early reading development: Evidence for strong genetic influences. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 350–368. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.729119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christopher, M. E., Hulslander, J., Byrne, B. et al. (2015). Genetic and environmental etiologies of the longitudinal relations between pre-reading skills and reading. Child Development, 86, 342–361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopher, M. E., Miyake, A., Keenan, J. M. et al. (2012). Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 470–488. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027375.Google Scholar
Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.836200.Google Scholar
DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–478. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01066239.Google Scholar
DeFries, J. C., Singer, S. M., Foch, T. T., & Lewitter, F. I. (1978). Familial nature of reading disability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 361–367.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356.Google Scholar
Elwér, Å., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2013). Longitudinal stability and predictors of poor oral comprehenders and poor decoders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 497–516. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, A., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Parental education moderates genetic influences on reading disability. Psychological Science, 19, 1124–1130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02213.x.Google Scholar
Gayán, J., & Olson, R. K. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on orthographic and phonological skills in children with reading disabilities. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 483–507. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2002_3.Google Scholar
Gayán, J., & Olson, R. K. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in printed word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 97–123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00181-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gayán, J., Willcutt, E. G., Fisher, S. E. et al. (2005). Bivariate linkage scan for reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder localizes pleiotropic loci. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1045–1056. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01447.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glezer, L. S., Kim, J., Rule, J., Jiang, X., & Riesenhuber, M. (2015). Adding words to the brain’s visual dictionary: Novel word learning selectively sharpens orthographic representations in the VWFA. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 4965–4972. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI,4031-14.2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlaar, N., Cutting, L., Deater-Deckard, K. et al. (2010). Predicting individual differences in reading comprehension: a twin study. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 265–288. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0044-7.Google Scholar
Harlaar, N., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., DeThorne, L. S., & Petrill, S. A. (2011). Associations between reading achievement and independent reading in early elementary school: A genetically informative cross-lagged study. Child Development, 82, 2123–2137. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01658.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlaar, N., Spinath, F. M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2005). Genetic influences on early word recognition abilities and disabilities: A study of 7-year-old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 373–384. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00358.x.Google Scholar
Harlaar, N., Trzaskowski, M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2014). Word reading fluency: Role of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms in developmental stability and correlations with print exposure. Child Development, 85, 1190–1205. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12207.Google Scholar
Hart, S. A., Logan, J. A. R., Soden-Hensler, B. et al. (2013). Exploring how nature and nurture affect the development of reading: An analysis of the Florida Twin Project on reading. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1971–1981. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008). Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genetics, 4(2), e1000008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Chow, B. W.-Y., Wong, S. W.-L. et al. (2012). The genetic and environmental foundation of the simple view of reading in Chinese. PLoS One, 7 (10), e47872. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047872.Google Scholar
Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulslander, J., Olson, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Wadsworth, S. J. (2010). Longitudinal stability of reading-related skills and their prediction of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 111–136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888431003604058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 75–91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00293.x.Google Scholar
Keller, M. C., & Coventry, W. L. (2005). Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, M. C., Medland, S. E., & Duncan, L. E. (2010). Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behavior Genetics, 40, 377–393. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9320-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, R. M., Legrand, L. N., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2011). A twin and adoption study of reading achievement: Exploration of shared environmental and gene-environment-interaction effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 368–375. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif. 2011.04.008.Google Scholar
Kovas, Y., & Plomin, R. (2007). Learning abilities and disabilities: Generalist genes, specialist environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 284–288. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00521.x.Google Scholar
Logan, J. A. R., Hart, S. A., Cutting, L. et al. (2013). Reading development in children ages 6 to 12: Genetic and environmental influences. Child Development, 84, 2131–2144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12104.Google Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Chan, W. et al. (2013). Poor readers of Chinese and English: Overlap, stability, and longitudinal correlates. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 57–70. doi:10.1080/10888438.2012.689787Google Scholar
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021890.Google Scholar
Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In Lyon, G. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2014). Why do children differ in their reading and related skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 38–54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.800521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., Byrne, B. et al. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary and reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 26–46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In MacKinnon, G. E. & Waller, T. G. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 4 (pp. 1–64). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200604.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C., Cao, F. & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17 (1), 5–21, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689786.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., & Olson, R. K. (2013). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks. Cognition, 126, 20–38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.007.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., & Wadsworth, S. (2014). Longitudinal stability of phonological and surface subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 347–362. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.904870.Google Scholar
Petrill, S. A., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., DeThorne, L. S., & Schatschneider, C. (2006). Reading skills in early readers: Genetic and shared environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 48–55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390010501.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2013). Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Powers, N. R., Eicher, J. D., Butter, F. et al. (2013). Alleles of a polymorphic ETV6 binding site in DCDC2 confer risk of reading and language impairment. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93, 19–28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.008.Google Scholar
Purcell, S., & Sham, P. C. (2003). A model-fitting implementation of the DeFries-Fulker model for selected twin data. Behavior Genetics, 33, 271–278. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023494408079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodgers, B. (1983). The identification and prevalence of specific reading retardation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 369–373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02570.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181–197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-76http://dx.doi.org/10.1975.tb01269.xGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson, S., Byrne, B., Olson, R. K. et al. (2008). Response to early literacy instruction in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia: A behavior-genetic analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 289–295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.004.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, S., Byrne, B., Quain, P. et al. (2005). Environmental and genetic influences on prereading skills in Australia, Scandinavia, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 705–722.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, S., Olson, R. K., Wadsworth, S. et al. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on prereading skills and early reading and spelling development in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia. Reading and Writing, 20, 51–75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9018-x.Google Scholar
Soden, B., Christopher, M. E., Hulslander, J. et al. (2015). Longitudinal stability in reading comprehension is largely heritable from grades 1 to 6. PLoS One, 10(1), e0113807. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113807.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747605.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, M., van den Berg, S. M., Peper, J. S., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Genetic covariance structure of reading, intelligence, and memory in children. Behavior Genetics, 39, 245–254. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9264-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogler, G. P., DeFries, J. C., & Decker, S. N. (1985). Family history as an indicator of risk for reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 419–421. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221948501800711.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, S. J., Corley, R. P., Plomin, R., Hewitt, J. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on continuity and change in reading achievement in the Colorado Adoption Project. In Huston, A. C. & Ripke, M. N. (Eds.), Developmental contexts of middle childhood: Bridges to adolescence and adulthood (pp. 87–106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, S. J., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2010). Differential genetic etiology of reading difficulties as a function of IQ: An update. Behavior Genetics, 40, 751–758. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-010-9349-x.Google Scholar
Willcutt, E. G., Betjemann, R. S., McGrath, L. et al. (2010). Etiology and neuropsychology of comorbidity between RD and ADHD: The case for multiple-deficit models. Cortex, 46, 1345–1361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.009.Google Scholar
Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2007). Understanding comorbidity: A twin study of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 144B, 709–714. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30310.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×